Comparative Assessment of RC and CFST Columns in Rigid-Frame Bridges Subjected to Horizontal and Vertical Ground Motions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Building for the Future: Durable, Sustainable, Resilient (fib Symposium 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 349))

  • 1856 Accesses

Abstract

The study aims to explore the application of concrete-filled steel tube (CFST) columns as a more resilient and sustainable alternative to vulnerable reinforced concrete (RC) columns in rigid-frame bridges prone to significant damage during strong earthquakes with large vertical ground motion intensities. A series of multi-axis hybrid simulations on a rigid-frame bridge structure are conducted, with circular and square CFST column cross-sections. The structure is subjected to combined horizontal and vertical ground motions using the state-of-the-art hybrid testing facility, the multi-axis substructures testing (MAST) system at Swinburne University of Technology. The test results of the CFST columns are then compared with those of a previous hybrid testing study on circular RC columns used in the construction of the same bridge structure. The study utilizes the classic performance-based earthquake engineering (PBEE) framework to compare the observed damage states and quantify the repair sustainability metrics, including repair cost (economic), repair downtime (social), and repair carbon emissions (environmental). The research findings confirm the superior seismic performance of CFST columns and highlight their potential in enhancing the resilience and sustainability of critical and post-disaster bridges that are susceptible to strong vertical ground motions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hashemi MJ, Al-Attraqchi AY, Kalfat R, Al-Mahaidi R (2019) Linking seismic resilience into sustainability assessment of limited-ductility RC buildings. Eng Struct 188:121–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hashemi J, Tsang HH, Al-Ogaidi Y, Wilson J, Al-Mahaidi R (2017) Collapse assessment of RC building columns through multi-axis hybrid simulation. ACI Struct J 114:437–449. https://doi.org/10.14359/51689438

  3. Hashemi MJ, Al-Ogaidi Y, Al-Mahaidi R, Kalfat R, Tsang HH, Wilson JL (2017) Application of hybrid simulation for collapse assessment of post-earthquake CFRP-repaired RC columns. J Struct Eng 143(1):04016149

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gunay S, Mosalam KM (2013) PEER performance-based earthquake engineering methodology Revisited. J Earthq Eng 17(6):829–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim SJ, Holub CJ, Elnashai AS (2011) Experimental investigation of the behavior of RC bridge piers subjected to horizontal and vertical earthquake motion. Eng Struct 33(7):2221–2235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mast R, et al. (1996) Seismic Design of Bridges. Design Example No. 4: Three-Span Continuous CIP Concrete Bridge. Federal Highway Administration

    Google Scholar 

  7. AASHTO (1995) Standard specifications for highway bridges, division I-A: seismic design. 15th ed. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials

    Google Scholar 

  8. Al-Attraqchi AY, Hashemi MJ, Al-Mahaidi R (2020) Hybrid simulation of bridges constructed with concrete-filled steel tube columns subjected to horizontal and vertical ground motions. Bull Earthq Eng 18(9):4453–4480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-00871-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hashemi MJ, Al-Mahaidi R, Kalfat R, Burnett G (2015) Development and validation of multi-axis substructure testing system for full-scale experiments. Aust J Struct Eng 16(4):302–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. AlMahaidi R, Hashemi J, Kalfat R, Burnett G, Wilson J (2018) Multi-Axis Substructure Testing System for Hybrid Simulation. Multi-Axis Substructure Testing System for Hybrid Simulation, p 1–81

    Google Scholar 

  11. Del Carpio RM, Hashemi MJ, Mosqueda G (2017) Evaluation of integration methods for hybrid simulation of complex structural systems through collapse. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 16(4):745–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hashemi MJ, Mosqueda G, Lignos DG, Medina RA, Miranda E (2016) Assessment of numerical and experimental errors in hybrid simulation of framed structural systems through collapse. J Earthq Eng 20(6):885–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hashemi MJ, Mosqueda G (2014) Innovative substructuring technique for hybrid simulation of multistory buildings through collapse. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 43(14):2059–2074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hashemi MJ, Masroor A, Mosqueda G (2014) Implementation of online model updating in hybrid simulation. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 43(3):395–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. McKenna F (2011) OpenSees: a framework for earthquake engineering simulation. Comput Sci Eng 13(4):58–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. FEMA P (2009) Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors. Report No: FEMA-695. FEMA P695. Washington: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 287 (A-16)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Al-Attraqchi AY, Hashemi MJ, Al-Mahaidi R (2022) Loss assessment of rigid-frame bridges under horizontal and vertical ground motions. Structures 35:243–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mackie KR, Wong J-M, Stojadinovicʹ B (2008) Integrated probabilistic performance-based evaluation of benchmark reinforced concrete bridges. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center

    Google Scholar 

  19. Han L-H, Lin X-K, Wang YC (2006) Cyclic performance of repaired concrete-filled steel tubular columns after exposure to fire. Thin-walled struct 44(10):1063–1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bumstead J, Korat J, Stephens M (2019) Repair Strategies for Earthquake-Damaged CFST Bridge Columns. In: Structures Congress 2019American Society of Civil Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Javad Hashemi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hashemi, J., Al-Attraqchi, A., Al-Mahaidi, R. (2023). Comparative Assessment of RC and CFST Columns in Rigid-Frame Bridges Subjected to Horizontal and Vertical Ground Motions. In: Ilki, A., Çavunt, D., Çavunt, Y.S. (eds) Building for the Future: Durable, Sustainable, Resilient. fib Symposium 2023. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 349. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32519-9_155

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32519-9_155

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-32518-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-32519-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation