Social Trust and Religion in Sweden: Theological Belief Versus Social Organization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Religion and Civil Society in Europe

Abstract

The question of whether religion and religiosity is positively or negatively related to social trust has been widely debated. In this chapter we will, using data from a local level survey on trust in Sweden, test whether religiosity as belief and religion as social organization correlate in any way with social trust in the specific case of a highly secular society. We are applying a multilevel approach in which we introduce both individual and contextual level data (church attendance and church membership) and where our focus will be on the local or community level. We conclude that while general surveys on trust suggest, if anything, a negative relationship between religiosity and social trust, one can, even in a highly secular country like Sweden, identify a modest positive correlation between trust and religion, which, however, is limited to religion as social organization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 85.59
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 105.49
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 105.49
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Although social trust is a complex theoretical concept, it has very often been measured through a single survey item, and it has been discussed whether this single item accurately picks up the complexity (Van Deth 2003). In this chapter we will rely upon several different items that measure trust as a moral imperative.

  2. 2.

    See note 1 on the problems associated with the classical single trust question first used by Rosenberg.

  3. 3.

    This is mainly due to the already mentioned history of Sweden having had a state church with the citizens being members of the church until they explicitly left it.

  4. 4.

    With the addition of the municipality of Malmö.

References

  • Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronsson, P. (2002). Tillit eller misstro i småorternas land – en studie av social ekonomi i fem län. Växjö: Växjö University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronsson, P., Betranz, L., Hansen, J., Johansson, L., Lärstedt, C., & Olofsson, G. (2002). Tillit och misstro i småorternas land, en studie av social ekonomi i fem län. Växjö: Växjö universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, R. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. M. (1985). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berggren, N., & Bjørnskov, C. (2011). Is the importance of religion in daily life related to social trust? Cross-country and cross-state comparisons. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 80(3), 459–480. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2011.05.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berggren, H., & Trägårdh, L. (2010). Social trust and radical individualism: The paradox at the heart of Nordic capitalism in The Nordic Way. Stockholm: Global Utmaning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bok, S. (1978). Lying: Moral choices in public and private life. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordum, A. (2001). Tillit er godt! Om tillidsbegrebebets vaerdiladning. In A. Bordum & W. Barlebo (Eds.), Det handler om Tillid. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delhey, J., & Newton, K. (2005). Predicting cross-national levels of social trust: A global pattern or Nordic exceptionalism? European Sociological Review, 21(4), 311–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frykman, J., & Hansen, K. (2009). I ohälsans tid: sjukskrivningar och kulturmönster i det samtida Sverige. Stockholm: Carlssons förlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halman, L., & Draulans, V. (2006). How secular is Europe? The British Journal of Sociology, 57(2), 263–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (1993). The street-level epistemology of trust. Politics and Society, 21(4), 505–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (1999). Do we want trust in government? In M. Warren (Ed.), Democracy and trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, M. (2003). Participation in voluntary associations and value indicators: The effect of current and previous participation experiences. Non Profit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(1), 47–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hox, J. (2002). Multilevel analysis. Mahwah/London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasch, C. (1979). The culture of narcissism: American life in an age of diminishing expectations. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (1971). Comparative politics and the comparative method. American Political Science Review, 65(3), 682–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (2000). Familarity, confidence, trust: Problems and alternatives. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations (pp. 94–107). Oxford: Department of Sociology, University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschall, M., & Stolle, D. (2004). Race and the city. Political Behavior, 26(2), 125–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Misztal, B. (1996). Trust in modern societies: The search for the bases of social order. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, K. (1999). Social capital and democracy in Europe. In J. van Deth, M. Maraffi, K. Netwon, & P. Whiteley (Eds.), Social capital and European democracy (pp. 3–24). London/New York: Routledge/ECPR Studies in European Political Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, O. (1999). Liberty against the democratic state: On the historical and contemporary sources of American distrust. In M. E. Warren (Ed.), Democracy and trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). The logic of comparative social inquiry. New York: Wiley-Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R., & Campbell, D. (2010). American grace. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riesman, D. (1950). The lonely crowd. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, B. (2005). Social traps and the problems of trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, E. (1978). Image of man: The effect of religion on trust. Review of Religious Research, 20(1), 61–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, A. (1997). The problem of trust. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1950). The sociology of Georg Simmel. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolle, D., Soroka, S., & Johnston, R. (2008). When does diversity erode trust? Political Studies, 56(1), 57–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stromsnes, K. (2008). The importance of church attendance and membership of religious voluntary organizations for the formation of social capital. Social Compass, 55(4), 478–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sztompka, P. (1999). Trust. A sociological theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traunmüller, R. (2011). Moral communities? Religion as a source of social trust in a multilevel analysis of 97 German regions. European Sociological Review, 27(3), 346–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner, E. (2001). Volunteering and social capital: How trust and religion shape civic participation in the United States. In P. Dekker & E. Uslaner (Eds.), Social capital and participation in everyday life (pp. 104–117). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner, E. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Deth, J. (2003). Measuring social capital: Orthodoxies and continuing controversies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6(1), 79–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigren, C. (2003). The spirit of Gnosjö: The grand narrative and beyond (Dissertation series: 17). Jönkö**: Internationella Handelshögskolan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollebaek, D., & Selle, P. (2002). Does participation in voluntary associations contribute to social capital? The impact of intensity, scope, and type. Non Profit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31(1), 32–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wollebaek, D., & Selle, P. (2007). Origins of social capital: Socialization and institutionalization approaches compared. Journal of Civil Society, 3(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wollebaek, D., & Stromsnes, K. (2008). Voluntary associations, trust, and civic engagement: A multilevel approach. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37(2), 249–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susanne Wallman Lundåsen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lundåsen, S.W., Trägårdh, L. (2013). Social Trust and Religion in Sweden: Theological Belief Versus Social Organization. In: de Hart, J., Dekker, P., Halman, L. (eds) Religion and Civil Society in Europe. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6815-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation