A New Centennial Dream: China’s Second Centennial Plan and Sino-US Relations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of Topical Issues in International Political Geography (TIPG 2021)

Part of the book series: Springer Geography ((SPRINGERGEOGR))

  • 394 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper, I tried to explore what China is aiming for by analyzing the content that was brought to public at the 100th anniversary of the founding of the Communist Party of China in July 2021 and the essence of a long-term plan presented for the 2035 future vision. The Chinese government defined it as ‘getting up’ in the Mao era, ‘getting rich’ in the Deng ** era, and ‘getting stronger’ in the ** era. ** also declared that China would stand proudly against anyone in the world that would challenge the country and achieve a victory by using strong military power accumulated through socialist modernization. He also stressed that China would contribute as maintaining an order in the international community by forming new global power relationships.

In response to China’s challenge, the United States is essentially adopting a policy of containment of China. Although US China policies slightly very depending on a American regime in power, the policy will to maintain the US-centered world order has not changed. Under these circumstances, it is expected that China’s responsible international role could influence China’s status in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. JungNam, L.: China’s Perception of Sino-US relations: focusing on ‘Interests correlators’, ‘G2’ and ‘new great power relations’. Contemp. China Study 15(1), 33–66, 39–40 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hüseyin, K., İdris, T.: Analysis of the competition between China and the US in the 21st century from the perspective of the concept of hybrid cold war. Anadolu Univ. J. Soc. Sci. 21(2) (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jun, W., Shiqing, H.: Deng ** Theory: the most precious wealth - commemorating the Centennial birthday of Comrade Deng **. People’s Daily July 30, 2013 (03)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Commentator of people’s daily, the great glory of the Chinese nation: on building a well-off society in an all-round way. Pople’s Daily, July 2, 2021. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-07/02/content_5621941.htm. Accessed 29 July 2021

  5. Miaoqiang, Z., Wenfeng, L.: Research on the basic clues of the CCP’s hundred years of struggle: an investigation based on historical development. J. Dezhou Un. 37(3), 12 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  6. ****, X.: Speech at the 100th anniversary conference of the Communist Party of China, July 1, 2021. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-07/15/content_5625254.htm. Accessed 29 July 2021

  7. The 100th anniversary congress of China celebrating the founding of the Communist Party of China is solemnly held: ** delivered an important speech, 2021–07–01, **nhua News Agency. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-07/01/content_5621846.htm. Accessed 29 July 2021

  8. **anyin, H.: Strategic guidance for building a socialist modern country in an all-round way. Dongyue Treatise 42(1), 6 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  9. **’s speech at the conference on education and mobilization of Party History. People’s Daily, 2021/02/20

    Google Scholar 

  10. **’s important speech at the 100th anniversary congress of the Communist Party of China, 2021.07.02. **’s important speech at the “July 1st Medal” ceremony, 2021.07.01. **nhua News Agency. http://www.gov.cn/xin-wen/2021-07/01/content_5621903.htm. Accessed 30 July 2021

  11. Suggestions of the CPC Central Committee on formulating the 14th five year plan for national economic and social development and the long-term objectives for 2005 (adopted at the fifth plenary meeting of the 19th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on October 29, 2020). **nhua News Agency. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2020-11/03/content_5556991.htm. Accessed 30 July 2021

  12. Grand blueprint at the historical intersection: the birth of the proposal of the CPC Central Committee on formulating the 14th five year plan for national economic and social development and the long-term goals for the year 2005, November 4, 2020. **nhua News Agency. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2020-11/04/content_5557298.htm. Accessed 30 July 2021

  13. Weinan, W.: On the “two countries group” theory from the perspective of the dimensions and limits of China US cooperation. Modern International Relations, 2009–10

    Google Scholar 

  14. Guofei, C., Wenxin, C.: China US ‘two state Group’: origin and feasibility analysis of the concept. Modern International Relations, 2009–6

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jianfei, L.: Rational response to the theory of ‘two state groups. China Party and Government Cadres Forum, 2009–5

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shumei, L.: “G2,” China and the United States “and the realistic positioning of China US relations”. Red Flag Manuscript, 2009–13

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bergsten, F.: A partnership of equals: how washington should respond to China’s economic challenge. Foreign Affairs 2008, 57–69 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Henry, K.: The chance for a new world order. The International Herald Tribune, January 12, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  19. Brzezinski, Z.: The Group of Two that could change the world. The Financial Times, January 13 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sannan, Z., Weidong, L.: On the strategic positioning of current China US relations. Guide to Ideological and Theoretical Education, 2009–6, p. 61

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jiabao, W.: Do not agree with the reference to the ‘two countries group’. Chongqing Evening News, November 19, 2009. http://news.sina.com.cn/c/2009-11-19/022816629792s.shtml. Accessed 29 July 2021

  22. Weinan, W.: On the group of the two countries from the perspective of the dimensions and limits of China US cooperation. Modern International Relations, 2009–10, p. 6

    Google Scholar 

  23. **ngtang, W.: How to view the positioning of the United States towards China. Contemporary World, 2006–2, p. 15

    Google Scholar 

  24. **tao, H.: “Unswervingly advancing along the road of socialism with Chinese characteristics and striving to build a well-off society in an all-round way: report at the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China”, November 8, 2012. http://dx.njupt.edu.cn/2012/1124/c3410a52388/page.htm. Accessed 29 July 2021

  25. Hu **tao met with Obama and put forward four suggestions on China US relations. June 20, 2012. China News Network. http://news.sohu.com/20120620/n346126079.shtml. Accessed 29 July 2021

  26. Renguo, H.: An analysis of Sino US coordination “(C2)”. Modern International Relations, 2012–5, pp. 35–40

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bin, S.: China’s view of international order in the new era: cognition, policy orientation and realization path. Res. Int. Issues 2021–2, p. 22, p. 27

    Google Scholar 

  28. “** meets with us President Obama,” 2015.09.25. xinhuanet.com. http://www.xinhuanet.com/world/2015-09/25/c_1116681366.htm. Accessed 30 July 2021

  29. Matthew, F., Brian H.: Understanding China’s 2021 Defense Budget, Center for Strategic and International Studies, 5, 2021. https://www.csis.org/analysis/understanding-chinas-2021-defense-budget. Accessed 29 July 2021

  30. Kwanok, K.: Trump administration’s security policy toward china: a comparative study with the Biden administration. Int. Politics Study 24(2), 59, 53–54, 68 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zoellick, B.: Whither China: from membership to responsibility? J. Int. Secur. Assis. Manag. 28(2), 94–98 (2006) (remarks to the National Committee on the United States and China Relations, presented in New York City, September 21, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Guo**, G., Renyi, M.,: Historical investigation of the concept of ‘two state Group’. Amer. Res. 2011(4), 102 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Aekyung, K.: Changes in China’s perception of external identity: focusing on analysis of changes in china’s role in the first and second North Korean nuclear crisis. Nat. Strategy 2004(4), 43–44 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gao, C., Hui, L.: “President Hu **tao holds talks with President Bush”, April 21, 2006, http://news.sohu.com/20060421/n242916880.shtml. Accessed 30 July 2021

  35. The White House, Remarks by President Obama and President ** of the People’s Republic of China Before Bilateral Meeting. June 7 2013 https://obamawihitehouse.archives.gov. Accessed 30 July 2021

  36. There is no way for China and the United States to establish a new type of major country relationship, Lianhe Zaobao, July 18, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  37. The White House, National Security Strategy of the United States of America, (December 2017), p. 46. https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2021

  38. U.S. Department of Defense, Indo-Pacific Strategy Report: Preparedness, Partnerships, and Promoting a Networked Region, (June 1, 2019), p. 3. https://media.defense.gov/2019/Jul/01/2002152311/-1/-1/1/DEPARTMENT-OF-DEFENSE-INDO-PACIFIC-STRATEGY-REPORT-2019.PDF. Accessed 29 July 2021

  39. The White House, “The United States Strategic Approach to the People’s Republic of China,” May 26, 2020, p. 16. https://china.usembassy-china.org.cn/wp-content/uploads/sites/252/U.S.-Strategic-Approach-to-The-Peoples-Republic-of-China-Report-5.24v1.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2021

  40. Mark, M., et al.: “Pivot to the Pacific? The Obama Administration’s ‘Rebalancing’ Toward Asia,” Congressional Research Service Report, (March 28, 2012), pp. 1–4. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R42448.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2021

  41. Michael, A.: “The Question of American Strategy in the Indo-Pacific,” Islamism and the International Order, (July 17, 2018), pp. 11–12. https://www.hoover.org/sites/default/files/research/docs/auslin_webreadypdf.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2021

  42. Joseph, B.: Why American Must Lead Again: Reassuring U.S. Foreign Policy After Trump. Foreign Affairs, (March/April 2020). https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2020-01-23/why-america-must-lead-again. Accessed 29 July 2021

  43. The White House, ‘Quad Leaders’ Joint Statement: “The Sprit of the Quad,” March 12, 2021.https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/03/12/quad-leaders-joint-statement-the-spirit-of-the-quad/. Accessed 29 July 2021

  44. Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), Pacific Deterrence Initiative, May 2021. https://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/Documents/def-budget/FY2022/fy2022_Pacific_Deterrence_Initiative.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2021

  45. Mallory, S.: U.S. Indo-Pacific Command Wants $4.68B for New Pacific Deterrence Initiative. USNI News, March 2, 2021. https://news.usni.org/2021/03/02/u-s-indo-pacific-command-wants-4-68b-for-new-pacific-deterrence-initiative. Accessed 30 July 2021

  46. Jeff, S.: In an Age of China Rising, Has U.S. Democracy Promotion Lost Its Edge As a Foreign Policy Goal? The Heritage Foundation, April 20, 2021. https://www.heritage.org/asia/commentary/age-china-rising-has-us-democracy-promotion-lost-its-edge-foreign-policy-goal. Accessed 30 July 2021

  47. Suggestions of the CCP Central Committee on formulating the 14th five year plan for national economic and social development and the long-term goals for 2035 (adopted at the fifth plenary meeting of the 19th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on October 29, 2020) 5556991.htm. Accessed 30 July 2021

    Google Scholar 

  48. ** hosted a forum on national security work and stressed: firmly establish and conscientiously implement the overall national security concept and open up a new prospect for national security under the new situation, **nhua News Agency, 2017.02.17. www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2017-02/17/c_1120486809.htm. Accessed 30 July 2021

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sunyoung Park .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Park, S. (2023). A New Centennial Dream: China’s Second Centennial Plan and Sino-US Relations. In: Bolgov, R., et al. Proceedings of Topical Issues in International Political Geography. TIPG 2021. Springer Geography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20620-7_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation