A New Approach to Classify Sugarcane Fields Based on Association Rules

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Technology - New Generations

Abstract

In order to corroborate the acquired knowledge of the human expert with the use of computational systems in the context of agrocomputing, this work presents a novel classification method for mining agrometeorological remote sensing data and its implementation to identify sugarcane fields, by analyzing Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) series. The proposed method, called RAMiner (R ule-based A ssociative classifier Miner ) creates a learning model from sets of mined association rules and employs the rules to constructs an associative classifier. RAMiner was proposed to deal with low spatial resolution image datasets, provided by two sensors/satellites (AVHRR/NOAA and MODIS/Terra). The proposal employs a two-ways classification step for the new data: Considers the conviction value and the conviction-based probability (a weighted accuracy formulated in this work). The results given were compared with others delivered by well-known classifiers, such as C4.5, zeroR, OneR, Naive Bayes, Random Forest and Support Vector Machine (SVM). RAMiner presented the highest accuracy (83.4%), attesting it is well-suited to mine remote sensing data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mucherino, A., Papajorgji, P., & Pardalos, P. M. (2009). Data mining in agriculture. New York: Springer.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Michalski, R. S., & Chilausky, R. L. (1980). Learning by being told and learning from examples: An experimental comparison of the two methods of knowledge acquisition in the context of develo** an expert system for soybean disease diagnosis. International Journal of Policy Analysis and Information System, 4, 125–161.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bhatia, J., & Gupta, A. (2014). Mining of quantitative association rules in agricultural data warehouse: A road map. IJISIS, 3, 187–198.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ramesh, V., & Ramar, K. (2011). Classification of agricultural land soils: A data mining approach. Agricultural Journal, 6, 82–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Verheyen, K., & Hermy, M. (2001). The relative importance of dispersal limitation of vascular plants in secondary forest succession in Muizen forest. Journal of Ecology, 89, 829–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brudzewski, K., Osowski, S., & Markiewicz, T. (2004). Classification of milk by means of an electronic nose and SVM neural network. Sens Actuators, 98, 291–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fagerlund, S. (2007). Bird species recognition using support vector machines. Signal Processing, 38637, 8.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Brudzewski, K., Osowski, S., & Markiewicz, T. (1998). Satellite remote sensing for forestry planning: A review. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 13, 90–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Das, K. C., & Evans, M. D. (1992). Detecting fertility of hatching eggs using machine vision II: Neural network classifiers. Transactions of the ASAE. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 35, 2035–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Karimi, Y., Prasher, S. O., Patel, R. M., & Kim, S. H. (2006). Application of support vector machine technology for weed and nitrogen stress detection in corn. Computer Electronics Agriculture, 51, 99–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Patel, V. C., McClendon, R. W., & Goodrum, J. W. (1994). Crack detection in eggs using computer vision and neural networks. Artificial Intelligence Applications, 8, 21–31.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Agrawal, R., & Srikant, R. (1994). Fast algorithms for mining association rules in large databases. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, VLDB, Santiago (pp. 487–499).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafael S. João .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

João, R.S., Mpinda, S.T.A., Vieira, A.P.B., João, R.S., Romani, L.A.S., Ribeiro, M.X. (2018). A New Approach to Classify Sugarcane Fields Based on Association Rules. In: Latifi, S. (eds) Information Technology - New Generations. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 558. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54978-1_61

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54978-1_61

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54977-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54978-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation