Abstract
The contents of the retroperitoneum are defined by the boundaries of the potential space behind the posterior abdominal parietal peritoneum and the fascia investing the lumbar musculature. Primary retroperitoneal neoplasms are a rare group of tumors which do not arise from a specific organ but rather originate from tissues or rests of embryonic cells which exist in the retroperitoneum (Rodríguez et al., Arch Esp Urol, 63[1], 13–22, 2010). The most common variety is sarcoma, which accounts for up to 90 % of lesions after lymphoma is excluded. Liposarcomas and leiomyosarcomas are the next most common types, accounting for up to 15 % of tumors. The average age of presentation is during the fifth to seventh decades, and the tumors are often large in size at diagnosis due to the paucity of symptoms associated with growth of retroperitoneal tumors in general. Excluding lymphomas, the most frequent primary retroperitoneal malignancies in decreasing order include liposarcoma, MFH, leiomyosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and malignant nerve sheath tumors (Nishino et al., Radiographics, 23[1], 45–57, 2003). Both Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma may also occur in the retroperitoneum. Epithelial tumors may rise from the kidney, adrenal gland, and pancreas, and metastatic disease from germ cell tumors, primary carcinomas, or melanomas can also occur. Benign tumors may have neurogenic origins as well (schwannomas, neurofibroma, paraganglioma).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rodríguez JAV, José M, Moreno D, Navarro HP, Carrión P. Primary retroperitoneal tumors: review of our 10-year case series. Arch Esp Urol. 2010;63(1):13–22.
Nishino M, Hayakawa K, Minami M, Yamamoto A, Ueda H, Takasu K. Primary retroperitoneal neoplasms: CT and MR imaging findings with anatomic and pathologic diagnostic clues. Radiographics. 2003;23(1):45–57. doi:10.1148/rg.231025037.
Strauss DC, Hayes AJ, Thomas JM. Retroperitoneal tumours: review of management. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011;93:275–80. doi:10.1308/003588411X571944.
Elsayes KM, Staveteig PT, Narra VR, Chen Z-M, Moustafa YL, Brown J. Retroperitoneal masses: magnetic resonance imaging findings with pathologic correlation. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2007;36(June):97–106. doi:10.1067/j.cpradiol.2006.12.003.
Rajiah P, Sinha R, Cuevas C, Dubinsky TJ, Bush WH, Kolokythas O. Imaging of uncommon retroperitoneal masses. Radiographics. 2011;31:949–76. doi:10.1148/rg.314095132.
Nishimura H, Zhang Y, Ohkuma K, Uchida M, Hayabuchi N, Sun S. MR imaging of soft-tissue masses of the extraperitoneal spaces. Radiographics. 2001;21:1141–54. doi:10.1148/radiographics.21.5.g01se141141.
Lee J, Hiken J, Semelka S. Retroperitoneum. In Lee J, Sagel S, Stanley R, Heiken J editors, Computed tomography with MRI correlation. 3rd ed. 1996. p. 1023–1086.
Craig WD, Fanburg-Smith JC, Henry LR, Guerrero R, Barton JH. Fat-containing lesions of the retroperitoneum: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2009;29(1):261–90. doi:10.1148/rg.291085203.
Butori N, Guy F, Collin F, Benet C, Causeret S, Isambert N. Retroperitoneal extra-adrenal myelolipoma: appearance in CT and MRI. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2012;93(3):204–7. doi:10.1016/j.diii.2011.12.010.
Tsutsumi M, Yamauchi A, Tsukamoto S, Ishikawa S. A case of angiomyolipoma presenting as a huge retroperitoneal mass. Int J Urol : Off J Jpn Urol Assoc. 2001;8(8): 470–1. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11555018.
Ahlén J, Enberg U, Larsson C, Larsson O, Frisk T, Brosjö O, Rosen A, Bäckdahl M. Malignant fibrous histiocytoma, aggressive fibromatosis and benign fibrous tumors express mRNA for the metalloproteinase inducer EMMPRIN and the metalloproteinases MMP-2 and MT1-MMP. Sarcoma. 2001;5(3):143–9. doi:10.1080/13577140120048601.
Hopper KD. Percutaneous, radiographically guided biopsy: a history. Radiology. 1995;196(2):329–33. doi:10.1148/radiology.196.2.7617841.
Nolsøe C, Nielsen L, Torp-Pedersen S, Holm HH. Major complications and deaths due to interventional ultrasonography: a review of 8000 cases. J Clin Ultrasound : JCU; 1990;18(3):179–84. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2155937.
Moulton JS, Moore PT. Coaxial percutaneous biopsy technique with automated biopsy devices: value in improving accuracy and negative predictive value. Radiology. 1993;186(2):515–22. doi:10.1148/radiology.186.2.8421758.
Knelson M, Haaga J, Lazarus H, Ghosh C, Abdul-Karim F, Sorenson K. (1989). Computed tomography-guided retroperitoneal biopsies. J Clin Oncol : Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 7(8):1169–73. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2754451.
Agid R, Sklair-Levy M, Bloom AI, Lieberman S, Polliack A, Ben-Yehuda D, Sherman Y, Libson E (2003). CT-guided biopsy with cutting-edge needle for the diagnosis of malignant lymphoma: experience of 267 biopsies. Clin Radiol. 58(2):143–7. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12623044.
