Abstract
Within the milieu of educational change in the twenty-first century in Aotearoa New Zealand, teachers have been asked to traverse myriad and complex transitions in their pedagogical practice and their physical environments. During times of transition and change, teachers endeavour to maintain their focus on their professional practice and simultaneously traverse a space in which they can become suspended ‘betwixt and between’ (Cook-Sather in Anthropol Educ Q 37:110–127, 2006). Known as the liminal space, both positive and negative issues can occupy it during a time of significant change. Consequently, the liminal space can have an impact on the success of any change initiative as teachers individually and collectively navigate such processes. This chapter discusses the findings of a small scale study that explored the experiences of junior school primary teachers as they moved from their single cell classrooms into two newly constructed innovative learning environments. Responses to a survey comprising a variety of Likert-type and open-ended questions guided the subsequent semi-structured interviews with purposively selected teacher participants. Thematic analysis highlighted that the main occupiers of teachers’ liminal space as they navigated transition and change were the pedagogical practice implications; professional conversations; collegial relationships; and, vision for the innovative learning environment. We subsequently identified seven pragmatic preparations which could support teachers’ transition from single celled practices to practices associated with an innovative learning environment, by hel** teachers prepare to make productive use of their liminal space. The study’s findings led to our contention that teachers should be supported to develop their knowledge and understanding of the liminal space as they anticipate moving to an innovative learning environment. Our belief is that when teachers are able to use the liminal space productively and creatively, they are more likely to embrace change and contribute positively to it.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agee, J. (2009). Develo** qualitative research questions: A reflective process. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 22(4), 431–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390902736512
Alterator, S., & Deed, C. (2013). Teacher adaptation to open learning spaces. Issues in Educational Research, 23(3), 315–330. https://www.iier.org.au/iier23/alterator.html
Arenstein, S. (2018). 13 P.R. pros reveal their best practices for internal communications during times of change. PR News Online. https://www.prnewsonline.com/issue/july-2018
Barnard, M. (2019). Exploring teachers’ liminal space in anticipation of imminent educational change. (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Waikato.
Baruch, Y. (2003). Career systems in transition: A normative model for career practices. Personnel Review, 32(2), 231–251. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480310460234
Beckhard, R., & Harris, R. (1987). Organizational transitions: Managing complex change (2nd ed.). Addison-Wesley.
Benade, L. (2017a). Being a teacher in the twenty-first century: A critical New Zealand research study. Springer.
Benade, L. (2017b). The evolution of policy: A critical examination of school property under the National-led Government. Waikato Journal of Education, 22(1), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.15663/wje.v22i1.558
Benade, L. (2017c). More than bricks and mortar: A critical examination of school property under the National-led Government. https://nzareblog.wordpress.com/2017/09/06/school-property-national/
Benade, L. (2017d). Is the classroom obsolete in the twenty-first century? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49(8), 796–807. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1269631
Bolstad, R., Gilbert, J., McDowall, S., Bull, A., Boyd, S., & Hipkins, R. (2012). Supporting future-oriented learning and teaching—A New Zealand perspective. Crown. https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/109317/994_Future-oriented-07062012.pdf
Borko, H., & Putnam, R. T. (1995). Expanding teacher’s knowledge base: A cognitive psychological perspective on professional development. In T. R. Guskey & A. M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education (pp. 35–65). Teachers College Press.
Boone, H., & Boone, D. (2012). Analysing Likert data. Journal of Extension, 50(2), article 2TOT2. https://www.joe.org/joe/2012april/pdf/JOE_v50_2tt2.pdf
Bradbeer, C. (2016). Working together in the space-between: Pedagogy, learning environment and teacher collaboration. In W. Imms, B. Cleveland, & K. Fisher (Eds.), Evaluating learning environments: Snapshots of emerging issues, methods and knowledge. Sense.
Bridges, W. (1995). Managing transitions: Making the most of change. Addison-Wesley.
Bridges, W. (2006). Getting them through the wilderness. https://wmbridges.com/featured/articles/getting-them-through-wilderness
Bunker, K. (2008). Responses to change: Hel** people manage transitions. Centre for Creative Leadership.
Chand, S. (2015). Leadership pain. The classroom for growth. Thomas Nelson.
Charteris, J., & Smardon, D. (2018). “Professional learning on steroids”: Implications for teacher learning through spatialised practice in new generation learning environments. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(12), 76–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2018.1469114
Charteris, J., Smardon, D., & Nelson, E. (2016). Innovative learning environments and discourses of leadership: Is physical change out of step with pedagogical development? Journal of Educational Leadership, Policy and Practice, 31(1), 33–47. https://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=638624901129144;res=IELHSS. ISSN:1178-8690.
Chenail, R. (2011a). Interviewing the investigator: Strategies for addressing instrumentation and researcher bias concerns in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 16(1), 255–262. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol16/iss1/16
Chenail, R. (2011b). Ten steps for conceptualising and conducting qualitative research studies in a pragmatically curious manner. The Qualitative Report, 16(6), 1713–1730. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol16/iss6/13
Cochran-Smith, M. (2015). A tale of two teachers: Learning to teach over time. Learning Landscapes, 8(2), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.36510/learnland.v8i2.699
Coenders, F., Terlouw, C., & Dijkstra, S. (2008). Assessing teachers’ beliefs to facilitate the transition to a new chemistry curriculum: What do the teachers want? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(4), 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-008-9096-5
Cook-Sather, A. (2006). Newly betwixt and between: Revising liminality in the context of a teacher preparation program. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 37(2), 110–127. https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.2006.37.2.110
Core Education. (2020). Te poukapa taiao ako auaha. Innovative learning matrix. https://core-ed.org/assets/Uploads/ILE-Matrix.pdf
Cox, R. D. (2012). Teaching qualitative research to practitioner–researchers. Theory into Practice, 51(2), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2012.662868
Cross, S., & Markus, H. (1991). Possible selves across the life span. Human Development, 34(4), 230–255. https://doi.org/10.1159/000277058
Czarniawska, B. (2005). Karl Weick: Concepts, style and reflection. The Sociological Review, 53(s1), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00554.x
Denning, S. (2015). How to make the whole organization agile. Strategy & Leadership, 43(6), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/SL-09-2015-0074
Dovey, K., & Fisher, K. (2014). Designing for adaptation: The school as socio-spatial assemblage. The Journal of Architecture, 19(1), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2014.882376
Dwyer, C. S., & Buckle, J. L. (2009). The space between: On being an insider-outsider in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800105
Dweck, C. S., & Molden, D. C. (2017). Mindsets: Their impact on competence motivation and acquisition. In A. Elliot, C. Dweck, & D. Yeager (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation: Theory and application (2nd ed.). Guilford.
Education Review Office. (2018). Leading innovative learning in New Zealand schools. Ministry of Education. http://www.ero.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/Leading-Innovative-Learning-in-Schools-2018.pdf
Elrod, P., & Tippett, D. (2002). The “death valley” of change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 15(3), 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810210429309
Errington, E. (2004). The impact of teacher beliefs on flexible learning innovation: Some practices and possibilities for academic developers. Innovations in Education and Teaching, International, 41(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/1470329032000172702
Ferguson, M. (2001). Managing change and transition; An overview. Centre for Excellence in Learning.
Field, J., & Lynch, H. (2015). Getting stuck, becoming unstuck: Agency, identity and transitions between learning contexts. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 21(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.7227/JACE.21.1.2
Fisher, J. M. (2005). A time for change? Human Resource Development International, 8(2), 257–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678860500100665
Fisher, J. (2012). The process of transition. https://www.csu.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/949533/fisher-transition-curve-2012.pdf
Fisher, K. (2004). Placemaking practice: Transforming classrooms from the inside out - the critical role of spatial literacy. https://minervaaccess.unimelb.edu.au/handle/11343/191736
Fleming, J. (2018). Recognizing and resolving the challenges of being an insider researcher in work-integrated learning. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 19(3), 311–320. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1196753.pdf
Fletsch, R. J. (2011). Transitions and changes: Who copes well? https://extension.colostate.edu/topic-areas/family-home-consumer/transitions-and-changes-who-copes-well-10-215/
Franks, A., & Meteyard, J. (2007). Liminality: The transforming grace of in-between places. Journal of Pastoral Care & Counseling, 61(3), 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/154230500706100306
Fullan, M. (1993). Why teachers must become change agents. Educational Leadership, 50(6), 1–13. http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/mar93/vol50/num06/Why-Teachers-Must-Become-Change-Agents.aspx
Fullan, M. (2002). The change leader. Educational Leadership, 59(8), 16–20. ERIC EJ644975.
Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.
Geertz, C. (2012). Available light: Anthropological reflections on philosophical topics. Princeton University Press.
Gieryn, T.F. (2000). A space for place in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology 26, 463–496. Open Access.
Giles, D., & Bills, A. (2017). Designing and using an organisational culture inquiry tool to glimpse the relational nature of leadership and organisational culture within a South Australian primary school. School Leadership & Management, 37(2), 120–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2017.1293637
Greyling, J. (2006). Managing people through transition and change. Accountancy SA, 22–23. http://ezproxy.waikato.ac.nz/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezproxy.waikato.ac.nz/docview/215228590?accountid=17287
Guerrero, J. M., Teng-Calleja, M., & Hechanova, M. R. M. (2018). Implicit change leadership schemas, perceived effective change management, and teachers’ commitment to change in secondary schools in the Philippines. Asia Pacific Education Review, 19(3), 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9545-6
Guilford, J. P. (1965). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. McGraw-Hill.
Guthrie, G. (2011). The progressive education fallacy in develo** countries. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1851-7_4
Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (1987). Change in schools. State University of New York Press.
Hargreaves, A. (2000). Four ages of professionalism and professional learning. Teachers and Teaching, 6(2), 151–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/713698714
Hargreaves, A., Lieberman, A., Fullan, M., & Hopkins, D. (1998). International handbook of educational change. Kluwer.
Hipkins, R., Whatman, J., & Felgate, R. (2017). Exploring the impact of the teaching and learning research initiative (TLRI). NZCER.
Hopson, B. (1982). Transition: Understanding and managing personal change. In A. J. Chapman & A. Gale (Eds.), Psychology and people: A tutorial text (pp. 120–145). Macmillan.
Ibarra, H., & Obodaru, O. (2016). Betwixt and between identities: Liminal experience in contemporary careers. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 36, 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.11.003
Institute for Education Leadership. (2014). Exploring five core leadership capacities: Promoting collaborative learning cultures—Putting the promise into practice. Ministry of Education.
Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. (2015). Likert scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 7(4), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975
Kay, M. R. (Fall, 2019). Demystifying the “safe space”. American Educator, 31–34. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1231891.pdf
Keavney, G., & Sinclair, K. E. (1978). Teacher concerns and teacher anxiety: A neglected topic of classroom research. Review of Educational Research, 48(2), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170085
La Due, S. (2016). Change management: Change vs. transition. http://knowlton-group.com/change-management-change-vs-transition
Lancer, N., Clutterbuck, D., & Megginson, D. (2016). Techniques for coaching and mentoring (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Land, R. (2016). Toil and trouble. In R. Land & J. F. Meyer (Eds.). Threshold concepts in practice (educational futures, rethinking theory and practice). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.
Langenberg, S., & Wesseling, H. (2016). Making sense of Weick’s organising: A philosophical exploration. Philosophy of Management, 15, 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-016-0040-z
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Blackwell Publishing.
Le Fevre, D. M. (2014). Barriers to implementing pedagogical change: The role of teachers’ perceptions of risk. Teaching and Teacher Education, 38, 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.11.007
Lock, J. V. (2006). A new image: Online communities to facilitate teacher professional development. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(4), 663–678. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/21030/
Menter, I., Elliot, D., Hulme, M., Lewin, J., & Lowden, K. (2011). A guide to practitioner research in education. Sage.
Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education, 49(3), 373–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6779
Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2006). Overcoming barriers to student understanding. Routledge.
Ministry of Education. (2011). The New Zealand school property strategy 2011–2021. Ministry of Education.
Ministry of Education. (2015). The Ministry of Education four year plan 2015–2019: Better education for New Zealand. Ministry of Education. https://www.education.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Ministry/Publications/MOE-Four-Year-Plan-2015-2019.pdf
Ministry of Education. (2016). Designing schools in New Zealand. Requirements and guidelines. Ministry of Education. https://www.education.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Primary-Secondary/Property/Design/Design-guidance/DSNZ-version-1-0-20151014.pdf
Morrison, M., & Ferrier-Kerr, J. (2015). Mentoring as a navigational change compass: Attending to the personal transition process. In C. Murphy & K. Thornton (Eds.), Mentoring in early childhood education: A compilation of thinking, pedagogy and practice (pp. 263–278). NZCER.
Mulcahy, D., Cleveland, B., & Aberton, H. (2015). Learning spaces and pedagogic change: Envisioned, enacted and experienced. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2015.1055128
OECD. (2013). Innovative learning environments. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264203488-en
OECD. (2017). OECD handbook for innovative learning environments. https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/the-oecd-handbook-for-innovative-learning-environments_9789264277274-en#page1
Osborne. (2016). Innovative learning environments. CORE Education. https://core-ed.org/assets/PDFs/Innovative-Learning-Environments.pdf
Pajares, F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B., & Hardy, C. (2004). Discourse and institutions. The Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 635–652. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159075
Piras, C. (2018). Change management: Putting the change and transition curve model into action. The Piras Group. https://www.thepirasgroup.com/blog/change-management-putting-the-change-and-transition-curve-model-into-action
Piro, J. S., & O’Callaghan, C. (2018). Journeying towards the profession: Exploring liminal learning within mixed reality simulations. Action in Teacher Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2018.1534221
Poggenpoel, M., & Myburgh, C. (2003). The researcher as research instrument in educational research: A possible threat to trustworthiness? Education, 124(2), 418–421.
Quick, S., Fletsch, R. J., & Rupured, M. (2011). Transitions and changes: Practical strategies. https://extension.colostate.edu/docs/pubs/consumer/10214.pdf
Rantatalo, O., & Lindberg, O. (2018). Liminal practice and reflection in professional education: Police education and medical education. Studies in Continuing Education, 40(3), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2018.1447918
Rattray, J. (2016). Affective dimensions of liminality. In R. Land, J. F. Meyer, & M. T. Flanagan (Eds.), Threshold concepts in practice (Educational futures, rethinking theory and practice). Sense.
Reinsfield, E. (2018a). The potential for a future-focused curriculum in New Zealand: The perceptions and practice of six secondary school technology teachers. [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. University of Waikato. https://hdl.handle.net/10289/11939
Reinsfield, E. (2018b). The uncertainty of a future-focused curriculum in New Zealand: The perceptions and practice of six secondary school technology teachers. Australasian Journal of Technology Education, 5, 2–19. https://doi.org/10.15663/ajte.v5i0.54
Retallick, J., & Fink, D. (2002). Framing leadership: Contributions and impediments to educational change. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 5(2), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603120110112864
Rohr, R. (1999). Everything belongs: The gift of contemplative prayer. Crossroad Publishing.
Saif, N., Razzaq, N., Rehman, S. U., Javed, A., & Ahmad, B. (2013). The concept of change management in today’s business world. Information and Knowledge Management, 3(6), 28–34. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1010.968&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Shortt, H. (2015). Liminality, space and the importance of ‘transitory dwelling places’ at work. Human Relations, 68(4), 633–658. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872671453693
Skogland, M. (2017). A spatial approach to transformational change. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 19(4), 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-09-2016-0030
Smull, M. (1996). Three approaches to a conversation. http://www.nwtdt.com/Archive/pcp/conversations.html
Taylor, P. (1995). Doing reflective practitioner research in arts education. In P. Taylor (Ed.), Researching drama and arts education (pp. 30–57). Griffith University.
Tempest, S., & Starkey, K. (2004). The effects of liminality on individual and organizational learning. Organization Studies, 25(4), 507–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840604040674
Turner, V. (1967). The forest of symbols: Aspects of Ndembu ritual. Cornell University Press.
van Gennep, A. (1977). The rites of passage (Paperback ed.). Redwood Burn.
Vince, R., & Martin, L. (1993). Inside action learning: An exploration of the psychology and politics of the action learning model. Management Education and Development, 24(3), 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/135050769302400308
Weick, K., & Quinn, R. (1999). Organizational change and development. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 361–386. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.361
Wells, A. W. J. (2018). Innovative learning environments as agents of teaching and learning. [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Auckland University of Technology. https://openrepository.aut.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10292/12058/WellsAWJ.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y
Whiteley, A. (2012). Supervisory conversations on rigour and interpretive research. Qualitative Research Journal, 12(2), 251–271. https://doi.org/10.1108/14439881211248383
Woolner, P., McCarter, S., Wall, K., & Higgins, S. (2012). Changed learning through changed space: When can a participatory approach to the learning environment challenge preconceptions and alter practice? Improving Schools, 15(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480211434796
Wooten, K. C. (2008). Ethical issues facing O.D. in new paradigm organizations: Back to the future. Organization Development Journal, 26(4), 11–23.
World Economic Forum. (2016). New vision for education: Fostering social and emotional learning through technology. Boston Consulting Group. https://www.bcg.com/Images/How-Education-Technology-Can-Foster-Social-Emotional-Skills-Mar-2016_tcm87-61303.pdf
Wright, N. (2018a). Becoming an innovative learning environment: The making of a New Zealand secondary school. Springer.
Wright, N. (2018b). What happens when a teacher shifts from an innovative school to a traditional school? https://nzareblog.wordpress.com/2018/10/04/teacher-shifts/
Zimmerman, J. (2006). Why some teachers resist change and what principals can do about it. NASSP Bulletin, 90(3), 238–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192636506291521
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barnard, M., Ferrier-Kerr, J. (2021). Moving to an Innovative Learning Environment: Exploring Teachers’ Liminal Space. In: Wright, N., Khoo, E. (eds) Pedagogy and Partnerships in Innovative Learning Environments. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5711-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5711-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-5710-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-5711-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)