Log in

Evaluation of the mechanical properties and performance cost of additively manufactured continuous glass and carbon fiber composites

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work focuses on characterization of the mechanical performance of additively manufactured fiberglass and carbon fiber–reinforced composites fabricated with varying amounts of fiber content using a Markforged X7 printer. Samples were subjected to tension and three-point bending tests, evaluating the nominal increase in those properties per unit cost in dollars and mass. Samples were also scanned using X-ray computed micro tomography (µCT) to characterize their internal structure. Test results showed that the tensile strength and stiffness of carbon fiber–reinforced samples improved with each increase in fiber volume fraction (Vf), while fiberglass-reinforced samples showed diminishing returns above a Vf of 22.3%. The bending strength and stiffness of carbon rose monotonically with every increase in Vf and plateaued for fiberglass above a Vf of 17.8%. Carbon outperformed fiberglass in both tension and bending stiffness per gram. Carbon had a much higher tensile stiffness per dollar than fiberglass, while the bending stiffness per dollar of both fiber types plateaued above a Vf of 5.2% for fiberglass and 6.5% for carbon. µCT analysis showed considerable void content with a lower average void fraction (Vv) for fiberglass than for carbon. The Vv of fiberglass decreased with increasing Vf, while the opposite was true for carbon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The data referenced in our manuscript will not be deposited.

Code availability

Any code referenced in our manuscript will not be deposited.

References

  1. Goh GD, Agarwala S, Goh GL, Dikshit V, Sing SL, Yeong WY (2017) Additive manufacturing in unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs): challenges and potential. Aerosp Sci Technol 63:140–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2016.12.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Van De Werken N, Tekinalp H, Khanbolouki P, Ozcan S, Williams A, Tehrani M (2020) Additively manufactured carbon fiber-reinforced composites: state of the art and perspective. Addit Manuf 31:100962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.100962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Díaz-Rodríguez JG, Pertúz-Comas AD, González-Estrada OA (2021) Mechanical properties for long fiber reinforced fused deposition manufactured composites. Compos B Eng 211:108657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tekinalp HL, Kunc V, Velez-Garcia GM, Duty CE, Love LJ, Naskar AK, Blue CA, Ozcan S (2014) Highly oriented carbon fiber–polymer composites via additive manufacturing. Compos Sci Technol 105:144–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.10.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Justo J, Távara L, García-Guzmán L, París F (2018) Characterization of 3D printed long fibre reinforced composites. Compos Struct 185:537–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bettini P, Alitta G, Sala G, Di Landro L (2017) Fused deposition technique for continuous fiber reinforced thermoplastic. J Mater Eng Perform 26(2):843–848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-016-2459-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ning F, Cong W, Wei J, Wang S, Zhang M (2015) Additive manufacturing of CFRP composites using fused deposition modeling: effects of carbon fiber content and length. Proceedings of the ASME 2015 International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1115/MSEC2015-9436

  8. Mori K, Maeno T, Nakagawa Y (2014) Dieless forming of carbon fibre reinforced plastic parts using 3D printer. Procedia Engineering 81:1595–1600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferreira RTL, Amatte IC, Dutra TA, Bürger D (2017) Experimental characterization and micrography of 3D printed PLA and PLA reinforced with short carbon fibers. Compos B Eng 124:88–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fidan I, Russell N, Imeri A, Rios CO, Chen Y (2020) Investigation of the tensile properties in fiber-reinforced additive manufacturing and fused filament fabrication. International Journal of Rapid Manufacturing 9(3):1. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRAPIDM.2020.10019313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fernandes RR, Tamijani AY, Al-Haik M (2021) Mechanical characterization of additively manufactured fiber-reinforced composites. Aerosp Sci Technol 113:106653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2021.106653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sanei SHR, Arndt A, Doles R (2020) Open hole tension testing of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced composites. J Compos Mater 54(20):2687–2695. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0021998320902510

  13. Peng Y, Wu Y, Wang K, Gao G, Ahzi S (2019) Synergistic reinforcement of polyamide-based composites by combination of short and continuous carbon fibers via fused filament fabrication. Compos Struct 207:232–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Melenka GW, Cheung BKO, Schofield JS, Dawson MR, Carey JP (2016) Evaluation and prediction of the tensile properties of continuous fiber-reinforced 3D printed structures. Compos Struct 153:866–875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.07.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Van der Klift F, Koga Y, Todoroki A, Ueda M, Hirano Y, Matsuzaki R (2016) 3D printing of continuous carbon fibre reinforced thermo-plastic (CFRTP) tensile test specimens. Open Journal of Composite Materials 6:18–27. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojcm.2016.61003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nakagawa Y, Mori K, Maeno T (2017) 3D printing of carbon fibre-reinforced plastic parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91:2811–2817. https://springer.longhoe.net/article/10.1007%2Fs00170-016-9891-7

  17. Caminero MA, Chacón JM, García-Moreno I, Reverte JM (2018) Interlaminar bonding performance of 3D printed continuous fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modelling. Polym Testing 68:415–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.04.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Andrzejewska A, Pejkowski L, Topolinski T (2019) Tension and fatigue behavior of additive manufactured polylactide. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing 6(5):272–280. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2017.0154

  19. Agarwal K, Kuchipudi S, Girard B, Houser M (2018) Mechanical Properties of fiber reinforced polymer composites: a comparative study of conventional and additive manufacturing methods. J Compos Mater 52(23):3173–3181. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0021998318762297

  20. Pertuz AD, Diaz-Cardona S, Gonzalez-Estrada OA (2020) Static and fatigue behavior of continuous fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites manufactured by fused deposition modeling technique. Int J Fatigue 130:105275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Brenken B, Eduardo B, Anthony F, Vlastimil K, Pipes RB (2018) Fused filament fabrication of fiber-reinforced polymers: a review. Addit Manuf 21:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Van de Werken N, Hurley J, Khanbolouki P, Sarvestani AN, Tamijani AY, Tehrani M (2019) Design considerations and modeling of fiber reinforced 3D printed parts. Compos B Eng 160:684–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kabir SM, Mathur K, Seyam AFM (2020) A critical review on 3D printed continuous fiber-reinforced composites: history, mechanism, materials, and properties. Compos Struct 232:111476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Li N, Link G, Wang T, Ramopoulos V, Neumaier D, Hofele J, Walter M, Jelonnek J (2020) Path-designed 3D printing for topological optimized continuous carbon fiber reinforced composite structures. Compos B Eng 182:107612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Naranjo-Lozada J, Ahuett-Garza H, Orta-Castanon P, Verdeeten WMH, Saiz-Gonazlez D (2019) Tension properties and failure behavior of chopped and continuous fiber composite produced by additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 26:227–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.12.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hetrick DR, Sanei SHR, Bakis CE, Ashour O (2021) Evaluating the effect of variable fiber content on mechanical properties of additively manufactured continuous carbon fiber composites. J Reinf Plas Compos 40(9–10):365–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0731684420963217

  27. Dickson AN, Barry JN, McDonnell KA, Dowling DP (2017) Fabrication of continuous carbon, glass and Kevlar fibre reinforced polymer composites using additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 16:146–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2017.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Soete J, Badoux B, Swolfs Y, Gorbatikh L (2019) Defect detection in 3D printed carbon fibre composites using X-ray computed tomography. Ninth Conference on Industrial Computed Tomography 1–8. https://www.ndt.net/article/ctc2019/papers/iCT2019_Full_paper_62.pdf

  29. Wang X, Zhao L, Fuh JYH, Lee HP (2019) Effect of porosity on mechanical properties of 3D printed polymers: experiments and micromechanical modeling based on x-ray computed tomography analysis. Polymers 11(7):1154. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11071154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ueda M, Kishimoto S, Yamawaki M, Matsuzaki R, Todoroki A, Hirano Y, Le Duigou A (2020) 3D compaction printing of a continuous carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 137:105985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Filippov AV, Rubtsov VE, Tarasov SY, Beloborodov VA (2016) Application of 3D computed microtomography for investigating the microstructural defects of carbon fiber reinforced composite made by 3D-printing. Key Eng Mater 712:324–327. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.712.324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Seon G, Nikishkov Y, Makeev A, Ferguson L (2020) Towards a digital twin for mitigating void formation during debulking of autoclave composite parts. Eng Fract Mech 225:106792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. ASTM D638–14 (2014) Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics. ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/D0638-14

  34. ASTM D7264–15 (2015) Standard test method for flexural properties of polymer matrix composite materials. ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/D7264_D7264M-21

  35. Nikishkov Y, Airoldi L, Makeev A (2013) Measurement of voids in composites by X-ray computed tomography. Compos Sci Technol 89:89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.09.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Harris M, Potgieter J, Archer R, Arif KM (2019) Effect of material and process specific factors on the strength of printed parts in fused filament fabrication: a review of recent developments. Materials 12(10):1664. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12101664

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Bradley D. Lawrence: investigation, formal analysis, visualization, writing—original draft. Michael D. Coatney: investigation, formal analysis, visualization, writing—original draft. Francis Phillips: investigation, formal analysis, visualization, writing—original draft. Todd C. Henry: conceptualization, visualization, formal analysis, resources, supervision, writing—original draft. Yuri Nikishkov: investigation. Andrew Makeev: investigation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bradley D. Lawrence.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The authors have no ethics approval statements to provide.

Consent to participate

The authors give their consent for participation in this journal.

Consent for publication

The authors give their consent for publication in this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lawrence, B.D., Coatney, M.D., Phillips, F. et al. Evaluation of the mechanical properties and performance cost of additively manufactured continuous glass and carbon fiber composites. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 120, 1135–1147 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-08879-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-08879-w

Keywords

Navigation