Abstract
This chapter spans the time from the early days of Life Cycle Assessment—LCA (the time of the so-called ‘proto-LCAs’ between about 1970 and 1990), until recent trends of simplified/streamlined LCAs, the footprint specifications (carbon footprint, water footprint) and Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment—LCSA.
Important benchmarks along this span are the harmonisation of LCA by SETAC (Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry) and the standardisation of LCA by ISO (International Standardisation Organisation).
The basic discussions within SETAC occurred between 1990 and 1993.
The first attempt to develop a suitable LCA-structure was achieved during the SETAC workshop ‘A Technical Framework for Life Cycle Assessments’ in August 1990, held in Smugglers Notch, Vermont, USA. The LCA-structure, the famous ‘SETAC triangle’, consisted of three components: Inventory—Impact Analysis—Improvement Analysis.
SETAC revised the framework during the Sesimbra workshop in 1993. It was the merit of SETAC to initiate a standardisation process which culminated in the ‘Guidelines for Life-Cycle Assessment: A Code of Practice’. The LCA-structure, again a triangle, now included four components: Goal Definition and Sco**—Inventory Analysis—Impact Assessment—Improvement Assessment.
This structure was only slightly modified by the ISO standardisation process: The fourth phase ‘Improvement Assessment’ (formerly ‘Improvement Analysis’) was replaced by ‘Interpretation’.
After the harmonisation of LCA by SETAC, the International Standardisation Process was soon initiated (Autumn 1993 in Paris), but it took seven years for the first series of LCA standards to be published (ISO 14040, ISO 14041, ISO 14042, ISO 14043).
The successful first series of ISO LCA standards superseded the SETAC ‘Code of Practice’, the Nordic guidelines and several national standards and became the uncontested model of an environmental life cycle standard. The series 14040 ff was revised once and condensed into two standards 14040 and 14044 (2006).
The four-phase structure was not altered
This chapter discusses the four phases of the LCA-structure by SETAC and ISO which are the subject of four volumes—Goal and Scope Definition in LCA; Life Cycle Inventory Analysis; Life Cycle Impact Assessment; Interpretation, Critical Review and Reporting. The remaining volumes follow a structure outside the ISO-framework: Applications of LCA, Special Types of LCA, Life Cycle Management, and Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
A pre-guideline or framework of LCSA was published by UNEP/SETAC at the end of 2011. The final version has been published in 2012 at: http://lcinitiative.unep.fr. It contains the three-pillar equation:
LCSA = LCA + LCC + SLCA
(SLCA = Social LCA).
- 2.
Upstream processes: toward the ‘cradle’, downstream processes: toward the ‘grave’.
- 3.
Use phase: e.g. driving a car for a certain time; the use phase is the centre of most life cycles defined in LCA.
- 4.
Product tree: the most common form of graphical presentation of product life cycles.
- 5.
Supply chain: usual, but misleading (since suggesting linearity) designation of the upper part of a product tree or branches thereof; modern economies are characterised by a high degree of work-sharing.
- 6.
The system boundary separates the system to be studied from the rest of the technosphere and the environment.
- 7.
Eidgenössische Materialprüfungs- und –forschungsanstalt.
- 8.
- 9.
Personal communication by Dr. Manfred Marsmann, chair of ISO/TC 207 ‘Environmental Management’, SC 5 ‘Life Cycle Assessment’, see also (Marsmann 2000).
- 10.
The international standards as the constitution of LCA: the ISO 14040 series and its offspring by Matthias Finkbeiner.
- 11.
Centrum voor Milieukunde Leiden.
- 12.
Stand-alone LCC as a purely economic method is older than LCA and has been used to calculate the true costs of long lived products—including the costs of the use and end-of-life phases in addition to the purchase.
- 13.
The ‘reference flow’ is the translation of the verbally defined functional unit into technical terms.
- 14.
Material Intensity Per Service unit (service unit = functional unit).
- 15.
Cumulative Energy Demand.
- 16.
Environmental Priority System.
- 17.
As adjective: nachhaltig (German) → soutenu (French) → sustainable (English) (Grober 2010).
- 18.
The international standards as the constitution of LCA: the ISO 14040 series and its offspring by Matthias Finkbeiner.
- 19.
The UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative by Guido Sonnemann and Sonia Valdivia.
- 20.
The international standards as the constitution of LCA: the ISO 14040 series and its offspring by Matthias Finkbeiner.
- 21.
The international standards as the constitution of LCA: the ISO 14040 series and its offspring by Matthias Finkbeiner.
- 22.
First conceived during the French revolution.
- 23.
Birgit Grahl, private communication 2011.
References
Ahbe S, Braunschweig A, Müller-Wenk R (1990) Methodik für Oekobilanzen auf der Basis ökologischer Optimierung. In: Bern (ed) Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft (BUWAL). Schriftenreihe Umwelt no 133
Baitz M, Brauner E, Albrecht S, Broadbent C, Castellan G, Conrath P, Fava J, Finkbeiner M, Fischer M, Fullana i Palmer P, Krinke S, Leroy C, Loebel O, McKeown P, Mersiowsky I, Möginger B, Pfaadt M, Rebitzer G, Rother E, Ruhland K, Schanssema A, Tikana L (2013) LCA‘s theory and practice: like ebony and ivory living in perfect harmony? Int J Life Cycle Ass 18(1):5–13
Barnthouse L, Fava J, Humphreys K, Hunt R, Laibson L, Noesen S, Norris G, Owens J, Todd J, Vigon B, Weitz K, Young J (eds) (1988) Life-cycle impact assessment: the state-of-the-art. Report of the SETAC life-cycle assessment (LCA) impact assessment workgroup, 2nd edn. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Pensacola
Benoît C, Norris GA, Valdivia S, Ciroth A, Moberg A, Bos U, Prakash S, Ugaya C, Beck T (2010) The guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: just in time! Int J Life Cycle Ass 15(2):156–163
Berger M, Finkbeiner M (2010) Water footprinting: how to address water use in life cycle assessment? Sustainability 2:919–944. doi:10.3390/su2040919
Blouet A, Rivoire E (1995) L’Écobilan. Les produits et leurs impacts sur l`environnement. Dunod, Paris (ISBN 2-10-002126-5)
Boustead I (1993) Eco-profiles of the European plastics industry. Report 3: polyethylene and polypropylene. Report to the European centre for plastics in the environment (PWMI), Brussels
Boustead I (1996) LCA—how it came about. The beginning in the UK. Int J Life Cycle Ass 1(3):147–150
Boustead I, Hancock GF (1979) Handbook of industrial energy analysis. Ellis Horwood Ltd, Chichester (Wiley, New York)
BSI—British Standards Institution (ed) (2008) Publicly available specification (PAS) 2050:2008. Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services
BUS—Bundesamt für Umweltschutz (ed) (1984) Oekobilanzen von Packstoffen. Schriftenreihe Umweltschutz no 24, Bern
CALCAS, Zamagni A, Buttol P, Buonamici R, Masoni P, Guinée JB, Huppes G, Heijungs R, van der Voet E, Ekvall T, Rydberg T (2009) Co-ordination action for innovation in life-cycle analysis for sustainability. D20 Blue Paper on Life Cycle Sustainability Analysis. Revision 1 after the open consultation. http://www.estis.net
Carlowitz HC von (1713, 2000) Sylvicultura oeconomica. Anweisung zur wilden Baum-Zucht. Johann Friedrich Braun, Leipzig, (Reprint: TU Bergakademie Freiberg. ISBN 3-86012-115-4. Freiberg, Germany)
Christiansen K (1997) Simplifying LCA: just a cut? Final report of the SETAC-Europe LCA screening and streamlining working group. Brussels
Ciambrone DF (1997) Environmental life cycle analysis. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton
Ciroth A, Fleischer G, Steinbach J (2004) Uncertainty calculation in life cycle assessments. A combined model of simulation and approximation. Int J Life Cycle Ass 9(4):216–226
Curran MA (ed) (1996) Environmental life-cycle assessment. McGraw-Hill, New York (ISBN 0-07-015063-X)
Curran MA (2008) Development of life cycle assessment methodology: a focus on co-product allocation. PhD Thesis, Erasmus University
Curran MA (ed) (2012, Nov) Life cycle assessment handbook: a guide for environmentally sustainable products. Wiley, 640 p (ISBN: 978-1-1180-9972-8; also available as e-book)
Curran MA, Young S (1996) Report from the EPA conference on streamlining LCA. Int J Life Cycle Ass 1(1):57–60
Ekvall T, Tillman A-M (1997) Open-loop recycling: criteria for allocation procedures. Int J Life Cycle Ass 2(3):155–162
Fava JA, Denison R, Jones B, Curran MA, Vigon B, Selke S, Barnum J (eds) (1991) SETAC workshop report: a technical framework for life cycle assessments. August 18–23 1990, Smugglers Notch, Vermont. SETAC, Washington, DC
Fink P (1997) LCA—how it came about. The roots of LCA in Switzerland: continuous learning by doing. Int J Life Cycle Ass 2(3):131–134
Finkbeiner M (2009) Carbon footprinting—opportunities and threats. Int J Life Cycle Ass 14(2):91–94
Finkbeiner M (2013) From the 40s to the 70s—the future of LCA in the 14000 family. Int J Life Cycle Ass 18(1):1–4
Finkbeiner M, Matsuno Y (eds) (2000a) Special issue Japan. Int J Life Cycle Assess 5(5):253–316
Finkbeiner M, Matsuno Y (2000b) LCA in Japan—the past, the present, the future. Editorial Int J Life Cycle Ass 5(5):253–254
Finkbeiner M, Inaba A, Tan RBH, Christiansen K, Klüppel H-J (2006) The new international standards for life cycle assessment: ISO 14040 and ISO 14044. Int J Life Cycle Ass 11:80–85
Finkbeiner M, Schau EM, Lehmann A, Traverso M (2010) Towards life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability 2:3309–3322. doi:10.3390/su2103309
Franke M (1983) Umweltauswirkungen durch Getränkeverpackungen: Systematik zur Ermittlung der Umweltauswirkungen von Prozessen am Beispiel von Einweg- und Mehrweg-Getränkebehältern. Dissertation, Technical University Berlin
Frischknecht R, Steiner R, Jungbluth, N (2009) Methode der ökologischen Knappheit—Ökofaktoren 2006. Methode für die Wirkungsabschätzung in Ökobilanzen. Umwelt-Wissen Nr 0906. Bundesamt für Umwelt (BAFU) Bern
Gabathuler H (1997) The CML story. How environmental sciences entered the debate on LCA. Int J Life Cycle Ass 2(4):187–194
Grober U (2010) Die Entdeckung der Nachhaltigkeit. Kulturgeschichte eines Begriffs. Antje Kunstmann, München
Habersatter K, Widmer F (1991) Oekobilanzen von Packstoffen. Stand 1990. In: Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft (BUWAL) (ed), Schriftenreihe Umwelt No 132, Bern
Hauschild M, Wenzel H (1998) Environmental assessment of products. scientific background, vol 2. Chapman & Hall, London (ISBN 0-412-80810-2)
Heijungs R, Frischknecht R (1998) On the nature of the allocation problem. A special view on the nature of the allocation problem. Int J Life Cycle Ass 3(6):321–332
Heijungs R, Suh S (2002) The computational structure of life cycle assessment. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, (ISBN 1-4020-0672-1)
Heijungs R, Suh S (2006) Reformulation of matrix-based LCI: from product balance to process balance. J Clean Prod 14(1):47–51
Heijungs R, Guinée JB, Huppes G, Lamkreijer RM, Udo de Haes HA, Wegener Sleeswijk A, Ansems AMM, Eggels PG, van Duin R, de Goede HP (1993) Environmental life cycle assessment of products. Guide (Part 1) and Backgrounds (Part 2). October 1992, prepared by CML, TNO and B & G. English Version Leiden
Heijungs R, Settanni E, Guinée J (2013) Toward a computational structure for life cycle sustainability analysis: unifying LCA and LCC. Int J Life Cycle Ass 18(9):1722–1733, doi: 10.1007/s11367-012-0461-4
Heintz B, Baisnée P-F (1992) System boundaries. In: SETAC-Europe (ed) Life-cycle assessment. Workshop Report, 2–3 December, Leiden 1991. Brussels
Hochschorner E, Finnveden G (2003) Evaluation of two simplified life cycle assessment methods. Int J Life Cycle Ass 8(2):119–128
Hunkeler D (2006) Societal LCA methodology and case study. Int J Life Cycle Ass 11(7):371–382
Hunkeler D, Yasui I, Yamamoto R (1998) LCA in Japan: policy and progress. Int J Life Cycle Ass 3(3):124
Hunkeler D, Lichtenvort K, Rebitzer G (eds) (2008) Environmental life cycle costing. CRC Press, SETAC, Boca Raton
Hunt R, Franklin WE (1996) LCA—how it came about. Personal reflections on the origin and the development of LCA in the USA. Int J Life Cycle Ass 1(1):4–7
Hunt RG, Sellers JD, Franklin WE (1992) Resource and environmental profile analysis: a life cycle environmental assessment for products and procedures. Environ Impact Asses Rev 12:245–269
Hunt RG, Boguski TK, Weitz K, Sharma A (1998) Case studies examining streamlining techniques. Int J Life Cycle Ass 3(1):36–42
Huppes G, Schneider F (eds) (1994) Proceedings of the European workshop on allocation in LCA. Under the auspices of SETAC-Europe. Leiden, (ISBN 90-5191-078-9)
ISO (1981) International Standard Organization: SI units and recommendations for the use of their multiples and of certain other units, 2nd edn. ISO, Geneva, (1000:1981)
ISO (1997) International Standard Organization: environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. ISO, Geneva, (14040:1997)
ISO (1998) International Standard Organisation: environmental management—life cycle assessment—goal and scope definition and inventory analysis. ISO, Geneva, (14041:1998)
ISO 14042 (2000a) International Standard Organisation: environmental management—life cycle assessment—life cycle impact assessment. ISO, Geneva, (14042:2000)
ISO (2000b): International Standard Organisation: environmental management—life cycle assessment—interpretation. ISO, Geneva, (14043:2000)
ISO (2006a) International Standard Organization: environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. ISO, Geneva, (14040:2006)
ISO (2006b) International Standard Organisation: environmental management—life cycle assessment: requirements and guidelines. ISO, Geneva, (14044:2006)
ISO (2006c) International Standard Organisation: environmental management—environmental labels and declarations—Type III environmental declarations—principles and procedures ISO, Geneva (14025)
ISO (2013) International Standard Organisation: carbon footprint of products—requirements and guidelines for quantification and communication ISO/DIS, Geneva, (14067)
ISO (2012) International Standard Organisation ISO/TC 207/SC5/WG7: environmental management—eco-efficiency assessment of product systems—principles, requirements and guidelines ISO, Geneva (14045)
Jensen AA (2007) The LCM conferences—how they came about. Int J Life Cycle Ass 12 (Suppl 1):2–3
Jensen AA, Postlethwaite D (2008) SETAC Europe LCA steering committee—the early years. Int J Life Cycle Ass 13(1):1–6
Kicherer A, Schaltegger S, Tschochohei H, Ferreira Pozo B (2007).: Eco-efficiency. Combining life cycle assessment and life cycle costs via normalization. Int J Life Cycle Ass 12(7):537–543
Klöpffer W (1989) Von der Emotion zur Ökobilanz. (Balancing reality and emotional response in relevant environmental issues). The Rudolf Wild International Seminars 1989. Heidelberg
Klöpffer W (1998a) Ciambrone DF (1997) Environmental life cycle analysis. Book review Int J Life Cycle Ass 3(5):280, (ISBN 1-56670-214–3)
Klöpffer W (1998b) Subjective is not arbitrary. Editorial. Int J Life Cycle Ass 3(2):61–62
Klöpffer W (2003) Life-cycle based methods for sustainable product development. Int J Life Cycle Ass 8(3):157–159
Klöpffer W (2006) The role of SETAC in the development of LCA. Int J Life Cycle Ass 11 (Suppl 1):116–122
Klöpffer W (2007) Publishing scientific articles with special reference to LCA and related topics. Int J Life Cycle Ass 12(2):71–76
Klöpffer W (2008) Life-cycle based sustainability assessment of products. Int J Life Cycle Ass 13(2):89–94
Klöpffer W (2012) The critical review of life cycle assessment studies according to ISO 14040 and 14044: origin, purpose and practical performance. Int J Life Cycle Ass 17(9):1087–1093
Klöpffer W, Heinrich AB (2001) Two planets and one journal. Editorial. Int J Life Cycle Ass 6(1):1–3
Klöpffer W, Grahl B (2009) Ökobilanz (LCA)—Ein Leitfaden für Ausbildung und Beruf. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim
Klöpffer W, Grahl B (2014) Life cycle assessment (LCA)—a guide to best practice. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim
Lecouls H (1999) ISO 14043: environmental management—life cycle assessment—life cycle interpretation. Int J Life Cycle Ass 4(5):245
Lindfors L-G, Christiansen K, Hoffmann L, Virtanen Y, Juntilla V, Hanssen O-J, Rønning A, Ekvall T, Finnveden G (1995) Nordic guidelines on life-cycle assessment. Nordic Council of Ministers. Copenhagen, (Nord 1995:20)
Lundholm M P, Sundström G (1985) Ressourcen und Umweltbeeinflussung. Tetrabrik Aseptic Kartonpackungen sowie Pfandflaschen und Einwegflaschen aus Glas. Malmö
Marsmann M (1997) ISO 14040—the first project. Int J Life Cycle Ass 2(3):122–123
Marsmann M (2000) The ISO 14040 family. Int J Life Cycle Ass 5(6):317–318
Müller-Wenk R (1978) Die ökologische Buchhaltung. Ein Informations- und Steuerungsinstrument für umweltkonforme Unternehmenspolitik. Campus, Frankfurt am Main
Oberbacher B (1975) Ökologischer Nutzwert der Einwegflasche. Ein systemanalytischer Ansatz. Müll und Abfall Nr 8:234–238
Oberbacher B, Nikodem H, Klöpffer W (1996) LCA—how it came about. An early systems analysis of packaging for liquids which would be called an LCA today. Int J Life Cycle Ass 1(2):62–65
Popper KR (1934, 1959) Logik der Forschung. Springer, Wien 1934. 1st English edn: the logic of scientific discovery. Hutchison, London
Potting J, Hauschild MZ (2006) Spatial differentiation in life cycle impact assessment—a decade of method development to increase the environmental realism of LCIA. Int J Life Cycle Ass 11(Suppl 1):11–13
Remmen A, Jensen AA, Frydendal J (2007) The triple bottom line—the business case of sustainability. In: Life Cycle Management. A Business Guide to Sustainability. UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative. pp 10–11 (ISBN 978-92-807-2772-2)
Saling P, Kicherer A, Dittrich-Krämer B, Wittlinger R, Zombik W, Schmidt I, Schrott W, Schmidt S (2002) Eco-efficiency analysis by BASF: the method. Int J Life Cycle Ass 7(4):203–218
Schmidt-Bleek F (1994) Wieviel Umwelt braucht der Mensch? MIPS—Das Maß für ökologisches Wirtschaften. Birkhäuser Verlag, Berlin
SETAC-Europe (ed) (1992) Life-cycle assessment. workshop report, 2–3 December, Leiden 1991, Brussels
SETAC-Europe (2011) Annual meeting in Milano. Founding session of an ecological footprint working group
SETAC—Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (1993) Guidelines for life-cycle assessment: a ‘Code of Practice’. From the SETAC workshop held at Sesimbra, Portugal 31 March–3 April 1993. Brussels and Pensacola, Florida
Sinden G (2009) The contribution of PAS 2050 to the evolution of international greenhouse gas emission standards. Int J Life Cycle Ass 14(3):195–203
Sonnemann G, Vigon B (eds) (2011) Global guidance principles for life cycle assessment databases—‘Shonan Guiding Principles’. 156 pp. ISBN: 978-92-807-3174-3. UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative, Paris http://lcinitiative.unep.fr
Steen B, Ryding S-O (1992) The EPS enviro-accounting method. IVL Report, Göteborg 1
Suh S (2003) Input-output and hybrid life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Ass 8(5):257
Swarr T, Hunkeler D, Klöpffer W, Pesonen H-L, Ciroth A, Brent A, Pagan B (2011) Environmental life cycle costing: a code of practice. SETAC Press, Pensacola
Töpfer K (2002) The launch of the UNEP-SETAC Life Cycle Initiative (Prague, April 28 2002). Int J Life Cycle Ass 7:191
UBA (1999) Schmitz S, Paulini I (eds) Bewertung in Ökobilanzen. Methode des Umweltbundesamtes zur Normierung von Wirkungsindikatoren, Ordnung (Rangbildung) von Wirkungskategorien und zur Auswertung nach ISO 14042 und 14043. Version `99. UBA Texte 92/99, Berlin
Udo de Haes HA, Jolliet O, Finnveden G, Hauschild M, Krewitt W, Müller-Wenk R (1999a) Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment. Part 1. Int J Life Cycle Ass 4(2):66–74
Udo de Haes HA, Jolliet O, Finnveden G, Hauschild M, Krewitt W, Müller-Wenk R (1999b) Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment. Part 2. Int J Life Cycle Ass 4(3):167–174
Udo de Haes HA, Finnveden G, Goedkoop M, Hauschild M, Hertwich EG, Hofstetter P, Jolliet O, Klöpffer W, Krewitt W, Lindeijer E, Müller-Wenk R, Olsen SI, Pennington DW, Potting J, Steen B (eds) (2002) Life-cycle impact assessment: striving towards best practice. SETAC Press, Pensacola, (ISBN 1-880611-54-6)
UNEP/SETAC (2007) Life cycle management. a business guide to sustainability. UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative. Paris, (ISBN 978-92-807-2772-2)
UNEP/SETAC (2009) Benoît C, Mazijn B (eds) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. Paris. 104 p. http://lcinitiative.unep.fr
Valdivia S, Ugaya CML, Sonnemann G, Hildenbrand J (eds) (2011) Towards a life cycle sustainability assessment. Making informed choices on products. UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative, Paris (ISBN: 978-92-807-3175-0)
Weidema B (2000) Avoiding co-product allocation in life-cycle assessment. J Ind Ecol 4(3):11–33
Weitz KA, Todd JA, Curran MA, Malkin MJ (1996) Streamlining life cycle assessment. Considerations and a report on the state of practice. Int J Life Cycle Ass 1(2):79–85
Wenzel H, Hauschild M, Alting L (1997) Environmental assessment of products, vol 1: methodology, tools and case studies in product development. Chapman & Hall, London, (ISBN 0-412-80800-5)
World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future (The Brundtland Report), Oxford
Wrisberg N, Udo de Haes HA, Triebswetter U, Eder P, Clift R (eds) (2002) Analytical tools for environmental design and management in a systems perspective. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix—Glossary
Appendix—Glossary
Cradle-to-grave analysis | All important steps in the life cycle of a product are included in the analysis (extraction of raw materials from the environment (soil, water, air), the production of materials, the final products, their use and waste removal or recycling) |
Downstream process | Toward the ‘grave’ |
Footprint studies | Footprint studies are no full LCAs (see simplified/ streamlined LCA). They mostly contain only one impact category: ‘Carbon footprint’ = Global Warming Potential. The ‘water footprint’ can be integrated into LCIA as an impact category belonging to resource use |
Functional unit | The basis of comparison of product systems (goods and services) if they provide the same or a very similar function |
Life cycle sustainability assessment—LCSA | In life cycle product assessment, LCA deals with the environmental aspects only. In order to give the full picture, however, an economic and a social life cycle assessment have to be added to the environmental one In the ‘three pillar’ interpretation of sustainability, environmental, economic and social aspects have to be considered and weighted against each other LCSA = LCA + LCC + SLCA LCSA: Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment LCA: (environmental) Life Cycle Assessment LCC: (environmental) Life Cycle Costing SLCA: Social Life Cycle Assessment |
Product tree | The most common form of graphical presentation of product life cycles |
proto-LCAs | The early LCAs before harmonisation (SETAC) and standardisation (ISO). |
SETAC triangle | Model of the phases (components) of an LCA. The first SETAC triangle was developed at the SETAC workshop ‘A Technical Framework for Life Cycle Assessments’ in August 1990, Smugglers Notch, Vermont and consisted of three components: Inventory, Impact Analysis, Improvement Analysis. The SETAC triangle 1992 (Sandestin workshop) and 1993 (Sesimbra workshop) consisted of four components: Goal Definition and Sco**, Inventory Analysis, Impact Assessment and Improvement Assessment. In the course of the ISO standardization process ‘Improvement assessment’ was replaced by ‘Interpretation’ |
Simplified LCA/Streamlined LCA | In 1994 the LCA Steering Committee of SETAC Europe established the Workgroup Screening and Streamlining. In the same year, the SETAC North America workgroup on Streamlining LCA was initiated. Both groups concluded their multi-year efforts on the issue of Simplifying/Streamlining by a report in each case. The approaches of the reports are different 1. The report of SETAC Europe discusses the methods for producing simplified procedures, commonly described as screening LCA studies, streamlined LCA studies and simplified LCA studies 2. The report of SETAC North America is more a description of carefully planning and stating an LCA’s goal than it is about Streamlined LCA methodology. |
Simplified LCA | Simplified LCA is an application of the LCA methodology for a comprehensive screening assessment. A simplified LCA should cover three steps which are iteratively interlinked: 1. Screening: identifying those parts of the system (life cycle) or of the elementary flows that are either important or have data gaps. 2. Simplifying: using the findings of Screening in order to focus further work on the important parts of the system or of the elementary flows. 3. Assessing reliability: checking that simplifying does not significantly reduce the reliability of the overall result. Simplifying methods can reduce the complexity of an LCA and so reduce the cost, time and effort required, by exclusion of certain life cycle stages, system inputs or outputs or impact categories, or use of generic data modules for the system under study |
Streamlined LCA | Identification of elements of an LCA that can be omitted or where surrogate or generic data can be used without significantly affecting the accuracy of the results Streamlining LCA is a practice to make a detailed/full LCA more manageable. Streamlining LCA can be achieved in a number of ways, including: –Limiting the scope in terms of time, cost, data, analytical approach: for example, eliminating life cycle phases deemed not significant, or processes with negligible effect on the environment; –Use of qualitative information; –Removal of upstream and/or downstream components; –Use of specific impact category. |
Supply chain | Usual, but misleading (since suggesting linearity) designation of the upper part of a product tree or branches thereof |
System boundary | The system boundary separates the system to be studied from the rest of the technosphere and the environment |
Unit process | The smallest unit for which data are available. |
Upstream process | Toward the ‘cradle’. |
Use phase | The use phase is the centre of most life cycles defined in LCA. |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Klöpffer, W. (2014). Introducing Life Cycle Assessment and its Presentation in ‘LCA Compendium’. In: Klöpffer, W. (eds) Background and Future Prospects in Life Cycle Assessment. LCA Compendium – The Complete World of Life Cycle Assessment. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8697-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8697-3_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-017-8696-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-8697-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)