Abstract
In any quantum theory of gravity, it is of the utmost importance to recover the limit of quantum theory in an external spacetime. In quantum geometrodynamics (quantization of general relativity in the Schrödinger picture), this leads in particular to the recovery of a semiclassical (WKB) time which governs the dynamics of non-gravitational fields in spacetime. Here, we first review this procedure with special emphasis on conceptual issues. We then turn to an alternative theory - Weyl (conformal) gravity, which is defined by a Lagrangian that is proportional to the square of the Weyl tensor. We present the canonical quantization of this theory and develop its semiclassical approximation. We discuss in particular the extent to which a semiclassical time can be recovered and contrast it with the situation in quantum geometrodynamics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
For a review and reference to original articles, see [11].
- 2.
Recall that the modern time standard is based on the hyperfine transitions in caesium-133.
- 3.
English translation: “On a Natural Addition to the Foundation of the General Theory of Relativity”.
- 4.
- 5.
The \(\varphi _{\nu }\) denote the components of the electromagnetic four-potential.
- 6.
The original German reads ([8], p. 416): “Kurze Zusammenfassung: Es wird gezeigt, dass man entsprechend dem Weyl’schen Grundgedanken auf die objektive Existenz der Lichtkegel (Invarianz der Gleichung \(ds^2=0\)) alleine eine Invarianten-theorie gründen kann, die jedoch im Gegensatz zu Weyl’s Theorie keine Hypothese über Streckenübertragung enthält und in welcher die Potentiale \(\varphi _{\nu }\) nicht explizite in die Gleichungen eingehen. Ob die Theorie auf physikalische Gültigkeit Anspruch erheben kann, müssen spätere Untersuchungen ergeben.”.
- 7.
We write “seems”, because the ghosts connected with non-unitarity may be removable [21].
- 8.
For the history of such theories, see for example [28].
- 9.
In quantum GR, there exist attempts to quantize solely the conformal factor [23]. Paddy has derived from this the interesting conclusion, that the Planck length provides a lower bound to measurable physical lengths. The situation will be different here, because Weyl gravity does not contain an intrinsic length scale.
- 10.
It can be shown that terms in \(\left( \,^{\scriptscriptstyle (3)}\! R_{ij}^{\scriptscriptstyle \mathrm T}+D_{i}D_{j}\right) \bar{P}^{ij}\) which depend on a cancel, making this expression conformally invariant.
References
R. Bach, Math. Z. 9, 110 (1921)
J. Barbour, in Quantum Field Theory and Gravity, ed. by F. Finster, et al. (Springer, Basel, 2012), p. 257
D. Boulware, in Quantum Theory of Gravity, ed. by S.M. Christensen (Adam Hilger Ltd., Bristol, 1984), p. 267
D. Brizuela, C. Kiefer, M. Krämer, Phys. Rev. D 93, 104035 (2016)
T. Brotz, C. Kiefer, Nucl. Phys. B 475, 339 (1996)
N. Deruelle, M. Sasaki, Y. Sendouda, D. Yamauchi, Prog. Theor. Phys. 123, 169 (2010)
A. Einstein, Preuß. Akad. Wiss. (Berlin). Sitzungsberichte 261–264 (1921)
A. Einstein, Collected Papers, vol. 12 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2009)
D. Giulini, C. Kiefer, Class. Quantum Grav. 12, 403 (1995)
J. Greensite, Nucl. Phys. B 351, 749 (1991)
H.F.M. Goenner, Living Rev. Relativ. 7 (2016). http://www.livingreviews.org/lrr-2004-2. Accessed 13 July 2016
M. Irakleidou, I. Lovrekovic, F. Preis, Phys. Rev. D 91, 104037 (2015)
C. Kiefer, Class. Quantum Grav. 4, 1369 (1987)
C. Kiefer, in Canonical Gravity: From Classical to Quantum, ed. by J. Ehlers, H. Friedrich (Springer, Berlin, 1994), p. 170
C. Kiefer, Quantum Gravity, 3rd edn. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012)
C. Kiefer, B. Nikolić, Conformal and Weyl-Einstein Gravity I. Classical Geometrodynamics (to be submitted) (2016)
C. Kiefer, B. Nikolić, Conformal and Weyl-Einstein Gravity II. Quantum Geometrodynamics (to be submitted) (2016)
C. Kiefer, T.P. Singh, Phys. Rev. D 44, 1067 (1991)
C. Kiefer, T. Padmanabhan, T.P. Singh, Class. Quantum Grav. 8, L185 (1991)
J. Kluson̆, M. Oksanen, A. Tureanu, Phys. Rev. D 89, 064043 (2014)
J. Maldacena, Einstein Gravity from Conformal Gravity. ar**v:1105.5632v2 [hep-th]
P.D. Mannheim, Found. Phys. 42, 388 (2012)
T. Padmanabhan, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 165, 38 (1985)
T. Padmanabhan, Phys. Rev. D 39, 2924 (1989)
T. Padmanabhan, Pramana - J. Phys. 35, L199 (1990)
V. Perlick, C. Xu, Astrophys. J. 449, 47 (1995)
B. Pitts, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 351, 382 (2014)
H.-J. Schmidt, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 04, 209 (2007)
T.P. Singh, T. Padmanabhan, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 196, 296 (1989)
T. Thiemann, Modern Canonical Quantum General Relativity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007)
G. ’t Hooft, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 24, 1543001 (2015)
H.D. Zeh, Phys. Lett. A 116, 9 (1986)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kiefer, C., Nikolić, B. (2017). Notes on Semiclassical Weyl Gravity. In: Bagla, J., Engineer, S. (eds) Gravity and the Quantum. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 187. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51700-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51700-1_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51699-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51700-1
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)