Methodology for Pedestrian Analysis in Public Spaces Based on Probabilistic Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2012
  • 2029 Accesses

Abstract

In the field of pedestrian simulation, there is a lack of detail in terms of the random movements of pedestrians within a public space. This is due to the use of models based on deterministic approaches, like O/D-based fixed percentage of routes which, in most cases, hardly reproduce those random patterns. The presented methodology tries to cover the need of representing the complexity of movements of such spaces, without forgetting the efficiency and effectiveness of the implementation in the model of such large amount of information. This paper describes an intuitive and innovative idea that substantially improves the modeling of random pedestrian patterns, the validation of the results and the analysis of commercial areas and future scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 160.49
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 210.99
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
EUR 210.99
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    GEH Statistic is a formula that gets its name from Geoffrey E. Havers, used to contrast two sets of transportation volumes.

References

  1. Fruin, John J., Ph.D (1987). Pedestrian. Planning and design. Elevator World, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fruin, John J., Ph.D (1970). Designing for Pedestrians: A Level of Service Concept. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Standing Committee on Transportation

    Google Scholar 

  3. Drew, Donald R. (1968). Traffic flow theory and control. McGraw Hill Book Company

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hill, Michael R. (1984). Walking, crossing streets, and choosing pedestrian routes: a survey of recent insights from the social/behavioral sciences. University of Nebraska

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zacharias J., Bernhardt T., Montigny L. (2005). Computer-simulated pedestrian behaviour in shop** environment. Journal of urban planning and development. ASCE

    Google Scholar 

  7. Uhlig K.R. (1979). Pedestrian areas: from malls to complete networks. Architectural Book Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Timmermans H.J.P. (2009). Pedestrian behaviour: Models, data collection and applications. Emerald Group Publising.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Emmerich, H., Nestler, B., Schreckenberg, M. (2003). Interface and Transport Dynamics: Computational Modelling. Springer. Series: Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, Vol. 32

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hoogendoorn. S.P and Bovy, P.H.L (2004). Pedestrian route choice and activity scheduling theory and models. Transp. Res., Part B.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schadschneider, A., Klüpfel, H., Kretz, T., Rogsch, C. and Seyfried, A. (2009). Fundamentals of Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics. Bazzan and Klugl (Eds), A.Multi-Agent Systems for Traffic and Transportation Engineering

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liddle, J., Seyfried, A., Klingsch, W., Rupprecht, T., Schadschneider, A. and Winkens, A. (2009). An Experimental Study of Pedestrian Congestions: Influence of Bottleneck Width and Length. Conference proceedings for Traffic and Granular Flow 2009

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zacharias, J (2001). Path choice and visual stimuli: signs of human activity and architecture. J. Environmental Psychology

    Google Scholar 

  14. Steffen, B., Seyfried, A. (2009). Methods for measuring pedestrian density, flow, speed and direction with minimal scatter. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2010, Vol. 389

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schadschneider A. and Seyfried, A. (2011). Empirical results for pedestrian dynamics and their implications for modeling. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, Vol. 6, Pages : 545 - 560

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thompson PA, Marchant EW (1993). Modelling techniques for evacuation. Smith RA, Dickie JF (eds) Engineering for crowd safety. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 259–269

    Google Scholar 

  17. Transportation Research Board (1985) Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209. Transportation Research Board, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  18. Garbrecht, D. (1973). Describing pedestrian and car trips by transition matrices. Traffic Q 27:89–109

    Google Scholar 

  19. Older SJ (1968). Movement of pedestrians on footways in shop** streets. Traffic Eng Control 10:160–163

    Google Scholar 

  20. Helbing, D. (1992). A mathematical model for attitude formation by pair interactions. Behav Sci 37:190–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Radjai F, Roux S (2002). Turbulentlike fluctuations in quasistatic flow of granular media. Phys Rev Lett 89:064302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Le Bon G (2002). The Crowd. Dover, New York (1st edn: 1895)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tubbs J, Meacham B (2007). Egress design solutions: A guide to evacuation and crowd management planning. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Smith R.A, Dickie J.F. (1993). Engineering for crowd safety. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  25. Waldau N, Gattermann P, Knoflacher H (2006). Pedestrian and evacuation dynamics 2005. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  26. Helbing D, Buzna L, Johansson A, Werner T (2005). Self-organized pedestrian crowd dynamics: Experiments, simulations, and design solutions. Transp Sci 39(1):1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Baeck T (1996). Evolutionary algorithms in theory and practice. Oxford University Press, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Johansson A, Helbing D (2007). Pedestrian flow optimization with a genetic algorithm based on Boolean grids. In: Waldau N, Gattermann P, Knoflacher H, Schreckenberg M. Pedestrian and evacuation dynamics 2005. Springer, Berlin, pp 267 - 272

    Google Scholar 

  29. Canter D (ed) (1990). Fires and human behaviour. Fulton. London

    Google Scholar 

  30. Helbing D., Johansson A. Pedestrian, Crowd and Evacuation Dynamics. ETH Zurich. Institute for Advanced Study, Collegium Budapest, Hungary

    Google Scholar 

  31. INECO (2010). Construction design for the extension of the Chamartin complex in Madrid. Spain

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ignacio Martínez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Martínez, I., Olmeda, A. (2014). Methodology for Pedestrian Analysis in Public Spaces Based on Probabilistic Approach. In: Weidmann, U., Kirsch, U., Schreckenberg, M. (eds) Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2012. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02447-9_64

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation