Abstract

The quality of instructional design in teaching and learning of mathematics has been one of the major challenges and concerns of educators in any higher educational settings. Recognizing the eloquence of the factors affecting math achievement is particularly important for making the best design decisions. This study, utilizing a mix-method approach among 370 randomly selected students (from which 18 were selected for the interviews), was conducted to identify the factors affecting the math achievement of students involved in a college preparatory diploma program where we seek to answer the fundamental question “Is this Mathematics program working?” First, the findings poignantly revealed that students faced great difficulty in the fundamentals of arithmetic and pre algebra. Secondly, majority of the students encountered difficulties in solving word problems as compared to numerical problems in the Mathematics Achievement test. Thirdly, attitude towards mathematics was not an indicator in the seminal determination of student’s achievement in mathematics. Finally, the usage and over reliance of calculators among the students plays a role in inhibiting their development of the fundamentals of mathematics learning. In general, the findings surmise that this Mathematics preparatory program specially tailored for students on their pursuit towards diploma courses “is not working” as one would hope so. These students have significant gaps in their mathematical knowledge and it will become incomprehensible for them to move forward. Our concern is that this will inevitably lead to lowering the standards of our graduates for them to be successful. We need to improve the current mathematics program design but one need to note that there are no quick fixes for it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 160.49
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 213.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 213.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken, L. R. (1974). Two scales of attitude toward mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 5, 67–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, L. R. (1976). Update on attitudes and other affective variables in learning mathematics. Review of Educational Research, 46, 293–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andaya, O. (2014). Factors that affect mathematics achievement of students of Philippines Normal University. Journal of Arts Science & Commerce, 5(4), 83–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeffer, A. (2013). Algebraic symbolism as a conceptual barrier in learning mathematics. In I. Maitre (Ed.), Innovation and exemplary practices in mathematics education (pp. 2–10). Thailand: Center for research in mathematics education, Khon Kaen Univesity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, H. L., & Idris, N. (2006). Assessing algebraic solving ability of Form Four students. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 1(1), 55–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmjit, S. (2009). Variation in First Year College Students’ understanding on their conceptions of and approaches to solving mathematical problems. Asian Journal for University Learning and Teaching, 5(1), 95–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmjit, S., & Hoon, T. S. (2012). Gender differences in number sense and mental computations among secondary school students. In A. L. White & Ui Hock Cheah (Eds.), Transforming school mathematics education in the 21st century (pp. 282–297). Penang: Regional Center for Education in Science and Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmjit, S., & White, A. (2006). Unpacking first year university students’ mathematical content knowledge through problem solving. Asian Journal of University Education, 1(1), 33–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plunkett, S. (1979). Decomposition and all that rot. Mathematics in School, 8(3), 2–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, G. R., Mazzocco, M. M., & Ansari, D. (2013, January 2). Single digit arithmetic predicts high school math scores. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33(1), 156–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, C., & Marrongelle, K. (2006). Pedagogical content tools: Integrating student reasoning and mathematics into instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37, 388–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saritas, T., & Akdemer, O. (2009). Identifying factors affecting the mathematics achievement of students for better instructional design. Retrieved November 9, 2014, from website: http://www.itdi.org./Journal/article.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffee, L. P. (1994). Children’s multiplying scheme. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 3–39). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suydam, M. N. (1984). Attitudes toward mathematics. Arithmetic Teacher, 32, 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yee, L. S. (2010). Mathematics attitudes and achievement of Junior College Students in Singapore. In Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, 33rd, Freemantle, Western Australia, 3–7 July 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Highest gratitude and thanks to all that are involved directly or indirectly that have gave their all to ensure the success and completion of this research. First of all, special thanks to Tan Sri Dato’ Prof. Ir. Dr. Sahol Hamid Abu Bakar, the Vice Chancellor of Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) for graciously putting great trust into this research team and for giving the opportunity and financial support that has made this study possible. Secondly, our humble gratitude to the Research Management Institute (RMI) of Universiti Teknologi MARA for guiding and providing us support all the way towards the completion of this research. Thirdly, thanks to the Rectors of the UiTM Campuses of Lendu, Jengka and Kuala Pilah for granting us the permission to conduct this research in the campuses. Deep appreciation to the students, their instructors and coordinators who have kindly accommodated us in the administration of the test and interview schedules. This study would not have been possible without their participation and response. Finally, a large amount of gratitude to all researchers, research assistants, the Faculty of Education, Prof. Dr. Mohd Mustafa Mohd Ghazali, the Dean of the Faculty of Education and everyone who had greatly contributed to the completion of this research. A big thank you and May God bless all of you.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Parmjit Singh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this paper

Cite this paper

Singh, P., Han, C.T., Nasir, N.A.M., Ramly, M.A.B., Hoon, T.S. (2016). Factors Contributing to Students’ Poor Performance in a Mathematics Preparatory Program. In: Fook, C., Sidhu, G., Narasuman, S., Fong, L., Abdul Rahman, S. (eds) 7th International Conference on University Learning and Teaching (InCULT 2014) Proceedings. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-664-5_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-664-5_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-287-663-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-664-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation