Characterization of an Inflatable Soft Actuator and Tissue Interaction for In Vitro Mechanical Stimulation of Tissue

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems (TAROS 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 13546))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 950 Accesses

Abstract

Technology to improve tissue development is constantly being improved and refined. Soft robots have been utilized in medical settings due to their compliant nature, reducing the stiffness gradient at tissue-device interfaces. In this paper, we present a pneumatically actuated soft stimulating balloon capable of applying up to 70% strain to a phantom tissue construct at a pressure of 0.3 bar. EcoflexTM0050 is used as a biocompatible material for the membrane, and the interaction between the two was investigated by varying the scaffold stiffness and initial tension. Data from video tracking was used to compute the tensile strain applied to the scaffold. We present here, the first steps of characterizing the device for in vitro implementation and further integration into a custom bioreactor.

This work was partially funded by The United Kingdom Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council grant EP/S021035/1 and by a Department of Automatic Control and Systems Engineering, University of Sheffield, PhD scholarship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lohberger, B., Kaltenegger, H., Stuendl, N., Rinner, B., Leithner, A., Sadoghi, P.: Impact of cyclic mechanical stimulation on the expression of extracellular matrix proteins in human primary rotator cuff fibroblasts. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 24(12), 3884–3891 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Thanarak, J., Mohammed, H., Pashneh-Tala, S., Claeyssens, F., Green, N.: Enhanced collagen production from human dermal fibroblasts on poly (glycerol sebacate)-methacrylate scaffolds. In: 2018 11th Biomedical Engineering International Conference (BMEiCON), pp. 1–4. IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lee, J.K., et al.: Tension stimulation drives tissue formation in scaffold-free systems. Nat. Mater. 16(8), 864–873 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dewey, C.F., Jr., Bussolari, S.R., Gimbrone, M.A., Jr., Davies, P.F.: The dynamic response of vascular endothelial cells to fluid shear stress. J. Biomech. Eng. 103(3), 177–185 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3138276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Xu, J., Liu, M., Liu, J., Caniggia, I., Post, M.: Mechanical strain induces constitutive and regulated secretion of glycosaminoglycans and proteoglycans in fetal lung cells. J. Cell Sci. 109(6), 1605–1613 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.109.6.1605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shachar, M., Benishti, N., Cohen, S.: Effects of mechanical stimulation induced by compression and medium perfusion on cardiac tissue engineering. Biotechnol. Progr. 28(6), 1551–1559 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.1633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. TC-3 bioreactor. https://ebersmedical.com/tissue-engineering/bioreactors/load-culture/tc-3

  8. Biotense bioreactor. https://www.admet.com/products/micro-testers/biotense-bioreactor/

  9. Cartigen: Mechanical compression bioreactor systems. https://www.tissuegrowth.com/prod_cartilage.cfm

  10. Discher, D.E., Janmey, P., Wang, Y.L.: Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 310(5751), 1139–1143 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghosh, K., et al.: Cell adaptation to a physiologically relevant ECM mimic with different viscoelastic properties. Biomaterials 28(4), 671–679 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Perez Guagnelli, E., Nejus, S., Yu, J., Miyashita, S., Liu, Y., Damian, D.: Axially and radially expandable modular helical soft actuator for robotic implantables (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Todros, S., Spadoni, S., Maghin, E., Piccoli, M., Pavan, P.G.: A novel bioreactor for the mechanical stimulation of clinically relevant scaffolds for muscle tissue engineering purposes. Processes 9, 474 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Paek, J., et al.: Soft robotic constrictor for in vitro modeling of dynamic tissue compression. Sci. Rep. 11, 1–11 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Carreira, S.C., Taghavi, M., Loriè, E.P., Rossiter, J.: FleXert: a soft, actuatable multiwell plate insert for cell culture under stretch. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 7, 2225–2245 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu, H., et al.: Microdevice arrays with strain sensors for 3D mechanical stimulation and monitoring of engineered tissues. Biomaterials 172, 30–40 (2018). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142961218303041

  17. Liu, H., Usprech, J.F., Parameshwar, P.K., Sun, Y., Simmons, C.A.: Combinatorial screen of dynamic mechanical stimuli for predictive control of MSC mechano-responsiveness. Sci. Adv. 7(19), eabe7204 (2021). https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/sciadv.abe7204

  18. Tension cell stretching bioreactor system. https://www.flexcellint.com/category/tension

  19. Kamotani, Y., et al.: Individually programmable cell stretching microwell arrays actuated by a braille display. Biomaterials 29, 2646–2655 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Smith, A.F., Thanarak, J., Pontin, M., Green, N.H., Damian, D.D.: Design and development of a robotic bioreactor for in vitro tissue engineering. In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 12 428–12 434 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Luis, E., Pan, H.M., Sing, S.L., Bajpai, R., Song, J., Yeong, W.Y.: 3D direct printing of silicone meniscus implant using a novel heat-cured extrusion-based printer. Polymers 12(5) (2020). https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/12/5/1031

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Marco Pontin and Joanna Jones for their input into this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frederick Forbes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Forbes, F., Smith, A., Damian, D.D. (2022). Characterization of an Inflatable Soft Actuator and Tissue Interaction for In Vitro Mechanical Stimulation of Tissue. In: Pacheco-Gutierrez, S., Cryer, A., Caliskanelli, I., Tugal, H., Skilton, R. (eds) Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems. TAROS 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13546. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15908-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15908-4_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-15907-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-15908-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation