SpringerLink
Log in

Diagnostik in der Arbeits-, Organisations- und Wirtschaftspsychologie

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Psychologische Diagnostik

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Kapitel wird die Relevanz Psychologischer Diagnostik im Zuge der Feststellung der Passung zwischen Individuen und Arbeitskontexten betont. Die Rolle der Psychologischen Diagnostik im Allgemeinen sowie von spezifischen diagnostischen Zugängen im Speziellen wird mit Bezug zu den Themenbereichen Organisationsdiagnostik, Personalauswahl und -entwicklung sowie Berufs- und Ausbildungswahl erläutert. Zudem wird der derzeitige Kenntnisstand zur Evaluation des diagnostischen Vorgehens in diesen Anwendungsbereichen präsentiert. Schließlich erfolgt eine Einführung in die DIN 33430 für berufsbezogene Eignungsbeurteilungen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 49.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
EUR 64.99
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Aguinis, H., & Kraiger, K. (2009). Benefits of training and development for individuals and teams, organizations, and society. Annual Review of Psychology 60, 451–474.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior 19, 235–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andres, J., & Kleinmann, M. (1993). Die Entwicklung eines Rotationssystems für die Beobachtungssituation im Assessment-Center. Zeitschrift für Arbeits-und Organisationspsychologie 37, 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apers, C., & Derous, E. (2017). Are they accurate? Recruiters' personality judgments in paper versus video resumes. Computers in Human Behavior 73, 9–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbeitskreis Assessment Center (2016). AC-Standards: Standards der Assessment Center Technik. https://www.forum-assessment-kongress.de/images/AKAC_AC_Standards_2016.pdf. Zugegriffen: 24. März 2020.

  • Armoneit, C., Schuler, H., & Hell, B. (2020). Nutzung, Validität, Praktikabilität und Akzeptanz psychologischer Personalauswahlverfahren in Deutschland 1985, 1993, 2007, 2020: Fortführung einer Trendstudie. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie 64, 67–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W. J., Day, E. A., McNelly, T. L., & Edens, P. S. (2003). A meta-analysis of the criterion-related validity of assessment center dimensions. Personnel Psychology 56, 125–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, US: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Boldt, J., Schuler, H., & Funke, U. (1988). Prädiktive Validität von Schulabschlussnoten: Eine Metaanalyse. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie 2, 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, T. N., Maertz, C. P., Dolen, M. R., & Campion, M. A. (1998). Longitudinal assessment of applicant reactions to employment testing and test outcome feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology 83, 892–903.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, N., Höft, S., Holzenkamp, M., & Spinath, F. M. (2011). The predictive validity of assessment centers in German-speaking regions: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personnel Psychology 10, 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beermann, D., Kersting, M., Stegt, S., & Zimmerhofer, A. (2013). Vorurteile und Urteile zur Akzeptanz von Persönlichkeitsfragebogen. PersonalQuarterly 65, 41–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, C., & Eder, F. (2005). AIST-R: Allgemeiner Interessen-Struktur-Test mit Umwelt-Struktur-Test (UST-R) – Revision. Göttingen: Beltz Test Gesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, P. N., & Thacker, J. W. (2013). Effective training: Systems, strategies, and practices. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, M. C., & Woehr, D. J. (2006). A meta-analytic evaluation of the impact of dimension and exercise factors on assessment center ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology 91, 1114–1124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, D. W., Campbell, R. J., & Grant, D. L. (1974). Formative years in business: A long-term AT&T study of managerial lives. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodbeck, F. C., Anderson, N., & West, M. (2000). TKI: Teamklima Inventar. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2013). How IRT can solve problems of ipsative data in forced-choice questionnaires. Psychological Methods 18, 36–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruk-Lee, V., Drew, E. N., & Hawkes, B. (2013). Candidate Reactions to Simulations and Media-Rich Assessments in Personnel Selection. In M. Fetzer & K. Tuzinski (Eds.), Simulations for Personnel Selection (pp. 43–60). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin. (2017). Psychische Gesundheit in der Arbeitswelt – Wissenschaftliche Standortbestimmung. Dortmund: Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Büssing, A. (2007). Organisationsdiagnose. In H. Schuler (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch Organisationspsychologie (4. Aufl., S. 557–599). Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology 87, 875–884.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campion, M. C., Ployhart, R. E., & MacKenzie, W. I. (2014). The state of research on situational judgment tests: A content analysis and directions for future research. Human Performance 27, 283–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catano, V. M., Brochu, A., & Lamerson, C. D. (2012). Assessing the reliability of situational judgment tests used in high‐stakes situations. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 20, 333–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, D., & Schmitt, N. (1997). Video-based versus paper-and-pencil method of assessment in situational judgment tests: subgroup differences in test performance and face validity perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology 82, 143–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, D., Schmitt, N., DeShon, R. P., Clause, C. S., & Delbridge, K. (1997). Reactions to cognitive ability tests: The relationships between race, test performance, face validity perceptions, and test-taking motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology 82, 300–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christian, M. S., Edwards, B. D., & Bradley, J. C. (2010). Situational judgment tests: Constructs assessed and a meta‐analysis of their criterion‐related validities. Personnel Psychology 63, 83–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clause, C. S., Mullins, M. E., Nee, M. T., Pulakos, E., & Schmitt, N. (1998). Parallel test form development: A procedure for alternate predictors and an example. Personnel Psychology 51, 193–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. S., Feild, H. S., Giles, W. F., & Harris, S. G. (2009). Recruiters’ inferences of applicant personality based on resume screening: do paper people have a personality? Journal of Business and Psychology 24, 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, J. M. (1996). Analysis and design of multitrait-multirater performance appraisal studies. Journal of Management 22, 139–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corstjens, J., Lievens, F., & Krumm, S. (2017). Situational Judgement Tests for selection. In H. Goldstein, E. Pulakos, J. Passmore, & C. Semedo (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of the psychology of recruitment, selection and employee retention (pp. 226–246). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daumenlang, K., Müskens, W., & Harder, U. (2004). FEO: Fragebogen zur Erfassung des Organisationsklimas. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demerouti, E., & Bakker, A. B. (2011). The job demands-resources model: Challenges for future research. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology 37, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychologie. (2020). Fachgruppe Arbeits-, Organisations- und Wirtschaftspsychologie. https://www.dgps.de/index.php?id=156. Zugegriffen: 18. Mai 2020.

  • Deutsches Institut für Normung e. V. (DIN). (2016). DIN 33430:2016-07: Anforderungen an berufsbezogene Eignungsdiagnostik. Berlin: Beuth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diagnostik- und Testkuratorium. (2018). Personalauswahl kompetent gestalten: Grundlagen und Praxis der Eignungsdiagnostik nach DIN 33430. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, T. L., Hassett, C. E., & Tannenbaum, S. I. (1986). Work performance ratings: A meta-analysis of multitrait-multimethod studies. San Antonio: Texas Maxima Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierdorff, E. C., & Wilson, M. A. (2003). A meta-analysis of job analysis reliability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunckel, H., & Resch, M. G. (2010). Arbeitsanalyse. In U. Kleinbeck, & K.-H. Schmidt (Hrsg.), Arbeitspsychologie (Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Serie Wirtschafts-, Organisations- und Arbeitspsychologie, Bd. 1, S. 1111–1158). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. R. (1993). Problems with the use of profile similarity indices in the study of congruence in organizational research. Personnel Psychology 46, 641–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. R. (2002). Alternatives to difference scores: Polynomial regression and response surface methodology. Advances in Measurement and Data Analysis, 350–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. R., & Parry, M. E. (1993). On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal 36, 1577–1613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin 51, 327–358.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, F., & Kanning, U. P. (2014). Lücken im Lebenslauf. Zeitschrift für Arbeits-und Organisationspsychologie 58, 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenstein, J.-P., Schäpers, P., Roemer, L., Mussel, P., & Krumm, S. (2020). Is it all in the eye of the beholder? The importance of situation construal for situational judgment test performance. Personnel Psychology. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12385.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frieling, E., & Hoyos, C. G. (1978). Fragebogen zur Arbeitsanalyse (FAA). Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gati, I., Gadassi, R., & Shemesh, N. (2006). The predictive validity of a computer-assisted career decision-making system: A six-year follow-up. Journal of Vocational Behavior 68, 205–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatzka, T., & Volmer, J. (2017). Situational Judgement Test für Teamarbeit (SJT-TA). Mannheim: GESIS – Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaugler, B. B., Rosenthal, D. B., Thornton, G. C., & Bentson, C. (1987). Meta-analysis of assessment center validity. Journal of Applied Psychology 72, 493–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, A. M., Rupp, D. E., Snyder, L. A., Holub, A. S., & Woo, S. E. (2006). A preliminary investigation of developable dimensions. The Psychologist-Manager Journal 9, 99–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilliland, S. W. (1993). The perceived fairness of selection systems: An organizational justice perspective. Academy of Management Review 18, 694–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, W., Fritsche, B., Richter, P., & Iwanowa, A. (1995). Tätigkeitsbewertungssystem (TBS): Verfahren zur Analyse, Bewertung und Gestaltung von Arbeitstätigkeiten. Zürich: vdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardison, C. M., & Sackett, P. R. (2007). Kriteriumsbezogene Validität des Assessment Centers: Lebendig und wohlauf? In H. Schuler (Hrsg.), Assessment Center zur Potenzialanalyse (S. 192–202). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hell, B., Schuler, H., Boramir, I., & Schaar, H. (2006). Verwendung und Einschätzung von Verfahren der internen Personalauswahl und Personalentwicklung im 10 Jahres-Vergleich. German Journal of Human Resource Management 20, 58–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermelin, E., Lievens, F., & Robertson, I. T. (2007). The validity of assessment centres for the prediction of supervisory performance ratings: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 15, 405–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, B. J., Kennedy, C. L., LoPilato, A. C., Monahan, E. L., & Lance, C. E. (2015). A review of the content, criterion-related, and construct-related validity of assessment center exercises. Journal of Applied Psychology 100, 1143–1168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, H., & Liepmann, D. (2004). Personalentwicklung. In H. Schuler (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch Organisationspsychologie (3. Aufl., S. 345–383). Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossiep, R., & Weiß, S. (2020). BIP-AM: Bochumer Inventar zur berufsbezogenen Persönlichkeitsbeschreibung – Anforderungsmodul. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossiep, R., Paschen, M., & Krüger, C. (2018). BIP plus BIP-6F: Bochumer Inventare zur berufsbezogenen Persönlichkeitsbeschreibung – Langform plus 6 Faktoren. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossiep, R., Krüger, C., & Weiß, S. (2020). BIP-6F-AM: Bochumer Inventar zur berufsbezogenen Persönlichkeitsbeschreibung – 6 Faktoren – Anforderungsmodul (in Vorbereitung). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, A. (1974). An assessment of assessment-centers. Academy of Management Journal 17, 115–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, P. V., Kleinmann, M., König, C. J., & Melchers, K. G. (2016). Transparency of assessment centers: Lower criterion‐related validity but greater opportunity to perform? Personnel Psychology 69, 467–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joerin Fux, S., & Stoll, F. (2006). EXPLOJOB – Das Werkzeug zur Beschreibung von Berufsanforderungen und -tätigkeiten. Deutschsprachige Adaptation und Weiterentwicklung des Position Classification Inventory (PCI) nach Garry D. Gottfredson und John L. Holland. Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. G., & Whitmore, M. D. (1995). Evaluating developmental assessment centers as interventions. Personnel Psychology 48, 377–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., & Zapata, C. P. (2015). The person–situation debate revisited: Effect of situation strength and trait activation on the validity of the Big Five personality traits in predicting job performance. Academy of Management Journal 58, 1149–1179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., & Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: a qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of Applied Psychology 87, 765–780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanning, U. P. (2015). Welche Aussagekraft besitzen biographische Daten bei der Sichtung von Bewerbungsunterlagen? Ein Überblick über aktuelle Studien. Wirtschaftspsychologie 17, 42–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanning, U. P., Grewe, K., Hollenberg, S., & Hadouch, M. (2006). From the subjects' point of view. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 22, 168–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanning, U. P., Budde, L., & Hülskötter, M. (2018). Wie valide ist die regelkonforme Gestaltung von Bewerbungsunterlagen? Personal Quarterly 70, 38–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasten, N., & Freund, P. A. (2016). A meta-analytical multilevel reliability generalization of Situational Judgment Tests (SJTs). European Journal of Psychological Assessment 32, 230–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffeld, S. (2004). FAT: Fragebogen zur Arbeit im Team. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelbetz, G., & Schuler, H. (2002). Verbessert Vorerfahrung die Leistung im Assessment Center? Zeitschrift für Personalpsychologie 1, 4–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersting, M. (2008a). Qualität in der Diagnostik und Personalauswahl – der DIN Ansatz. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersting, M. (2008b). Zur Akzeptanz von Intelligenz- und Leistungstests. [The acceptance of intelligence and achievement tests]. Report Psychologie 33, 420–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersting, M. (2010). Akzeptanz von Assessment Centern; Was kommt an und worauf kommt es an? Wirtschaftspsychologie 12, 58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersting, M. (2018). Zur Information über und Dokumentation von Instrumenten zur Erfassung menschlichen Erlebens und Verhaltens – Die DIN SCREEN Checkliste 1, Version 3. In Diagnostik- und Testkuratorium (Hrsg.), Personalauswahl kompetent gestalten: Grundlagen und Praxis der Eignungsdiagnostik nach DIN 33430 (S. 223–244). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersting, M., & Püttner, I. (2018). Einführung in die DIN 33430. In Diagnostik- und Testkuratorium (Hrsg.), Personalauswahl kompetent gestalten: Grundlagen und Praxis der Eignungsdiagnostik nach DIN 33430 (S. 1–25). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinmann, M. (2013). Assessment-Center. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, A., Strobel, A., Kici, G., & Westhoff, K. (2009). Quality of the Critical Incident Technique in practice: Interrater reliability and users' acceptance under real conditions. Psychology Science Quarterly 51, 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, A., Strobel, A., Miller, R., Garten, A., Cimander, C., & Westhoff, K. (2012). Never use one when two will do: The effects of a multi-perspective approach on the outcome of job analyses using the Critical Incident Technique. Journal of Personnel Psychology 11, 95–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • König, C. J., Melchers, K. G., Kleinmann, M., Richter, G. M., & Klehe, U. C. (2007). Candidates' ability to identify criteria in nontransparent selection procedures: Evidence from an assessment center and a structured interview. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 15, 283–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooij, D. T., De Lange, A. H., Jansen, P. G., Kanfer, R., & Dikkers, J. S. (2011). Age and work‐related motives: Results of a meta‐analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior 32, 197–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, J. (2009). Allgemeine Intelligenz und beruflicher Erfolg in Deutschland: Vertiefende und weiterführende Metaanalysen. Psychologische Rundschau 60, 82–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individual's fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology 58, 281–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumm, S., Grube, A., & Hertel, G. (2013). No time for compromises: Age as a moderator of the relation between needs–supply fit and job satisfaction. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 22, 547–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumm, S., Lievens, F., Hüffmeier, J., Lipnevich, A. A., Bendels, H., & Hertel, G. (2015). How "situational" is judgment in an situational judgment test? Journal of Applied Psychology 100, 399–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lance, C. E. (2008). Why assessment centers do not work the way they are supposed to. Industrial and Organizational Psychology 1, 84–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior 45, 79–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lievens, F. (1998). Factors which improve the construct validity of assessment centers: A review. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 6, 141–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lievens, F. (2001). Assessor training strategies and their effects on accuracy, interrater reliability, and discriminant validity. Journal of Applied Psychology 86, 255–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lievens, F. (2002). Trying to understand the different pieces of the construct validity puzzle of assessment centers: An examination of assessor and assessee effects. Journal of Applied Psychology 87, 675–686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lievens, F. (2017). Assessing Personality–Situation Interplay in Personnel Selection: Toward More Integration into Personality Research. European Journal of Personality 31, 424–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohaus, D., & Schuler, H. (2014). Leistungsbeurteilung. In H. Schuler & U. P. Kanning (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch der Personalpsychologie (S. 357–411). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marlowe, C. M., Schneider, S. L., & Nelson, C. E. (1996). Gender and attractiveness biases in hiring decisions: Are more experienced managers less biased? Journal of Applied Psychology 81, 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, E. J., Jeanneret, P. R., & Mecham, R. C. (1969). The development and background of the Position Analysis Questionnaire. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University: Occupational Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, M. A., Morgeson, F. P., Finnegan, E. B., Campion, M. A., & Braverman, E. P. (2001). Use of situational judgment tests to predict job performance: A clarification of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology 86, 730–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, M. A., Hartman, N. S., Whetzel, D. L., & Grubb, W. (2007). Situational judgment tests, response instructions, and validity: a meta‐analysis. Personnel Psychology 60, 63–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melchers, K. G., & Annen, H. (2010). Officer selection for the Swiss armed forces: An evaluation of validity and fairness issues. Swiss Journal of Psychology 69, 105–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melchers, K. G., Henggeler, C., & Kleinmann, M. (2007). Do within-dimension ratings in assessment centers really lead to improved construct validity? A meta-analytic reassessment. Zeitschrift für Personalpsychologie 6, 141–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melchers, K. G., Kleinmann, M., Richter, G. M., Konig, C. J., & Klehe, U. C. (2004). Messen Einstellungsinterviews das, was sie messen sollen? Zur Bedeutung der Bewerberkognitionen über bewertetes Verhalten. Zeitschrift für Personalpsychologie 3, 159–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meriac, J. P., Hoffman, B. J., Woehr, D. J., & Fleisher, M. S. (2008). Further evidence for the validity of assessment center dimensions: A meta-analysis of the incremental criterion-related validity of dimension ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology 93, 1042–1052.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, A., Cannan, K., & Cullinane, J. (2005). 360 feedback: A critical enquiry. Personnel Review 34, 663–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgeson, F. P., & Campion, M. A. (1997). Social and cognitive sources of potential inaccuracy in job analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 82, 627–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): develo** and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology 91, 1321–1339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgeson, F. P., Mumford, T. V., & Campion, M. A. (2005). Coming full circle: Using research and practice to address 27 questions about 360-degree feedback programs. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research 57, 196–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Benedict, V. (2010). Grenzen von leistungsbasierten Auswahlverfahren. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 13, 451–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, T. V., Van Iddekinge, C. H., Morgeson, F. P., & Campion, M. A. (2008). The team role test: Development and validation of a team role knowledge situational judgment test. Journal of Applied Psychology 93, 250–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mussel, P., Gatzka, T., & Hewig, J. (2016). Situational judgment tests as an alternative measure for personality assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 34, 328–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neubauer, A., Bergner, S., & Felfe, J. (2012). LJI: Leadership Judgement Indicator. Deutschsprachige Adaptation des Leadership Judgement Indicator (LJI) von M. Lock und R. Wheeler. Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obermann, C. (2009). Assessment-Center: Entwicklung, Durchführung, Trends. Mit originalen AC-Übungen (4. Aufl.). Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Occupational Information Network (O*NET). (2020). National Center for O*NET Development. O*NET OnLine. https://www.onetonline.org/. Zugegriffen: 24. März 2020.

  • Oh, I.-S., & Berry, C. M. (2009). The five-factor model of personality and managerial performance: Validity gains through the use of 360 degree performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology 94, 1498–1513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostendorf, F., & Angleitner, A. (2004). NEO-PI-R: NEO-Persönlichkeitsinventar nach Costa und McCrae, revidierte Fassung. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peus, C., Braun, S., & Frey, D. (2016). LSA: Leadership Style Assessment: Ein Situational Judgment Test zur Erfassung von Führungsstilen. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimann, G. (2009). Moderne Eignungsbeurteilung mit der DIN 33430. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothe, I., Adolph, L., Beermann, B., Schütte, M., Windel, A., Grewer, A., Grewer, A., et al. (2017). Psychische Gesundheit in der Arbeitswelt: Wissenschaftliche Standortbestimmung. Dortmund: Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupp, D. E., Snyder, L. A., Gibbons, A. M., & Thornton, G. C., III. (2006). What should developmental assessment centers be develo**? The Psychologist-Manager Journal 9, 75–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, A. M., McFarland, L., Baron, H., & Page, R. (1999). An international look at selection practices: Nation and culture as explanations for variability in practice. Personnel Psychology 52, 359–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, A. M., Reeder, M. C., Golubovich, J., Grand, J., Inceoglu, I., Bartram, D., Derous, E., et al. (2017). Culture and testing practices: is the world flat? Applied Psychology 66, 434–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salgado, J. F., Anderson, N., Moscoso, S., Bertua, C., & de Fruyt, F. (2003). International validity generalization of GMA and cognitive abilities: A European community meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology 56, 573–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäpers, P., Mussel, P., Lievens, F., König, C. J., Freudenstein, J.-P., & Krumm, S. (2019). The role of situations in situational judgment tests: Effects on construct saturation, predictive validity, and applicant perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schippmann, J., Ash, R., Battista, M., Carr, L., Eyde, L., Hesketh, B., Kehoe, J., et al. (2000). The practice of compentency modeling. Personnel Psychology 53, 703–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin 124, 262–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F. L., Oh, I.-S., & Shaffer, J. A. (2016). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 100 years of research findings. Working Paper. Tippie College of Business, University of Iowa. https://testingtalent.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/2016-100-Yrs-Working-Paper-on-Selection-Methods-Schmit-Mar-17.pdf. Zugegriffen: 27. März 2020.

  • Schmidt, F. L., Shaffer, J. A., & Oh, I.-S. (2008). Increased accuracy for range restriction corrections: Implications for the role of personality and general mental ability in job and training performance. Personnel Psychology 61, 827–868.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, H. (2006). Arbeits- und Anforderungsanalyse. In H. Schuler (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch der Personalpsychologie (2. Aufl., S. 45–68). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, H., & Höft, S. (2007). Diagnose beruflicher Eignung und Leistung. In H. Schuler (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch Organisationspsychologie (4. Aufl., S. 289–343). Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, H., & Kanning, U. P. (2014). Lehrbuch der Personalpsychologie (3. Aufl.). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, H., & Moser, K. (2014). Lehrbuch Organisationspsychologie (5. Aufl.). Bern: Hans Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, H., & Stehle, W. (1983). Neuere Entwicklungen des Assessment-Center-Ansatzes – beurteilt unter dem Aspekt der sozialen Validität. Zeitschrift für Arbeits-und Organisationspsychologie 27, 33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, H., Frier, D., & Kauffmann, M. (1993). Personalauswahl im europäischen Vergleich. Göttingen: Verlag für Angewandte Psychologie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, H., Hell, B., Trapmann, S., Schaar, H., & Boramir, I. (2007). Die Nutzung psychologischer Verfahren der externen Personalauswahl in deutschen Unternehmen. Ein Vergleich über 20 Jahre. Zeitschrift für Personalpsychologie 6, 60–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, J. A., & Postlethwaite, B. E. (2012). A matter of context: A meta‐analytic investigation of the relative validity of contextualized and noncontextualized personality measures. Personnel Psychology 65, 445–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solga, M., Ryschka, J., & Mattenklott, A. (2011). Personalentwicklung: Gegenstand, Prozessmodell, Erfolgsfaktoren. In J. Ryschka, M. Solga, & A. Mattenklott (Hrsg.), Praxishandbuch Personalentwicklung (S. 19–33). Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speer, A. B., Christiansen, N. D., Goffin, R. D., & Goff, M. (2014). Situational bandwidth and the criterion-related validity of assessment center ratings: Is cross-exercise convergence always desirable? Journal of Applied Psychology 99, 282–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperka, M., & Rózsa, J. (2007). KOMMINO: Fragebogen zur Erfassung der Kommunikation in Organisationen. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stangel-Meseke, M., Akli, H., & Schnelle, J. (2005). Lernförderliches Feedback im modifizierten Lernpotenzial-Assessment Center: Umsetzung der Forschungsergebnisse in einer betrieblichen Studie. Zeitschrift für Personalpsychologie 4, 187–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmann, S., van Dick, R., Ullrich, J., Charalambous, J., Menzel, B., Egold, N., & Wu, T. T.-C. (2010). Der Work Design Questionnaire. Zeitschrift für Arbeits-und Organisationspsychologie 54, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, D. D. (2012). Personnel selection across the globe. In N. Schmitt (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook of Personnel Assessment and Selection (S. 740–767). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillema, H. H. (1998). Assessment of potential, from assessment centers to development centers. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 6, 185–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trapmann, S., Hell, B., Weigand, S., & Schuler, H. (2007). Die Validität von Schulnoten zur Vorhersage des Studienerfolgs – eine Metaanalyse. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie 21 132–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Iddekinge, C. H., Raymark, P. H., Eidson, J., Carl E & Attenweiler, W. J. (2004). What do structured selection interviews really measure? The construct validity of behavior description interviews. Human Performance 17, 71–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Iddekinge, C. H., Putka, D. J., & Campbell, J. P. (2011a). Reconsidering vocational interests for personnel selection: The validity of an interest-based selection test in relation to job knowledge, job performance, and continuance intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology 96, 13–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Iddekinge, C. H., Roth, P. L., Putka, D. J., & Lanivich, S. E. (2011b). Are you interested? A meta-analysis of relations between vocational interests and employee performance and turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology 96, 1167–1194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanhove, A. J., Gibbons, A. M., & Kedharnath, U. (2016). Rater agreement, accuracy, and experienced cognitive load: Comparison of distributional and traditional assessment approaches to rating performance. Human Performance 29, 378–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voskuijl, O. F., & van Sliedregt, T. (2002). Determinants of interrater reliability of job analysis: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 18, 52–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, P. (1997). 360 degree feedback. London, UK: Charter House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weekley, J. A., & Ployhart, R. E. (2013). Situational judgment tests: Theory, measurement, and application. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesner, W. H., & Cronshaw, S. F. (1988). A meta‐analytic investigation of the impact of interview format and degree of structure on the validity of the employment interview. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 61, 275–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woehr, D., Arthur, W., & Meriac, J. (2007). Methodenfaktoren statt Fehlervarianz: eine Metaanalyse der Assessment Center-Konstruktvalidität. In H. Schuler (Hrsg.), Assessment Center zur Potentialanalyse (S. 81–108). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, M., MacCann, C., & Roberts, R. (2011). New perspectives on faking in personality assessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Berln, Deutschland

    Stefan Krumm, Lothar Schmidt-Atzert & Manfred Amelang

Authors
  1. Stefan Krumm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lothar Schmidt-Atzert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Manfred Amelang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Fachbereich Psychologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Hessen, Deutschland

    Lothar Schmidt-Atzert

  2. Arbeitsbereich Psychologische Diagnostik, Differentielle und Persönlichkeitspsychologie, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland

    Stefan Krumm

  3. Psychologisches Institut, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Deutschland

    Manfred Amelang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Krumm, S., Schmidt-Atzert, L., Amelang, M. (2021). Diagnostik in der Arbeits-, Organisations- und Wirtschaftspsychologie. In: Schmidt-Atzert, L., Krumm, S., Amelang, M. (eds) Psychologische Diagnostik. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-61643-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-61643-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-61642-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-61643-7

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation