Ergonomic Evaluation Tools Associated with Biomechanical Risk Factors in Work Activities: Review of Literature

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) (IEA 2018)

Abstract

Objective: Identify the most used evaluation tools in work situations that involve biomechanical and postural load. Through the literature review, it seeks to answer the following questions, which is the influence of the work or occupational ergonomics in the industry? What are the ergonomic evaluation tools most used in labor situation similar to surgical support? and What is the relation between working conditions and the appearance of symptoms associated with pain and occupational diseases?. Method: Were defined keywords related to main areas: Ergonomics, productivity and risk factors, with which it was subsequently made a literature review on these databases: PubMed, Springer, and ScienceDirect. Likewise, it is included in the review, documents related to OMS, OIT, Fasecolda, among others. The documents founded were classified taking into account the inclusion criteria like language (Spanish, English, and French) and the relation with interest topics. Finally, it has been made the analysis of content with Nvivo Software. Results: It has been identified that the most recurrent evaluation tools for studies, related to labor activities that involve biomechanical and postural load, were LEST, REBA and VAS methods. Likewise, it was identified the relation between biomechanical risk factors with labors activities that involve load lifting and handling. Conclusions: Similar Investigations on the surgical support in companies were reviewed, show that exist a tendency toward the appearance and development of MSDs of occupational origin, especially injuries at the lumbar level due to biomechanical demand of these activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pérez S, Méndez J, Jiménez A, Pérez S, Méndez J, Jiménez A, Ramos M, Aguilera V (2014) Análisis y optimización de estaciones de trabajo, con enfoque ergonómico para el aumento de la productividad y disminución de riesgos laborales. Ciencias de la Ingenieria y Tecnologia, pp 176–187

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ccollana-salazar Y (2015) Rotación del personal, absentismo laboral y productividad de los trabajadores, pp 50–59

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guadalupe J, Estrada S, Cristóbal IJ, Pupo G, Yadira II (2009) Clima y cultura organizacional: dos componentes esenciales en la productividad laboral. Rev Cubana de Inf en Ciencias de la Salud (ACIMED) 20(4):67–75

    Google Scholar 

  4. Díaz C (2010) Actividad laboral y carga mental del trabajo. Comport Organ 12(36):281–292

    Google Scholar 

  5. Arbeláez G, Velásquez A, Tamayo C (2011) Principales patologías osteomusculares relacionadas con el riesgo ergonómico derivado de las actividades laborales administrativas. Rev CES Salud Publica 2(2145–9932):196–203

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tolosa-Guzman I (2015) Riesgos biomecánicos asociados al desorden músculo esquelético en pacientes del régimen contributivo que consultan a un centro ambulatorio en Madrid. Rev Ciencia y Salud 13(1):25–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Karlqvist L, Wigaeus E, Hagberg M, Hagman M (2002) Self-reported working conditions of VDU operators and associations with musculoskeletal symptoms: a cross-sectional study focussing on gender differences. Int J Ind Ergon 30:277–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zare M, Bodin J, Cercier E, Brunet R, Roquelaure Y (2015) Evaluation of ergonomic approach and musculoskeletal disorders in two different organizations in a truck assembly plant. Int J Ind Ergon 50:34–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Caraballo Y (2013) Epidemiología de los trastornos musculo -esqueleticos de origen ocupacional. Temas De Epidemiologia Y Salud Publica, pp 745–764

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vernaza P, Sierra C (2005) Dolor músculo-esquelético y su asociación con factores de riesgo ergonómicos, en trabajadores administrativos. Rev de Salud Pública 7(3):317–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Valle E, Manero R (2008) Evaluación integral del nivel de riesgo músculo esquelético en diferentes actividades laborales. Salud de los Trabajadores 16(1):17–28

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lite AS, García MG, Ángel M (2007) Métodos de evaluación y herramientas aplicadas al diseño y optimización ergonómica de puestos de trabajo, pp 239–250

    Google Scholar 

  13. Escalante M (2009) Evaluación ergonómica de Puestos de Trabajo. In: Seventh LACCEI Latin American and Caribbean Conference for Engineering and Technology (LACCEI’2009), pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  14. Alonso ML, Dolores M, Aires M, González EM (2011) Análisis de los riesgos musculoesqueléticos asociados a los trabajos de ferrallas. Buenas prácticas Musculoskeletal risks analysis related to steel reinforcement works. Good practices. Ingenieria de Construccion 26:284–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cequea M, Rodríguez-Monroy C, Bottini MN (2011) Productividad humana. análisis factorial de sus dimensiones y factores, no. February 2014, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lucas RAI, Epstein Y, Kjellstrom T (2017) Excessive occupational heat exposure: a significant ergonomic challenge and health risk for current and future workers, pp 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lan L, Lian Z, Pan L (2010) The effects of air temperature on office workers’ well-being, workload and productivity-evaluated with subjective ratings. Appl Ergon 42(1):29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Escorpizo R (2008) Understanding work productivity and its application to work-related musculoskeletal disorders. Int J Ind Ergon 38:291–297

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cequea MM, Monroy CR, Angel M, Bottini N (2014) La productividad desde una perspectiva humana: dimensiones y factores. 7(2): 549–584

    Google Scholar 

  20. Arenas-Ortiz L, Cantú Gómez Ó (2013) Factores de riesgo de trastornos músculo-esqueléticos crónicos laborales. Med Interna de Mexico 29(4):370–379

    Google Scholar 

  21. Molen HFVD, Mol E, Kuijer PPFM, Frings-dresen MHW (2007) The evaluation of smaller plasterboards on productivity, work demands and workload in construction workers. Appl Ergon 38:681–686

    Google Scholar 

  22. Molen HFVD, Kunst M, Kuijer PPFM, Frings-dresen MHW (2011) Evaluation of the effect of a paver’ s trolley on productivity, task demands, workload and local discomfort. Int J Ind Ergon 41(1):59–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Molina A (2010) Ergonomia. Espadelada, vol. uno, pp. 3–93

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ruíz YR, Brito SV, Martínez RM, No IC, Habana L (2010) ERIN: Un método observacional para evaluar la exposición a factores de riesgo de desórdenes músculo-esqueléticos. Convencion científica de ingeniería y arquitectura, no. 11901

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lopez B, González E, Colunga C, Lopez E (2014) Evaluación de sobrecarga postural en trabajadores: revisión de la literatura. Ciencia and Trabajo, pp 111–115

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ibáñez RM, Manzanares A (2005) Escalas de valoración del dolor. vol. LXVIII, no. 527, pp 527–530

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sirit Y, Amortegui M (2007) Síntomas Músculo Esqueléticos en Trabajadores de una Empresa de construcción civil. Salud de los Trabajadores 15(2):89–98

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hurley K, Marshall J, Hogan K, Wells R (2012) A comparison of productivity and physical demands during parcel delivery using a standard and a prototype electric courier truck. Int J Ind Ergon 42(4):384–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Venicio J, Valerio G, Herrera EY, Torres LB, Damian WC (2016) Agroindustrial Science 6: 199–212

    Google Scholar 

  30. Morales KL, Acosta G (2017) Diez años de ergonomía en el Banco de la República : De la mano en pro de la salud y la productividad

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rodriguez-Ruíz Y, Pérez-Mergarejo E (2014) Procedimiento ergonómico para la prevención de enfermedades en el contexto ocupacional/ergonomic procedure for the prevention of occupational disease. Rev Cubana de Salud Publica 40(2):279–285

    Google Scholar 

  32. Caraballo Y (2013) Epidemiología de los trastornos músculo- esqueléticos de origen ocupacional. Temas de epidemiología y salud pública 2:745–764

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María José González Carvajal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Carvajal, M.J.G., García, F.M., Gualdrón, C.I.L. (2019). Ergonomic Evaluation Tools Associated with Biomechanical Risk Factors in Work Activities: Review of Literature. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 818. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96098-2_34

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation