Abstract
In earthquake-prone areas, upgrading of existing structures is one of the main challenges in the field of structural engineering. Seismic upgrading of old structures is deemed necessary mainly due to their poor initial design, but also due to ageing of materials. Special attention is required for masonry-infilled reinforced concrete (RC) framed buildings. In such buildings masonry infills have not been taken into account in the design phase and thus they are unreliable structural elements which may fail prematurely and/or impose local failures to critical RC elements. Advanced techniques and materials for the seismic retrofitting of such structures have been successfully used in the past; namely the externally bonded Textile-Reinforced Mortars (TRM).
The behavior of masonry-infilled RC frames subjected to cyclic loading has been experimentally investigated widely in the past. However, only one analytical model has been developed so far, describing the in-plane behavior of TRM-strengthened masonry-infilled RC frames. This model is based on the use of single strut and tie elements which follow a multi-linear response with hysteretic properties and has been validated against experimental data. This study aims to investigate the ability of materials following different hysteresis laws to capture the experimental response of a 3-story masonry-infilled RC frame, using the open-source software OpenSees. The main conclusion is that, after proper calibration, alternative materials can be used to simulate the hysteretic behavior of masonry infills, showing satisfactory agreement with the experimental results.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Doğangün, A., Ural, A., Sezen, H., Güney, Y., Fırat, F.: The 2011 earthquake in Simav, Turkey and seismic damage to reinforced concrete buildings. Buildings 3, 173–190 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings3010173
Koutas, L., Bousias, S.N., Triantafillou, T.C.: Seismic strengthening of masonry-infilled RC frames with TRM: experimental study. J. Compos. Constr. 19, 04014048 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000507
Ismail, N., El-Maaddawy, T., Khattak, N.: Quasi-static in-plane testing of FRCM strengthened non-ductile reinforced concrete frames with masonry infills. Constr. Build. Mater. 186, 1286–1298 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.230
Akhoundi, F., Vasconcelos, G., Lourenço, P.: Experimental out-of-plane behavior of brick masonry infilled frames. Int. J. Architectural Heritage 14, 221–237 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2018.1529207
Koutas, L., Triantafillou, T.C., Bousias, S.N.: Analytical modeling of masonry-infilled RC frames retrofitted with textile-reinforced mortar. J. Compos. Constr. 19, 04014082 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000553
McKenna, F.: OpenSees: a framework for earthquake engineering simulation. Computing in Sci. Eng. 13, 58–66 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2011.66
Pohoryles, D.A., Bournas, D.A.: Seismic retrofit of infilled RC frames with textile reinforced mortars: State-of-the-art review and analytical modelling. Compos. B Eng. 183, 107702 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107702
Fardis, M.N., Panagiotakos, T.B.: Seismic design and response of bare and masonry-infilled reinforced concrete buildings. Part II: infilled Structures. J. Earthquake Eng. 1, 475–503 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469708962375
Skafida, S., Koutas, L., Bousias, S.N.: Analytical modeling of masonry infilled RC frames and verification with experimental data. J. Struct. 2014, 1–17 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/216549
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Monastiridou, M., Koutas, L. (2023). Numerical Modeling of Masonry Infills in RC Frames Subjected to In-Plane Cyclic Loading: Comparison Analysis Between Different Materials in OpenSees. In: Di Trapani, F., Demartino, C., Marano, G.C., Monti, G. (eds) Proceedings of the 2022 Eurasian OpenSees Days. EOS 2022. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 326. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30125-4_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30125-4_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-30124-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-30125-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)