Log in

Electrophysiological indexes of ToM and non-ToM humor in healthy adults

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The cognitive processes involved in humor comprehension were analyzed by directly comparing the time course of brain activity associated with the perception of slapstick humor and that associated with the comprehension of humor requiring theory of mind (ToM). Four different comic strips (strips containing humorous scenes that required ToM, non-ToM humorous strips, non-humorous semantically coherent strips and non-humorous semantically incoherent strips) were presented to participants, while their EEG response was recorded. Results showed that both of the humorous comic strips and the semantically incongruent strip elicited an N400 effect, suggesting similar cognitive mechanisms underlying the processing of incongruent and humorous comic strips. The results also showed that the humorous ToM strips elicited a frontal late positive (LP) response, possibly reflecting the active deployment of ToM abilities such as perspective-taking and empathy that allow for the resolution and interpretation of apparently incongruent situations. In addition, the LP response was positively correlated with ratings of perceived amusement as well as individual empathy scores, suggesting that the increased LP response to ToM humorous strips reflects the combined activation of neural mechanisms involved in the experience of amusement and ToM abilities. Overall, humor comprehension appears to demand distinct cognitive steps such as the detection of incongruent semantic components, the construction of semantic coherence, and the appreciation of humoristic elements such as maladaptive emotional reactions. Our results show that the deployment of these distinct cognitive steps is at least partially dependent on individual empathic abilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amoruso L, Gelormini C, Aboitiz F, González MA, Manes F, Cardona J, Ibanez A (2013) N400 ERPs for actions: building meaning in context. Front Hum Neurosci 2013:7

    Google Scholar 

  • Attardo S, Hempelmann CF, DiMaio S (2002) Script oppositions and logical mechanisms: modeling incongruities and their resolutions. Humor Int J Humor Res 2002:15346

    Google Scholar 

  • Bambini V, Bertini C, Schaeken W, Stella A, Russo FD (2016) Disentangling metaphor from context: an ERP study. Front Psychol 7:559

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bartolo A, Benuzzi F, Nocetti L, Baraldi P, Nichelli P (2006) Humor comprehension and appreciation: an FMRI study. J Cognit Neurosci 18(11):1789–1798

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentin S, McCarthy G, Wood CC (1985) Event-related potentials, lexical decision, and semantic priming. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 60:353–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Bihrle AM, Brownell HH, Powelson JA, Gardner H (1986) Comprehension of humorous and nonhumorous materials by left and right brain-damaged patients. Brain Cogn 5:399–411

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bischetti L, Ceccato I, Lecce S, Cavallini E, Bambini V (2019) Pragmatics and theory of mind in older adults’ humor comprehension. Curr Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00295-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunet E, Sarfati Y, Hardy-Baylé MC, Decety J (2000) A PET investigation of the attribution of intentions with a nonverbal task. NeuroImage 11(2):157–166

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Camblin CC, Ledoux K, Boudewy M, Gordon PC, Swaab TY (2007) Processing new and repeated names: effects of coreference on repetition priming with speech and fast RSVP. Brain Res 1146:172–184

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Canal P, Bischetti L, Di S, Bertini C, Ricci I, Bambini V (2019) Brain and Cognition ‘Honey, shall I change the baby ? Well done, choose another one’: ERP and Time-Frequency correlates of humor processing. Brain and Cognit 132:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan YC, Chou TL, Chen HC, Yeh YC, Lavallee JP, Liang KC, Chang KE (2013) Towards a neural circuit model of verbal humor processing: an fMRI study of the neural substrates of incongruity detection and resolution. NeuroImage 66:169–176

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn N, Paczynski M (2013) Prediction, events, and the advantage of agents: the processing of semantic roles in visual narrative. Cogn Psychol 67(3):73–97

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn N, Paczynski M, Jackendoff R, Holcomb PJ, Kuperberg GR (2012) (Pea)nuts and bolts of visual narrative: structure and meaning in sequential image comprehension. Cogn Psychol 65(1):1–38

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Coulson S (2000) Semantic leaps: frame-shifting and conceptual blending in meaning construction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulson S, Kutas M (2001) Getting it: human event-related brain response to jokes in good and poor comprehenders. Neurosci Lett 316(2):71–74

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coulson S, Van Petten C (2007) A special role for the right hemisphere in metaphor comprehension? ERP evidence from hemifield presentation. Brain Res 1146:128–145

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coulson S, Wu YC (2005) Right hemisphere activation of joke-related information: an event-related brain potential study. J Cognit Neurosci 17(3):494–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuthbert BN, Schupp HT, Bradley MM, Birbaumer N, Lang PJ (2000) Brain potentials in affective picture processing: Covariation with autonomic arousal and affective report. Biol Psychol 52(2):95–111

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Oliveira Falcone M, Ferreira MC, Curty Monteiro da Luz R et al (2008) Inventário de Empatia (I.E.) desenvolvimento e validação de uma medida brasileira. Avaliaçao Psicol 7:321–334

  • Du X, Qin Y, Tu S, Yin H, Wang T, Yu C (2013) Differentiation of stages in joke comprehension: evidence from an ERP study. Int J Psychol 48(2):149–157

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feng Y, Chan Y, Chen H (2014) Specialization of neural mechanisms underlying the three-stage model in humor processing: an ERP study. J Neurolinguistics 32:59–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin RG, Adams RB (2011) The reward of a good joke: neural correlates of viewing dynamic displays of stand-up comedy. Cognit Affect Behav Neurosci 11(4):508–515

    Google Scholar 

  • Geangu E, Gibson A, Kaduk K, Reid VM (2013) The neural correlates of passively viewed sequences of true and false beliefs. Soc Cognit Affect Neurosci 8(4):432–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Goel V, Dolan RJ (2001) The functional anatomy of humor: segregating cognitive and affective components. Nat Neurosci 4(3):237–238

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gorenstein C, Andrade LHSG (1996) Validation of a Portuguese version of the beck depression inventory and the state-trait anxiety inventory in Brazilian subjects. Braz J Med Biol Res 29:453–457

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hagoort P, Brown C, Groothusen J (1993) The syntactic positive shift (sps) as an erp measure of syntactic processing. Lang Cognit Process 8(4):439–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagoort P, Hald L, Bastiaansen KMP (2004) Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language. Science 304:438–442

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Happé F, Ehlers S, Fletcher P, Frith U, Johansson M, Gillberg C et al (1996) ‘Theory of mind’ in the brain. Evidence from a PET scan study of Asperger syndrome. NeuroReport 8:197–201

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iwase M, Ouchi Y, Okada H, Yokoyama C, Nobezawa S, Yoshi-kawa E, Tsukada H, Takeda M, Yamashita K, Takeda M et al (2002) Neural substrates of human facial expression of pleasant emotion induced by comic films: a PET study. NeuroImage17:758–768

  • Ku LC, Feng YR, Chan YC, Wu CL, Chen HC (2017) A re-visit of three-stage humor processing with readers' surprise, comprehension, and funniness ratings: an ERP study. J Neurolinguistics 42:49–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutas M, Federmeier KD (2011) Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annu Rev Psychol 62:621–647. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kutas M, Hillyard SA (1980) Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science 207:203–208

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kutas M, Hillyard SA (1984) Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature 307:161–163

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu D, Sabbagh MA, Gehring WJ, Wellman HM (2004) Decoupling beliefs from reality in the brain: an ERP study of theory of mind. NeuroReport 15:991–995

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu D, Sabbagh MA, Gehring WJ, Wellman HM (2009) Neural correlates of children’s theory of mind development. Child Dev 80(2):318–326

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Manfredi M, Adorni R, Proverbio AM (2014) Why do we laugh at misfortunes? An electrophysiological exploration of comic situation processing. Neuropychologia 61:324–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Manfredi M, Proverbio AM, Gonçalves Donate A, Macarini S, De Araujo AM, Boggio PS (2017) tDCS application over the right STG improves facial expression recognition during humor detection. Exp Brain Res 2017:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Manfredi M, Cohn N, De Araújo Andreoli M, Boggio PS (2018) Listening beyond seeing: event-related potentials to audiovisual processing in visual narrative. Brain Lang 2018:185

    Google Scholar 

  • Manfredi M, Proverbio AM, Marques LM, Ribeiro B, Yumi Nakao Morello L, Boggio PS (2019) Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of MPFC enhances humor processing. Soc Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2019.1674687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manfredi M, Cohn N, Sanchez Mello P, Fernandez E, Boggio PS (2020) Visual and verbal narrative comprehension in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders: an ERP study. J Autism Dev Disord. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04374-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marinkovic K, Baldwin S, Courtney MG, Witzel T, Dale AM, Halgren E (2011) Right hemisphere has the last laugh: neural dynamics of joke appreciation. Cognit Affect Behav Neurosci 11(1):113–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin RA (2007) The psychology of humor. An integrative approach. Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinhardt J, Sodian B, Thoermer C, Döhnel K, Sommer M (2011) True- and false-belief reasoning in children and adults: an event-related potential study of theory of mind. Develop Cognit Neurosci 1:67–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Mobbs D, Greicius MD, Abdel-Azim E, Menon V, Reiss AL (2003) Humor modulates the mesolimbic reward centers. Neuron 40(5):1041–1048

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moran JM, Wig GS, Adams RB, Janata P, Kelley WM (2004) Neural correlates of humor detection and appreciation. NeuroImage 21(3):1055–1060

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Osterhout L, Holcomb P (1992) Event-related potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. J Mem Lang 31:758–806

    Google Scholar 

  • Premack D, Woodruff G (1978) Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behav Brain Sci 1:515–526

    Google Scholar 

  • Proverbio AM, Riva F (2009) RP and N400 ERP components reflect semantic violations in visual processing of human actions. Neurosci Lett 459:142–146

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Regel S, Meyer L, Gunter TC (2014) Distinguishing neurocognitive processes reflected by P600 effects: evidence from ERPs and neural oscillations. PLoS One 9:e96840

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Samson AC, Zysset S, Huber O (2008) Cognitive humor processing: different logical mechanisms in nonverbal cartoons—an fMRI study. Soc Neurosci 3:125–140

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz W (2002) Getting formal with dopamine and reward. Neuron 36(2):241–263

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shammi P, Stuss DT (1999) Humour appreciation: a role of the right frontal lobe. Brain J Neurol 122:657–666

    Google Scholar 

  • Shibata M, Terasawa Y, Osumi T, Masui K, Ito Y, Sato A, Umeda S (2017) Time course and localization of brain activity in humor comprehension: an ERP/sLORETA study. Brain Res 1657:215–222

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sitnikova T, Kuperberg G, Holcomb PJ (2003) Semantic integration in videos of real-world events: an electrophysiological investigation. Psychophysiology 40(1):160–164

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sitnikova T et al (2008) Two neurocognitive mechanisms of semantic integration during the comprehension of visual real- world events. J Cognit Neurosci 20:2037–2057

    Google Scholar 

  • Sitnikova T, Holcomb PJ, Kiyonaga KA, Kuperberg GR (2008) Two neurocognitive mechanisms of semantic integration during the comprehension of visual real-world events. J Cognit Neurosci 20(11):2037–2057

    Google Scholar 

  • Spotorno N, Cheylus A, Van Der Henst JB, Noveck IA (2013) What’s behind a P600? Integration operations during irony processing. PLoS One 8:e66839

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suls J (1972) A two stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons. In: Goldstein J, McGhee P (eds) Psychology of humor. Academic Press, New York

  • Tu S, Cao X, Yun X, Wang K, Zhao G, Qiu J (2014) A new association evaluation stage in cartoon apprehension: evidence from an ERP study. J Behav Brain Sci 2:75–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Vissers CTWM, Virgillito D, Fitzgerald DA, Speckens AEM, Tendolkar I, van Oostrom I, Chwilla DJ (2010) The influence of mood on the processing of syntactic anomalies: evidence from P600. Neuropsychologia 48(12):3521–3531

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson KK, Matthews BJ, Allman JM (2007) Brain activation during sight gags and language-dependent humor. Cereb Cortex 17(2):314–324

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • West WC, Holcomb PJ (2002) Event-related potentials during discourse-level semantic integration of complex pictures. Cognit Brain Res 13:363–375

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Mirella Manfredi was supported by a FAPESP post-doctoral research Grant (2015/00553-5). Lucas M. Marques was supported by a FAPESP PhD Grant (2017/06136-2). William E. Comfort is supported by a FAPESP post-doctoral research Grant (2017/12752-8). Paulo S. Boggio is supported by a CNPq research Grant (311641/2015-6).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mirella Manfredi.

Additional information

Communicated by Melvyn A. Goodale.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A: Examples of comic strips

Appendix A: Examples of comic strips

  • 5 congruent comic strips

    figure a
  • 5 incongruent comic strips

    figure b
  • 5 non-ToM humorous comic strips

    figure c
  • 5 ToM humorous comic strips

    figure d

-

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Manfredi, M., Proverbio, A.M., Sanchez Mello de Pinho, P. et al. Electrophysiological indexes of ToM and non-ToM humor in healthy adults. Exp Brain Res 238, 789–805 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-020-05753-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-020-05753-7

Keywords

Navigation