Abstract
This work proposes the implementation of a multiple-network poroelastic theory (MPET) model for the purpose of investigating in detail the transport of water within the cerebral environment. The key advantage of using the MPET representation is that it accounts for fluid transport between CSF, brain parenchyma and cerebral blood. A further novelty in the model is the amalgamation of anatomically accurate Choroid Plexus regions, with their individual feeding arteries. This model is used to demonstrate and discuss the impact of aqueductal stenosis on the cerebral ventricles, along with possible future treatment techniques.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bai M, Elsworth D, Roegiers J (1993) Multiporosity/multipermiability approach to the simulation of naturally fractured reservoirs. Water Resour Res 29:1621–1633
Biot MA (1941) General theory of three-dimensional consolidation. J Appl Phys 12:155–164
Bradley WG Jr (2008) Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: new findings and thoughts on etiology. Am J Neuroradiol 29:1–3
Byrd C (2006) Normal pressure hydrocephalus: dementia’s hidden cause. Nurse Pract 31:28–29, 31–35
Cheng S, Tan K, Bilston LE (2010) The effects of interthalamic adhesion position on cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in the cerebral ventricles. J Biomech 43:579–582
Giannetti AV, Malheiros JA, da Silva MC (2011) Fourth ventriculostomy: an alternative treatment for hydrocephalus due to atresia of the magendie and luschka foramina. J Neurosurg Pediatrics 7:152–156
Gupta S, Soellinger M, Boesiger P, Poulikakos D, Kurtcuoglu V (2009) Three-dimensional computational modeling of subject-specific cerebrospinal fluid flow in the subarachnoid space. JÂ Biomech Eng 131:021010
Gupta S, Soellinger M, Grzybowski DM, Boesiger P, Biddiscombe J, Poulikakos D, Kurtcuoglu V (2010) Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in the human cranial subarachnoid space: an overlooked mediator of cerebral disease. I. Computational model. J R Soc Interface 7:1195–1204
Gustavsson A, Svensson M, Jacobi F, Allgulander C, Alonso J, Beghi E, Dodel R, Ekman M, Faravelli C, Fratiglioni L, Gannon B, Jones DH, Jennum P, Jordanova A, Jönsson L, Karampampa K, Knapp M, Kobelt G, Kurth T, Lieb R, Linde M, Ljungcrantz C, Maercker A, Melin B, Moscarelli M, Musayev A, Norwood F, Preisig M, Pugliatti M, Rehm J, Salvador-Carulla L, Schlehofer B, Simon R, Steinhausen HC, Stovner LJ, Vallat JM, den Bergh PV, van Os J, Vos P, Xu W, Wittchen HU, Jönsson B, Olesen J (CDBE2010Study Group) (2011) Cost of disorders of the brain in Europe 2010. Eur Neuropsychopharmacology 21:718–779.
Hakim S, Adams R (1965) The special clinical problem of symptomatic hydrocephalus with normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure: observations on cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics. J Neurol Sci 2:307–327
Hamilton MG (2009) Treatment of hydrocephalus in adults. Semin Pediatr Neurol 16:34–41
Howden L, Giddings D, Power H, Aroussi A, Vloeberghs M, Garnett M, Walker D (2007) Three-dimensional cerebrospinal fluid flow within the human vetricular system. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 11:123–133
Irani DN (2009) Cerebrospinal fluid in clinical practice. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia
Khandelwal S, Visaria M (2006) Algebraic multigrid solver for structured meshes. Me608 final report, pp 1–7
Loth F, Yardimci MA, Alperin N (2001) Hydrodynamic modeling of cerebrospinal fluid motion within the spinal cavity. J Biomech Eng 123:71–79
Rekate HL (2008) The definition and classification of hydrocephalus: a personal recommendation to stimulate debate. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res 5:1–7
Rekate HL (2009) A contemporary definition and classification of hydrocephalus. Semin Pediatr Neurol 16:9–15
Schödel P, Proescholdt M, Ullrich OW, Brawanski A, Schebesch KM (2012) An outcome analysis of two different procedures of burr-hole trephine and external ventricular drainage in acute hydrocephalus. J Clin Neurosci 19:267–270
Stadlbauer A, Salomonowitz E, van der Riet W, Buchfelder M, Ganslandt O (2010) Insight into the patterns of cerebrospinal fluid flow in the human ventricular system using MR velocity map**. Neuroimage 51:42–52
Terzaghi K (1943) Theoretical soil mechanics. Wiley, New York
Thompson D (2009) Hydrocephalus. Neurosurg 27:130–134
Tu J, Yeoh G, Liu C (2008) Computational fluid dynamics: a practical approach. Wiley, New York
Tully B, Ventikos Y (2011) Cerebral water transport using multiple-network poroelastic theory: application to normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Fluid Mech 667:188–215
Webster R (1994) An algebraic multigrid solver for Navier-Stokes problems. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 18:761–780
Acknowledgements
This study is supported by the Digital Economy Programme; a Research Councils UK cross-Council initiative led by EPSRC and contributed to by AHRC, ESRC, and MRC. The EPSRC is further acknowledged for providing the resources necessary for the High Performance Computing simulations conducted in this study. The ESI Group and Dr. M. Megahed are kindly acknowledged for allowing the use of the CFD-ACE+ multiphysics suite.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this paper
Cite this paper
Vardakis, J.C., Tully, B.J., Ventikos, Y. (2013). Multicompartmental Poroelasticity as a Platform for the Integrative Modeling of Water Transport in the Brain. In: Holzapfel, G., Kuhl, E. (eds) Computer Models in Biomechanics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5464-5_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5464-5_22
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5463-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5464-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)