Abstract
With a pure exchange economy and its Walrasian equilibrium formalized as a distribution on the space of consumer characteristics, Mas-Colell (J Math Econ 2:263–296, 1975) showed the existence of equilibrium in a pure exchange economy with differentiated and indivisible commodities. We present a variant of Mas-Colell’s theorem; but more than for its own sake, we use it to expose and illustrate recent techniques due to Keisler-Sun (Adv Math 221:1584–1607, 2009), as developed in Khan-Rath-Yu-Zhang (On the equivalence of large individualized and distributionalized games. Johns Hopkins University, mimeo, 2015), to translate a result on a large distributionalized economy (LDE) to a large individualized economy (LIE), when the former can be represented by a saturated or super-atomless measure space of consumers, as formalized in Keisler-Sun (Adv Math 221:1584–1607, 2009) and Podczeck (J Math Econ 44:836–852, 2008) respectively. This also leads us to identify, hitherto unnoticed, open problems concerning symmetrization of distributionalized equilibria of economies in their distributionalized formulations. In relating our result to the antecedent literature, we bring into salience the notions of (i)“overriding desirability of the indivisible commodity,” as in Hicks (A revision of demand theory. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1956), Mas-Colell (J Econ Theory 16:443–456, 1977) and Yamazaki (Econometrica 46:541–555, 1978; Econometrica 49:639–654, 1981), and of (ii) “bounded marginal rates of substitution,” as in Jones (J Math Econ 12:119–138, 1983; Econometrica 52:507–530, 1984) and Ostroy-Zame (Econometrica 62:593–633, 1994). Our work also relies heavily on the technical notion of Gelfand integration.
JEL Classification: D51
This research is supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (No. 15K03362, Suzuki) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan. This work is part of a joint project on “General Equilibrium Theory with a Saturated Space of Consumers” with Nobusumi Sagara of Hosei University; the authors thank him for all his input in this paper, and express their regret that he did not think it enough to accept co-authorship. A preliminary version was prepared when Khan was visiting the Shanghai University of Finance and Economics (SHUFE), and he thanks Haomiao Yu and Yongchao Zhang for stimulating conversation and encouragement. This final version has benefited substantially from an anonymous referee’s emphasis on the need for replacing the assumption of overriding desirability of “every homogeneous commodity” to a single money-like commodity; and the Editor’s insistence that the authors take a stand on reporting the work as a technical note for a narrow specialized readership or as an expository essay for a general audience.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
One may also mention here that Kolm [45, p. 711] writes, “Adding time constraint to budget constraint was done by Jacques Lesourne before rediscovery by Gary Becker, and the resulting cost of time was applied by others to the optimization of public transportation networks.”
- 2.
- 3.
Mas-Colell sights here the work of Dierker, Henry and Broome. This work found subsequent extension in [50] and in [44], building on the work of Yamazaki on non-convex consumption sets, and the papers of Khan-Rashid, and Anderson-Khan-Rashid. Since this work is not relevant to the theorem presented here, we do not burden our bibliography with it, and send the reader to [3, 4].
- 4.
See Chapter V. In Mas-Colell [50], an explicit connection is made to McKenzie’s [55] paper which follows Hicks. Mas-Colell writes, “In particular, we postulate that some commodities are perfectly divisible (for simplicity, just one) and we argue that this hypothesis, besides being reasonable, is a sine qua non; see McKenzie [55].” For the relation between Hicks and McKenzie, see Khan-Schlee [40].
- 5.
- 6.
As for the erasure of the production sector, it has two consequence for our expository re-visitation of Mas-Colell’s model. First, we are forced to ignore the rich strand of the literature associated with Hotelling [27], Hart, Dixit-Stiglitz and their followers on optimum product diversity under monopolistic competition. Secondly, we are also led to ignore the rich literature on production externalities and the convergence of Nash equilibria to Walrasian equilibria; on this see the work of Hart, Pascoa and others, and including that of Mas-Colell himself; see [17, 51, 53] for the latter. To be sure, subsequent work extended the results to economies with production; see, for example [13, 19, 24, 60, 61, 74] among others.
- 7.
Note that it is the equivalence theorem that already necessitates a continuum; the fact that indivisible commodities potentially disturb the upper hemi-continuity of the individual demand correspondence requires additional assumptions that guarantee the “regularizing effect” of the total demand; see the example in [50] and reproduced in [44] to motivate their results. We return to this issue in Sect. 3.2 below.
- 8.
- 9.
We remind the reader that Jones [30] is concerned with an economy with a finite number of consumers.
- 10.
It is also well known that models with a continuum of consumers and an infinite-dimensional commodity face mathematically formidable problems. These arise from the notorious failure of technical propositions such as Fatou’s lemma or Lyapunov’s theorem. We bypass these problems in the present paper. For the technical details, as well as their resolution, of these problems, we cite [39] and references in them.
- 11.
See Lemma 2.1 in [31], reproduced as Fact 5 in the Appendix below. This technique can be applied to other work; as for example, the papers of Suzuki [75–77] which study economies with both indivisible and indivisible commodities in the space \(\ell^{\infty },\) and also with and without production. This work relies on “irreducibility” assumptions on the economy and assumes that the individual endowments are in the interior of the consumption set, and we note that the techniques of this paper will also work in these settings. However, note that we are limiting ourselves to a pure exchange economy, and thereby bracketing consideration of Jones’ [30] theorem on existence of equilibrium for a “private ownership economy” with a finite number of consumers and producers. The reader is also referred to [48] and [61], among others.
- 12.
- 13.
The free Abelian group usually appears as a basic concept for the singular homology theory in algebraic topology; see Vick [80], for example.
- 14.
- 15.
- 16.
We eliminate the technical symbolism from Mas-Colell’s text.
- 17.
- 18.
- 19.
For a comprehensive discussion of the technical difficulties that led Milgrom-Weber to follow the approach they did, see Khan-Rath-Sun-Yu [36]. To be sure, Milgrom-Weber also presented a pure-strategy equilibrium under the hypotheses of finite actions and conditional independence of types, a variants of results presented in Radner-Rosenthal [67].
- 20.
- 21.
- 22.
In the context of Milgrom-Weber [57], it is to ask whether the equilibrium distribution on the joint space of actions and types has, its support, the graph of a function from types to actions, an individualized function for each player that dictates that he or she take the same action for each of his or own revealed type, that he or she does not randomize.
- 23.
- 24.
We have routinely modified Mas-Colell’s prose to fit the continuity of our text. It is also worth mentioning that Mas-Colell credits Walras for this idea.
- 25.
In fact, Jones did not assume that the commodity space was the product of \(\mathbb{R}^{\ell}\) and \(\mathcal{M}(K)\). But for notational consistency between the text, we keep this setting.
- 26.
- 27.
References
Arrow KJ (2005) Personal reflections on applied general equilibrium models. In: Kehoe T, Srinivasan TN, Whalley J (eds) Frontiers in applied general equilibrium modeling. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Arrow KJ, Hahn FH (1971) General competitive analysis. Holden-Day, San Francisco
Anderson RM (1991) Non-standard analysis with applications to economics. In: Hildenbrand W, Sonnenschein H (eds) Handbook of mathematical economics, vol 4. North-Holland, New York, pp 2145–2208
Anderson RM (1992) The core in perfectly competitive economies. In: Aumann RJ, Hart S (eds) Handbook of game theory, vol 1. North-Holland, New York, pp 413–457
Aumann RJ (1964) Markets with a continuum of traders. Econometrica 32:39–50
Aumann RJ (1966) Existence of competitive equilibria in markets with a continuum of traders. Econometrica 34:1–17
Becker GS (1965) A theory of the allocation of time. Econ J 75:493–517
Becker GS (1981) A treatise on the family, Enlarged edn. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Bewley TF (1972) Existence of equilibria in economies with infinitely many commodities. J Econ Theory 4:514–540
Bewley TF (1991) A very weak theorem on the existence of equilibria in atomless economies with infinitely many commodities. In: Khan MA, Yannelis N (eds) Equilibrium theory in infinite dimensional spaces. Springer, Berlin/New York, pp 74–101
Brown DJ, Robinson A (1972) A limit theorem on the cores of large standard exchange economies. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 69:1258–1260; A Correction in 69:3068
Carmona G, Podczeck K (2009) On the existence of pure-strategy equilibria in large games. J Econ Theory 144:1300–1319
Castaneda MA, Marton J (2008) A model of commodity differentiation with indivisibilities and production. Econ Theory 34:85–106
Chamberlin EH (1956) The theory of monopolistic competition, 8th edn. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Debreu, G. (1959) Theory of value. Wiley, New York
Diestel J, Uhl JJ Jr (1977) Vector measures. Mathematical surveys and monographs, vol 15. American Mathematical Society, Providence
Dubey P, Mas-Colell A, Shubik M (1980) Efficiency properties of strategic market games: an axiomatic approach. J Econ Theory 22:339–362
Forges F, Heifetz A, Minelli E (2001) Incentive compatible core and competitive equilibria in differential information economies. Econ Theory 18:349–365
Fradera I (1986) Perfect competition with product differentiation. Int Econ Rev 27:529–538
Gorman WM (1956) The demand for related goods: a possible procedure for analysing quality differentials in the egg market. Journal Paper No. 2319, Iowa Agricultural Experiment Station, Nov 1956; Reprinted in Rev Econ Stud 47:843–856 (1980)
Hart OD (1979) Monopolistic competition in a large economy with differentiated commodities. Rev Econ Stud 46:1–30
Hart S, Hildenbrand W, Kohlberg E (1974) On equilibrium allocations as distributions on the commodity space. J Math Econ 1:159–166
Hart S, Kohlberg E (1974) On equally distributed correspondences. J Math Econ 1:167–174
Hervés-Beloso C, Moreno-García E, Páscoa MR (1999) Manipulation-proof equilibrium in atomless economies with commodity differentiation. Econ Theory 14:545–563
Hicks JR (1956) A revision of demand theory. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Hildenbrand W (1974) Core and equilibria of a large economy. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Hotelling H (1929) Stability in competition. Econ J 39:41–57
Houthakker H (1952) Compensated changes in quantities and qualities consumed. Rev Econ Stud 19:155–164
Jones L (1983) Existence of equilibria with infinitely many consumers and infinitely many commodities. J Math Econ 12:119–138
Jones L (1984) A competitive model of commodity differentiation. Econometrica 52:507–530
Keisler HJ, Sun YN (2009) Why saturated probability spaces are necessary. Adv Math 221:1584–1607
Khan MA (1985) On the integration of set-valued map**s in a non-reflexive Banach space. Simon Stevin 59:257–267
Khan MA (1989) On Cournot-Nash equilibrium distributions for games with a nonmetrizable action space and upper semicontinuous payoffs. Trans Am Math Soc 315:127–146
Khan MA (2008) Perfect competition. In: Durlauf S, Blume L (eds) The new Palgrave. Macmillan, London/New York
Khan MA (2012) La Concorrenza Perfetta come Teoria D’ellequilibrio, Chapter 25. In: Bartocci C, Odifreddie P (eds) La Matematica, vol 4. Guilio Einaudi Editore, Roma, pp 875–947
Khan MA, Rath KP, Sun YN, Yu H (2015) Strategic uncertainty and the ex-post Nash property in large games. Theor Econ 10:103–129
Khan MA, Rath KP, Yu H, Zhang Y (2013) Large distributional games with traits. Econ Lett 118:502–505
Khan MA, Rath KP, Yu H, Zhang Y (2015) On the equivalence of large individualized and distributionalized games. Johns Hopkins University, mimeo
Khan MA, Sagara N, Suzuki T (2014) On the core and equilibria of a saturated exchange economy with differentiated commodities. The Johns Hopkins University, mimeo
Khan MA, Schlee E (2015) On Lionel McKenzie’s 1957 intrusion into 20th-century demand theory. Canad J Econ (forthcoming)
Khan MA, Sun YN (1994) On large games with finite actions: a synthetic treatment. Mita J Econ 87:73–84 (in Japanese) (English translation, In: Maruyama T, Takahashi W (eds) Nonlinear and convex analysis in economic theory. Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems, vol 419. Springer, pp 149–161)
Khan MA, Sun YN (1995) Extremal structures and symmetric equilibria with countable actions. J Math Econ 24:239–248
Khan MA, Sun YN (2002) Non-cooperative games with many players. Handbook of game theory with economic applications, vol 3. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 1761–1808
Khan MA, Yamazaki A (1981) On the cores of economies with indivisible commodities and a continuum of traders. J Econ Theory 24:218–225
Kolm S (2010) History of public economics: the historical French school. Eur J Hist Econ Thought 17:687–718
Lancaster K (1966) A new approach to consumer theory. J Polit Econ 74:132–157
Loeb PA (1975) Conversion from nonstandard to standard measure spaces and applications in probability theory. Trans Am Math Soc 211:113–122
Martin-da-Rocha VF (2004) Equilibrium in large economies with differentiated commodities and non-ordered preferences. Econ Theory 23:529–552
Mas-Colell A (1975) A model of equilibrium with differentiated commodities. J Math Econ 2:263–296
Mas-Colell A (1977) Indivisible commodities and general equilibrium theory. J Econ Theory 16:443–456
Mas-Colell A (1982) Cournotian foundations of Walrasian equilibrium theory: an exposition of recent theory, Chapter 6. In: Hildenbrand W (ed) Advances in economic theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Mas-Colell A (1984) On a theorem of Schmeidler. J Math Econ 13:201–206
Mas-Colell A (1984) On the theory of perfect competition. Nancy Schwartz Memorial Lecture. Kellogg School, Northwestern University
Mas-Colell A, Vives X (1993) Implementation in economies with a continuum of agents. Rev Econ Stud 60:613–629
McKenzie LW (1956–1957) Demand theory without utility index. Rev Econ Stud 24:185–189
McKenzie LW (2002) Classical general equilibrium theory. MIT, Cambridge
Milgrom P, Weber R (1985) Distributional strategies for games with incomplete information. Math Oper Res 10:619–632
Nikaido H (1968) Convex structures and economic theory. Academic, New York
Ostroy JM, Zame W (1994) Nonatomic economies and the boundaries of perfect competition. Econometrica 62:593–633
Podczeck K (1992) General equilibrium with differentiated commodities: the linear activity model without joint production. Econ Theory 2:247–263
Podczeck K (1998) Quasi-equilibrium and equilibrium in a large production economy with differentiated commodities. In: Abramovich Y, Yannelis NC, Avgerinos E (eds) Functional analysis and economic theory. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York
Podczeck K (2008) On the convexity and compactness of the integral of a Banach space valued correspondence. J Math Econ 44:836–852
Podczeck K (2010) On existence of rich Fubini extensions. Econ Theory 45:1–22
Pollak RA (2012) Allocating time: individuals’ technologies, household technology, perfect substitutes, and specialization. Ann Econ Stat 105/106:75–97
Prescott E, Townsend R (1984) Pareto optima and competitive equilibria with adverse selection and moral hazard. Econometrica 52:21–45
Prescott E, Townsend R (1984) General competitive analysis in an economy with private information. Int Econ Rev 25:1–20
Radner R, Rosenthal R (1982) Private information and pure-strategy equilibria. Math Oper Res 7:401–409
Robinson J (1933) The economics of imperfect competition. Macmillan, London
Rosen S (1974) Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. J Polit Econ 82:34–55
Royden HW (1988) Real analysis, 3rd edn. Macmillan, London
Samuelson P (1969) The monopolistic competition revolution. In: Kuenne R (ed) Monopolistic competition theory: studies in impact. Wiley, New York
Schmeidler D (1973) Equilibrium points of non-atomic games. J Stat Phys 7:295–300
Sun YN, Zhang YC (2009) Individual risk and Lebesgue extension without aggregate uncertainty. J Econ Theory 144:432–443
Suzuki T (2000) Monopolistically competitive equilibria with differentiated commodities. Econ Theory 16:259–275
Suzuki T (2013) Core and competitive equilibria for a coalitional exchange economy with infinite time horizon. J Math Econ 49:234–244
Suzuki T (2013) Competitive equilibria of a large exchange economy on the commodity space \(\ell^{\infty }\). Adv Math Econ 17:1–19
Suzuki T (2014) A coalitional production economy with infinitely many indivisible commodities. Econ Theory Bull (in press). doi:10.1007/s40505-015-0067-7
Theil H (1952) Qualities, prices and budget enquiries. Rev Econ Stud 19:129–147
Varadarajan VS (1965) Measure on topological spaces. Mathematicheskii Sbornik 55:35–100 (in Russian) (English translation, Am Math Soc Trans Ser 2 48:161–228). Reprinted in The selected works of Varadarajan VS (1988) American Mathematical Society, Providence
Vick JW (1994) Homology theory. Springer, Berlin/New York
Vind K (1964) Edgeworth allocations in an exchange economy with many traders. Int Econ Rev 5:165–177
Yamazaki A (1978) An equilibrium existence theorem without convexity assumptions. Econometrica 46:541–555
Yamazaki A (1981) Diversified consumption characteristics and conditionally dispersed endowment distribution: regularizing effect and existence of equilibria. Econometrica 49:639–654
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
In this section, we collect some mathematical results for the readers convenience.Footnote 27 The following is easy to see from Diestel and Uhl [16], pp. 53–54.
Fact 1
If \(g: A \rightarrow ca(K)\) is weak* measurable and \(\boldsymbol{q}g(a)\) is integrable function for all \(\boldsymbol{q} \in C(K)\) , then g is Gelfand integrable.
It is easy to prove
Fact 2
Let {g n } be a sequence of Gelfand integrable functions from A to ca(K) which converges a.e. to g in the weak* topology. Then it follows that \(\int _{A}g_{n}(a)d\lambda \rightarrow \int _{A}g(a)d\lambda\) in the weak* topology.
The next fact (Alaoglu’s Theorem, Royden [70, ch. 14]) is well known.
Fact 3
Let K be a compact metric space. The weak* topology of ca(K) is separable and norm bounded subsets of ca(K) are compact and metrizable, in particular, the set of probability measures on K is compact with respect to the weak* topology.
The next fact is also well known (Fatou’s lemma in ℓ dimensions, Hildenbrand [26, p. 69]).
Fact 4
Let \((g_{n})_{n\in \mathbb{N}}\) be a sequence of integrable functions of a measure space \((A,\mathcal{A},\lambda )\) to \(\mathbb{R}_{+}^{\ell}\) . Suppose that \(\lim _{n}\int _{A}g_{n}(a)d\lambda\) exists. Then there exists an integrable function \(g: (A,\mathcal{A},\lambda ) \rightarrow \mathbb{R}_{+}^{\ell}\) such that
-
(a) g(a) ∈ Ls(g n (a)) a.e. in A
-
(b) \(\int _{A}g(a)d\lambda \leq \lim _{n\rightarrow \infty }\int _{A}g_{n}(a)d\lambda\).
Let (Y, d) be a complete separable metric space (Polish space), \((A,\mathcal{A},\lambda )\) a complete and atomless probability space and g a Borel measurable map from \((A,\mathcal{A},\lambda )\) to ca(Y ). The direct image measure \(\lambda \circ g^{-1}\) is denoted by \(g_{{\ast}}\lambda\). The operator \(_{{\ast}}\lambda\) is a map from the set of all measurable maps of A to Y which is denoted by L 0(A, Y ) to \(\mathcal{M}(Y )\) where L 0(A, Y ) is the set of all (Borel) measurable functions from A to Y with the topology of convergence in measure. Recall that if a sequence of measurable functions converges a.e., it converges in measure. We then have (Keisler and Sun [31, Lemma 2.1])
Fact 5
-
(i)
The map \(_{{\ast}}\lambda: L^{0}(A,Y ) \rightarrow \mathcal{M}(Y )\) is surjective and continuous.
-
(ii)
Let \((g_{n})_{n\in \mathbb{N}}\) be a sequences in L 0 (A,Y ) and \((h_{n})_{n\in \mathbb{N}}\) a sequences in L 0 (A,Z), where Y and Z are Polish spaces. Suppose that \(\lambda _{{\ast}}g_{n} \rightarrow \eta _{1} \in \mathcal{M}(Y )\) and \(\lambda _{{\ast}}h_{n} \rightarrow \eta _{2} \in \mathcal{M}(Z)\) . Then some sub-sequence of \(\lambda _{{\ast}}(g_{n},h_{n})\) converges (weakly) to \(\theta \in \mathcal{M}(Y \times Z)\) such that \(\theta _{Y } =\eta _{1}\) and \(\theta _{Z} =\eta _{2}\) , respectively.
The next fact reveals a striking property of the saturated space (Keisler and Sun [31, Definition 2.2]).
Fact 6
Let Z and Y are complete separable metric spaces. Then a finite measure space \((A,\mathcal{A},\lambda )\) is saturated if and only if for every measure \(\nu \in \mathcal{M}(Z \times Y )\) and measurable function \(\mathcal{E}: A \rightarrow Y\) with \(\mathcal{E}_{{\ast}}\lambda =\nu _{Y }\) , there exists a measurable function \(\xi: A \rightarrow Z\) which satisfies \((\xi,\mathcal{E})_{{\ast}}\lambda =\nu\).
Let Z be a Hausdorff topological space. We denote the set of all closed subsets of a set Z by \(\mathcal{F}(Z)\). The topology τ c on \(\mathcal{F}(Z)\) of closed convergence is a topology which is generated by the base
as C ranges over the compact subsets of Z and G i are arbitrarily finitely many open subsets of Z. It is well known that if Z is locally compact, the space \(\mathcal{F}(Z)\) is a compact metric space; see Hildenbrand [26, pp. 15–19] for details. Recall that a set \(K \subset Z\) is called \(\sigma\)-compact if it is a countable union of compact subsets of Z.
Fact 7
If F n is a sequence of closed subsets of a locally compact and \(\sigma\) -compact metric space K such that F n → F in the topology of closed convergence and μ n is a sequence of probability measures on K such that μ n ( f n ) = 1 for all n and μ n →μ, then μ( f) = 1.
Proof
The proof is similar to that of Suzuki [75, Fact 5]. □
Let {K n } be an increasing sequence of closed subsets of a compact metric space K converging to K in the topology of closed convergence. If \(\boldsymbol{q}_{n}: K_{n} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) is continuous, we will write \((K_{n},\boldsymbol{q}_{n}) \rightarrow (K,\boldsymbol{q})\) if \(\boldsymbol{q} \in C(K)\) and for every subsequence n k and \(t_{n_{k}} \in K_{n_{k}}\) with \(t_{n_{k}} \rightarrow t\), \(\boldsymbol{q}(t_{n_{k}}) \rightarrow \boldsymbol{ q}(t)\). We have from [49]
Fact 8
Let \(\{\boldsymbol{m}_{n}\}\) be a bounded sequence in ca(K) with \(support(\boldsymbol{m}_{n}) \subset K_{n}\) , and \((K_{n},\boldsymbol{q}_{n}) \rightarrow (K,\boldsymbol{q})\) . Then \(\boldsymbol{q}_{n}\boldsymbol{m}_{n} \rightarrow \boldsymbol{ q}\boldsymbol{m}\).
Let \((K_{n},\boldsymbol{q}_{n})\) be a sequence as above. We will say that it is equi-continuous if for all ε > 0 there is a δ > 0 such that for all t, s ∈ K n with d(t, s) ≤ δ, \(\vert \boldsymbol{q}_{n}(t) -\boldsymbol{ q}_{n}(s)\vert \leq \ \epsilon\). Mas-Colell [49] proved
Fact 9
Let {K n } be a sequence of closed sets of a compact metric space K with \(K_{n} \subset K_{n+1} \subset \ldots \rightarrow K\) in the topology of closed convergence and \(\{\boldsymbol{q}_{n}\}\) a sequence in C(K) with \(\|\boldsymbol{q}_{n}\| \leq \hat{ q}\) for all n and for some fixed \(\hat{q} > 0\) . If \((K_{n},\boldsymbol{q}_{n})\) is equi-continuous, then there is a subsequence n k and \(\boldsymbol{q} \in C(K)\) with \((K_{n_{k}},\boldsymbol{q}_{n_{k}}) \rightarrow (K,\boldsymbol{q})\).
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Khan, M.A., Suzuki, T. (2016). On Differentiated and Indivisible Commodities: An Expository Re-framing of Mas-Colell’s 1975 Model. In: Kusuoka, S., Maruyama, T. (eds) Advances in Mathematical Economics Volume 20. Advances in Mathematical Economics, vol 20. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0476-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0476-6_5
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0475-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0476-6
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)