Stattaus J, Kalkmann J, Kuehl H, Metz K, Metz KA, Nowrousian MR, Forsting M, Ladd SC. Diagnostic yield of computed tomography-guided coaxial core biopsy of undetermined masses in the free retroperitoneal space: single-center experience. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2008;31:919–25. doi:10.1007/s00270-008-9317-5.
Tomozawa Y, Inaba Y, Yamaura H, Sato Y, Kato M, Kanamoto T, Sakane M. Clinical value of CT-guided needle biopsy for retroperitoneal lesions. Korean J Radiol. 2011;12(3):351–7. doi:10.3348/kjr.2011.12.3.351.
Braak SJ, van Strijen MJL, van Es HW, Nievelstein RAJ, van Heesewijk JPM. Effective dose during needle interventions: cone-beam CT guidance compared with conventional CT guidance. J Vasc Interv Radiol: JVIR. 2011;22(4):455–61. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2011.02.011.
Yarram SG, Nghiem HV, Higgins E, Fox G, Nan B, Francis IR. Evaluation of imaging-guided core biopsy of pelvic masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188(5):1208–11. doi:10.2214/AJR.05.1393.
Shah J, Kirshenbaum M, Shah K. CT characteristics of primary retroperitoneal tumors and the importance of differentiation from secondary retroperitoneal tumors. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2008;31(17):1–5.
Lu DS, Silverman SG, Raman SS. MR-guided therapy. Applications in the abdomen. Magn Reson Imaging Clin North Am. 1999;7(2):337–48. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10382165.
Kariniemi J, Blanco Sequeiros R, Ojala R, Tervonen O. MRI-guided abdominal biopsy in a 0.23-T open-configuration MRI system. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:1256–62. doi:10.1007/s00330-004-2566-z.
Kitajima K, Kono A, Konishi J, Suenaga Y, Takahashi S, Sugimura K. 18F-FDG-PET/CT findings of retroperitoneal tumors: a pictorial essay. Jpn J Radiol. 2013;31:301–9. doi:10.1007/s11604-013-0192-x.
Tatli S, Gerbaudo VH, Mamede M, Tuncali K, Shyn PB, Silverman SG. Abdominal masses sampled at PET/CT-guided percutaneous biopsy: initial experience with registration of prior PET/CT images. Radiology. 2010;256(1):305–11. doi:10.1148/radiol.10090931.
Kobayashi K, Bhargava P, Raja S, Nasseri F, Al-Balas HA, Smith DD, George SP, Vij MS. Image-guided biopsy: what the interventional radiologist needs to know about PET/CT. Radiographics. 2012;32:1483–501. doi:10.1148/rg.325115159.
Wallace MJ, Gupta S, Hicks ME. Out-of-plane computed-tomography-guided biopsy using a magnetic-field-based navigation system. Cardiovasc interv Radiol. 2006;29(November 2005):108–13. doi:10.1007/s00270-005-0041-0.
Orth RC, Wallace MJ, Kuo MD. C-arm cone-beam CT: general principles and technical considerations for use in interventional radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol: JVIR. 2008;19(4):814–20. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2008.02.002.
Conyers R, Young S, Thomas DM. Liposarcoma: molecular genetics and therapeutics. Sarcoma. 2011;2011:483154. doi:10.1155/2011/483154.
Albanna AS, Kasymjanova G, Robitaille C, Cohen V, Brandao G, Pepe C, Small D, Agulnik J. Comparison of the yield of different diagnostic procedures for cellular differentiation and genetic profiling of non-small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol: Off Publ Int Assoc Study of Lung Cancer. 2014;9(8):1120–5. doi:10.1097/JTO.0000000000000230.
Patel IJ, Davidson JC, Nikolic B, Salazar GM, Schwartzberg MS, Walker TG, Saad WA. Consensus guidelines for periprocedural management of coagulation status and hemostasis risk in percutaneous image-guided interventions. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;23(6):727–36. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2012.02.012.
De Bazelaire C, Farges C, Mathieu O, Zagdanski AM, Bourrier P, Frija J, De Kerviler E. Blunt-tip coaxial introducer: a revisited tool for difficult CT-guided biopsy in the chest and abdomen. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193(August):144–8. doi:10.2214/AJR.08.2125.
Gupta S, Nguyen HL, Morello Jr FA, Ahrar K, Wallace MJ, Madoff DC, Murthy R, Hicks ME. Various approaches for CT-guided percutaneous biopsy of deep pelvic lesions: anatomic and technical considerations. Radiographics. 2004;24:175–89. doi:10.1148/rg.241035063.
Maleux G, Hertogh GD, Lavens M, Oyen R. Transvenous biopsy of retroperitoneal tumoral masses : value of cone-beam CT guidance. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1830;25(11):1830–2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2014.07.006.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Levy, E. (2016). Retroperitoneal Biopsy: Indications and Imaging Approach. In: Rastinehad, A., Siegel, D., Pinto, P., Wood, B. (eds) Interventional Urology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23464-9_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23464-9_29
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23463-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23464-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)