Enhancing the Behavior of Agents in Social Simulations with Emotions and Social Relations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Multi-Agent Based Simulation XVIII (MABS 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 10798))

Abstract

Social Simulations need agents with a realistic behavior to be used as a scientific tool by social scientists. When simulating a human society, a realistic behavior implies the use of cognition, social relations between people but also to take into account emotions and the dynamic between these features. However, develo** such a behavior is often too complex for people with little knowledge in programming. In this paper, we present a formalism to represent cognition, social relations and emotions, which is integrated in an agent architecture to give a dynamic emotional behavior to social agents. This architecture is implemented in the open-source multi-agent platform GAMA. A use case about evacuation during bush fires in Australia is used to show the possibilities of our work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adam, C.: Emotions: from psychological theories to logical formalization and implementation in a BDI agent (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adam, C., Dugdale, J.: Comparing agent architectures in social simulation: BDI agents versus finite-state machines. In: HICSS (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Adam, C., Gaudou, B.: BDI agents in social simulations: a survey. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 31, 207–238 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arnold, M.B.: Emotion and Personality. Columbia University Press (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Balke, T., Gilbert, N.: How do agents make decisions? A survey. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 17(4), 1–3 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Balmer, M., Rieser, M., Meister, K., Charypar, D., Lefebvre, N., Nagel, K., Axhausen, K.: MATSim-T: architecture and simulation times. In: Multi-agent Systems for Traffic and Transportation Engineering (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bates, J.: The role of emotion in believable agents. Commun. ACM 37, 122–125 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bellifemine, F., Poggi, A., Rimassa, G.: JADE-A FIPA-compliant agent framework. In: Proceedings of PAAM, London (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bickmore, T., Cassell, J.: Relational agents: a model and implementation of building user trust. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bourgais, M., Taillandier, P., Vercouter, L.: An agent architecture coupling cognition and emotions for simulation of complex systems. In: SSC (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bratman, M.: Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reason. Harvard University Press (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brown, P., Levinson, S.C.: Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage, vol. 4. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Byrne, M.D., Anderson, J.R.: Perception and action. In: The Atomic Components of Thought (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cohen, P.R., Levesque, H.J.: Intention is choice with commitment. Artif. Intell. 42, 213–261 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Collins, N.L., Miller, L.C.: Self-disclosure and liking: a meta-analytic review. Psychol. Bull. 116, 457–475 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. de Rivera, J., Grinkis, C.: Emotions as social relationships. Motiv. Emot. 10, 351–369 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gilbert, N., Troitzsch, K.: Simulation for the Social Scientist. McGraw-Hill Education, London (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gratch, J.: Socially situated planning. In: Dautenhahn, K., Bond, A., Cañamero, L., Edmonds, B. (eds.) Socially Intelligent Agents. Springer, Boston (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47373-9_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Gratch, J., Marsella, S.: A domain-independent framework for modeling emotion. Cogn. Syst. Res. 5, 269–306 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Grignard, A., Taillandier, P., Gaudou, B., Vo, D.A., Huynh, N.Q., Drogoul, A.: GAMA 1.6: advancing the art of complex agent-based modeling and simulation. In: Boella, G., Elkind, E., Savarimuthu, B.T.R., Dignum, F., Purvis, M.K. (eds.) PRIMA 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8291, pp. 117–131. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-44927-7_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Howden, N., Rönnquist, R., Hodgson, A., Lucas, A.: Jack intelligent agents-summary of an agent infrastructure. In: 5th International Conference on Autonomous Agents (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Isbister, K.: Better Game Characters by Design: A Psychological Approach. Elsevier, San Francisco (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jiang, H., Vidal, J.M., Huhns, M.N.: EBDI: an architecture for emotional agents. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. ACM (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Keltner, D., Haidt, J.: Social functions of emotions (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Knutson, B.: Facial expressions of emotion influence interpersonal trait inferences. J. Nonverbal Behav. 20, 165–182 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Laird, J.E., Newell, A., Rosenbloom, P.S.: SOAR: an architecture for general intelligence. Artif. Intell. 33, 1–64 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Macatulad, E.G., Blanco, A.C.: 3DGIS-based multi-agent geosimulation and visualization of building evacuation using GAMA platform. In: The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Myers, K.L.: User guide for the procedural reasoning system. Technical report, SRI International AI Center (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nair, R., Tambe, M., Marsella, S.: The role of emotions in multiagent teamwork. In: Who Needs Emotions (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Ochs, M., Sabouret, N., Corruble, V.: Simulation of the dynamics of nonplayer characters’ emotions and social relations in games. IEEE Trans. Comput. Intell. AI Games 1, 281–297 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ortony, A.: Value and emotion. In: Memories, Thoughts, and Emotions: Essays in Honor of George Mandler (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ortony, A., Clore, G.L., Collins, A.: The Cognitive Structure of Emotions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pokahr, A., Braubach, L., Lamersdorf, W.: Jadex: a BDI reasoning engine. In: Bordini, R.H., Dastani, M., Dix, J., El Fallah Seghrouchni, A. (eds.) Multi-Agent Programming. Springer, Boston (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-26350-0_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Prendinger, H., Ishizuka, M.: Social role awareness in animated agents. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Autonomous Agents. ACM (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ramli, N.R., Razali, S., Osman, M.: An overview of simulation software for non-experts to perform multi-robot experiments. In: ISAMSR. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rönnquist, R.: The goal oriented teams (GORITE) framework. In: Dastani, M., El Fallah Seghrouchni, A., Ricci, A., Winikoff, M. (eds.) ProMAS 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4908, pp. 27–41. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79043-3_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Rousseau, D., Hayes-Roth, B.: A social-psychological model for synthetic actors. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Autonomous Agents. ACM (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sakellariou, I., Kefalas, P., Stamatopoulou, I.: Enhancing NetLogo to simulate BDI communicating agents. In: Darzentas, J., Vouros, G.A., Vosinakis, S., Arnellos, A. (eds.) SETN 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5138, pp. 263–275. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87881-0_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Shiota, M.N., Campos, B., Keltner, D., Hertenstein, M.J.: Positive emotion and the regulation of interpersonal relationships. In: The Regulation of Emotion (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Singh, D., Padgham, L.: OpenSim: a framework for integrating agent-based models and simulation components. In: Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, ECAI 2014, vol. 263. IOS Press (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Smith, C.A., Lazarus, R.S.: Emotion and Adaptation. Psychology Press (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Smith, E.R., Mackie, D.M., Claypool, H.M.: Social Psychology. Psychology Press, Hove (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sun, R.: Cognition and Multi-agent Interaction: From Cognitive Modeling to Social Simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Svennevig, J.: Getting Acquainted in Conversation: A Study of Initial Interactions. John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam (2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  45. Taillandier, P., Bourgais, M., Caillou, P., Adam, C., Gaudou, B.: A BDI agent architecture for the GAMA modeling and simulation platform. In: MABS (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Van Dyke Parunak, H., Bisson, R., Brueckner, S., Matthews, R., Sauter, J.: A model of emotions for situated agents. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents And Multiagent Systems. ACM (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Wilensky, U., Evanston, I.: NetLogo: Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling. Northwestern University, Evanston (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work is partially supported by two public grants overseen by the French National Research Agency (ANR) as part of the program PRC (reference: ESCAPE ANR-16-CE39-0011-01 and ACTEUR ANR-14-CE22-0002).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mathieu Bourgais .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bourgais, M., Taillandier, P., Vercouter, L. (2018). Enhancing the Behavior of Agents in Social Simulations with Emotions and Social Relations. In: Dimuro, G., Antunes, L. (eds) Multi-Agent Based Simulation XVIII. MABS 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10798. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91587-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91587-6_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91586-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91587-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation