SpringerLink
Log in

The Role of Incident-Reporting Systems in Improving Patient Safety in Japanese Hospitals: A Comparative Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Humans and Devices in Medical Contexts

Part of the book series: Health, Technology and Society ((HTE))

  • 258 Accesses

Abstract

Serious attention has been given to safety in many high-risk domains in Japan and elsewhere. Healthcare has been relatively slow to respond to the development of safety science. However, in many countries attempts have been made since the 1990s to reform the regulation of risks to patients, and Japan is no exception. Nationally, the Japan Council for Quality Health Care (JQ) manages the web-based reporting system and collects data about serious adverse events and incidents on a voluntary basis. This chapter compares how hospitals in Japan and England use their respective reporting systems as a source of learning, and highlights the importance of sociocultural and institutional contexts when examining socio-technical settings in healthcare. While this study was modelled upon that previously carried out in England, the scope of this chapter is broader, and targeted at country-level comparison. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patient safety managers in three different types of hospitals in Japan (Dec 2016–Jun 2018) and experts in four European countries (Jan–Dec 2017). Our findings from the various frameworks and the patient safety managers’ perceptions suggest that web-based reporting has become an important tool, but human-to-human interactions and national policy contexts remain critical for understanding incident reporting and patient safety.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 106.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 139.09
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 139.09
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarts, Jos, Joanne Callen, Enrico Coiera, and Johanna Westbrook. 2010. Information Technology in Health Care: Socio-Technical Approaches. International Journal of Medical Informatics 79 (6): 389–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Janet E., Naonori Kodate, Rhiannon Walters, and Anneliese Dodds. 2013. Can Incident Reporting Improve Safety? Healthcare Practitioners’ Views of the Effectiveness of Incident Reporting. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 25 (2): 141–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Janet E., and Naonori Kodate. 2015. Learning from Patient Safety Incidents in Incident Review Meetings: Organisational Factors and Indicators of Analytic Process Effectiveness. Safety Science 80: 105–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, Julian, Nick Lynn, Lee Coombes, Martin Roberts, Tom Gale, De Bere, and Sam Regan. 2017. The Medical Licensing Examination Debate. Regulation & Governance 11 (3): 315–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich. 1999. World Risk Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich. 2006. Living in the World Risk Society. Economy and Society 35 (3): 329–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich, and Mark Ritter. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, Theory, Culture and Society. London; Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benn, Jonathan, Maria Koutantji, Louise M. Wallace, Peter Spurgeon, Mike Rejman, Andrew Healey, and Charles Vincent. 2009. Feedback from Incident Reporting: Information and Action to Improve Patient Safety. Quality & Safety in Health Care 18 (1): 11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantelli, Fabrizio, Naonori Kodate, and Kristian Krieger. 2011. Towards Democratic Governance of Uncertainty? Contesting Notions of Participation, Control and Accountability. Journal of Risk Research 14 (8): 919–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayon, Pascale, Randi Cartmill, Mary Ann Blosky, Roger Brown, Matthew Hackenberg, Peter Hoonakker, Ann Schoofs Hundt, Evan Norfolk, Tosha B. Wetterneck, and James M. Walker. 2011. ICU Nurses’ Acceptance of Electronic Health Records. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 18 (6): 812–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, Sarah, and Naonori Kodate. 2018. Understanding the State of Health Information in Ireland: A Qualitative Study Using a Socio-Technical Approach. International Journal of Medical Informatics 114: 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health. 2000. An Organisation with a Memory: Report of an Expert Group on Learning from Adverse Events in the National Health Service. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2014. Key Findings and Recommendations on Reporting and Learning Systems for Patient Safety Incidents Across Europe. European Commission’s Patient Safety and Quality of Care Working Group. Available from https://ec.europa.eu/health/home_en. Accessed 1 July 2019.

  • Faulkner, Alex. 2009. Medical Technology into Healthcare and Society: A Sociology of Devices, Innovation and Governance (Health, Technology and Society Series). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, Tanya Anne, and Samia Chreim. 2015. Fix and Forget or Fix and Report: A Qualitative Study of Tensions at the Front Line of Incident Reporting. BMJ Quality & Safety 24 (5): 303–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, Tanya, Samia Chreim, and Alan Forster. 2017. SocioCultural Factors Influencing Incident Reporting Among Physicians and Nurses: Understanding Frames Underlying Self- and Peer-Reporting Practices. Journal of Patient Safety 13 (3): 129–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirose, Masahiro. 2016. Is Patient Safety Sufficient in Japan? Differences in Patient Safety Between Japan and the United States: Learning from the United States. Journal of Hospital Administration 5 (6): 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirose, Masahiro, Yuichi Imanaka, Tatsuro Ishizaki, and Edward Evans. 2003. How Can We Improve the Quality of Health Care in Japan? Learning from JCQHC Hospital Accreditation. Health Policy 66 (1): 29–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogle, Linda F. 2008. Emerging Medical Technologies. In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd ed, ed. Edward J. Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael E. Lynch, and Judy Wajcman, 841–874. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • JQ (Japan Council for Quality Health Care). 2018. Iryō jiko jōhō shūshū tō jigyō [Report on the Activities of Collaborating Medical Accident Data], No. 53 (January–March 2018). http://www.med-safe.jp/pdf/report_53.pdf. Accessed 24 April 2020.

  • JQ (Japan Council for Quality Health Care). 2019. Iryō jiko jōhō shūshū tō jigyō [Report on the Activities of Collaborating Medical Accident Data], No. 56 (October–December 2018). http://www.med-safe.jp/pdf/report_56.pdf. Accessed 24 April 2020.

  • JQ (Japan Council for Quality Health Care). 2020. Iryō jiko jōhō shūshū tō jigyō: Jigyō no naiyō to sanka hōhō [Activities Regarding the Collection of Medical Accident Data: Contents and How to Participate]. http://www.med-safe.jp/pdf/business_pamphlet.pdf. Accessed 24 April 2020.

  • Kamide, Hiroko, Koji Kawabe, Satoshi Shigemi, and Tatsuo Arai. 2015. Anshin as a Concept of Subjective Well-Being Between Humans and Robots in Japan. Advanced Robotics 29 (24): 1624–1636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamisato, Tatsuhiro. 2017. Nihon-gata risuku shakai [The Japanese Version of a Risk Society]. In Posuto reisen jidai no kagaku-gijutsu [Science and Technology in the Post-Cold War Era Japan], ed. Hideto Nakajima, 145–174. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kodate, Naonori. 2012. Events, Politics and Patterns of Policy-Making: Impact of Major Incidents on Health Sector Regulatory Reforms in the UK and Japan. Social Policy & Administration 46 (3): 280–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kodate, Naonori. 2018. Regulating Risks in Healthcare in Japan: Between New Politics and the Tradition of Liberal Practice in Medicine. Contemporary Japan 30 (2): 204–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kodate, Naonori, Akiyo Yumoto, Yoshiko Sugiyama, and Ken’ichiro Taneda. 2019. How Do Frontline Staff Report, Discuss and Learn from Incidents? The Case of Two Hospitals in Japan. International Forum on Quality and Safety in Healthcare. Glasgow, March, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, Linda T., Janet Corrigan, Molla S. Donaldson, and America Institute of Medicine (Committee on Quality of Health Care). 1999. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovacs, Eszter, Andrea E. Schmidt, Gabor Szocska, Reinhard Busse, Martin McKee, and Helena Legido-Quigley. 2014. Professional Issues. Licensing Procedures and Registration of Medical Doctors in the European Union. Clinical Medicine 14 (3): 229–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leflar, Robert B. 2009. “Unnatural deaths,” Criminal Sanctions, and Medical Quality Improvement in Japan. Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics 9 (1): 1–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leflar, Robert B. 2012. The Law of Medical Misadventure in Japan. Zeitschrift für Japanisches Recht, 189–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • MEXT (Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology). 2004. Anshin anzen na shakai no kōchiku ni shirusu kagaku gijutsu seisaku ni kan suru kondankai (Hōkokusho) [Study on Science and Technology Policy Contributing to Building a Safe and Secure Society Report]. http://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/kagaku/anzen/houkoku/04042302/1242078.htm. Accessed 24 June 2019.

  • MHLW (Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare). 2018. Iryō shisetsu chōsa [Survey on Medical Institutions]. National Printing Bureau. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/iryosd/m18/is1810.html. Accessed 14 January 2020.

  • Møller, Ander Damgaard, Kurt Rasmussen, and Kent Jacob Nielsen. 2016. Learning and Feedback from the Danish Patient Safety Incident Reporting System Can Be Improved. Danish Medical Journal 63 (6): 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murakami, Yōichirō. 1998. Anzen-gaku [Safety Studies]. Tokyo: Seidosha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale, Graham, E. Jane Chapman, Jonathan Hoare, and Sisse Olsen. 2006. Recognising Adverse Events and Critical Incidents in Medical Practice in a District General Hospital. Clinical Medicine 6 (2): 157–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, Paul. 2001. The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reason, James. [1997] 2016. Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runciman, William Ben, and Jerry Moller. 2001. Iatrogenic Injury in Australia. Adelaide: Australian Patient Safety Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanne, Johan M. 2008. Incident Reporting or Storytelling? Competing Schemes in a Safety-Critical and Hazardous Work Setting. Safety Science 46 (8): 1205–1222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slawomirski, Luke, Ane Auraaen, and Niek Klazinga. 2017. The Economics of Patient Safety–Strengthening a Value-Based Approach to Reducing Patient Harm at National Level. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/fileadmin/Dateien/3_Downloads/P/Patientensicherheit/The_Economics_of_patient_safety_Web.pdf. Accessed 14 January 2020.

  • Stemn, Eric, Carmel Bofinger, David Cliff, and Maureen E. Hassall. 2018. Failure to Learn from Safety Incidents: Status, Challenges and Opportunities. Safety Science 101: 313–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tahara, Katsushi. 2007. Shinryō kōi ni kanren shita shibō no chōsa bunseki moderu jigyō ni tsuite [Concerning the Model Programme for Investigation of Unnatural Deaths Related to Medical Treatment]. In Seimei rinri to hō II [Bioethics and Law II], ed. Higuchi, Norio, and Futoshi Iwata, 96–111. Tokyo: Kōbundō.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takaku, Reo, and Shun-ichiro Bessho. 2018. Political Cycles in Physician Employment: A Case of Japanese Local Public Hospitals. Social Science and Medicine 216: 97–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, Ken’ichi. 1996. The Kobe Earthquake: The System Response. A Disaster Report from Japan. European Journal of Emergency Medicine: Official Journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine 3 (4): 263–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taneda, Ken’ichiro. 2005. The Sarin Nerve Gas Attack on the Tokyo Subway System: Hospital Response to Mass Casualties and Psychological Issues in Hospital Planning. Traumatology 11 (2): 75–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taneda, Ken’ichiro. 2019. Patient Safety: History and Recent Updates in Japan. Journal of the National Institute of Public Health 68 (1): 55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Schaaf, Tjerk, and Linda Wright. 2005. Systems for Near Miss Reporting and Analysis. In Evaluation of Human Work (3rd ed.), ed. Wilson, John R., and Nigel Corlett, 877–900. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waring, Justin J. 2005. Beyond Blame: Cultural Barriers to Medical Incident Reporting. Social Science and Medicine 60 (9): 1927–1935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (World Health Organization). n.d. Regional Office for Europe. http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/Health-systems/patient-safety. Accessed 24 April 2020.

List of Interviews

  • Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • AC (Interview ID), Safety Manager in an acute care hospital, 10 January 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • MH (Interview ID), Safety Manager in a mental health hospital, 26 December 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • TH (Interview ID), Director of Patient Safety Office in a teaching hospital, 22 June 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • JP (Interview ID), Representative, national incident-reporting centre, 22 June 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  • DK1 (Interview ID), Representative, non-governmental body for the promotion of patient safety, 5 July 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • DK2 (Interview ID), Representative, national incident-reporting centre, 7 July 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • DK3 (Interview ID), Researcher in patient safety, 30 August 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • DE1 (Interview ID), Safety Manager, university hospital, 21 July 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • DE2 (Interview ID), Manager, region-based incident-reporting centre, 11 September 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ireland

    Google Scholar 

  • IE1 (Interview ID), Government official in charge of patient safety policy, 25 January 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • IE2 (Interview ID), Researcher in patient safety, 20 February 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • IE3 (Interview ID), Representative, state-funded regulator in charge of quality and standards of care, 15 March 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • IE4 (Interview ID), Representative, state-funded regulator in charge of incident reporting, 12 May 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • NE1 (Interview ID), Representative, third-party national regulator in charge of patient safety and incident data, 1 March 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • NE2 (Interview ID), Researcher in patient safety, 16 March 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • NE3 (Interview ID), Safety Manager/doctor in university hospital, 15 September 2017.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Social Policy, Social Work and Social Justice, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

    Naonori Kodate

  2. Department of International Health and Collaboration/Department of Health and Welfare Services, National Institute of Public Health, Wako, Japan

    Ken’ichiro Taneda

  3. Graduate School of Nursing, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan

    Akiyo Yumoto

  4. Technology Division, Paramount Bed Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan

    Yoshiko Sugiyama

Authors
  1. Naonori Kodate
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ken’ichiro Taneda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Akiyo Yumoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yoshiko Sugiyama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naonori Kodate .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. German Institute for Japanese Studies (DIJ), Tokyo, Japan

    Susanne Brucksch

  2. Center for Medical Education, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan

    Kaori Sasaki

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kodate, N., Taneda, K., Yumoto, A., Sugiyama, Y. (2021). The Role of Incident-Reporting Systems in Improving Patient Safety in Japanese Hospitals: A Comparative Perspective. In: Brucksch, S., Sasaki, K. (eds) Humans and Devices in Medical Contexts. Health, Technology and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6280-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6280-2_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-33-6279-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-33-6280-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation