Abstract
Borders, boundary markers, and borderscapes are diverse, so too are the approaches researchers adopt to analyze and understand the phenomena they shape – and are shaped by. Commonly, geographers analyze borders, boundary markers, and borderscapes by examining particular languages they communicate – both overtly and tacitly. Examples include expressions of state power, sites of conflict and contestation, social and cultural containers, channels that lubricate transnational economic activity, or conduits for energy transmission. Borders, boundary markers, and borderscapes, therefore, can either be highly visible representations or subliminal manifestations of phenomena. Generally, border areas are highly idiosyncratic, due to the myriad ways they are delineated and continually shaped by conditions at local, regional, national, and supranational scales. They illuminate both homogeneity and stark inequality due to unevenness in power dynamics, economic wealth, natural resources, or human capital. Depending on specific context, they may also represent sites of conflict or cooperation, both restricting and facilitating flows of people, goods, and capital. In this sense, borders and boundaries can be understood as a language, for their representations and sha** of phenomena. The focal points of borders are commonly found at international crossing points. It is here physical and visual dimensions of abstract policies manifest, in a range of vastly different ways. Through a photographic essay supported by personal narratives, this chapter will illuminate some of the substantial diversity represented in borders, boundary markers, and borderscapes across China and Asia. The differences represent a range of meanings, objectives, histories, and languages that are communicated and contested in a dynamic, rapidly changing part of the world.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chen, X. (2005). As borders bend: Transnational spaces on the Pacific rim. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Hessler, P. (2011). Country driving. New York: Harper Collins.
Jackson, J. B. (1986). Discovering the vernacular landscape. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Jones, R. (2005). Categories, borders and boundaries. Progress in Human Geography, 33(2), 174–189.
Lewis, P. (1979). Axioms for reading the landscape: Some guide to the American scene. In D. W. Meinig (Ed.), The interpretation of ordinary landscapes: Geographical essays (pp. 11–32). New York: Oxford University Press.
Rajaram, P. K., & Grundy-Warr, C. (Eds.). (2007). Borderscapes: Hidden geographies and politics at territories end. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Ptak, T. (2019). Visual Expressions of States, Culture, and Nature: Borders, Boundary Markers, and Borderscapes Across a Dynamic China and Asia. In: Brunn, S., Kehrein, R. (eds) Handbook of the Changing World Language Map. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73400-2_71-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73400-2_71-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73400-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73400-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences