What to Expect of Automated Driving: Expectations and Anticipation of System Behavior

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation (AHFE 2017)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 597))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A realistic view on what new technology can or cannot handle safely should enhance the interaction of driver and technology from first activation on. Wrong assumptions on how technology functions might result in critical driving situations or prevent the activation of an otherwise useful system. Addressing different forms of information given to a driver, a two-tiered research approach was conducted. A focus group study (N = 11) on users concerns regarding automated driving revealed the need of information provided to users to gain an understanding of the function. Further, the usefulness of specific initial information to enhance prediction of system behavior in selected driving situations was focused on in an online survey (N = 108). The results are discussed with regard to further use in behavioral studies on take-over anticipation and intention to use automated systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (Brazil)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.00
Price excludes VAT (Brazil)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (Brazil)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zeeb, K., Buchner, A., Schrauf, M.: Is take-over time all that matters? The impact of visual-cognitive load on driver take-over quality after conditionally automated driving. Accid. Anal. Prev. 92, 230–239 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Merat, N., Jamson, A.H., Lai, F.C.H., Daly, M., Carsten, O.M.J.: Transition to manual: driver behaviour when resuming control from a highly automated vehicle. Transp. Res. Part F 27, 274–282 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gold, C., Damböck, D., Lorenz, L., Bengler, K.: “Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop? Proc. Hum. Factors Ergonom. Soc. Ann. Meet. 57, 1938–1942 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Merat, N., Jamson, A.H., Lai, F.C.H., Carsten, O.M.J.: Highly automated driving, secondary task performance, and driver state. Hum. Factors 54, 762–771 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Goncalves, J., Happee, R., Bengler, K.: Drowsiness in conditional automation: proneness, diagnosis and driving performance effects. In: IEEE 19th International Conference on ITSC, pp. 873–878 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beggiato, M., Krems, J.F.: The evolution of mental model, trust and acceptance of adaptive cruise control in relation to initial information. Transp. Res. Part F 18, 47–57 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. SAE On-Road Automated Vehicle Standards Committee. Information Report J3016: Taxonomy and Definitions (2014). https://www.sae.org/misc/pdfs/automated_driving.pdf

  8. Josten, J., Zlocki, A., Eckstein, L.: Untersuchung der Bewältigungsleistung des Fahrers von kurzfristig auftretenden Wiederübernahmesituationen nach teilautomatischem, freihändigen Fahren. FAT-Schriftenreihe 289 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mullet, E., Duquesnoy, C., Raiff, P., Fahrasmane, R., Namur, E.: The evaluative factor of risk perception. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 23, 1594–1605 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schmidt, T., Philipsen, R., Themann, P., Ziefle, M.: Public perception of V2X-technology – evaluation of general advantages, disadvantages and reasons for data sharing with connected vehicles. In: IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, pp. 1344–1349 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stockert, S., Richardson, N.T., Lienkamp, M.: Driving in an increasingly automated world – approaches to improve the driver-automation interaction. Proc. Manuf. 3, 2889–2896 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Crundall, D., Chapman, P., Trawley, S., Collings, L., van Loon, E., Andrews, B., Underwood, G.: Some hazards are more attractive than others: drivers of varying experience respond differently to different types of hazard. Accid. Anal. Prev. 45, 600–609 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Profile Area ICT of RWTH Aachen University (RWTH-PH-ICT).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johanna Josten .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Josten, J., Schmidt, T., Philipsen, R., Eckstein, L., Ziefle, M. (2018). What to Expect of Automated Driving: Expectations and Anticipation of System Behavior. In: Stanton, N. (eds) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 597. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60441-1_59

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60441-1_59

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60440-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60441-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation