Abstract
In this paper, I tried to explore what China is aiming for by analyzing the content that was brought to public at the 100th anniversary of the founding of the Communist Party of China in July 2021 and the essence of a long-term plan presented for the 2035 future vision. The Chinese government defined it as ‘getting up’ in the Mao era, ‘getting rich’ in the Deng ** era, and ‘getting stronger’ in the ** era. ** also declared that China would stand proudly against anyone in the world that would challenge the country and achieve a victory by using strong military power accumulated through socialist modernization. He also stressed that China would contribute as maintaining an order in the international community by forming new global power relationships.
In response to China’s challenge, the United States is essentially adopting a policy of containment of China. Although US China policies slightly very depending on a American regime in power, the policy will to maintain the US-centered world order has not changed. Under these circumstances, it is expected that China’s responsible international role could influence China’s status in the future.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
JungNam, L.: China’s Perception of Sino-US relations: focusing on ‘Interests correlators’, ‘G2’ and ‘new great power relations’. Contemp. China Study 15(1), 33–66, 39–40 (2013)
Hüseyin, K., İdris, T.: Analysis of the competition between China and the US in the 21st century from the perspective of the concept of hybrid cold war. Anadolu Univ. J. Soc. Sci. 21(2) (2021)
Jun, W., Shiqing, H.: Deng ** Theory: the most precious wealth - commemorating the Centennial birthday of Comrade Deng **. People’s Daily July 30, 2013 (03)
Commentator of people’s daily, the great glory of the Chinese nation: on building a well-off society in an all-round way. Pople’s Daily, July 2, 2021. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-07/02/content_5621941.htm. Accessed 29 July 2021
Miaoqiang, Z., Wenfeng, L.: Research on the basic clues of the CCP’s hundred years of struggle: an investigation based on historical development. J. Dezhou Un. 37(3), 12 (2021)
****, X.: Speech at the 100th anniversary conference of the Communist Party of China, July 1, 2021. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-07/15/content_5625254.htm. Accessed 29 July 2021
The 100th anniversary congress of China celebrating the founding of the Communist Party of China is solemnly held: ** delivered an important speech, 2021–07–01, **nhua News Agency. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-07/01/content_5621846.htm. Accessed 29 July 2021
**anyin, H.: Strategic guidance for building a socialist modern country in an all-round way. Dongyue Treatise 42(1), 6 (2021)
**’s speech at the conference on education and mobilization of Party History. People’s Daily, 2021/02/20
**’s important speech at the 100th anniversary congress of the Communist Party of China, 2021.07.02. **’s important speech at the “July 1st Medal” ceremony, 2021.07.01. **nhua News Agency. http://www.gov.cn/xin-wen/2021-07/01/content_5621903.htm. Accessed 30 July 2021
Suggestions of the CPC Central Committee on formulating the 14th five year plan for national economic and social development and the long-term objectives for 2005 (adopted at the fifth plenary meeting of the 19th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on October 29, 2020). **nhua News Agency. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2020-11/03/content_5556991.htm. Accessed 30 July 2021
Grand blueprint at the historical intersection: the birth of the proposal of the CPC Central Committee on formulating the 14th five year plan for national economic and social development and the long-term goals for the year 2005, November 4, 2020. **nhua News Agency. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2020-11/04/content_5557298.htm. Accessed 30 July 2021
Weinan, W.: On the “two countries group” theory from the perspective of the dimensions and limits of China US cooperation. Modern International Relations, 2009–10
Guofei, C., Wenxin, C.: China US ‘two state Group’: origin and feasibility analysis of the concept. Modern International Relations, 2009–6
Jianfei, L.: Rational response to the theory of ‘two state groups. China Party and Government Cadres Forum, 2009–5
Shumei, L.: “G2,” China and the United States “and the realistic positioning of China US relations”. Red Flag Manuscript, 2009–13
Bergsten, F.: A partnership of equals: how washington should respond to China’s economic challenge. Foreign Affairs 2008, 57–69 (2008)
Henry, K.: The chance for a new world order. The International Herald Tribune, January 12, 2009
Brzezinski, Z.: The Group of Two that could change the world. The Financial Times, January 13 (2009)
Sannan, Z., Weidong, L.: On the strategic positioning of current China US relations. Guide to Ideological and Theoretical Education, 2009–6, p. 61
Jiabao, W.: Do not agree with the reference to the ‘two countries group’. Chongqing Evening News, November 19, 2009. http://news.sina.com.cn/c/2009-11-19/022816629792s.shtml. Accessed 29 July 2021
Weinan, W.: On the group of the two countries from the perspective of the dimensions and limits of China US cooperation. Modern International Relations, 2009–10, p. 6
**ngtang, W.: How to view the positioning of the United States towards China. Contemporary World, 2006–2, p. 15
**tao, H.: “Unswervingly advancing along the road of socialism with Chinese characteristics and striving to build a well-off society in an all-round way: report at the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China”, November 8, 2012. http://dx.njupt.edu.cn/2012/1124/c3410a52388/page.htm. Accessed 29 July 2021
Hu **tao met with Obama and put forward four suggestions on China US relations. June 20, 2012. China News Network. http://news.sohu.com/20120620/n346126079.shtml. Accessed 29 July 2021
Renguo, H.: An analysis of Sino US coordination “(C2)”. Modern International Relations, 2012–5, pp. 35–40
Bin, S.: China’s view of international order in the new era: cognition, policy orientation and realization path. Res. Int. Issues 2021–2, p. 22, p. 27
“** meets with us President Obama,” 2015.09.25. xinhuanet.com. http://www.xinhuanet.com/world/2015-09/25/c_1116681366.htm. Accessed 30 July 2021
Matthew, F., Brian H.: Understanding China’s 2021 Defense Budget, Center for Strategic and International Studies, 5, 2021. https://www.csis.org/analysis/understanding-chinas-2021-defense-budget. Accessed 29 July 2021
Kwanok, K.: Trump administration’s security policy toward china: a comparative study with the Biden administration. Int. Politics Study 24(2), 59, 53–54, 68 (2021)
Zoellick, B.: Whither China: from membership to responsibility? J. Int. Secur. Assis. Manag. 28(2), 94–98 (2006) (remarks to the National Committee on the United States and China Relations, presented in New York City, September 21, 2005)
Guo**, G., Renyi, M.,: Historical investigation of the concept of ‘two state Group’. Amer. Res. 2011(4), 102 (2011)
Aekyung, K.: Changes in China’s perception of external identity: focusing on analysis of changes in china’s role in the first and second North Korean nuclear crisis. Nat. Strategy 2004(4), 43–44 (2004)
Gao, C., Hui, L.: “President Hu **tao holds talks with President Bush”, April 21, 2006, http://news.sohu.com/20060421/n242916880.shtml. Accessed 30 July 2021
The White House, Remarks by President Obama and President ** of the People’s Republic of China Before Bilateral Meeting. June 7 2013 https://obamawihitehouse.archives.gov. Accessed 30 July 2021
There is no way for China and the United States to establish a new type of major country relationship, Lianhe Zaobao, July 18, 2013
The White House, National Security Strategy of the United States of America, (December 2017), p. 46. https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2021
U.S. Department of Defense, Indo-Pacific Strategy Report: Preparedness, Partnerships, and Promoting a Networked Region, (June 1, 2019), p. 3. https://media.defense.gov/2019/Jul/01/2002152311/-1/-1/1/DEPARTMENT-OF-DEFENSE-INDO-PACIFIC-STRATEGY-REPORT-2019.PDF. Accessed 29 July 2021
The White House, “The United States Strategic Approach to the People’s Republic of China,” May 26, 2020, p. 16. https://china.usembassy-china.org.cn/wp-content/uploads/sites/252/U.S.-Strategic-Approach-to-The-Peoples-Republic-of-China-Report-5.24v1.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2021
Mark, M., et al.: “Pivot to the Pacific? The Obama Administration’s ‘Rebalancing’ Toward Asia,” Congressional Research Service Report, (March 28, 2012), pp. 1–4. https://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R42448.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2021
Michael, A.: “The Question of American Strategy in the Indo-Pacific,” Islamism and the International Order, (July 17, 2018), pp. 11–12. https://www.hoover.org/sites/default/files/research/docs/auslin_webreadypdf.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2021
Joseph, B.: Why American Must Lead Again: Reassuring U.S. Foreign Policy After Trump. Foreign Affairs, (March/April 2020). https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2020-01-23/why-america-must-lead-again. Accessed 29 July 2021
The White House, ‘Quad Leaders’ Joint Statement: “The Sprit of the Quad,” March 12, 2021.https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/03/12/quad-leaders-joint-statement-the-spirit-of-the-quad/. Accessed 29 July 2021
Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), Pacific Deterrence Initiative, May 2021. https://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/Documents/def-budget/FY2022/fy2022_Pacific_Deterrence_Initiative.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2021
Mallory, S.: U.S. Indo-Pacific Command Wants $4.68B for New Pacific Deterrence Initiative. USNI News, March 2, 2021. https://news.usni.org/2021/03/02/u-s-indo-pacific-command-wants-4-68b-for-new-pacific-deterrence-initiative. Accessed 30 July 2021
Jeff, S.: In an Age of China Rising, Has U.S. Democracy Promotion Lost Its Edge As a Foreign Policy Goal? The Heritage Foundation, April 20, 2021. https://www.heritage.org/asia/commentary/age-china-rising-has-us-democracy-promotion-lost-its-edge-foreign-policy-goal. Accessed 30 July 2021
Suggestions of the CCP Central Committee on formulating the 14th five year plan for national economic and social development and the long-term goals for 2035 (adopted at the fifth plenary meeting of the 19th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on October 29, 2020) 5556991.htm. Accessed 30 July 2021
** hosted a forum on national security work and stressed: firmly establish and conscientiously implement the overall national security concept and open up a new prospect for national security under the new situation, **nhua News Agency, 2017.02.17. www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2017-02/17/c_1120486809.htm. Accessed 30 July 2021
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Park, S. (2023). A New Centennial Dream: China’s Second Centennial Plan and Sino-US Relations. In: Bolgov, R., et al. Proceedings of Topical Issues in International Political Geography. TIPG 2021. Springer Geography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20620-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20620-7_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-20619-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-20620-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)