Abstract
The impact of different storage conditions on the generation of radicals was evaluated through electronic paramagnetic resonance (EPR) detection of spin adducts based on the Fenton reaction, after an accelerated aging of beer (55 °C for 150 min). The different conditions applied, namely storage time and temperature, have clearly demonstrated to affect the beer oxidative stability. The greater endogenous antioxidant potential (higher lag phase values) observed for fresh beers is due to the higher levels of SO2. In contrast, the higher levels of radicals observed after 150 min of accelerated aging are related to the higher content of iron in fresh beers. Lower levels of SO2 and iron found in aged beers are therefore related to the lower endogenous antioxidant potential and the lower levels of radicals after 150 min of accelerated aging, respectively. According to our model for shelf-life prediction, the best-before date of beer can be reduced from 6 months, if stored at 20 °C, to as little as 9 days if it is stored at 37 °C.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kuchel L, Brody AL, Wicker L (2006) Oxygen and its reactions in beer. Packag Technol Sci Int J 19(1):25–32
Frederiksen AM, Festersen RM, Andersen ML (2008) Oxidative reactions during early stages of beer brewing studied by electron spin resonance and spin trap**. J Agric Food Chem 56(18):8514–8520
Huvaere K, Andersen ML (2009) Beer and ESR spin trap**. Beer in health and disease prevention. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1043–1053
Kaneda H et al (1988) Detection of free radicals in beer oxidation. J Food Sci 53(3):885–888
Schmallegger M, Gescheidt G (2018) Antioxidant activity of beer: an EPR experiment for an undergraduate physical-chemistry laboratory. J Chem Educ 95(11):2013–2016
Jenkins D et al (2018) Impacts of copper, iron, and manganese metal ions on the EPR assessment of beer oxidative stability. J Am Soc Brew Chem 76(1):50–57
Nøddekær TV, Andersen ML (2007) Effects of Maillard and caramelization products on oxidative reactions in lager beer. J Am Soc Brew Chem 65(1):15–20
Convention, E.B., 9.13.1—iron in beer by spectrophotometry with 2,2-bipyridyl or 1,10-phenanthroline, in Analytica-EBC. 2005, Fachverlag Hans Carl Nürnberg
Convention, E.B., 9.25.3—total sulphur dioxide in beer: p-rosaniline method, in Analytica—EBC. 2005, Fachverlag Hans Carl Nürnberg
Andersen ML, Skibsted LH (1998) Electron spin resonance spin trap** identification of radicals formed during aerobic forced aging of beer. J Agric Food Chem 46(4):1272–1275
Filik H, Giray D (2012) Cloud point extraction for speciation of iron in beer samples by spectrophotometry. Food Chem 130(1):209–213
Zufall C, Tyrell T (2008) The influence of heavy metal ions on beer flavour stability. J Inst Brew 114(2):134–142
Kunz T et al (2013) Influence of intermediate Maillard reaction products with enediol structure on the oxidative stability of beverages. J Am Soc Brew Chem 71(3):114–123
Mertens T et al (2021) Complexation of transition metals by chelators added during mashing and impact on beer stability. J Inst Brew 127(4):345–357
Pohl P (2008) Determination and fractionation of metals in beer: a review. Food Addit Contam 25(6):693–703
Blanco CA et al (2003) Chelation of aqueous iron (III) by 2-acetyl-1,3-cyclohexanedione and beer ageing. Food Chem 81(4):561–568
Kaneda H et al (1990) Evaluation of beer deterioration by chemiluminescence. J Food Sci 55(5):1361–1364
Baert JJ et al (2012) On the origin of free and bound staling aldehydes in beer. J Agric Food Chem 60(46):11449–11472
Marques L et al (2017) Advancing flavor stability improvements in different beer types using novel electron paramagnetic resonance area and forced beer aging methods. J Am Soc Brew Chem 75(1):35–40
Guido LF (2016) Sulfites in beer: reviewing regulation, analysis and role. Scientia Agricola 73(2):189–197
Andersen ML, Skibsted LH (2000) Potential antioxidants in beer assessed by ESR spin trap**. J Agric Food Chem 48(8):3106–3111
Lund MN, Kramer AC, Andersen ML (2015) Antioxidative mechanisms of sulfite and protein-derived thiols during early stages of metal induced oxidative reactions in beer. J Agric Food Chem 63(37):8254–8261
Ilett DR, Simpson WJ (1995) Loss of sulphur dioxide during storage of bottled and canned beers. Food Res Int 28(4):393–396
Uchida M, Ono M (1996) Improvement for oxidative flavor stability of beer—role of OH-radical in beer oxidation. J Am Soc Brew Chem 54(4):198–204
Danilewicz JC (2011) Mechanism of autoxidation of polyphenols and participation of sulfite in wine: key role of iron. Am J Enol Vitic 62(3):319–328
Lehnhardt F, Gast M, Becker T (2019) Forced into aging: analytical prediction of the flavor-stability of lager beer. A review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 59(16):2642–2653
Funding
This work received financial support from PT national funds (FCT/MCTES, Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia and Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior) through the project UIDB/50006/2020.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors disclose any potential sources of conflict of interest.
Compliance with ethics requirements
This study does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contribution for the Special Issue: The chemistry behind malt and beer production – from raw material to product quality.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ferreira, I.M., Carvalho, D.O. & Guido, L.F. Impact of storage conditions on the oxidative stability of beer. Eur Food Res Technol 249, 149–156 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-022-04140-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-022-04140-6