Log in

Efficacy of a mobile phone application for the improvement of oral hygiene of patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment

A randomized controlled clinical trial

Wirksamkeit einer Mobiltelefonanwendung zur Verbesserung der Mundhygiene von Patienten während einer kieferorthopädischen Behandlung mit festsitzenden Apparaturen

Eine randomisierte kontrollierte klinische Studie

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a mobile phone application (app) to improve oral hygiene of patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment.

Materials and methods

This randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted with a total of 60 patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment in two groups: intervention and control (n = 30 each). A previously designed mobile app (Labkhand) was used by patients in the intervention group. Orthodontic plaque index (OPI) and modified gingival index (MGI) were recorded in the two groups at baseline (first session or T0), and after 1 (T1) and 3 (T2) months. The number of debonded/broken brackets was also recorded, and pain score of the patients was assessed at nine time points. Data were analyzed using the χ2 test, paired t‑test, and repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA; α = 0.05).

Results

The two groups demonstrated no significant difference in OPI and MGI at T0 (P > 0.05). OPI and MGI at T1 and T2 were significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group (P < 0.05). The number of patients with broken brackets in the intervention group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P = 0.017). The two groups reported no significant difference in pain score (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

The Labkhand mobile app successfully improved oral hygiene indices of patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment, and decreased the frequency of broken brackets after 1 and 3 months of use.

Zusammenfassung

Zielsetzung

Ziel dieser Studie war es, die Wirksamkeit einer Mobiltelefonanwendung (App) zur Verbesserung der Mundhygiene von Patienten zu untersuchen, die sich einer kieferorthopädischen Behandlung mit festsitzenden Apparaturen unterziehen.

Materialien und Methoden

Diese randomisierte, kontrollierte klinische Studie wurde mit insgesamt 60 Patienten mit einer kieferorthopädischen Behandlung mit festsitzenden Apparaturen in zwei Gruppen durchgeführt: Interventions- und Kontrollgruppe (jeweils n = 30). Die Patienten der Interventionsgruppe nutzten eine zuvor entwickelte mobile App (Labkhand). Der kieferorthopädische Plaqueindex (OPI) und der modifizierte Gingivaindex (MGI) wurden in beiden Gruppen zu Beginn (erste Sitzung oder T0) sowie nach einem (T1) und 3 (T2) Monaten erfasst. Außerdem wurde die Anzahl der gelösten Brackets erfasst, und die Schmerzbewertung der Patienten wurde zu neun Zeitpunkten erhoben. Die Daten wurden mit dem χ2-Test, dem t‑Test für gepaarte Stichproben und der Varianzanalyse mit wiederholten Messungen (ANOVA; α = 0,05) ausgewertet.

Ergebnisse

Die beiden Gruppen wiesen keine signifikanten Unterschiede bei OPI und MGI zu T0 auf (p > 0,05). OPI und MGI zu T1 und T2 waren in der Interventionsgruppe signifikant niedriger als in der Kontrollgruppe (p < 0,05). Die Anzahl der Patienten mit gelösten Brackets war in der Interventionsgruppe signifikant geringer als in der Kontrollgruppe (p = 0,017). Die beiden Gruppen wiesen keinen signifikanten Unterschied im Schmerzscore auf (p > 0,05).

Schlussfolgerung

Die mobile Labkhand-App verbesserte erfolgreich die Mundhygieneindizes von Patienten, die sich einer kieferorthopädischen Behandlung mit festsitzenden Apparaturen unterzogen, und verringerte die Häufigkeit gelöster Brackets nach 1 und 3 Monaten der Anwendung.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1 Abb. 1
Fig. 2 Abb. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Jewair TS, Suri S, Tompson BD (2011) Predictors of adolescent compliance with oral hygiene instructions during two-arch multibracket fixed orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 81(3):525–531

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Cantekin K, Celikoglu M, Karadas M, Yildirim H, Erdem A (2011) Effects of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances on oral health status: a comprehensive study. J Dent Sci 6(4):235–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. O’Reilly MM, Featherstone JD (1987) Demineralization and remineralization around orthodontic appliances: an in vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 92(1):33–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zaghrisson BU, Zachrisson S (1971) Caries incidence and oral hygiene during orthodontic treatment. Eur J Oral Sci 79(4):394–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chapman JA, Roberts WE, Eckert GJ, Kula KS, González-Cabezas C (2010) Risk factors for incidence and severity of white spot lesions during treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 138(2):188–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Marini I, Bortolotti F, Parenti SI, Gatto MR, Bonetti GA (2014) Combined effects of repeated oral hygiene motivation and type of toothbrush on orthodontic patients: a blind randomized clinical trial. Angle Orthod 84(5):896–901

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Fleming P (2015) Timetable for oral prevention in childhood—A current opinion. Prog Orthod 16(1):1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chow J, Cioffi I (2018) Pain and orthodontic patient compliance: a clinical perspective. Semin Orthod 24(2):242–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cozzani M, Ragazzini G, Delucchi A, Mutinelli S, Barreca C, Rinchuse DJ, Servetto R, Piras V (2016) Oral hygiene compliance in orthodontic patients: a randomized controlled study on the effects of a post-treatment communication. Prog Orthod 17(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Skidmore KJ, Brook KJ, Thomson WM, Harding WJ (2006) Factors influencing treatment time in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129(2):230–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Robotham D, Satkunanathan S, Reynolds J, Stahl D, Wykes T (2016) Using digital notifications to improve attendance in clinic: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 6(10):e12116

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Li X, Xu ZR, Tang N, Ye C, Zhu XL, Zhou T, Zhao ZH (2016) Effect of intervention using a messaging app on compliance and duration of treatment in orthodontic patients. Clin Oral Investig 20(8):1849–1859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ay ZY, Sayın M, Özat Y, Goster T, Atilla AO, Bozkurt FY (2007) Appropriate oral hygiene motivation method for patients with fixed appliances. Angle Orthod 77(6):1085–1089

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Alkadhi OH, Zahid MN, Almanea RS, Althaqeb HK, Alharbi TH, Ajwa NM (2017) The effect of using mobile applications for improving oral hygiene in patients with orthodontic fixed appliances: a randomised controlled trial. J Orthod 44(3):157–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Scheerman JF, van Meijel B, van Empelen P, Kramer GJ, Verrips GH, Pakpour AH, Van den Braak MC, van Loveren C (2018) Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial to test the effect of a smartphone application on oral-health behavior and oral hygiene in adolescents with fixed orthodontic appliances. BMC Oral Heal 18(1):1–0

    Google Scholar 

  16. Klasnja P, Pratt W (2012) Healthcare in the pocket: map** the space of mobile-phone health interventions. J Biomed Inform 1;45(1):184–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Underwood B, Birdsall J, Kay E (2015) The use of a mobile app to motivate evidence-based oral hygiene behaviour. Br Dent J 219(4):E2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tayebi A, Sheikh Davoodi N, Rahimipour K, Mousavi R, Mirzadeh M, Amin M, Vaseghi E (2022) Mobile app for comprehensive management of orthodontic patients with fixed appliances. J Orofac Orthop 7:1–0

    Google Scholar 

  19. Beberhold K, Sachse-Kulp A, Schwestka-Polly R, Hornecker E, Ziebolz D (2012) The orthodontic plaque index: an oral hygiene index for patients with multibracket appliances. Orthodontics 13(1):94–99

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rebelo MAB, Queiroz AJPF, Davies RM (2011) Gingival indices: state of art. In: Gingival diseases-their aetiology, prevention, limited TLI, pp 41–54

    Google Scholar 

  21. Paschos E, Bücher K, Huth KC, Crispin A, Wichelhaus A, Dietel T (2014) Is there a need for orthodontic plaque indices?—Diagnostic accuracy of four plaque indices. Clin Oral Investig 18(4):1351–1358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Löe H (1967) The gingival index, the plaque index and the retention index systems. J Periodontol 38(6):610–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lobene RR, Weatherford T, Ross NM, Lamm RA, Menaker L (1986) A modified gingival index for use in clinical trials. Clin Prev Dent 8(1):3–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M (2011) Measures of adult pain: visual analog scale for pain (VAS pain), numeric rating scale for pain (NRS pain), mcgill pain questionnaire (MPQ), short-form mcgill pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ), chronic pain grade scale (CPGS), short form-36 bodily pain scale (SF-36 BPS), and measure of intermittent and constant osteoarthritis pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res 63(S11):S240–S252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A, Buckingham B (1983) The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain 17(1):45–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Keith DJ, Rinchuse DJ, Kennedy M, Zullo T (2013) Effect of text message follow-up on patient’s self-reported level of pain and anxiety. Angle Orthod 83(4):605–610

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Eppright M, Shroff B, Best AM, Barcoma E, Lindauer SJ (2014) Influence of active reminders on oral hygiene compliance in orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod 84(2):208–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jejurikar H, Nene S, Kalia A, Gupta G, Mirdehghan N (2014) Does text messaging reminder help in the orthodontic compliance of patients to maintain their oral hygiene. Oral Hyg Health 31:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zotti F, Dalessandri D, Salgarello S, Piancino M, Bonetti S, Visconti L, Paganelli C (2016) Usefulness of an app in improving oral hygiene compliance in adolescent orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod 86(1):101–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cozzani M, Ragazzini G, Delucchi A, Barreca C, Rinchuse DJ, Servetto R, Calevo MG, Piras V (2016) Self-reported pain after orthodontic treatments: a randomized controlled study on the effects of two follow-up procedures. Eur J Orthod 38(3):266–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Faria IM, Sancas MC, Pintor AV, Primo LS (2018) Dental apps for smartphones: new way of providing services and education. Creat Educ 9(05):687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Jasti D, Pratap KVNR, Padma TM et al (2015) Healthcare apps—Will they be a facelift for today’s medical/dental practice? J Mob Technol Med 4:8–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kasra Rahimipour.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

N.S. Davoodi, A. Tayebi, K. Rahimipour, M. Zarei, A. Mozaffari, M. Mirzadeh, R. Mousavi and N. Bayat declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants or on human tissue were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1975 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards and the study was approved by the ethics committee of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences (Institutional Review Board: IR.QUMS.REC.1397.216). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants or their parents/legal guardians included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Davoodi, N.S., Tayebi, A., Rahimipour, K. et al. Efficacy of a mobile phone application for the improvement of oral hygiene of patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment. J Orofac Orthop (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-023-00492-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-023-00492-0

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation