Abstract
Ever since the influential Thomas Hobbes, who claimed that ‘natural men’ were ‘like wolves’ to one another, Western philosophy has valued the animal aspects of our humanity negatively, and seen the growth of reason and civilization as the way to overcome them. The relations between different human peoples were understood in a similar vein: the Western, white, man was considered endowed with reason, while the ‘others’ were seen as almost ‘animals’ – almost, as Kant and Hegel saw beneficial effects in colonizing them, and leading them out of their supposed natural state into (Western) history. I will discuss two critical approaches to the double divide, between a) humans and animals and b) ‘reasonable’ and ‘savage’ human beings, that characterizes modern Western thought. One approach seeks to decolonize (Eze, Fanon), and the other to deconstruct (Derrida) the divide. The first criticizes the non-inclusive nature and oppressive effects of the modern idea of ‘humanity’, while the second seeks to ‘undefine’ the animal, thereby undermining the oppressive effects of the divide. To begin with, I will describe the alternative views of human-animal relations in shamanistic cultures, as interpreted by anthropologists (Bamana, Kohn), who aim to escape the white canon of disciplinary philosophy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
‘Animot’ has the same sound as ‘animaux’, the plural of animal in French. The neologism also indicates that the war is about a word (‘mot’) – the word animal, which is supposed to divide humans and non-humans from each other.
- 2.
I deliberately give Eze’s translations of the respective texts, as they are now commonly used in discussions of race in the US and beyond. In Roothaan 2016 I refer to other, somewhat different translations. These differences, as well as differences between the German publications of the texts themselves, are interesting to analyze. I will not go into them here, however, as they go beyond the purpose of this paper.
Bibliography
Bamana, G. (2014). Dogs and herders. Sino-Platonic Papers, 245, 1–16.
Derrida, J. (2002). The animal that therefore I am (More to Follow). Critical Inquiry, 28, 369–418.
Eze, E. (1997). Race and the enlightenment. A reader. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Eze, E. (2001). Achieving our humanity. The idea of a postracial future. New York: Routledge.
Fanon, F. (2008 [1952]). Black skin, white masks. London: Pluto Press.
Kant, I. (2006 [1798]). Anthropology from a pragmatic point of view. Cambridge/New York, Cambridge University Press.
Kohn, E. (2013). How forests think. Toward an anthropology beyond the human. Berkeley/Los Angelos/London: University of California Press.
Llored, P. (2012). Jacques Derrida. In Politique et Ethique de l’Animalité. Mons: Les Éditions Sils Maria asbl.
Park, P. K. (2013). Africa, Asia, and the history of philosophy. In Racism in the formation of the philosophical Canon, 1780–1830. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Roothaan, A. (2015). The “Shamanic” travels of Jesus and Muhammad: Cross-cultural and transcultural understandings of religious experience. American Journal of Theology and Philosophy, 36, 140–153.
Roothaan, A. (2016). Political and cultural identity in the global postcolony. Postcolonial thinkers on the racist enlightenment and the struggle for humanity. In Acta Politologica. http://acpo.vedeckecasopisy.cz/publicFiles/001247.pdf. Accessed 2 Feb 2017.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roothaan, A. (2017). Aren’t We Animals? Deconstructing or Decolonizing the Human – Animal Divide. In: Fuller, M., Evers, D., Runehov, A., Sæther, KW. (eds) Issues in Science and Theology: Are We Special?. Issues in Science and Religion: Publications of the European Society for the Study of Science and Theology, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62124-1_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62124-1_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-62123-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-62124-1
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)