Abstract
The optimal reactive power dispatch problem optimizes the shunt capacitor bank installation in distribution systems, reducing power loss and also reducing the financial loss for the electricity market associated with power loss. Moreover, the sharing of both active and reactive power from different renewable energy sources like PV and wind in the form of distributed generation also contributes toward reducing power loss and improving the voltage profile of the system. But the installation and maintenance costs associated with these additional set-ups are rarely taken into consideration any optimization problem. This paper aims to reduce the power loss and improve the voltage profile of a radial distribution network with the integration of capacitor banks, PV, and wind energy sources, while taking into account the overall associated cost of each parameter during optimization. The problem is formulated as a novel cost minimization problem aiming to achieve the optimal settings for a life-long capacitor bank-PV-wind integrated distribution network with the least possible installation, operational, and maintenance costs while reducing its power loss significantly for a span of 20 years. The uncertain nature of PV and wind power output has been modeled using the beta probability distribution function and the Weibull probability distribution function, respectively. This unique proposed problem statement of the capacitor bank-PV-wind power integrated distribution network has been tested on the IEEE 33 and IEEE 141 bus systems and solved using the rock hyraxes swarm optimization (RHSO) algorithm. The results were compared with those from other nine well-established techniques, from which it was concluded that the RHSO algorithm has obtained optimal conditions for both systems to operate efficiently. The problem has also been tested on a practical 13-bus 33 kV distribution network in Maharashtra, India, to validate its performance on a practical system. The RHSO has successfully reduced the power loss to almost 17.48% w.r.t. the base case for the practical network while maintaining a minimum overall cost of $51,073,687.7582 for an entire life-span of 20 years.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00202-024-02548-9/MediaObjects/202_2024_2548_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00202-024-02548-9/MediaObjects/202_2024_2548_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00202-024-02548-9/MediaObjects/202_2024_2548_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00202-024-02548-9/MediaObjects/202_2024_2548_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00202-024-02548-9/MediaObjects/202_2024_2548_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00202-024-02548-9/MediaObjects/202_2024_2548_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00202-024-02548-9/MediaObjects/202_2024_2548_Fig7_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00202-024-02548-9/MediaObjects/202_2024_2548_Fig8_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00202-024-02548-9/MediaObjects/202_2024_2548_Fig9_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00202-024-02548-9/MediaObjects/202_2024_2548_Fig10_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00202-024-02548-9/MediaObjects/202_2024_2548_Fig11_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00202-024-02548-9/MediaObjects/202_2024_2548_Fig12_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00202-024-02548-9/MediaObjects/202_2024_2548_Fig13_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00202-024-02548-9/MediaObjects/202_2024_2548_Fig14_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00202-024-02548-9/MediaObjects/202_2024_2548_Fig15_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00202-024-02548-9/MediaObjects/202_2024_2548_Fig16_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00202-024-02548-9/MediaObjects/202_2024_2548_Fig17_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00202-024-02548-9/MediaObjects/202_2024_2548_Fig18_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00202-024-02548-9/MediaObjects/202_2024_2548_Fig19_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
No data were used for the research described in the article.
References
Singh H, Sawle Y, Dixit S, Malik H, Márquez FPG (2023) Optimization of reactive power using dragonfly algorithm in DG integrated distribution system. Electr Power Syst Res 220:109351
Ianțoc A, Bulac C, Sidea D (2022) Optimal reactive power dispatch in active distribution power systems using grey wolf optimizer. UPB sci Bull Ser C Electr Eng Comput Sci 84:235–246
Li X, Zhao W, Lu Z (2023) Hierarchical optimal reactive power dispatch for active distribution network with multi-microgrids. J Electr Eng Technol 18(3):1705–1718
Singh H, Srivastava L (2017) September. Multi-objective optimal reactive power dispatch for distribution system. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Power, Control, Signals and Instrumentation Engineering (ICPCSI) (pp. 558–563). IEEE
Babu MR, Kumar CV, Anitha S (2021) Simultaneous reconfiguration and optimal capacitor placement using adaptive whale optimization algorithm for radial distribution system. J Electr Eng Technol 16:181–190
Hosseini-Hemati S, Sheisi GH, Karimi S (2021) Allocation-based optimal reactive power dispatch considering polynomial load model using improved grey wolf optimizer. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Electr Eng 45:921–944
Zhang L, Tang W, Liang J, Cong P, Cai Y (2015) Coordinated day-ahead reactive power dispatch in distribution network based on real power forecast errors. IEEE Trans Power Syst 31(3):2472–2480
Liu Y, Ćetenović D, Li H, Gryazina E, Terzija V (2022) An optimized multi-objective reactive power dispatch strategy based on improved genetic algorithm for wind power integrated systems. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 136:107764
Hosseini-Hemati S, Karimi S, Sheisi GH (2021) Multi-objective ORPD considering different load models for active distribution networks. Int J Ind Electr Control Optim 4(2):191–210
Wagle R, Sharma P, Sharma C, Amin M (2024) Optimal power flow based coordinated reactive and active power control to mitigate voltage violations in smart inverter enriched distribution network. Int J Green Energy 21(2):359–375
Yesuratnam G, Sriker A, Jena MK, Prabhat P (2024) A practical approach to real-time network topology processing in a radial distribution system. Electr Power Syst Res 226:109951
Li Y, Sun Y, Wang Q, Sun K, Li KJ, Zhang Y (2023) Probabilistic harmonic forecasting of the distribution system considering time-varying uncertainties of the distributed energy resources and electrical loads. Appl Energy 329:120298
Püvi V, Lehtonen M (2023) Evaluating distribution network optimal structure with respect to solar hosting capacity. Electr Power Syst Res 216:109019
Zishan F, Mansouri S, Abdollahpour F, Grisales-Noreña LF, Montoya OD (2023) Allocation of renewable energy resources in distribution systems while considering the uncertainty of wind and solar resources via the multi-objective salp swarm algorithm. Energies 16(1):474
Dashtaki AA, Hakimi SM, Hasankhani A, Derakhshani G, Abdi B (2023) Optimal management algorithm of microgrid connected to the distribution network considering renewable energy system uncertainties. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 145:108633
Yang Z, Yang F, Min H, Tian H, Hu W, Liu J, Eghbalian N (2023) Energy management programming to reduce distribution network operating costs in the presence of electric vehicles and renewable energy sources. Energy 263:125695
Li LL, Fan XD, Wu KJ, Sethanan K, Tseng ML (2024) Multi-objective distributed generation hierarchical optimal planning in distribution network: improved beluga whale optimization algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 237:121406
Garrido-Arévalo, V.M., Gil-González, W., Montoya, O.D., Grisales-Noreña, L.F. and Hernández, J.C., 2024. Optimal Dispatch of DERs and Battery-Based ESS in Distribution Grids While Considering Reactive Power Capabilities and Uncertainties: A Second-Order Cone Programming Formulation. IEEE Access.
Xu Y, Han J, Yin Z, Liu Q, Dai C, Ji Z (2024) Voltage and reactive power-optimization model for active distribution networks based on second-order cone algorithm. Computers 13(4):95
Borousan F, Hamidan MA (2023) Distributed power generation planning for distribution network using chimp optimization algorithm in order to reliability improvement. Electr Power Syst Res 217:109109
Jahed YG, Mousavi SYM, Golestan S (2024) Optimal sizing and siting of distributed generation systems incorporating reactive power tariffs via water flow optimization. Electr Power Syst Res 231:110278
Kyeremeh F, Fang Z, Liu F, Peprah F (2024) Techno-economic analysis of reactive power management in a solar PV microgrid: a case study of Sunyani to Becheam MV feeder, Ghana. Energy Rep 11:83–96
Meng L, Yang X, Zhu J, Wang X, Meng X (2024) Network partition and distributed voltage coordination control strategy of active distribution network system considering photovoltaic uncertainty. Appl Energy 362:122846
Ebadi, R., Aboshady, F.M., Ceylan, O., Pisica, I. and Ozdemir, A., 2024. Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Optimal Operation Problem of Unbalanced Distribution Networks Integrated with Photovoltaic Units. IEEE Access.
Khasanov M, Kamel S, Halim Houssein E, Rahmann C, Hashim FA (2023) Optimal allocation strategy of photovoltaic-and wind turbine-based distributed generation units in radial distribution networks considering uncertainty. Neural Comput Appl 35(3):2883–2908
Khasanov, M., Kamel, S., Hassan, M.H. and Domínguez-García, J.L., 2024. Maximizing renewable energy integration with battery storage in distribution systems using a modified Bald Eagle Search Optimization Algorithm. Neural Computing and Applications, pp.1–29.
Alanazi M, Alanazi A, AboRas KM, Ghadi YY (2024) Multiobjective and coordinated reconfiguration and allocation of photovoltaic energy resources in distribution networks using improved clouded leopard optimization algorithm. Int J Energy Res 2024(1):7792658
Kayal P, Chanda CK (2013) Placement of wind and solar based DGs in distribution system for power loss minimization and voltage stability improvement. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 53:795–809
Das, T., Roy, R., Mandal, K.K., Mondal, S., Mondal, S., Hait, P. and Das, M.K., 2020. Optimal reactive power dispatch incorporating solar power using Jaya algorithm. In Computational advancement in communication circuits and systems: proceedings of ICCACCS 2018 (pp. 37–48). Springer Singapore.
Roy R, Jadhav HT (2015) Optimal power flow solution of power system incorporating stochastic wind power using Gbest guided artificial bee colony algorithm. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 64:562–578
Wu QH, Ma JT (1995) Power system optimal reactive power dispatch using evolutionary programming. IEEE Trans Power Syst 10(3):1243–1249
Ghatak SR, Sannigrahi S, Acharjee P (2017) Comparative performance analysis of DG and DSTATCOM using improved PSO based on success rate for deregulated environment. IEEE Syst J 12(3):2791–2802
Genc, M.S., 2010. Economic analysis of large-scale wind energy conversion systems in central anatolian Turkey. Clean energy systems and experiences, pp.131-154.
Al-Khateeb B, Ahmed K, Mahmood M, Le DN (2021) Rock hyraxes swarm optimization: A new nature-inspired metaheuristic optimization algorithm. Comput. Mater. Contin 68(1):643
Kennedy, J. and Eberhart, R., 1995, November. Particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of ICNN’95-international conference on neural networks (Vol. 4, pp. 1942–1948). IEEE.
Pandya, S. and Roy, R., 2015, March. Particle swarm optimization based optimal reactive power dispatch. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Technologies (ICECCT) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.
Ghoshal SP (2004) Optimizations of PID gains by particle swarm optimizations in fuzzy based automatic generation control. Electr Power Syst Res 72(3):203–212
Naka S, Genji T, Yura T, Fukuyama Y (2003) A hybrid particle swarm optimization for distribution state estimation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 18(1):60–68
Pan WT (2012) A new fruit fly optimization algorithm: taking the financial distress model as an example. Knowl-Based Syst 26:69–74
Pan WT (2013) Using modified fruit fly optimisation algorithm to perform the function test and case studies. Connect Sci 25(2–3):151–160
Mirjalili S, Gandomi AH, Mirjalili SZ, Saremi S, Faris H, Mirjalili SM (2017) Salp swarm algorithm: a bio-inspired optimizer for engineering design problems. Adv Eng Softw 114:163–191
Zhiheng W, Jianhua L (2021) Flamingo search algorithm: a new swarm intelligence optimization algorithm. IEEE Access 9:88564–88582
Markad, P. and Thosar, D.A., 2020. Optimum Location and Size of DG Using GA with Sensitivity Analysis for a Real Time Radial Distribution System. In 2nd International Conference on Communication & Information Processing (ICCIP).
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Mr. Tanmay Das carried out basic design and simulation work and prepared a draft paper. Dr. Ranjit Roy and Dr. Kamal Krishna Mandal participated in checking simulation work, results and discussions, and sequence of writing and helped to organize the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Das, T., Roy, R. & Mandal, K.K. Solving the cost minimization problem of optimal reactive power dispatch in a renewable energy integrated distribution system using rock hyraxes swarm optimization. Electr Eng (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-024-02548-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-024-02548-9