Abstract
In this short note we study Spin-Boson Models from the Quasi-Classical standpoint. In the Quasi-Classical limit, the field becomes macroscopic while the particles it interacts with, they remain quantum. As a result, the field becomes a classical environment that drives the particle system with an explicit effective dynamics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
We use a somewhat unorthodox notation for the second quantization functor. We denote by \(\mathcal {G}_{\varepsilon }^{\mathrm {s}}(\mathfrak {h})=\bigoplus _{n\in \mathbb {N}} \mathfrak {h}_n\) the symmetric Fock space over \(\mathfrak {h}\) in which the canonical creation and annihilation operators have \(\varepsilon \)-dependent commutation relations:
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} [a_{\varepsilon}(f),a_{\varepsilon}^{*}(g)]= \varepsilon\langle f , g \rangle_{\mathfrak{h}};. \end{aligned}$$The second quantization of an operator A on \(\mathfrak {h}\) is written thus as
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \mathrm{d}\mathcal{G}_{\varepsilon}(A)= \sum_{i,j=0}^{\infty}A_{ij}a^{*}_{\varepsilon,i}a_{\varepsilon,j}\;, \end{aligned}$$with \(A_{ij}=\langle e_i , A e_j \rangle _{\mathfrak {h}}\), and \(a^{\sharp }_{\varepsilon ,k}=a_{\varepsilon }^{\sharp }(e_k)\), with \(\{e_k\}_{k\in \mathbb {N}}\) an O.N.B. of \(\mathfrak {h}\). The quasi-classical parameter \(\varepsilon \) clearly plays the role of a semiclassical parameter for the (Segal) field \(\varphi _{\varepsilon }(f)= a^{*}_{\varepsilon }(f)+ a_{\varepsilon }(f)\): as \(\varepsilon \to 0\), the field becomes a classical commutative observable [see 15, for a gentler and more detailed introduction to the quasi-classical scaling], and [11,12,13,14] for other recent papers concerning the quasi-classical regime.
- 2.
We denote by \(\mathcal {C}_0^{\infty }\big (\mathrm {d}\mathcal {G}_{\varepsilon }(1)\big )\) the Fock space vectors with a finite number of particles (i.e., for which the k-particle components are all zero for \(k> \underline {k}\), for some \( \underline {k}\in \mathbb {N}\)).
- 3.
A cylindrical measure is a finitely additive measure that is \(\sigma \)-additive on any subalgebra of cylinders generated by a finite number of vectors.
- 4.
\(\mathfrak {U}_{t,s}(z)\) is the unique solution of \(i\partial _t\mathfrak {U}_{t,s}(z) = \mathfrak {H}(z) \mathfrak {U}_{t,s}(z)\) and \(\mathfrak {U}_{t,t}(z)=\mathbf 1\).
- 5.
We restrict our attention only to the limits \(\nu =1\) and \(\nu =0\), since they encode all different and well-defined outcomes that one could obtain for the effective dynamics. In fact, every choice of \(\nu (\varepsilon )\) such that \(\lim _{\varepsilon \to 0}\varepsilon \nu (\varepsilon )= \lambda >0\) would amount in a rescaling of the field dispersion relation, while any choice such that either \(\lim _{\varepsilon \to 0}\varepsilon \nu (\varepsilon )= \lambda = \infty \) or such that the limit does not exist would prevent an explicit definition of the effective dynamics in the limit \(\varepsilon \to 0\).
- 6.
We plan to investigate the non-Markovian character of the quasi-classical effective dynamics in an upcoming paper.
- 7.
If \(\mathfrak {S}\) has compact resolvent (and it is bounded from below), \(\mathfrak {A}=\mathfrak {S} + \lvert \inf \sigma (\mathfrak {S}) \rvert _{ }^{}+1\) would be a natural choice, and the associated condition (2) would mean that mass is not lost if one restricts to states with \(\varepsilon \)-uniformly-bounded Spin kinetic energy.
- 8.
The scalar convergence \(\xi _{\varepsilon }\underset {\varepsilon \to 0}{\longrightarrow } \mu \) is perfectly analogous to the quasi-classical one, and could be seen as a particular case of it where the additional degrees of freedom are trivial. Let us remark again that for the scalar case—and thus also for the unentangled quasi-classical states considered here – (1) is sufficient to guarantee that \(\mu (\mathfrak {h})=1\).
- 9.
Quasi-classical convergence is the pointwise convergence of Fourier transforms in weak-* topology, i.e. when tested with compact operators. Since \(\mathfrak {sk}_{r+}\) is compact, we have pointwise convergence of \(\hat {\Upsilon }_{\varepsilon }(\tau )\) traced together with \(\mathfrak {sk}_{r+}\).
References
Arai, A., Hirokawa, M.: On the existence and uniqueness of ground states of a generalized spin-boson model. J. Funct. Anal. 151(2), 455–503 (1997). http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jfan.1997.3140
Ammari, Z., Nier, F.: Mean field limit for bosons and infinite dimensional phase-space analysis. Ann. Henri Poincaré 9(8), 1503–1574 (2008). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00023-008-0393-5. ar**v:0711.4128
Ammari, Z., Nier, F.: Mean field limit for bosons and propagation of Wigner measures. J. Math. Phys. 50(4), 042107 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3115046. ar**v:0807.3108
Ammari, Z., Nier, F.: Mean field propagation of Wigner measures and BBGKY hierarchies for general bosonic states. J. Math. Pures Appl. 95(6), 585–626 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matpur.2010.12.004. ar**v:1003.2054
Ammari, Z., Nier, F.: Mean field propagation of infinite-dimensional Wigner measures with a singular two-body interaction potential. Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. XIV(1), 155–220 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.2422/2036-2145.201112_004. ar**v:1111.5918
Amour, L., Lascar, R., Nourrigat, J.: Weyl calculus in Wiener spaces and in QED (2016). ar**v:1610.06379
Amour, L., Jager, L., Nourrigat, J.: Infinite dimensional semiclassical analysis and applications to a model in NMR (2017). ar**v:1705.07097
Amour, L., Lascar, R., Nourrigat, J.: Weyl calculus in QED I. The unitary group. J. Math. Phys. 58(1), 013501 (2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4973742. ar**v:1510.05293
Arai, A.: An asymptotic analysis and its application to the nonrelativistic limit of the Pauli-Fierz and a spin-boson model. J. Math. Phys. 31(11), 2653–2663 (1990). http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.528966
Arai, A.: A theorem on essential selfadjointness with application to Hamiltonians in nonrelativistic quantum field theory. J. Math. Phys. 32(8), 2082–2088 (1991)
Carlone, R., Correggi, M., Falconi, M., Olivieri, M.: Emergence of time-dependent point interactions in polaron models. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 53(4), 4657–4691 (2021). http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/20M1381344. ar**v:1904.11012
Correggi, M., Falconi, M.: Effective potentials generated by field interaction in the quasi-classical limit. Ann. Henri Poincaré 19(1), 189–235 (2018). . ar**v:1701.01317
Correggi, M., Falconi, M., Olivieri, M.: Magnetic Schrödinger operators as the quasi-classical limit of Pauli-Fierz-type models. J. Spectr. Theory 9(4), 1287–1325 (2019). . ar**v:1711.07413
Correggi, M., Falconi, M., Olivieri, M.: Ground state properties in the quasi-classical regime. Anal. PDE (2022, in press). ar**v:2007.09442
Correggi, M., Falconi, M., Olivieri, M.: Quasi-classical dynamics. J. Eur. Math. Soc. 25, 731–783 (2023)
Cook, J.M.: The mathematics of second quantization. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 37, 417–420 (1951)
Dereziński, J.: Van Hove Hamiltonians—exactly solvable models of the infrared and ultraviolet problem. Ann. Henri Poincaré 4(4), 713–738 (2003). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00023-003-0145-5
Dereziński, J., Gérard, C.: Mathematics of Quantization and Quantum Fields. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013). ISBN 978-1-107-01111-3, xii+674pp.
Falconi, M.: Classical limit of the Nelson model with cutoff. J. Math. Phys. 54(1), 012303 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4775716. ar**v:1205.4367
Falconi, M.: Self-adjointness criterion for operators in Fock spaces. Math. Phys. Anal. Geom. 18(1), Art. 2 (2015). ar**v:1405.6570
Falconi, M.: Cylindrical Wigner measures. Doc. Math. 23, 1677–1756 (2018). http://dx.doi.org/10.25537/dm.2018v23.1677-1756. ar**v:1605.04778
Hasler, D., Herbst, I.: Ground states in the spin boson model. Ann. Henri Poincaré 12(4), 621–677 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00023-011-0091-6
Joye, A., Merkli, M., Spehner, D.: Adiabatic transitions in a two-level system coupled to a free boson reservoir. Ann. Henri Poincaré 21(10), 3157–3199 (2020). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00023-020-00946-w
Könenberg, M., Merkli, M.: On the irreversible dynamics emerging from quantum resonances. J. Math. Phys. 57(3), 033,302 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4944614
Könenberg, M., Merkli, M., Song, H.: Ergodicity of the spin-boson model for arbitrary coupling strength. Commun. Math. Phys. 336(1), 261–285 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00220-014-2242-3
Leggett, A.J., Chakravarty, S., Dorsey, A.T., Fisher, M.P.A., Garg, A., Zwerger, W.: Dynamics of the dissipative two-state system. Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 1–85 (1987). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.59.1. Erratum: Rev. Mod. Phys. 67(1), 725 (1995)
Lonigro, D.: Generalized spin-boson models with non-normalizable form factors. J. Math. Phys. 63(7), 072,105 (2022). http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0085576
Lions, P.-L., Paul, T.: Sur les mesures de Wigner. Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana 9(3), 553–618 (1993)
Merkli, M.: Quantum markovian master equations: resonance theory shows validity for all time scales. Ann. Phys. 412, 167,996 (2020). http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2019.167996
Merkli, M.: Dynamics of open quantum systems i, oscillation and decay. Quantum 6, 615 (2022)
Merkli, M.: Dynamics of open quantum systems ii, markovian approximation. Quantum 6, 616 (2022)
Merkli, M., Sigal, I.M., Berman, G.P.: Decoherence and thermalization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98(13), 130401 (2007). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.130401
Merkli, M., Berman, G.P., Borgonovi, F., Gebresellasie, K.: Evolution of entanglement of two qubits interacting through local and collective environments. Quant. Inf. Comput. 11(5–6), 390–419 (2011)
Merkli, M., Berman, G.P., Sayre, R.: Electron transfer reactions: generalized spin-boson approach. J. Math. Chem. 51(3), 890–913 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10910-012-0124-5
Merkli, M., Berman, G.P., Sayre, R.T., Gnanakaran, S., Könenberg, M., Nesterov, A.I., Song, H.: Dynamics of a chlorophyll dimer in collective and local thermal environments. J. Math. Chem. 54(4), 866–917 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10910-016-0593-z
Mohseni, M., Omar, Y., Engel, G.S., Plenio, M.B. (eds.): Quantum Effects in Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2014)
Palma, G.M., Suominen, K.A., Ekert, A.K.: Quantum computers and dissipation. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 452(1946), 567–584 (1996). http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1996.0029
Segal, I.E.: Foundations of the theory of dynamical systems of infinitely many degrees of freedom. I. Mat.-Fys. Medd. Danske Vid. Selsk. 31(12), 39pp. (1959)
Segal, I.E.: Foundations of the theory of dyamical systems of infinitely many degrees of freedom. II. Can. J. Math. 13, 1–18 (1961)
Xu, D., Schulten, K.: Coupling of protein motion to electron transfer in a photosynthetic reaction center: investigating the low temperature behavior in the framework of the spin—boson model. Chem. Phys. 182(2), 91–117 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0104(94)00016-6
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Correggi, M., Falconi, M., Merkli, M. (2023). Quasi-Classical Spin Boson Models. In: Correggi, M., Falconi, M. (eds) Quantum Mathematics I. INdAM 2022. Springer INdAM Series, vol 57. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5894-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5894-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-5893-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-5894-8
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)