Normative Conflicts that Depend on the Domain

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems IX (COIN 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8386))

  • 696 Accesses

Abstract

Norms are being used in multi-agent systems as a powerful abstraction to capture social constraints. Norms regulate the behavior of the agents by describing the actions that can be performed, actions that must be performed, and actions that cannot be performed. One of the main challenges on design and implementation of normative systems is that norms may conflict with one another. Although there are several works that contribute to the checking and solving conflicts between norms, there is still a need for approaches able to check for conflicts when such conflicts are only detected when analyzing the application domain. Without considering the application domain it is not possible to identify conflicts that, for instance, regulate the execution of different, but related actions, executed by different, but related entities. In this paper we present an approach bases the checking for conflicts between the norms on the description of the application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    By abstract action we mean the action that cannot be executed since it does only define the goals to be achieved when it is executed but no implementation is provided.

  2. 2.

    In this paper we are not dealing with partial fulfillment.

References

  1. Aldewereld, H., Alvarez-Napagao, S., Dignum, F., Vazquez-Salceda, J.: Making Norms Concrete. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 807–814 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Deutch, M., Gerard, H.: A study of normative and informational social influence upon judgment. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 51(3), 629–636 (1955)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dung, P., Sartor, G.: The modular logic of private international law. Artif. Intell. Law 19(2–3), 233–261 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. da Silva Figueiredo, K., Torres da Silva, V., de Oliveira Braga, C.: Modeling norms in multi-agent systems with NormML. In: De Vos, M., Fornara, N., Pitt, J.V., Vouros, G. (eds.) COIN 2010. LNCS, vol. 6541, pp. 39–57. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Fitting, M.: First-Order Logic and Automated Theorem Proving. Springer, New York (1990)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Gaertner, D., Garcia-Camino, A., Noriega, P., Vasconcelos, W.: Distributed norm management in regulated multi-agent systems. In: 6th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 624–631. ACM, Hawaii (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. García-Camino, A., Noriega, P., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.-A.: An algorithm for conflict resolution in regulated compound activities. In: O’Hare, G.M., Ricci, A., O’Grady, M.J., Dikenelli, O. (eds.) ESAW 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4457, pp. 193–208. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Governatori, G.: Legal Contractions: A logical analysis. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 63–72 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kollingbaum, M.J., Vasconcelos, W.W., García-Camino, A., Norman, T.J.: Managing conflict resolution in norm-regulated environments. In: Artikis, A., O’Hare, G.M., Stathis, K., Vouros, G.A. (eds.) ESAW 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4995, pp. 55–71. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Kollingbaum, M.J., Vasconcelos, W.W., García-Camino, A., Norman, T.J.: Conflict resolution in norm-regulated environments via unification and constraints. In: Baldoni, M., Son, T.C., van Riemsdijk, M., Winikoff, M. (eds.) DALT 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4897, pp. 158–174. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Li, T., Balke, T., De Vos, M., Satoh, K., Padget, J.: Detecting conflicts in legal systems. In: Motomura, Y., Butler, A., Bekki, D. (eds.) JSAI-isAI 2012. LNCS, vol. 7856, pp. 174–189. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Li, T., Balke, T., De Vos, M., Padget, J., Satoh, K.: Legal conflict detection in interacting legal systems. In: The 26th International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (JURIX) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Oren, N., Luck, M., Miles, S., Norman, T.: An argumentation inspired heuristic for resolving normative conflict. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Coordination, Organisations, Institutions and Norms in Agent Systems (COIN@AAMAS 2008) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vasconcelos, W., Kollingbaum, M., GarcĂ­a-camino, A., Norman, T.: Achieving conflict freedom in norm-based societies. In: Workshop on Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vasconcelos, W., Kollingbaum, M., Norman, T.: Resolving conflict and inconsistency in norm regulated virtual organizations. In: 6th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, ACM (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vasconcelos, W., Kollingbaum, M., Norman, T.: Normative conflict resolution in multi-agent systems. Auton. Agent. Multi-Agent Syst. 19(2), 124–152 (2009). ACM

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vasconcelos, W., Norman, T.: Contract formation through preemptive normative conflict resolution. In: 12th International Conference of the Catalan Association for Artificial Intelligence, pp. 179–188. IOS Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Viviane Torres da Silva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

da Silva, V.T., Zahn, J. (2014). Normative Conflicts that Depend on the Domain. In: Balke, T., Dignum, F., van Riemsdijk, M., Chopra, A. (eds) Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems IX. COIN 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8386. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07314-9_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07314-9_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07313-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07314-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation