Abstract
The assessment of seismic risk for transportation networks is a difficult task, due to its complexity, hard to get detailed data, lack of methods with low uncertainties and difficulty of defining inter-relations. Through this paper we identify viable ways of analysing the seismic risk of transportation networks in Romania, considering the availability and characteristics of specific data, the possibilities of adapting external knowledge and recently developed methodologies. Until now there was no coherent and complex approach in Romania for this task, referring to the bigger picture. Therefore, we propose an integrative framework that incorporates GIS capabilities (like the ones provided by the ArcGIS Network Analyst Toolbox) and test it for Bucharest. This framework can provide answer to important questions, like “which are the critical segments of networks” or “what could the implications of connectivity loss be?” in case of an earthquake. The approach relies on using fragility functions for critical structures like bridges and tunnels, on empirical formulas for estimating damage level, traffic flow characteristics or connectivity analysis. Results are depicted through multiple performance indicators.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anbazhagan P, Srinivas S, Chandran D (2012) Classification of road damage due to earthquakes. Nat Hazards 60:425–460
Ardeleanu LA (2010) Estimări ale hazardului seismic probabilist pentru teritoriul, României edn. Tehnopress, Iași
Asakura Y, Kashiwadani M (1991) Road network reliability caused by daily fluctuation of traffic flow. In: Proceedings of the 19th PTRC summer annual meeting, University of Sussex, United Kingdom
Bucharest General Municipality (2015) List of buildings technically expertise, classified into seismic risk classes. Available from: www.pmb.ro/servicii/alte_informatii/lista_imobilelor_exp/docs/Lista_imobilelor_expertizate.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2015
Chen A, Yang H, Lo HK, Tang WH (1999) A capacity related reliability for transportation networks. J Adv Trans 33(2):183–200
Cioflan CO (2006) Efecte seismice locale. Ed. Universității “Alexandru Ioan Cuza”, Iași
Ciutea D, Atanasiu GM (2014) Defining seismic resilience within the context of north-eastern region of Romania. Bull Polytech Inst Iasi—Cons & A, Tome LX(LXIV) 1:53–62
Coburn A, Spence E (2002) Earthquake protection. Wiley, Hoboken
Du ZP, Nicholson A (1997) Degradable transportation systems: sensitivity and reliability analysis. Transp Res Part B 31(3):225–237
Initiative Media (2015) Media FactBook Romania 2015. Available from www.mediafactbook.ro. Accessed 30 July 2015
Jansuwan S (2013) A quantitative framework for assessing vulnerability and redundancy of freight transportation networks. All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. Paper 2026
Kaynia AM, Mayoral JM, Johansson J, Argyroudis S, Pitilakis K, Anastasiadis A (2011) Fragility functions for roadway system elements. SYNER-G Project Deliverable 3:7
Leduc G (2008) Road traffic data: collection methods and applications. Working Papers on Energy, Transport and Climate Change Nr. 1, JRC 47967
Marmureanu G, Cioflan CO, Marmureanu A (2010) Researches on local seismic hazard (Microzonation) for metropolitan bucharest area. Tehnopress, Bucharest
Mantyniemi P, Marza VI, Kijko A, Retief P (2003) A new probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for the Vrancea (Romania) seismogenic zone. Nat Hazards 29:371–385
Miller M, Cortes S, Ory D, Baker JW (2015) Estimating impacts of catastrophic network damage from earthquakes using an activity-based travel model. Transportation research board 94th annual meeting compendium of papers, Washington, DC, Paper 15-2366
Musson RMW (2000) Generalised seismic hazard maps for the Pannonian Basin using probabilistic methods. Pure Appl Geophys 157:147–169
Pinto PE, Cavalieri F, Franchin P, Lupoi A (2011) Definition of system components and the formulation of system functions to evaluate the performance of tranportation infrastructures. SYNER-G Project Deliverable 2:6
Porter K (2015) A beginner’s guide to fragility, vulnerability, and risk. University of Colorado Boulder and SPA Risk LLC, Denver, CO
Racanel IR (2015) Dynamic response of a special bridge in Romania using different types of seismic isolators. In: Proceedings of the 15th international multidisciplinary scientific geoconference SGEM 2015, Book 1(3):807–814
Sartori M (2012) Seismic protection of the Basarab Overpass in Bucharest. In: Proceedings of the 15th world conference on earthquake engineering (15WCEE), 24–28 Sept 2012, Lisbon
Shinozuka M, Murachi Y, Dong X, Zhou Y, Orlikowski M (2003) Seismic performance of highway transportation networks. In: Proceedings of China-US Workshop on protection of urban infrastructure and public buildings against earthquakes and man-made disasters, Bei**g, China
Sokolov V, Bonjer KP, Wenzel F, Grecu B, Radulian M (2008) Ground-motion prediction equations for the intermediate depth Vrancea (Romania) earthquakes. Bull Earthq Eng 6(3):367–388
Toma-Danila D (2013) Transport network vulnerability assessment methodology, based on the cost-distance method and GIS integration. Intelligent systems for crisis management. Springer, Berlin, pp 199–213R
Vacareanu M, Radulian M, Iancovici F Pavel, Neagu C (2015) Fore-arc and back-arc ground motion prediction model for Vrancea intermediate depth seismic source. J Earthq Eng 19(3):535–562
Werner SD, Taylor CE, Cho S, Lavoie J-P, Huyck C, Eitzel C, Chung H, Eguchi RT (2006) REDARS 2: methodology and software for seismic risk analysis of highway systems MCEER-06-SP08
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge the contribution of the doctoral scholarship from Faculty of Geography, University of Bucharest of the main author, and also the RO-Risk POCA Project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Toma-Danila, D., Armas, I., Cioflan, C.O. (2016). Conceptual Framework for the Seismic Risk Evaluation of Transportation Networks in Romania. In: Vacareanu, R., Ionescu, C. (eds) The 1940 Vrancea Earthquake. Issues, Insights and Lessons Learnt. Springer Natural Hazards. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29844-3_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29844-3_34
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-29843-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-29844-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)