SpringerLink
Log in

Nine Challenges for Immersive Entertainment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Grand Research Challenges in Games and Entertainment Computing in Brazil - GranDGamesBR 2020–2030 (GranDGamesBR 2020, GranDGamesBR 2021)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1702))

  • 794 Accesses

Abstract

Immersive entertainment is an important driver of mixed reality platforms. As technology becomes better and cheaper, this will spark the next major shift in digital entertainment. We identify nine research topics on immersive entertainment across theoretical-scientific, creative, systems, and social dimensions. For each topic, we discuss possible research directions that can lead to advances in the field. This chapter is an extended version of a paper originally published in the proceedings of the XX Brazilian Symposium on Computer Games and Digital Entertainment. Each of the topics is discussed in more depth and a separate challenge for input devices and body tracking was added.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 64.19
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 80.24
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aeschbach, L.F., Perrig, S.A., Weder, L., Opwis, K., Brühlmann, F.: Transparency in measurement reporting: a systematic literature review of CHI PLAY. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5(CHI PLAY), 1–21 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmad, A., Migniot, C., Dipanda, A.: Tracking hands in interaction with objects: a review. In: 2017 13th International Conference on Signal-Image Technology & Internet-Based Systems (SITIS), pp. 360–369. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alabdulkarim, A., Li, S., Peng, X.: Automatic story generation: challenges and attempts. ar**v preprint ar**v:2102.12634 (2021)

  4. Alcaniz Raya, M., Marín-Morales, J., Minissi, M.E., Teruel Garcia, G., Abad, L., Chicchi Giglioli, I.A.: Machine learning and virtual reality on body movements’ behaviors to classify children with autism spectrum disorder. J. Clin. Med. 9(5), 1260 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alkomah, F., Ma, X.: A literature review of textual hate speech detection methods and datasets. Information 13(6), 273 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ashktorab, Z., Vitak, J.: Designing cyberbullying mitigation and prevention solutions through participatory design with teenagers. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3895–3905 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Attal, B., Huang, J.B., Zollhoefer, M., Kopf, J., Kim, C.: Learning neural light fields with ray-space embedding networks. ar**v preprint ar**v:2112.01523 (2021)

  8. Azuma, R.: Fundamentals of wearable computers and augmented reality (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bernal, G., Hidalgo, N., Russomanno, C., Maes, P.: Galea: a physiological sensing system for behavioral research in virtual environments. In: 2022 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), pp. 66–76. IEEE (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Blaga, A.D., Frutos-Pascual, M., Creed, C., Williams, I.: Freehand gras**: an analysis of gras** for docking tasks in virtual reality. In: 2021 IEEE Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), pp. 749–758. IEEE (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Blaga, A.D., Frutos-Pascual, M., Creed, C., Williams, I.: A grasp on reality: understanding gras** patterns for object interaction in real and virtual environments. In: 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct), pp. 391–396. IEEE (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bowman, D., Koller, D., Hodges, L.: Travel in immersive virtual environments: an evaluation of viewpoint motion control techniques. In: Proceedings of IEEE 1997 Annual International Symposium on Virtual Reality, pp. 45–52 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1109/VRAIS.1997.583043

  13. Bowman, D.A., Kruijff, E., LaViola, J.J., Poupyrev, I.: An introduction to 3-D user interface design. Presence 10(1), 96–108 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Breyer, F., et al.: Narrative-led interaction techniques. In: Rouse, R., Koenitz, H., Haahr, M. (eds.) ICIDS 2018. LNCS, vol. 11318, pp. 217–229. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04028-4_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Brockmyer, J.H., Fox, C.M., Curtiss, K.A., McBroom, E., Burkhart, K.M., Pidruzny, J.N.: The development of the game engagement questionnaire: a measure of engagement in video game-playing. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 45(4), 624–634 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Burns, A., Tulip, J.: Detecting flow in games using facial expressions. In: 2017 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games (CIG), pp. 45–52. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cavazza, M., Aylett, R., Dautenhahn, K., Fencott, C., Charles, F.: Interactive storytelling in virtual environments: building the “holodeck”. In: Proceedings of VSMM, pp. 678–687. Citeseer (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chang, E., Kim, H.T., Yoo, B.: Virtual reality sickness: a review of causes and measurements. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 36(17), 1658–1682 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Choi, I., Ofek, E., Benko, H., Sinclair, M., Holz, C.: Claw: a multifunctional handheld haptic controller for gras**, touching, and triggering in virtual reality. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–13 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cukor, J., Spitalnick, J., Difede, J., Rizzo, A., Rothbaum, B.O.: Emerging treatments for PTSD. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 29(8), 715–26 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dadvar, M., De Jong, F.: Cyberbullying detection: a step toward a safer internet yard. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 121–126 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. De Guzman, J.A., Thilakarathna, K., Seneviratne, A.: Security and privacy approaches in mixed reality: a literature survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 52(6), 1–37 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dekker, A., Champion, E.: Please biofeed the zombies: enhancing the gameplay and display of a horror game using biofeedback. In: DiGRA 2007-Proceedings of the 2007 DiGRA International Conference: Situated Play, pp. 550–558 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Denisova, A., Nordin, A.I., Cairns, P.: The convergence of player experience questionnaires. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, pp. 33–37. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Djuric, N., Zhou, J., Morris, R., Grbovic, M., Radosavljevic, V., Bhamidipati, N.: Hate speech detection with comment embeddings. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 29–30 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Egliston, B., Carter, M.: Oculus imaginaries: the promises and perils of Facebook’s virtual reality. New Media & Society, p. 1461444820960411 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Figueiredo, L.S., Livshits, B., Molnar, D., Veanes, M.: Prepose: privacy, security, and reliability for gesture-based programming. In: 2016 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pp. 122–137. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Freeman, G., Zamanifard, S., Maloney, D., Acena, D.: Disturbing the peace: experiencing and mitigating emerging harassment in social virtual reality. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6(CSCW1), 1–30 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Freeman, J., Avons, S.E., Meddis, R., Pearson, D.E., IJsselsteijn, W.: Using behavioral realism to estimate presence: a study of the utility of postural responses to motion stimuli. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 9(2), 149–164 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gafni, G., Thies, J., Zollhofer, M., Nießner, M.: Dynamic neural radiance fields for monocular 4D facial avatar reconstruction. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 8649–8658 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Grassini, S., Laumann, K.: Questionnaire measures and physiological correlates of presence: a systematic review. Front. Psychol. 11, 349 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Halbig, A., Latoschik, M.E.: A systematic review of physiological measurements, factors, methods, and applications in virtual reality. Front. Virtual Real. 2, 694567 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hameed, A., Perkis, A.: Spatial storytelling: finding interdisciplinary immersion. In: Rouse, R., Koenitz, H., Haahr, M. (eds.) ICIDS 2018. LNCS, vol. 11318, pp. 323–332. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04028-4_35

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Hampali, S., Sarkar, S.D., Rad, M., Lepetit, V.: Handsformer: keypoint transformer for monocular 3D pose estimation of hands and object in interaction. ar**v preprint ar**v:2104.14639 (2021)

  35. Houzangbe, S., Christmann, O., Gorisse, G., Richir, S.: Fear as a biofeedback game mechanic in virtual reality: effects on engagement and perceived usability. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, pp. 1–6 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  36. IJsselsteijn, W.A., De Kort, Y.A., Poels, K.: The game experience questionnaire. Tech. rep., Technische Universiteit Eindhoven (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ishaque, S., Rueda, A., Nguyen, B., Khan, N., Krishnan, S.: Physiological signal analysis and classification of stress from virtual reality video game. In: 2020 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC), pp. 867–870. IEEE (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Jackson, S.A., Eklund, R.C.: Assessing flow in physical activity: the flow state scale-2 and dispositional flow scale-2. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 24(2), 133–150 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kennedy, R.S., Lane, N.E., Berbaum, K.S., Lilienthal, M.G.: Simulator sickness questionnaire: an enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 3(3), 203–220 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lages, W.S.: Opportunities and challenges in immersive entertainment. Anais Estendidos do XX Simpósio Brasileiro de Jogos e Entretenimento Digital, pp. 943–946 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lang, B.: In ‘horizon’ Facebook can invisibly observe users in real-time to spot rule violations. https://www.roadtovr.com/facebook-horizon-privacy-monitoring-moderation/

  42. Lattas, A., et al.: Avatarme: realistically renderable 3D facial reconstruction “in-the-wild”. In: CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), IEEE (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Laugwitz, B., Held, T., Schrepp, M.: Construction and evaluation of a user experience questionnaire. In: Holzinger, A. (ed.) USAB 2008. LNCS, vol. 5298, pp. 63–76. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89350-9_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  44. LaViola, Jr, J.J., Kruijff, E., McMahan, R.P., Bowman, D., Poupyrev, I.P.: 3D user interfaces: theory and practice, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley Professional (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Liu, L., Habermann, M., Rudnev, V., Sarkar, K., Gu, J., Theobalt, C.: Neural actor: neural free-view synthesis of human actors with pose control. ACM Trans. Graph. 40(6), 1–16 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lombard, M., Ditton, T.: At the heart of it all: the concept of presence. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 3(2), JCMC321 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Maloney, D., Freeman, G., Wohn, D.Y.: “Talking without a voice’’ understanding non-verbal communication in social virtual reality. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4(CSCW2), 1–25 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Masurovsky, A., Chojecki, P., Runde, D., Lafci, M., Przewozny, D., Gaebler, M.: Controller-free hand tracking for grab-and-place tasks in immersive virtual reality: design elements and their empirical study. Multimodal Technol. Interact. 4(4), 91 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Matamoros-Fernández, A., Farkas, J.: Racism, hate speech, and social media: a systematic review and critique. Telev. New Media 22(2), 205–224 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Meehan, M., Insko, B., Whitton, M., Brooks, F.P., Jr.: Physiological measures of presence in stressful virtual environments. ACM Trans. Graph. 21(3), 645–652 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Mehrabi, A., Siekkinen, M., Kämäräinen, T., yl̈ J̈ski, A.: Multi-tier cloudvr: leveraging edge computing in remote rendered virtual reality. ACM Trans. Multimed. Comput. Commun. Appl. 17(2), 1–24 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Meta: Notice of monitoring and recording to improve safety in horizon worlds. https://store.facebook.com/legal/quest/monitoring-recording-safety-horizon/

  53. Miller, M.R., Herrera, F., Jun, H., Landay, J.A., Bailenson, J.N.: Personal identifiability of user tracking data during observation of 360-degree VR video. Sci. Rep. 10(1), 1–10 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Murray, J.H.: Hamlet on the Holodeck, Updated Edition: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace. MIT Press, Cambridge (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Nacke, L.E., Kalyn, M., Lough, C., Mandryk, R.L.: Biofeedback game design: using direct and indirect physiological control to enhance game interaction. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 103–112 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  56. NewZoo: The global games market reaches \$99.6 billion in 2016, mobile generating 37%. https://newzoo.com/insights/articles/global-games-market-reaches-99-6-billion-2016-mobile-generating-37. Accessed 01 Sep 2021

  57. Oh Kruzic, C., Kruzic, D., Herrera, F., Bailenson, J.: Facial expressions contribute more than body movements to conversational outcomes in avatar-mediated virtual environments. Sci. Rep. 10(1), 1–23 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Oriti, D., Manuri, F., Pace, F.D., Sanna, A.: Harmonize: a shared environment for extended immersive entertainment. Virtual Real. 2021, 1–14 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-021-00585-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Park, J., Park, H., Yoon, S.E., Woo, W.: Physically-inspired deep light estimation from a homogeneous-material object for mixed reality lighting. IEEE Trans. Visual Comput. Graphics 26(5), 2002–2011 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Pater, J.A., Kim, M.K., Mynatt, E.D., Fiesler, C.: Characterizations of online harassment: comparing policies across social media platforms. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Supporting Group Work, pp. 369–374 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Patten, T., Park, K., Leitner, M., Wolfram, K., Vincze, M.: Object learning for 6D pose estimation and gras** from RGB-D videos of in-hand manipulation. In: 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 4831–4838. IEEE (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Phan, M.H., Keebler, J.R., Chaparro, B.S.: The development and validation of the game user experience satisfaction scale (GUESS). Hum. Factors 58(8), 1217–1247 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Razzaque, S., Kohn, Z., Whitton, M.C.: Redirected walking. In: ACM (ed.) Proceedings of Eurographics, pp. 289–294. Citeseer (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Sanghrajka, R., Young, R.M., Salisbury, B., Lang, E.W.: ShowRunner: a tool for storyline execution/visualization in 3D game environments. In: Cardona-Rivera, R.E., Sullivan, A., Young, R.M. (eds.) ICIDS 2019. LNCS, vol. 11869, pp. 323–327. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33894-7_32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  65. Schrepp, M., Hinderks, A., Thomaschewski, J.: Design and evaluation of a short version of the user experience questionnaire (UEQ-S). Int. J. Interact. Multim. Artifi. Intell. 4(6), 103–108 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Segovia, K.Y., Bailenson, J.N.: Virtually true: children’s acquisition of false memories in virtual reality. Media Psychol. 12(4), 371–393 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Sekhavat, Y.A., Sisi, M.J., Roohi, S.: Affective interaction: using emotions as a user interface in games. Multimed. Tools Appl. 80(4), 5225–5253 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Shin, J.E., Kim, H., Parker, C., Kim, H.I., Oh, S., Woo, W.: Is any room really ok? The effect of room size and furniture on presence, narrative engagement, and usability during a space-adaptive augmented reality game. In: 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), pp. 135–144. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Siler, C., Ware, S.: A good story is one in a million: solution density in narrative generation problems. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment, vol. 16, pp. 123–129 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  70. Skarbez, R., Brooks, F.P., Jr., Whitton, M.C.: A survey of presence and related concepts. ACM Comput. Surv. 50(6), 1–39 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Slater, M.: A note on presence terminology. Presence Connect 3(3), 1–5 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  72. Slater, M.: How colorful was your day? Why questionnaires cannot assess presence in virtual environments. Presence 13(4), 484–493 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Slater, M., et al.: The ethics of realism in virtual and augmented reality. Front. Virtual Real. 1, 1 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  74. Souza, V., Maciel, A., Nedel, L., Kopper, R.: Measuring presence in virtual environments: a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 54(8), 1–37 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Stauffert, J.P., Niebling, F., Latoschik, M.E.: Latency and cybersickness: impact, causes, and measures: a review. Front. Virtual Real. 1, 582204 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  76. Steed, A., Takala, T.M., Archer, D., Lages, W., Lindeman, R.W.: Directions for 3D user interface research from consumer VR games. IEEE Trans. Visual Comput. Graphics 27(11), 4171–4182 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2021.3106431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Svensson, T.: Using VR to simulate interactable AR storytelling. In: Cardona-Rivera, R.E., Sullivan, A., Young, R.M. (eds.) ICIDS 2019. LNCS, vol. 11869, pp. 328–332. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33894-7_33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  78. Szczurowski, K., Smith, M.: Measuring presence: hypothetical quantitative framework. In: 2017 23rd International Conference on Virtual System & Multimedia (VSMM), pp. 1–8. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  79. Szolin, K., Kuss, D., Nuyens, F., Griffiths, M.: Gaming disorder: a systematic review exploring the user-avatar relationship in videogames. Comput. Hum. Behav. 128, 107124 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Tewari, A., et al.: Advances in neural rendering. In: Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 41, pp. 703–735. Wiley Online Library (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  81. Thomas, K., et al.: Sok: hate, harassment, and the changing landscape of online abuse. In: 2021 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pp. 247–267. IEEE (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  82. Tseng, W.J., et al.: The dark side of perceptual manipulations in virtual reality. In: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–15 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  83. Usoh, M., Catena, E., Arman, S., Slater, M.: Using presence questionnaires in reality. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 9(5), 497–503 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  84. Voigt-Antons, J.N., Kojic, T., Ali, D., Möller, S.: Influence of hand tracking as a way of interaction in virtual reality on user experience. In: 2020 Twelfth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience, pp. 1–4. IEEE (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  85. Vorderer, P., et al.: MEC spatial presence questionnaire. Retrieved Sept 18, 2015 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  86. Wee, C., Yap, K.M., Lim, W.N.: Haptic interfaces for virtual reality: challenges and research directions. IEEE Access 9, 112145–112162 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Weech, S., Kenny, S., Lenizky, M., Barnett-Cowan, M.: Narrative and gaming experience interact to affect presence and cybersickness in virtual reality. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 138, 102398 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Wienrich, C., Latoschik, M.E.: Extended artificial intelligence: new prospects of human-AI interaction research. ar**v preprint ar**v:2103.15004 (2021)

  89. Witmer, B.G., Singer, M.J.: Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 7(3), 225–240 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  90. Wolf, D., Rogers, K., Kunder, C., Rukzio, E.: JumpVR: jump-based locomotion augmentation for virtual reality. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–12 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  91. Yee, N., Bailenson, J.N.: The Proteus effect: the effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Hum. Commun. Res. 33(3), 271–290 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00299.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Yu, R., et al.: Bookshelf and bird: enabling real walking in large VR spaces through cell-based redirection. In: 2017 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI), pp. 116–119. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  93. Zhang, L., Oney, S.: Flowmatic: an immersive authoring tool for creating interactive scenes in virtual reality. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 342–353 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  94. Zhao, X., Pang, Y., Yang, J., Zhang, L., Lu, H.: Multi-source fusion and automatic predictor selection for zero-shot video object segmentation. ar**v preprint ar**v:2108.05076 (2021)

  95. Zhu, K., Chen, T., Han, F., Wu, Y.S.: Haptwist: creating interactive haptic proxies in virtual reality using low-cost twistable artefacts. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p. 693. ACM (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA

    Wallace Santos Lages

Authors
  1. Wallace Santos Lages
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wallace Santos Lages .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. UNIRIO, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    Rodrigo Pereira dos Santos

  2. UDESC, Joinville, Brazil

    Marcelo da Silva Hounsell

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lages, W.S. (2023). Nine Challenges for Immersive Entertainment. In: Santos, R.P.d., Hounsell, M.d.S. (eds) Grand Research Challenges in Games and Entertainment Computing in Brazil - GranDGamesBR 2020–2030. GranDGamesBR GranDGamesBR 2020 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1702. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27639-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27639-2_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-27638-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-27639-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation