Abstract
This chapter introduces the general theoretical and methodological comparative framework of the book, its structure and the 11 European cities studied. It highlights the importance of studying welfare policy making and service provisions, not only at the national level, but also at the local level. It discusses the roles of and relations between different territorial levels and policy actors in welfare policy making. It also makes connections between local welfare systems, especially those related to childcare and care for older people, and the labour market integration and informal care responsibilities of women.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
This book is based mainly on the findings of the first four work packages of the FLOWS research project: Degree and structures of women’s labour market integration (WP1) led by Birgit Pfau-Effinger, University of Hamburg; Local production system (WP 2) led by Lluís Flaquer, Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona and Costanzo Ranci, Polytechnic of Milan; The local welfare system (WP3) led by Teppo Kröger, University of Jyväskylä; and Local policy formation/local political actors (WP 4) led by Dagmar Kutsar, University of Tartu.
- 3.
These reports are available at the project website http://www.flows-eu.eu/home/
- 4.
The NUTS classification (Nomenclature of territorial units for statistics) is a hierarchical system for dividing up the economic territory of the EU for the purpose of the collection, development and harmonisation of EU regional statistics, socio-economic analyses of the regions, and for the framing of EU regional policies. NUTS levels are classified as: major socio-economic regions (NUTS1), basic regions for the application of regional policies (NUTS2), and small regions for specific diagnoses (NUTS3). See: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/nuts_nomenclature/introduction
- 5.
In the FLOWS project an extensive survey and focus group interviews among women in the 11 cities were also undertaken but these data and findings are not used in this book as it concentrates on policy formation processes and service provisions.
References
Albertini, M., Kohli, M., & Vogel, C. (2007). Intergenerational transfers of time and money in European families: Common patterns different regimes. Journal of European Social Policy, 17(4), 319–334.
Andreotti, A., Mingione, E., & Polizzi, E. (2012). Local welfare systems: A challenge for social cohesion. Urban Studies, 49(9), 1925–1940.
Anttonen, A. (2005). Vertailut ja sosiaalipolitiikan uusi suunta [New trends in social policy research: Comparative approach to social policy]. Janus The Finnish Journal of Social Policy and Social Work Research, 13(3), 268–288.
Anttonen, A., & Sipilä, J. (1996). European social care services: Is it possible to identify models? Journal of European Social Policy, 6(2), 87–100.
Baekgaard, M., Blom-Hansen, J., & Serritzlew, S. (2014). When politics matters: The impact of politicians’ and bureaucrats’ preferences on salient and nonsalient policy areas. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions. Article first published online: 10 July 2014.
Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive modernization. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bettio, F., & Plantenga, J. (2004). Comparing care regimes in Europe. Feminist Economics, 10(1), 85–113.
Blome, A., Keck, W., & Alber, J. (2009). Family and the welfare state in Europe: Intergenerational relations in ageing societies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Braun, C. (2012). The captive or the broker? Explaining public agency–interest group interactions. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 25(2), 291–314.
Burau, V., & Kröger, T. (2004). The local and the national in community care: Exploring policy and politics in Finland and Britain. Social Policy and Administration, 38(7), 793–810.
Burau, V., & Vabo, S. I. (2011). Shifts in Nordic welfare governance: Introduction and outlook. Guest editorial. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 31(3/4), 140–147.
Es**-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
Eydal, G., & Rostgaard, T. (2011). Gender equality revisited – Changes in Nordic childcare policies in the 2000s. Social Policy and Administration, 45(2), 161–179.
Gomez, M. V., & Kuronen, M. (2011). Comparing local strategies and practices: Recollections from two qualitative cross-national research projects. Qualitative Research, 11(6), 683–697.
Hantrais, L. (2004). Family policy matters. Responding to family change in Europe. Cambridge, MA: The Policy Press.
Hantrais, L. (2006). Family and welfare research (Policy Review Series nr 1). Brussels: European Commission.
Hantrais, L. (2009). International comparative research: Theory, methods and practice. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kazepov, Y. (2010). Rescaling social policies towards multilevel governance in Europe: Some reflections on processes at stake and actors involved. In Y. Kazepov (Ed.), Rescaling social policies: Towards multilevel governance in Europe (pp. 35–72). Farnham: Ashgate.
Kohli, M. (1999). Private and public transfers between generations. European Societies, 1(1), 103–122.
Kröger, T. (1997). Local government in Scandinavia: Autonomous or integrated into the welfare state? In J. Sipilä (Ed.), Social care services: The key to the Scandinavian welfare model(pp. 95–108). Aldershot: Avebury.
Kröger, T. (2011a). Defamilisation, dedomestication and care policy: Comparing childcare service provisions of welfare states. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 31(7), 424–440.
Kröger, T. (2011b). Retuning the Nordic welfare municipality. Central regulation of social care under change in Finland. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 31(3–4), 148–159.
Kröger, T., & Sipilä, J. (Eds.). (2005). Overstretched. European families up against the demands of work and care. Oxford: Blackwell.
Leitner, S. (2003). Varieties of familialism. The caring function of the family in comparative perspective. European Societies, 5(4), 353–375.
León, M. (2009). Gender equality and the European Employment Strategy: The work/family balance debate. Social Policy and Society, 8(2), 197–209.
Lister, R. (1994). “She has other duties’: Women, citizenship and social security’. In S. Baldwin & J. Falkingham (Eds.), Social security and social change: New challenges (pp. 31–44). Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Mabbett, D., & Bolderson, H. (1999). Theories and methods in comparative social policy. In J. Clasen (Ed.), Comparative social policy: Concepts, theories and methods (pp. 34–56). Oxford: Blackwell.
Mahon, R. (2002). Child care: Toward what kind of “social Europe”? Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 9(3), 343–379.
Mills, M., Van de Bunt, G., & De Bruijn, J. (2006). Comparative research persistent problems and promising solutions. International Sociology, 21(5), 619–631.
Moreno, L. (2006). The model of social protection in Southern Europe. Enduring characteristics? Reveu Française des Affaires Sociales, 5(5), 73–95.
Naldini, M. (2003). The family in the Mediterranean welfare states. London: Frank Cass.
Pfau-Effinger, B. (2004). Development of culture, welfare states and women’s employment in Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Pfau-Effinger, B., & Geissler, B. (Eds.). (2005). Care and social integration in European societies (pp. 3–19). Bristol: Policy Press.
Pronzato, C. D. (2009). Return to work after childbirth: Does parental leave matter in Europe? Review of Economics of the Household, 7(4), 341–360.
Quilgars, D., Elsinga, M., Jones, A., Toussaint, J., Ruonavaara, H., & Naumanen, P. (2009). Inside qualitative, cross-national research: Making methods transparent in a EU housing study. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(1), 19–31.
Ranci, C., Brandsen, T., & Sabatinelli, S. (Eds.). (2014). Social vulnerability in European cities. The role of local welfare in time of crisis. Houndmills Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rønsen, M. (1999). Assessing the impact of parental leave: Effects on fertility and female employment. In P. Moss & F. Deven (Eds.), Parental leave: Progress or pitfall (Vol. 35, pp. 193–225). The Hague/Brussels: NIDI/CBGS Publications.
Ruhm, C. (1998). The economic consequences of parental leave mandates: Lessons from Europe. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(1), 285–317.
Saraceno, C. (Ed.) (2008). Families, aging and social policy: Intergenerational solidarity in European welfare states. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Saraceno, C. (2010). Social inequalities in facing old-age dependency: A bi-generational perspective. Journal of European Social Policy, 20(1), 32–44.
Szelewa, D., & Polakowski, M. P. (2008). Who cares? Changing patterns of childcare in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 18(2), 115–131.
Trydegård, G., & Thorslund, M. (2010). One uniform welfare state or a multitude of welfare municipalities? The evolution of local variation in Swedish elder care. Social Policy and Administration, 44(4), 495–511. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9515.2010.00725.x.
Vabo, S. I., & Burau, V. (2011). Universalism and the local organisation of elderly care. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 31(3–4), 173–184.
van Heffen, O., Kickert, W. J. M., & Thomassen, J. (2000). Governance in modern societies. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Webster, F. (2002). Theories of the information society (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Weible, C., & Sabatier, P. A. (2005). Comparing policy networks: Marine protected areas in California. Policy Studies Journal, 33(2), 181–202.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kuronen, M., Kutsar, D. (2015). Introduction. In: Kutsar, D., Kuronen, M. (eds) Local Welfare Policy Making in European Cities. Social Indicators Research Series, vol 59. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16163-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16163-1_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16162-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16163-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)