Abstract
Incremental sheet forming (ISF) is a highly versatile and flexible process for rapid manufacturing of complex sheet metal parts. In the ISF process, efficient and accurate prediction of part thickness variation is still a challenging task, which is especially true for the multi-pass ISF process. The Sine law equation and the finite element method (FEM) are the two commonly used conventional prediction methods. However, these approaches are either with limited accuracy or very time consuming. For the multi-pass ISF process, the thickness prediction is even more challenging since two or more forming steps are involved. Focusing on the thickness prediction of multi-stage ISF process, this work proposes a thickness prediction model based on the geometrical calculation of intermediate shapes of the formed part and backward tracing of nodal points of the forming tool. By develo** this method, the thickness distribution can be calculated through the predicted nodal displacement in the ISF process. To verify the proposed model, four different geometrical shapes, i.e., conic, parabolic conic, non-axisymmetric, and hemispherical parts, are physically formed by using a NC ISF machine. The geometric shapes and the detailed thickness distributions of the formed parts are carefully measured and compared with the prediction model developed. Good agreements between the analytical predictions, and the experimental results are obtained. This indicates the effectiveness and robustness of the developed thickness prediction approach.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jeswiet J, Micari F, Hirt G, Bramley A, Duflou J, Allwood J (2005) Asymmetric single point incremental forming of sheet metal. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 54(2):88–114
Malhotra R, Xue L, Belytschko T, Cao J (2012) Mechanics of fracture in single point incremental forming. J Mater Process Technol 212(7):1573–1590
Ambrogio G, De Napoli L, Filice L, Gagliardi F, Muzzupappa M (2005) Application of incremental forming process for high customised medical product manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol 162–163:156–162
Micari F, Fratini L, Governale A, Lo Franco A, Panzeca A (2007) Incremental forming process for the accomplishment of automotive details. Key Eng Mater 344:559–566
Iseki H, Kato K, Sakamoto S (1989) Flexible forming method using ball roller. Proc. 40th Japanese Joint Conf. For technology of plasticity (in Japanese) 41–44
Matsubara S (1994) Incremental backward bulge forming of a sheet metal with a hemispherical head tool. J JSTP 35:1311–1316
Smith J, Malhotra R, Liu WK, Cao J (2013) Deformation mechanics in single-point and accumulative double-sided incremental forming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69:1185–1201
Duflou JR, Callebaut B, Verbert J, De Baerdemaeker H (2007) Laser assisted incremental forming: formability and accuracy improvement. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 56(1):273–276
Fan GQ, Sun FT, Meng XG, Gao L, Tong GQ (2010) Electric hot incremental forming of Ti-6Al-4V titanium sheet. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 49:941–947
Iseki H (2001) Flexible and incremental bulging of sheet metal using high-speed water jet. JSME Int J 44(2):486–493
Li JC, Hu JB, Pan JJ, Geng P (2012) Thickness distribution and design of a multi-stage process for sheet metal incremental forming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 62(9–12):981–988
Skjoedt M, Bay N, Endelt B, Ingarao G (2008) Multi stage strategies for single point incremental forming of a cup. Int J Mater Form. doi:10.1007/s12289-008-0156-3
Malhotra R, Bhattacharya A, Kumar A, Reddy NV, Cao J (2011) A new methodology for multi-pass single point incremental forming with mixed toolpaths. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 60(1):323–326
Zhang C, **ao HF, Yu DH (2013) Incremental forming path-generated method based on the intermediate models of bulging simulation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67(9–12):2837–2844
Hussain G, Gao L (2007) A novel method to test the thinning limits of sheet metals in negative incremental forming. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(3–4):419–435
Kitazawa K, Nakanes M, Hemi-ellipsoidal stretch expanding of aluminum sheet by CNC incremental forming process with two path method. JJILM 47:440–445
Kitazawa K,SH, Sumio Y (2001) Hemispherical stretch-expanding of aluminum sheet by computerized numerically controlled incremental forming process with two path method. JJILM 46:219–224
Van Houtte P, Van Bael A, He S, Duflou JR, Szekeres A, Henrard C, Habraken AM (2005) Finite element modeling of incremental forming of aluminum sheets. Adv Mater Res 6:525–532
Bambach M (2010) A geometrical model of the kinematics of incremental sheet forming for the prediction of membrane strains and sheet thickness. J Mater Process Technol 210(12):1562–1573
Duflou JR, Verbert J, Belkassem B, Gu J, Sol H, Henrard C, Habraken AM (2008) Process window enhancement for single point incremental forming through multi-step toolpaths. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 57(1):253–256
Filice L (2006) A phenomenology-based approach for modeling material thinning and formability in incremental forming of cylindrical parts. Proc IMechE 220:1449–1455
He S, Gu J, Sol H, Van Bael A, Van Houtte P, Tunckol Y, Duflou JR (2007) Determination of strain in incremental sheet forming process. Key Eng Mater 344:503–510
Ji YH, Park JJ (2008) Formability of magnesium AZ31 sheet in the incremental forming at warm temperature. J Mater Process Technol 201(1–3):354–358
Fang Y, Lu B, Chen J, Xu DK, Ou H (2014) Analytical and experimental investigations on deformation mechanism and fracture behavior in single point incremental forming. J Mater Process Technol 214:1503–1515
Piegl L, Tiller W (1996) The Nurbs book. Springer, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cao, T., Lu, B., Xu, D. et al. An efficient method for thickness prediction in multi-pass incremental sheet forming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77, 469–483 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6489-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6489-9