Addressing the Different Needs for Charging Infrastructure: An Analysis of Some Criteria for Charging Infrastructure Set-up

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
E-Mobility in Europe

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN))

Abstract

Electric mobility is an important means to decarbonise the transport sector. Especially in cities, the use of zero-emission vehicles like electric vehicles is favourable, as emissions of conventional cars cause severe air pollution. Besides CO2, the most important emissions are nitric oxides, particular matter and noise. Given the trend of urbanisation, the problem of air pollution in large cities will rather grow than diminish. Although electric vehicles are an infrastructure-dependent technology, one important advantage of plug-in electric vehicles (EV) compared to hydrogen-powered vehicles is the possibility to use the existing electricity infrastructure in households for charging. While additional public charging infrastructure is also needed for interim charging or overnight charging for the so-called ‘on-street parkers’ without own garage, the majority of vehicles could be operated as EVs without additional public charging infrastructure. However, public charging infrastructure is an important component for the large-scale diffusion of electric vehicles and political action seems necessary since no business models are presently available. In the present paper the authors combine different data sets concerning German charging points and mobility patterns to describe the different needs for charging infrastructure, and provide an overview of the underlying different technical options. Based on the current charging infrastructure stock, the set-up methodology and the impact of user needs on charging infrastructure, the authors compare a coverage-oriented and a demand-oriented approach. The authors also estimate the number of public charging points for those two approaches. Finally, criteria for charging infrastructure are categorised and related to the different approaches. It results that the number of charging stations needed for the two different scenarios and the actual distribution of this predefined number of charging stations are answers to fundamentally different questions. As one consequence, an explicit statement on the number of charging stations needed on large scale (such as Germany) is difficult to make on the basis of (local) user demand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    One has to divide the area of Germany (357,097 km²) by the number of refuelling stations multiplied by √3 (intersection point of three equal circles).

  2. 2.

    Or supranationally if agreed at that level, or if devolved to federal state level at that level.

  3. 3.

    The word heuristics in this context is used as the description of a mathematical method to approximate the optimal solution. In contrast, the word heuristics in the title is used to describe generally an experience-based approach for infrastructure set-up strategies.

  4. 4.

    In the document 150,000 charging points are postulated. For the estimation of the resulting number of charging stations, the authors assume two charging points per charging station (Lemnet Europe e.V. 2014).

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was made possible as part of the REM 2030 project, which is funded by the Fraunhofer Society and the federal state Baden-Wȕrttemberg.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Árpád Funke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Funke, S.Á., Gnann, T., Plötz, P. (2015). Addressing the Different Needs for Charging Infrastructure: An Analysis of Some Criteria for Charging Infrastructure Set-up. In: Leal Filho, W., Kotter, R. (eds) E-Mobility in Europe. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13194-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13194-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13193-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13194-8

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation