Route Risk Assessment for Road Transport Companies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Contemporary Complex Systems and Their Dependability (DepCoS-RELCOMEX 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 761))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 604 Accesses

Abstract

The transportation process is described by 5 parameters: transport operations and the relations between them, the route, the time of the transportation process and the kind of product that is transported. The direct interviews conducted among carriers indicate that if entered into the TMS (Transport Management System), the route parameters applicable for carriers would speed up cost calculation process and improve accuracy of business decisions. One of those parameters is the level of risk connected with potential disruptions of the transportation process. Therefore, this article aims to present a new approach to risk analysis conducted to facilitate decision process for the management of a transport enterprise. The research presented in this article is part of “Identifying data supporting risk assessment in road transport system in the aspect of safety and meeting logistic standards” program financed as part of MINIATURA 1 program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ambituuni, A., Amezaga, J.M., Werner, D.: Risk assessment of petroleum product transportation by road: a framework for regulatory improvement. Saf. Sci. 79, 324–335 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ambros, J., Havránek, P., Valentová, V., Krivankova, Z., Striegler, R.: Identification of hazardous locations in regional road network – comparison of reactive and proactive approaches. Transp. Res. Procedia 14, 4209–4217 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Apostolakis, G.E.: How useful is quantitative risk assessment? Risk Anal. 24, 515–520 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aven, T.: Perspectives on risk in a decision-making context – review and discussion. Saf. Sci. 47, 798–806 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aven, T.: On how to define, understand and describe risk. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 95, 623–631 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Aven, T.: The risk concept—historical and recent development trends. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 99, 33–44 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Aven, T., Zio, E.: Foundational issues in risk analysis. Risk Anal. 34(7), 1164–1172 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Aven, T.: Risk assessment and risk management: review of recent advances on their foundation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 253, 1–13 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Bajpai, S., Sachdeva, A., Gupta, J.P.: Security risk assessment: applying the concepts of fuzzy logic. J. Hazard. Mater. 173, 258–264 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Benekos, I., Diamantidis, D.: On risk assessment and risk acceptance of dangerous goods transportation through road tunnels in Greece. Saf. Sci. 91, 1–10 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bronk, H.: Features and costs structure in transport allowing for decision making. Zesz. Nauk. Uniw. Szczec. 813, 21–39 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Caliendo, C., De Guglielmo, M.L.: Accident rates in road tunnels and social cost evaluation. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 53, 166–177 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Caliendo, C., De Guglielmo, M.L.: Quantitative risk analysis on the transport of dangerous goods through a bi-directional road tunnel. Risk Anal. 37(1), 116–129 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chakrabarti, U.K., Parikh, J.K.: Applying HAZAN methodology to hazmat transportation risk assessment. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 90, 368–375 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Conca, A., Ridella, Ch., Sapori, E.: A risk assessment for road transportation of dangerous goods: a routing solution. Transp. Res. Procedia 14, 2890–2899 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Douglas, J., Serrano, J.-J., Coraboeuf, D., Bouc, O., Arnal, C., Robida, F., Modaressi, H., Atkinson, M., Vowles, G., Holt, I.: Risk assessment for the road network in the French-Italian border region using web services. In: First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology (a joint event of the 13th ECEE & 30th General Assembly of the ESC), September 2006, Geneve, Switzerland, Paper number 827 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. East, A., Smale, N., Kang, S.: A method for quantitative risk assessment of temperature control in insulated boxes. Int. J. Refrig. 32, 1505–1513 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Goerlandt, F., Montewka, J.: Maritime transportation risk analysis: review and analysis in light of some foundational issues. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 138, 115–134 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hampel, J.: Different concepts of risk – a challenge for risk communication. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 296, 5–10 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Heckmann, I., Comes, T., Nickel, S.: A critical review on supply chain risk – definition, measure and modelling. Omega 52, 119–132 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jurewicz, Ch., Excel, R.: Application of a crash-predictive risk assessment model to prioritise road safety investment in Australia. Transp. Res. Procedia 14, 2101–2110 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaplan, S.: The words of risk analysis. Risk Anal. 17, 407–417 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kierzkowski, A., Kisiel, T.: Simulation model of security control system functioning: a case study of the Wroclaw Airport terminal. J. Air Transp. Manag. (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Młyńczak, M., Nowakowski, T., Valis, D.: How to manage risks? The normative approach. Probl. Eksploat. 1, 137–147 (2011). (in Polish)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mokrzyszczak, H.: Ładunkoznawstwo. Technologia zabezpieczania ładunków w transporcie. WKiŁ, Warszawa (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Norros, I., Kuusela, P., Innamaa, S., Pilli-Sihvola, E., Rajamäki, R.: The Palm distribution of traffic conditions and its application to accident risk assessment. Anal. Methods Accid. Res. 12, 48–65 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nowosielski, S. (ed.): Logistic Processes and Projects. Wydawnictwo UE we Wrocławiu, Wroclaw (2008). (in Polish)

    Google Scholar 

  28. PN-72/M-78000: Transport – określenia podstawowe i podział. PKN, Warsaw (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  29. PN-ISO 31000:2010: Risk management – principles and guide-lines. PKN, Warsaw (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Restel, F.J.: The Markov reliability and safety model of the railway transportation system. In: Safety and Reliability: Methodology and Applications - Proceedings of the European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2014, pp. 303–311. Taylor and Francis (2015)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Szymanek, A.: Conception of “4 Goals and 3 Levels” in risk management in road transport systems. Arch. Transp. 22(3), 359–375 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tubis, A., Werbińska-Wojciechowska, S.: The scope of the collected data for a holistic risk assessment performance in the road freight transport companies. In: Zamojski, W. (ed.) Advances in Dependability Engineering of Complex Systems: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Dependability and Complex Systems DepCoS-RELCOMEX, 2–6 July 2017, Brunów, Poland, pp. 450–463 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tu, H., Li, H., van Lint, H., van Zuylen, H.: Modeling travel time reliability of freeways using risk assessment techniques. Transp. Res. Part A 46, 1528–1540 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zajac, M., Swieboda, J.: Process hazard analysis of the selected process in intermodal transport. In: 2015 International Conference on Military Technologies (ICMT), pp. 1–7. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agnieszka Tubis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tubis, A. (2019). Route Risk Assessment for Road Transport Companies. In: Zamojski, W., Mazurkiewicz, J., Sugier, J., Walkowiak, T., Kacprzyk, J. (eds) Contemporary Complex Systems and Their Dependability. DepCoS-RELCOMEX 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 761. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91446-6_46

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation