Log in

Optimization of process parameters for high speed machining of Ti-6Al-4V using response surface methodology

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Titanium (Ti) and its alloys are excellent contenders while selecting materials in aviation industry. The aerospace industries around the globe are extensively using high-strength, corrosion- and heat-resistant titanium alloys. However, titanium alloys are very difficult to machine due to poor thermal conductivity which causes excessive heat at tool–workpiece junction, springiness, and material build up along the cutting edge of tool. Currently, high speed machining (HSM) is becoming popular due to high material removal rate (MRR) and greater productivity. The HSM of titanium alloys is not less than a challenge. Under prevailing machining scenario and scope of usage of titanium alloys, the HSM process parameters optimization is the utmost need of the hour. Rare work has been done on HSM of titanium alloys in near past, specially beyond cutting speed of 500 m/min. In this paper, an average surface roughness (R a) model has been developed for milling of titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) using carbide inserts tooling. A series of experiments have been performed using response surface methodology (RSM) for develo** a relationship with R a (output) and machining parameters, i.e., cutting speed, feed, and depth of cut (input variables). It was observed that surface roughness is mainly influenced by depth of cut while cutting speed and feed rate do not have significant effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fang N, Wu Q (2009) A comparative study of the cutting forces in high speed machining of Ti–6Al–4V and Inconel 718 with a round cutting edge tool. J Mater Process Technol 209(9):4385–4389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Asiltürk I, Harun A (2011) Determining the effect of cutting parameters on surface roughness in hard turning using the Taguchi method. Measurement 44(9):1697–1704

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boothroyd G, Dewhurst P, Knight WA (2010) Product design for manufacture and assembly. CRC Press

  4. Ding T, Zhang S, Wang Y, Zhu X (2010) Empirical models and optimal cutting parameters for cutting forces and surface roughness in hard milling of AISI H13 steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 51(1–4):45–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lalwani DI, Mehta NK, Jain PK (2008) Experimental investigations of cutting parameters influence on cutting forces and surface roughness in finish hard turning of MDN250 steel. J Mater Process Technol 206(1):167–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Neşeli S, Yaldız S, Türkeş E (2011) Optimization of tool geometry parameters for turning operations based on the response surface methodology. Measurement 44(3):580–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Andriya N, Rao P, Sudarsan G (2012) Dry Machining of Ti-6Al-4V using PVD Coated TiAlN Tools. In: Proceedings of The World Congress on Engineering, London, UK, pp 1492–1497

  8. Chauhan KK, Chauhan DK (2013) Optimization of machining parameters of titanium alloy for tool life. Journal of Engineering, Computers & Applied Sciences 2:6

  9. Honghua SU, Peng LIU, Yucan FU, Jiuhua XU (2012) Tool life and surface integrity in high-speed milling of titanium alloy TA15 with PCD/PCBN tools. Chin J Aeronaut 25(5):784–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yusup N, Azlan Mohd Z, Siti Zaiton Mohd H (2012) Evolutionary techniques in optimizing machining parameters: Review and recent applications (2007–2011). Expert Syst Appl 39(10):9909–9927

  11. Sangwan KS, Saxena S, Kant G (2015) Optimization of Machining Parameters to Minimize Surface Roughness using Integrated ANN-GA Approach. Procedia CIRP 29:305–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhigang J, Zhou F, Zhang H, Wang Y, Sutherland JW (2015) Optimization of machining parameters considering minimum cutting fluid consumption. J Clean Prod (in press)

  13. Krishnakumar P, Rameshkumar K, Ramachandran KI (2015) Tool wear condition prediction using vibration signals in high speed machining (HSM) of titanium (Ti-6Al-4V) alloy. Procedia Comput Sci 50:270–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jain H, Tripathi J, Bharilya R, Jain S, Kumar A (2015) Optimisation and evaluation of machining parameters for turning operation of Inconel-625. Mater Today Proc 2(4):2306–2313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Su Y, He N, Li L, Li XL (2006) An experimental investigation of effects of cooling/lubrication conditions on tool wear in high-speed end milling of Ti-6Al-4V. Wear 261(7):760–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yusuf K, Nukman Y, Yusof TM, Dawal SZ, Qin Yang H, Mahlia TMI, Tamrin KF (2010) Effect of cutting parameters on the surface roughness of titanium alloys using end milling process. Sci Res Essays 5(11):1284–1293

  17. Ibrahim GA, CheHaron CH, Ghani JA (2009) The effect of dry machining on surface integrity of titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V ELI. J Appl Sci 9(1):121–127

  18. Bhogal, Sukhdev S, Sindhu C, Dhami SS, Pabla BS (2015) Minimization of Surface Roughness and Tool Vibration in CNC Milling Operation. Journal of Optimization (in press)

  19. Korkut I, Donertas MA (2007) The influence of feed rate and cutting speed on the cutting forces, surface roughness and tool–chip contact length during face milling. Mater Des 28(1):308–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yasir A, Che Hassan CH, Jaharah AG, Nagi HE, Yanuar B, Gusri AI (2009) Machinalibilty of Ti-6Al-4V under dry and near dry condition using carbide tools. Open Ind Manuf Eng J 2:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  21. Machai C, Biermann D (2011) Machining of β-titanium-alloy Ti–10V–2Fe–3Al under cryogenic conditions: Cooling with carbon dioxide snow. J Mater Process Technol 211(6):1175–1183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yusuf K, Nukman Y, Yusof TM, Dawal SZ, Qin Yang H, Mahlia TMI, Tamrin KF (2010) Effect of cutting parameters on the surface roughness of titanium alloys using end milling process. Sci Res Essays 5(11):1284–1293

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mohamad SS (2012) Taguchi method approach on effect of lubrication condition on surface roughness in milling operation. PhD diss. Universiti Malaysia Pahang

  24. Xavior MA, Adithan M (2009) Determining the influence of cutting fluids on tool wear and surface roughness during turning of AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel. J Mater Process Technol 209(2):900–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. El-Tayeb NSM, Yap TC, Venkatesh VC, Brevern PV (2009) Modeling of cryogenic frictional behaviour of titanium alloys using response surface methodology approach. Mater Des 30(10):4023–4034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Seeman M, Ganesan G, Karthikeyan R, Velayudham A (2010) Study on tool wear and surface roughness in machining of particulate aluminum metal matrix composite-response surface methodology approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 48(5–8):613–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Choudhury IA, El-Baradie MA (1999) Machinability assessment of inconel 718 by factorial design of experiment coupled with response surface methodology. J Mater Process Technol 95(1):30–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Baş D, Boyacı İH (2007) Modeling and optimization I: usability of response surface methodology. J Food Eng 78(3):836–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ghulam Zakria.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hashmi, K.H., Zakria, G., Raza, M.B. et al. Optimization of process parameters for high speed machining of Ti-6Al-4V using response surface methodology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85, 1847–1856 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-8057-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-8057-3

Keywords

Navigation