Causality, Renaissance

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy
  • 21 Accesses

Abstract

How providence correlates with free will and the divine agrees with the natural order have been the foundational issues of Christian teaching. Owing a great deal to ancient discussions on fate and causality, Christian theologians adjusted the notions in hand to meet their needs. In the Renaissance, an alleged connection between a divinely structured universe and the causes of terrestrial events was put into question. There were two main reasons for that. First, the late fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries witnessed a revival of the philosophical ideas that challenged the Aristotelian teaching on the four causes. On the other hand, contemporary scientific developments shook belief in the harmonious design of the universe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,399.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Primary Sources

  • Alexander of Aphrodisias. 1983. De Fato. Edited by Robert W. Sharples. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ficino, Marsilio. 1998. Three books on life. Edited and translated by Carol V. Kaske and John R. Clark. Tempe: Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsius, Justus. 2016. La Constance. Edited and translated by Jacqueline Lagrée. Paris: Classiques Garnier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manetti, Giannozzo. 2012. De terremotu. Edited by Daniela Pagliara. Florence: Edizioni del Galluzzo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piché, David., ed. and trans. 1999. La condamnation parisienne de 1277. Paris: Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pico della Mirandola, Giovanni. 2004. Disputationes adversus astrologiam divinatricem. 2 vols. Edited by Eugenio Garin. Turin: Nino Aragno.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomponazzi, Pietro. 2004. Il fato, il libero arbitrio e la predestinazione. 2 vols. Edited by Vittoria Perrone Compagni. Turin: Nino Aragno.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salutati, Coluccio. 1985. De fato et fortuna. Edited by Concetta Bianca. Florence: Olschki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telesio, Bernardino. 2009. La natura secondo i suoi principi. Edited by Roberto Bondi. Milan: Bompiani.

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Sources

  • Adamson, Peter. 2008. Plotinus on astrology. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 35: 265–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, Tamsyn. 1994. Ancient astrology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bober, Harry. 1948. The zodiacal miniature of the Très riches heures of the Duke of Berry – Its sources and meaning. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 11: 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boudet, Jean-Patrice. 2006. Entre science et nigromance. Astrologie, divination et magie dans l’Occident médiéval (XII–XV siècle). Paris: Éditions de la Sorbonne.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Libera, Alain. 1991. Penser au Moyen Age. Paris: Le Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falcon, Andrea. 2005. Aristotle and the Science of Nature: Unity without Uniformity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Federici Vescovini, Graziella. 2008. Medioevo magico: la magia tra religione e scienza nei secoli XIII e XIV. Turin: UTET.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaille, Marie. 2018. Machiavelli on freedom and civil conflict: An historical and medical approach to political thinking. Leiden/Boston: Brill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gerson, Lloyd P. 2016. Plotinus and the platonic responses to stoicism. In The Routledge handbook of the stoic tradition, ed. John Sellars, 44–55. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hankins, James. 2019. Virtue politics. Soulcraft and statecraft in Renaissance Italy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hesselink, John. 2004. Calvin’s theology. In The Cambridge companion to John Calvin, ed. Donald K. McKim, 74–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hirai, Hiro. 2011. Medical humanism and natural philosophy: Renaissance debates on matter, life, and the soul. Leiden: Brill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kraye, Jill. 2016. Stoicism in the philosophy of the Italian Renaissance. In The Routledge handbook of the stoic tradition, ed. John Sellars, 132–144. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüthy, Christoph, John E. Murdoch, and William R. Newman, eds. 2001. Late medieval and early modern corpuscular matter theories. Leiden/Boston/Cologne: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutton, Vivian. 2004. Ancient medicine. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pompeo Faracovi, Ornella. 1996. Scritto negli astri: l’astrologia nella cultura dell’Occidente. Venice: Marsilio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkin, Richard. 2003. The history of scepticism: From Savonarola to Bayle. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prins, Jacomien, and Maude Vanhaelen, eds. 2018. Sing aloud harmonious spheres. Renaissance conceptions of cosmic harmony. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rist, John M. 1967. Plotinus: Road to reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teselle, Eugene. 2014. The background. Augustine and the Pelagian controversy. In Grace for grace. The debates after Augustine and Pelagius, ed. Alexander Y. Hwang, Brian J. Matz, and Augustine Casiday, 1–13. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanden Broecke, Steven. 2003. The limits of influence: Pico, Louvain, and the crisis of Renaissance astrology. Leiden/Boston: Brill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vanhaelen, Maude. 2007. Liberté, astrologie et fatalité: Marsile Ficin et le De fato de Plotin. Accademia (Revue de la Société Marsile Ficin) 7: 45–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westman, Robert. 2011. The Copernican question: Prognostication, skepticism, and celestial order. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ovanes Akopyan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Akopyan, O. (2022). Causality, Renaissance. In: Sgarbi, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14169-5_253

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation