Abstract
Technological organization (TO) is decades old but remains ill-defined and underspecified. Broadly, TO denotes the effects of cultural and adaptive context upon the size and character of tool assemblages. Chapters in this volume reveal TO as a productive approach to the study of hunter-gatherer lithic technologies. Yet TO remains burdened with self-imposed limitations. It must be expanded in scope and applications, in lithics beyond tools, in materials generally beyond lithics, in causes beyond narrow adaptation, and in subjects beyond hunter-gatherers. TO is applied as a set of narrative interpretive tropes. To improve its practice, TO must treat curation as a continuous variable not categorical state, assimilate the time-averaged quality of assemblages as accumulations, reconcile the synchronic behavior it explains with the diachronic accumulations it analyzes, accommodate history as well as adaptation, and transform itself from narrative device to a body of specified, predictive theory. The high quality of chapters at once catalogues the current state and highest expression of TO as interpretive craft and reveals the inherent limitations of that use. Building from this collection, the challenge is to forge the systematic theory that will transform TO into a deductive science.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ammerman, A. J., & Feldman, M. W. (1974). On the ‘making’ of an assemblage of stone tools. American Antiquity, 39, 610–616.
Andrefsky, W. (2009). The analysis of stone tool procurement, production, and maintenance. Journal of Archaeological Research, 17, 65–103.
Attenbrow, V. (2004). What’s changing? Population size or land–use patterns? The archaeology of Upper Mangrove Creek, Sydney Basin. Terra Australis No. 21. Canberra: Pandanus Press, Australian National University.
Beck, C., Taylor, A., Jones, G. T., Fadem, C., Cook, C., & Millward, S. (2002). Rocks are heavy: Transport costs and Paleoarchaic quarry behavior in the Great Basin. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 21, 481–507.
Bever, M. (2006). Too little, too late? The radiocarbon chronology of Alaska and the peopling of the New World. American Antiquity, 71, 595–620.
Binford, L. R. (1977). Forty-seven trips: A case study in the character of archaeological formation processes. In R. V. Wright (Ed.), Stone tools as cultural markers: Change, evolution and complexity (pp. 24–36). Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
Binford, L. R. (1979). Organization and formation processes: Looking at curated technologies. Journal of Anthropological Research, 35, 255–273.
Binford, L. R., & Binford, S. R. (1966). A preliminary analysis of functional variability in the Mousterian of Levallois facies. American Anthropologist, 68, 238–295.
Bleed, P. (1986). The optimal design of hunting weapons: Maintainability or reliability. American Antiquity, 51, 737–747.
Clarke, D. L. (1972). Models and paradigms in contemporary archaeology. In D. L. Clarke (Ed.), Models in archaeology (pp. 1–60). London: Methuen.
Clarke, D. L. (1973). Archaeology: The loss of innocence. Antiquity, 47, 6–18.
Clarkson, C., Haslam, M., & Harris, C. (2015). When to retouch, haft, or discard? Modeling optimal use/maintenance schedules in lithic tool use. In N. Goodale & W. Andrefsky (Eds.), Lithic technological systems and evolutionary theory (pp. 117–138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holdaway, S., Dougless, M., & Phillipps, R. (2015). Flake selection, assemblage variability, and technological organization. In M. Shott (Ed.), Works in stone: Contemporary perspectives on lithic analysis (pp. 46–62). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
Kelly, R. L. (1983). Hunter-gatherer mobility strategies. Journal of Anthropological Research, 39, 277–306.
Kuhn, S. L. (1994). A formal approach to the design and assembly of mobile toolkits. American Antiquity, 59, 426–442.
Kuhn, S. L., & Miller, D. S. (2015). Artifacts as patches: The marginal value theorem and stone tool life histories. In N. Goodale & W. Andrefsky (Eds.), Lithic technological systems and evolutionary theory (pp. 172–197). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mathew, S., & Perreault, C. (2015). Behavioural variation in 172 small-scale societies indicates that social learning is the main mode of human adaptation. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B, 282, 20150061.
Morales, J. I. (2016). Distribution patterns of stone-tool reduction: Establishing frames of reference to approximate occupational features and formation processes in Paleolithic societies. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 41, 231–245.
Nelson, M. C. (1991). The study of technological organization. Archaeological Method and Theory, 3, 57–100.
Odess, D., & Rasic, J. T. (2007). Toolkit composition and assemblage variability: The implications of Nogahabara I, northern Alaska. American Antiquity, 72, 691–718.
Schiffer, M. B. (1975). The effects of occupation span on site content. In M. Schiffer & J. House (Eds.), The Cache River Archeological project: An experiment in contract Archeology (pp. 265–269). Fayetteville, AR: Arkansas Archeological Survey Research Series No. 8.
Shott, M. J. (1986). Technological organization and settlement mobility: An ethnographic examination. Journal of Anthropological Research, 42, 15–51.
Shott, M. J. (1996). An exegesis of the curation concept. Journal of Anthropological Research, 52, 259–280.
Shott, M. J. (2003). Size as a factor in assemblage variation: The European Middle Palaeolithic viewed from a North American perspective. In N. Moloney & M. Shott (Eds.), Lithic analysis at the millennium (pp. 137–149). London: Archtype.
Shott, M. J. (2013). Human colonization and late Pleistocene lithic industries of the Americas. Quaternary International, 285, 150–160.
Shott, M. J. (2015). Glass is heavy too: Testing the field-processing model at the Modena obsidian quarry, Lincoln County, southeastern Nevada. American Antiquity, 80, 548–570.
Shott, M. J., & Habtzghi, D. (2016). Toward disentangling stages in mixed assemblages of flake debris from biface reduction: An experimental approach. Journal of Archaeological Science, 70, 172–180.
Shott, M. J., & Seeman, M. F. (2017). Use and multifactorial reconciliation of uniface reduction measures: A pilot study at the Nobles Pond Paleoindian site. American Antiquity, 81(4.) October.
Spry, C., & Stern, N. (2016). Technological organization. In J. L. Jackson (Ed.), Oxford bibliographies in anthropology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Surovell, T. A. (2009). Toward a behavioral ecology of lithic technology: Cases from Paleoindian archaeology. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
Thomson, D. (1939). The seasonal factor in human culture illustrated from the life of a contemporary nomadic group. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 5, 209–221.
Torrence, R. (1983). Time budgeting and hunter-gatherer technology. In G. Bailey (Ed.), Hunters-gatherer economy in prehistory: A European perspective (pp. 11–22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wiessner, P. (1983). Style and social information in Kalahari San projectile points. American Antiquity, 48, 253–276.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shott, M.J. (2018). The Costs and Benefits of Technological Organization: Hunter-Gatherer Lithic Industries and Beyond. In: Robinson, E., Sellet, F. (eds) Lithic Technological Organization and Paleoenvironmental Change. Studies in Human Ecology and Adaptation, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64407-3_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64407-3_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64405-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64407-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)