Abstract
Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) solutions usually aim at defining an integrated and multi-modal framework to make sustainable mobility choices easier and seamless. Nevertheless, several scholars highlight that their effectiveness in supporting modal-shift from individual mobility is therefore limited without side-interventions on making more difficult, expensive and non-competitive the use of private cars. Similar goals may be achieved through the increasing of sustainable alternatives’ attractiveness (effective and easy multi-modal integration reducing travel times, convenient fare policies…) or the reduction of individual cars privileges (urban tolls, congestion charges, controlled or limited access to green-vehicles to urban cores…). Recently, Genoa Municipality has started to evaluate a smart-gate system to border the city center and limit car access. This measure targets several goals: to control vehicles flow, collect data on city users and support modal shift towards public transport and sharing mobility. Moreover this measure should be able to make sustainable alternatives more appealing together with the adoption of a urban MaaS solution (thanks to “GetUp” project, currently ongoing) integrating urban parking, PT services and sharing mobility options. Data-driven process should improve urban performances concerning sustainable mobility and improve citizens quality of life in terms of reducing polluting emissions and ease individual journeys across the city.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Pilati, M.: National recovery and resilience plans: empowering the green and digital transitions? EPC Discussion Paper, April 2021
Kakderi, C., Oikonomaki, E., Papadaki, I.: Smart and resilient urban futures for sustainability in the post COVID-19 era: a review of policy responses on urban mobility. Sustainability 13(11), 6486 (2021)
Reyes-Rubiano, L., Serrano-Hernandez, A., Montoya-Torres, J.R., Faulin, J.: The sustainability dimensions in intelligent urban transportation: a paradigm for smart cities. Sustainability 13(19), 10653 (2021)
Kramarz, M., Przybylska, E.: Multimodal transport in the context of sustainable development of a city. Sustainability 13(4), 2239 (2021)
Campisi, T., Garau, C., Acampa, G., Maltinti, F., Canale, A., Coni, M.: Develo** flexible mobility on-demand in the era of mobility as a service: an overview of the Italian context before and after pandemic. In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2021. LNCS, vol. 12954, pp. 323–338. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86979-3_24
Le Pira, M., Tavasszy, L.A., de Almeida Correia, G.H., Ignaccolo, M., Inturri, G.: Opportunities for integration between Mobility as a Service (MaaS) and freight transport: a conceptual model. Sustain. Cities Soc. 74, 103212 (2021)
Maas, B.: Literature review of mobility as a service. Sustainability 14(14), 8962 (2022)
Hensher, D.A., Ho, C.Q., Reck, D.J.: Mobility as a service and private car use: Evidence from the Sydney MaaS trial. Transport. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 145, 17–33 (2021)
Alyavina, E., Nikitas, A., Njoya, E.T.: Mobility as a service and sustainable travel behaviour: a thematic analysis study. Transport. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 73, 362–381 (2020)
Salihou, F., Le Boennec, R., Bulteau, J., Da Costa, P.: Incentives for modal shift towards sustainable mobility solutions: a review. Revue d'économie industrielle, 199–246 (2023)
Buehler, R., Pucher, J., Gerike, R., Götschi, T.: Reducing car dependence in the heart of Europe: lessons from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Transp. Rev. 37(1), 4–28 (2017)
Mulalic, I., Rouwendal, J.: Does improving public transport decrease car ownership? Evidence from a residential sorting model for the Copenhagen metropolitan area. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 83, 103543 (2020)
Valdez, A.M., Cook, M., Langendahl, P.A., Roby, H., Potter, S.: Prototy** sustainable mobility practices: user-generated data in the smart city. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 30(2), 144–157 (2018)
Hrelja, R., Rye, T.: Decreasing the share of travel by car. Strategies for implementing ‘push’ or ‘pull’ measures in a traditionally car-centric transport and land use planning. Int. J. Sustain. Transport. 17(5), 446–458 (2023)
Nogueira, M., Dias, F., Santos, V.: Sustainable mobility choices: exploring the impact of consumers’ values, attitudes, perceived behavioural control and subjective norms on the likelihood to choose sustainable mobility options. J. Consum. Behav. 22(2), 511–528 (2023)
Zawieska, J., Pieriegud, J.: Smart city as a tool for sustainable mobility and transport decarbonisation. Transp. Policy 63, 39–50 (2018)
Nicolas, J.P., Pochet, P., Poimboeuf, H.: Towards sustainable mobility indicators: application to the Lyons conurbation. Transp. Policy 10(3), 197–208 (2003)
Athanasopoulou, A., Deijkers, T., Ozkan, B., Turetken, O.: MaaS platform features: an exploration of their relationship and importance from supply and demand perspective. J. Urban Mob. 2, 100028 (2022)
Durand, A., Harms, L., Hoogendoorn-Lanser, S., Zijlstra, T.: Mobility-as-a-Service and changes in travel preferences and travel behaviour: a literature review (2018)
Delponte, I., Costa, V.: Metropolitan MaaS and DRT Schemes: are they paving the way towards a more inclusive and resilient urban environment? In: Da Sixth International Conference on Universal Design Transforming our World through Universal Design for Human Development, Brescia, 7–9 Settembre 2022 (2022). ISBN 978-1-64368-305-8
Reck, D.J., Hensher, D.A., Ho, C.Q.: MaaS bundle design. Transport. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 141, 485–501 (2020)
Kim, Y., Kim, E.J., Jang, S., Kim, D.K.: A comparative analysis of the users of private cars and public transportation for intermodal options under Mobility-as-a-Service in Seoul. Travel Behav. Soc. 24, 68–80 (2021)
Gössling, S., Kees, J., Litman, T.: The lifetime cost of driving a car. Ecol. Econ. 194, 107335 (2022)
Graham-Rowe, E., Skippon, S., Gardner, B., Abraham, C.: Can we reduce car use and if so, how? A review of available evidence. Transport. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 45(5), 401–418 (2011)
Saleh, W.: Success and failure of travel demand management: is congestion charging the way forward? Special Issue of J. Transport. Res. Part A. (Guest Editor) 41(7), 611–614 (2007)
Coconea, L., Mizaras, V., Türetken, O., Dovinola, G., Grefen, P.: Insights on traffic management in the MaaS value chain. In: 13th ITS European Congress: fulfilling its promises, June 2019
Audouin, M.U.J.: Towards Mobility-as-a-Service: a cross-case analysis of public authorities’ roles in the development of ICT-supported integrated mobility schemes. Thesis 9098, EPFL (2019)
Mostofi, H.: The association between ICT-based mobility services and sustainable mobility behaviors of New Yorkers. Energies 14(11), 3064 (2021)
Mostofi, H.: The frequency use and the modal shift to ICT-based mobility services. Resourc. Environ. Sustain. 9, 100076 (2022)
Kamargianni, M., Matyas, M.: The Business Ecosystem of Mobility-as-a-Service, vol. 96. Transportation Research Board (2017)
Oskarbski, J., Kaszubowski, D.: Potential for ITS/ICT solutions in urban freight management. Transport. Res. Procedia 16, 433–448 (2016)
Hysing, E., Isaksson, K.: Building acceptance for congestion charges–the Swedish experiences compared. J. Transp. Geogr. 49, 52–60 (2015)
Sugiarto, S., Miwa, T., Sato, H., Morikawa, T.: Explaining differences in acceptance determinants toward congestion charging policies in Indonesia and Japan. J. Urban Plann. Dev. 143(2), 04016033 (2017)
Guerrero-Ibáñez, J., Zeadally, S., Contreras-Castillo, J.: Sensor technologies for intelligent transportation systems. Sensors 18(4), 1212 (2018)
Patil, P.: Applications of deep learning in traffic management: a review. Int. J. Bus. Intell. Big Data Anal. 5(1), 16–23 (2022)
Rathore, M.M., Ahmad, A., Paul, A., Rho, S.: Urban planning and building smart cities based on the internet of things using big data analytics. Comput. Netw. 101, 63–80 (2016)
Eckhoff, D., Wagner, I.: Privacy in the smart city—applications, technologies, challenges, and solutions. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 20(1), 489–516 (2017)
Legambiente: CleanCities. Genova 2023 (2021). https://www.legambiente.it/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/CC2023_GENOVA2030.pdf
Genoa Municipality: Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan-Strategic Framework (2018)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Delponte, I., Costa, V. (2024). Tackling Un-sustainable Mobility. Smart City Tools to Limit Car Access to the City Center Through MaaS Solutions, the Genoese Experience. In: Marucci, A., Zullo, F., Fiorini, L., Saganeiti, L. (eds) Innovation in Urban and Regional Planning. INPUT 2023. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 467. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54118-6_57
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54118-6_57
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-54117-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-54118-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)