Abstract
This chapter offers a historically-grounded analysis of the nature of bioethics as a field of inquiry and practice. It begins with a detailed history of the evolution of early bioethics organizations, including the Society for Health and Human Values, the American Association of Bioethics, and the Society for Bioethics Consultation, and traces this history into the period in which these organizations merged as the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. This rich recounting offers both first-person and third-person observations of these organizations’ development, membership, problems, and mergers. With this historically-informed background in place, the author proceeds analytically to consider four basic approaches to characterizing the nature of bioethics: (1) bioethics as pure public discourse, with no experts, core texts, common methods, or common standards; (2) bioethics as unique to a single existing discipline (e.g., philosophy, medicine, etc.), with bioethics expertise limited to those who have undertaken extensive study in that field; and (3) bioethics as evolving into a new, independent discipline with its own core texts, methods, area of expertise, and common standards for scholarship and consultation. These three views are rejected in favor of the view that (4) bioethics is an interdisciplinary and second-order discipline with no unique area of expertise. Four key pieces of evidence support this analysis: bioethicists (1) tend to expand their subject matter (unlike most new fields, which splinter off from, and narrow the subject matter of, existing disciplines), (2) think of bioethics problems as complex and solutions as interdisciplinary, (3) welcome various perspectives from different professions, and (4) allow those various professions to set their own standards of competency.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. 1998. ‘Task force on standards for bioethics consultation’, core competencies for health care ethics consultation. Glenview: American Society for Bioethics and Humanities.
Baker, R. 2005. A draft model aggregate code of ethics for bioethics. The American Journal of Bioethics 5: 33–41.
Beauchamp, T. 2005. What can a model professional code for bioethics hope to achieve? The American Journal of Bioethics 5: 42–43.
Beauchamp, T., and J.F. Childress. 1979, 1983, 1989, 1994, 2001, 2008. Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Blackburn, S. 1996. The oxford dictionary of philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Brody, B. 2003. Taking issue: Pluralism and casuistry in bioethics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Callahan, D. 1990. What kind of life: The limits of medical progress. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Callahan, D. 1999. Ethics from the top down: A view from the well. In Building bioethics, ed. L.M. Kopelman, 25–35. London: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Callahan, D. 2005. Bioethics and the culture wars. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 14: 424–431.
Childress, J.F. 1970. Who shall live when not all can live? Soundings 53: 339–354.
Clouser, K.D. 1978. Bioethics. In Encyclopedia of bioethics, 1st ed, ed. W.T. Reich, 124–125. New York: The Free Press.
Clouser, K.D., and B. Gert. 1990. A critique of principlism. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15: 219–236.
Cooter, R. 2004. Historical keywords: Bioethics. The Lancet 364: 1749.
Daniels, N. 1985. Just health care. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Elliott, C. 2001. Throwing a bone to the watchdog. The Hastings Center Report 31: 9–12.
Elliott, C. 2005. The soul of a new machine: Bioethicists in the bureaucracy. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 14: 379–384.
Engelhardt, H.T. 1992. The search for a universal system of ethics: Post-modern disappointments and contemporary possibilities. In Ethical problems in dialysis and transplantation, ed. C.M. Kjellstrand and J.B. Dossetor. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Engelhardt, H.T., and S. Spicker. 1975. Evaluation and explanation in the biomedical sciences. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Faden, R., T.L. Beauchamp, and N. King. 1986. A history and theory of informed consent. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fletcher, J. 1966. Situation ethics. Philadelphia: The Westminster Press.
Fox, R.C., and J.P. Swazey. 2005. Examining American bioethics: Its problems and prospects. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 14: 361–373.
Frankena, W.K. 1973. Ethics, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Frey, R.G. 1978. Moral experts. The Personalist 59: 47–52.
Gert, B. 1998. Morality: Its nature and justification. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gustafson, J.M. 1973. Mongolism, parental desires, and the right to life. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 17: 529–530.
Holmes, R.L. 1990. The limited relevance of analytical ethics to the problems of bioethics. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15: 143–159.
Hooker, B. 1998. Moral expertise. In Encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. Edward Craig, 509. New York: Routledge.
Jaggar, A.M. 2000. Feminist ethics. In The Blackwell guide to ethical theory, ed. H. LaFollette, 348–374. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Jahr, F. 1927. Bio-Ethik: Eine Umschau über die ethischen Beziehungen des Menschen zu Tier und Pflanze. Kosmos: Handweiser für Naturfreunde 24: 2–4.
Jonsen, A.R. 1991. Of balloons and bicycles or the relationship between ethical theory and practical judgments. The Hastings Center Report 21: 14–16.
Jonsen, A.R. 1998. The birth of bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jonsen, A.R., and S. Toulmin. 1988. The abuse of casuistry: A history of moral reasoning. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Jonsen, A., M. Siegler, and W. Winslade. 1982. Clinical ethics. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Kipnis, K. 2005. The elements of code development. The American Journal of Bioethics 5: 48–50.
Kopelman, L.M. 1995. Philosophy and medical education. Academic Medicine 70: 795–805.
Kopelman, L.M. 1998. Bioethics and humanities: What makes us one field? The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23: 356–368.
Kopelman, L.M. 2006. Bioethics as a second-order discipline: Who is not a bioethicist? The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31: 601–628.
Kopelman, L.M., and J.C. Moskop (eds.). 1984. Ethics and mental retardation. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Lantos, J. 2005. Commentary on “a draft model aggregated code for bioethicists”. The American Journal of Bioethics 5: 45–46.
Lewis, S. 1925. Arrowsmith. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
MacDonald, C. 2003. Draft: Model code of ethics for bioethics. In The canadian bioethics societies and Ad Hoc Working Group on employment standards for bioethics [On-line]. http://www.bioethics.ca/resources/PDF%20documents/draftcode.pdf. Accessed Sept 20, 2012.
McMahan, J. 2000. Moral intuitionism. In The Blackwell guide to ethical theory, ed. H. LaFollette, 92–110. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Miller, F.G. 2005. The case for a code of ethics for bioethicists: Some reasons for skepticism. The American Journal of Bioethics 5: 50–52.
Nowell-Smith, P.H. 1957. Ethics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Parker, L.S. 2005. Ethical expertise, maternal thinking, and the work of clinical ethicists. In Ethics expertise: History, contemporary perspectives, and applications, ed. L.M. Rasmussen, 165–207. Dordrecht: Springer.
Perlman, D. 2005. Bioethics in industry settings: One situation where a code for bioethicists would help. The American Journal of Bioethics 5: 62–64.
Rasmussen, L.M. (ed.). 2005. Ethics expertise: History, contemporary perspectives, and applications. Dordrecht: Springer.
Regenberg, A.C., and D. Mathews. 2005. Resisting the tide of professionalization: Valuing diversity in bioethics. The American Journal of Bioethics 5: 44–45.
Reich, W.T. 1995. Introduction. In Encyclopedia of bioethics, vol. 1, 2nd ed, ed. W.T. Reich, xxi. New York: Simon Schuster Macmillan.
Satel, S. 2000. How political correctness is corrupting medicine. New York: Basic Books.
Schuklenk, U., and J. Gallager. 2005. Status, careers and influence in bioethics. The American Journal of Bioethics 5: 64–66.
Singer, P. 1972. Moral experts. Analysis 32: 114–117.
Smith, W.J. 2000. Culture of death: The assault on medical ethics in America. San Francisco: Encounter Books.
Toulmin, S. 1981. The tyranny of principles. The Hastings Center Report 11: 31–39.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). 2005. Universal declaration on bioethics and human rights [On-line]. http://portal.unesco.org/shs/en/ev.php-URL_ID=1883&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html. Accessed Sept 20, 2012.
Veatch, R.M. 1999. Contract and critique of principlism: Hypothetical contract or epistemological theory as method of conflict resolution. In Building bioethics, ed. L.M. Kopelman, 121–143. Great Britain: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Wittgenstein, L. 1953, 1961. Philosophical investigations. New York: The Macmillan Company.
Wolf, S., and J. Kahn. 2005. Bioethics matures: The field faces the future. The Hastings Center Report 35: 22–24.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kopelman, L.M. (2013). The Growth of Bioethics as a Second-Order Discipline. In: Garrett, J., Jotterand, F., Ralston, D. (eds) The Development of Bioethics in the United States. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 115. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4011-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4011-2_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4010-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4011-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)