Retroperitoneal Biopsy: Indications and Imaging Approach

  • Chapter
Interventional Urology
  • 1343 Accesses

Abstract

The contents of the retroperitoneum are defined by the boundaries of the potential space behind the posterior abdominal parietal peritoneum and the fascia investing the lumbar musculature. Primary retroperitoneal neoplasms are a rare group of tumors which do not arise from a specific organ but rather originate from tissues or rests of embryonic cells which exist in the retroperitoneum (Rodríguez et al., Arch Esp Urol, 63[1], 13–22, 2010). The most common variety is sarcoma, which accounts for up to 90 % of lesions after lymphoma is excluded. Liposarcomas and leiomyosarcomas are the next most common types, accounting for up to 15 % of tumors. The average age of presentation is during the fifth to seventh decades, and the tumors are often large in size at diagnosis due to the paucity of symptoms associated with growth of retroperitoneal tumors in general. Excluding lymphomas, the most frequent primary retroperitoneal malignancies in decreasing order include liposarcoma, MFH, leiomyosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and malignant nerve sheath tumors (Nishino et al., Radiographics, 23[1], 45–57, 2003). Both Hodgkin’s and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma may also occur in the retroperitoneum. Epithelial tumors may rise from the kidney, adrenal gland, and pancreas, and metastatic disease from germ cell tumors, primary carcinomas, or melanomas can also occur. Benign tumors may have neurogenic origins as well (schwannomas, neurofibroma, paraganglioma).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rodríguez JAV, José M, Moreno D, Navarro HP, Carrión P. Primary retroperitoneal tumors: review of our 10-year case series. Arch Esp Urol. 2010;63(1):13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nishino M, Hayakawa K, Minami M, Yamamoto A, Ueda H, Takasu K. Primary retroperitoneal neoplasms: CT and MR imaging findings with anatomic and pathologic diagnostic clues. Radiographics. 2003;23(1):45–57. doi:10.1148/rg.231025037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Strauss DC, Hayes AJ, Thomas JM. Retroperitoneal tumours: review of management. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011;93:275–80. doi:10.1308/003588411X571944.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Elsayes KM, Staveteig PT, Narra VR, Chen Z-M, Moustafa YL, Brown J. Retroperitoneal masses: magnetic resonance imaging findings with pathologic correlation. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2007;36(June):97–106. doi:10.1067/j.cpradiol.2006.12.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rajiah P, Sinha R, Cuevas C, Dubinsky TJ, Bush WH, Kolokythas O. Imaging of uncommon retroperitoneal masses. Radiographics. 2011;31:949–76. doi:10.1148/rg.314095132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nishimura H, Zhang Y, Ohkuma K, Uchida M, Hayabuchi N, Sun S. MR imaging of soft-tissue masses of the extraperitoneal spaces. Radiographics. 2001;21:1141–54. doi:10.1148/radiographics.21.5.g01se141141.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee J, Hiken J, Semelka S. Retroperitoneum. In Lee J, Sagel S, Stanley R, Heiken J editors, Computed tomography with MRI correlation. 3rd ed. 1996. p. 1023–1086.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Craig WD, Fanburg-Smith JC, Henry LR, Guerrero R, Barton JH. Fat-containing lesions of the retroperitoneum: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2009;29(1):261–90. doi:10.1148/rg.291085203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Butori N, Guy F, Collin F, Benet C, Causeret S, Isambert N. Retroperitoneal extra-adrenal myelolipoma: appearance in CT and MRI. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2012;93(3):204–7. doi:10.1016/j.diii.2011.12.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tsutsumi M, Yamauchi A, Tsukamoto S, Ishikawa S. A case of angiomyolipoma presenting as a huge retroperitoneal mass. Int J Urol : Off J Jpn Urol Assoc. 2001;8(8): 470–1. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11555018.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ahlén J, Enberg U, Larsson C, Larsson O, Frisk T, Brosjö O, Rosen A, Bäckdahl M. Malignant fibrous histiocytoma, aggressive fibromatosis and benign fibrous tumors express mRNA for the metalloproteinase inducer EMMPRIN and the metalloproteinases MMP-2 and MT1-MMP. Sarcoma. 2001;5(3):143–9. doi:10.1080/13577140120048601.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hopper KD. Percutaneous, radiographically guided biopsy: a history. Radiology. 1995;196(2):329–33. doi:10.1148/radiology.196.2.7617841.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nolsøe C, Nielsen L, Torp-Pedersen S, Holm HH. Major complications and deaths due to interventional ultrasonography: a review of 8000 cases. J Clin Ultrasound : JCU; 1990;18(3):179–84. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2155937.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Moulton JS, Moore PT. Coaxial percutaneous biopsy technique with automated biopsy devices: value in improving accuracy and negative predictive value. Radiology. 1993;186(2):515–22. doi:10.1148/radiology.186.2.8421758.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Knelson M, Haaga J, Lazarus H, Ghosh C, Abdul-Karim F, Sorenson K. (1989). Computed tomography-guided retroperitoneal biopsies. J Clin Oncol : Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 7(8):1169–73. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2754451.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Agid R, Sklair-Levy M, Bloom AI, Lieberman S, Polliack A, Ben-Yehuda D, Sherman Y, Libson E (2003). CT-guided biopsy with cutting-edge needle for the diagnosis of malignant lymphoma: experience of 267 biopsies. Clin Radiol. 58(2):143–7. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12623044.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stattaus J, Kalkmann J, Kuehl H, Metz K, Metz KA, Nowrousian MR, Forsting M, Ladd SC. Diagnostic yield of computed tomography-guided coaxial core biopsy of undetermined masses in the free retroperitoneal space: single-center experience. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2008;31:919–25. doi:10.1007/s00270-008-9317-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tomozawa Y, Inaba Y, Yamaura H, Sato Y, Kato M, Kanamoto T, Sakane M. Clinical value of CT-guided needle biopsy for retroperitoneal lesions. Korean J Radiol. 2011;12(3):351–7. doi:10.3348/kjr.2011.12.3.351.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Braak SJ, van Strijen MJL, van Es HW, Nievelstein RAJ, van Heesewijk JPM. Effective dose during needle interventions: cone-beam CT guidance compared with conventional CT guidance. J Vasc Interv Radiol: JVIR. 2011;22(4):455–61. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2011.02.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yarram SG, Nghiem HV, Higgins E, Fox G, Nan B, Francis IR. Evaluation of imaging-guided core biopsy of pelvic masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188(5):1208–11. doi:10.2214/AJR.05.1393.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shah J, Kirshenbaum M, Shah K. CT characteristics of primary retroperitoneal tumors and the importance of differentiation from secondary retroperitoneal tumors. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2008;31(17):1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lu DS, Silverman SG, Raman SS. MR-guided therapy. Applications in the abdomen. Magn Reson Imaging Clin North Am. 1999;7(2):337–48. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10382165.

  23. Kariniemi J, Blanco Sequeiros R, Ojala R, Tervonen O. MRI-guided abdominal biopsy in a 0.23-T open-configuration MRI system. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:1256–62. doi:10.1007/s00330-004-2566-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kitajima K, Kono A, Konishi J, Suenaga Y, Takahashi S, Sugimura K. 18F-FDG-PET/CT findings of retroperitoneal tumors: a pictorial essay. Jpn J Radiol. 2013;31:301–9. doi:10.1007/s11604-013-0192-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tatli S, Gerbaudo VH, Mamede M, Tuncali K, Shyn PB, Silverman SG. Abdominal masses sampled at PET/CT-guided percutaneous biopsy: initial experience with registration of prior PET/CT images. Radiology. 2010;256(1):305–11. doi:10.1148/radiol.10090931.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kobayashi K, Bhargava P, Raja S, Nasseri F, Al-Balas HA, Smith DD, George SP, Vij MS. Image-guided biopsy: what the interventional radiologist needs to know about PET/CT. Radiographics. 2012;32:1483–501. doi:10.1148/rg.325115159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wallace MJ, Gupta S, Hicks ME. Out-of-plane computed-tomography-guided biopsy using a magnetic-field-based navigation system. Cardiovasc interv Radiol. 2006;29(November 2005):108–13. doi:10.1007/s00270-005-0041-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Orth RC, Wallace MJ, Kuo MD. C-arm cone-beam CT: general principles and technical considerations for use in interventional radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol: JVIR. 2008;19(4):814–20. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2008.02.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Conyers R, Young S, Thomas DM. Liposarcoma: molecular genetics and therapeutics. Sarcoma. 2011;2011:483154. doi:10.1155/2011/483154.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Albanna AS, Kasymjanova G, Robitaille C, Cohen V, Brandao G, Pepe C, Small D, Agulnik J. Comparison of the yield of different diagnostic procedures for cellular differentiation and genetic profiling of non-small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol: Off Publ Int Assoc Study of Lung Cancer. 2014;9(8):1120–5. doi:10.1097/JTO.0000000000000230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Patel IJ, Davidson JC, Nikolic B, Salazar GM, Schwartzberg MS, Walker TG, Saad WA. Consensus guidelines for periprocedural management of coagulation status and hemostasis risk in percutaneous image-guided interventions. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;23(6):727–36. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2012.02.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. De Bazelaire C, Farges C, Mathieu O, Zagdanski AM, Bourrier P, Frija J, De Kerviler E. Blunt-tip coaxial introducer: a revisited tool for difficult CT-guided biopsy in the chest and abdomen. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193(August):144–8. doi:10.2214/AJR.08.2125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gupta S, Nguyen HL, Morello Jr FA, Ahrar K, Wallace MJ, Madoff DC, Murthy R, Hicks ME. Various approaches for CT-guided percutaneous biopsy of deep pelvic lesions: anatomic and technical considerations. Radiographics. 2004;24:175–89. doi:10.1148/rg.241035063.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Maleux G, Hertogh GD, Lavens M, Oyen R. Transvenous biopsy of retroperitoneal tumoral masses : value of cone-beam CT guidance. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1830;25(11):1830–2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2014.07.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elliot Levy MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Levy, E. (2016). Retroperitoneal Biopsy: Indications and Imaging Approach. In: Rastinehad, A., Siegel, D., Pinto, P., Wood, B. (eds) Interventional Urology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23464-9_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23464-9_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23463-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23464-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation