Abstract
Aristotelian diagrams, such as the square of opposition, are among the oldest and most well-known types of logical diagrams. Within the burgeoning research program of logical geometry, we have been develo** a comprehensive database of Aristotelian diagrams that occur in the extant literature: Leonardi.DB (the Leuven Ontology for Aristotelian Diagrams, and its corresponding Database). This paper presents an (intermediate) report on this development. We describe the philosophical background and main motivations for Leonardi.DB, focusing on how the database provides a solid empirical foundation for theoretical research within logical geometry. We also discuss some of the main methodological and technical aspects of the database development. As a proof-of-concept, we provide some examples of the new kinds of research that will be facilitated by Leonardi.DB, e.g. regarding broad trends in the usage and visual properties of Aristotelian diagrams.
The first author holds a Research Professorship (BOFZAP) from KU Leuven. This research was funded through the KU Leuven research projects ‘Empirical Foundations for Logical Geometry: A Database of Aristotelian Diagrams’ (3H180236, 2018–2020) and ‘BITSHARE: Bitstring Semantics for Human and Artificial Reasoning’ (3H190254, 2019–2023).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
A first and very preliminary report can be found in [25].
- 3.
See [13] for the broader religious-cultural context of this temporary setback.
- 4.
See https://data.cerl.org/thesaurus/_search?lang=en. Note that these other datasets concern people, books, etc.; setting aside Leonardi.DB, we currently do not know of any comprehensive database which primarily consists of (logical) diagrams.
References
Béziau, J.Y., Jacquette, D. (eds.): Around and Beyond the Square of Opposition. Springer, Basel (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-0379-3
Béziau, J.Y., Vandoulakis, I. (eds.): The Exoteric Square of Opposition. Springer, Basel (2022)
Ciucci, D., Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Structures of opposition induced by relations. The Boolean and the gradual cases. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 76, 351–373 (2016)
Demey, L.: Algebraic aspects of duality diagrams. In: Cox, P., Plimmer, B., Rodgers, P. (eds.) Diagrams 2012. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7352, pp. 300–302. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31223-6_32
Demey, L.: Boolean considerations on John Buridan’s octagons of opposition. Hist. Philos. Logic 40(2), 116–134 (2019)
Demey, L., Smessaert, H.: The relationship between Aristotelian and Hasse diagrams. In: Dwyer, T., Purchase, H., Delaney, A. (eds.) Diagrams 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8578, pp. 213–227. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44043-8_23
Demey, L., Smessaert, H.: The interaction between logic and geometry in Aristotelian diagrams. In: Jamnik, M., Uesaka, Y., Elzer Schwartz, S. (eds.) Diagrams 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9781, pp. 67–82. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42333-3_6
Demey, L., Smessaert, H.: Logical and geometrical distance in polyhedral Aristotelian diagrams in knowledge representation. Symmetry 9(10), 204 (2017)
Demey, L., Smessaert, H.: Aristotelian and duality relations beyond the square of opposition. In: Chapman, P., Stapleton, G., Moktefi, A., Perez-Kriz, S., Bellucci, F. (eds.) Diagrams 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10871, pp. 640–656. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91376-6_57
Demey, L., Smessaert, H.: Using multigraphs to study the interaction between opposition, implication and duality relations in logical squares. In: Pietarinen, A.-V., Chapman, P., Bosveld-de Smet, L., Giardino, V., Corter, J., Linker, S. (eds.) Diagrams 2020. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 12169, pp. 385–393. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54249-8_30
Demey, L., Smessaert, H.: From Euler diagrams to Aristotelian diagrams. In: V. Giardino et al. (eds.) Diagrams 2022. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 13462, pp. 279–295. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15146-0_24
García Cruz, J.D.: What kind of opposition-forming operator is privation? In: Basu, A., Stapleton, G., Linker, S., Legg, C., Manalo, E., Viana, P. (eds.) Diagrams 2021. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 12909, pp. 118–131. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86062-2_11
Jaspers, D., Seuren, P.: The square of opposition in Catholic hands: a chapter in the history of 20th-century logic. Logique et Anal. (N.S.) 59(233), 1–35 (2016)
Lemanski, J., Demey, L.: Schopenhauer’s partition diagrams and logical geometry. In: Basu, A., Stapleton, G., Linker, S., Legg, C., Manalo, E., Viana, P. (eds.) Diagrams 2021. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 12909, pp. 149–165. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86062-2_13
Li, W.: Zipf’s law everywhere. Glottometrics 5, 14–21 (2002)
Pascucci, M., Sileno, G.: The search for symmetry in Hohfeldian modalities. In: Basu, A., Stapleton, G., Linker, S., Legg, C., Manalo, E., Viana, P. (eds.) Diagrams 2021. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 12909, pp. 87–102. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86062-2_9
Risse, W.: Bibliographia Logica. 4 vols., esp. I: 1472–1800 and II: 1801–1969. Georg Olms, Hildesheim (1965–1979)
Smessaert, H.: Boolean differences between two hexagonal extensions of the logical square of oppositions. In: Cox, P., Plimmer, B., Rodgers, P. (eds.) Diagrams 2012. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7352, pp. 193–199. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31223-6_21
Smessaert, H., Demey, L.: Logical and geometrical complementarities between Aristotelian diagrams. In: Dwyer, T., Purchase, H., Delaney, A. (eds.) Diagrams 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8578, pp. 246–260. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44043-8_26
Smessaert, H., Demey, L.: Logical geometries and information in the square of opposition. J. Logic Lang. Inform. 23, 527–565 (2014)
Smessaert, H., Demey, L.: Visualising the Boolean Algebra \(\mathbb {B}_{4}\) in 3D. In: Jamnik, M., Uesaka, Y., Elzer Schwartz, S. (eds.) Diagrams 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9781, pp. 289–292. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42333-3_26
Smessaert, H., Shimojima, A., Demey, L.: Free rides in logical space diagrams versus Aristotelian diagrams. In: Pietarinen, A.-V., Chapman, P., Bosveld-de Smet, L., Giardino, V., Corter, J., Linker, S. (eds.) Diagrams 2020. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 12169, pp. 419–435. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54249-8_33
Smessaert, H., Shimojima, A., Demey, L.: On the cognitive potential of derivative meaning in Aristotelian diagrams. In: Basu, A., Stapleton, G., Linker, S., Legg, C., Manalo, E., Viana, P. (eds.) Diagrams 2021. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 12909, pp. 495–511. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86062-2_51
Sørensen, H.K., Johansen, M.W.: Counting mathematical diagrams with machine learning. In: Pietarinen, A.-V., Chapman, P., Bosveld-de Smet, L., Giardino, V., Corter, J., Linker, S. (eds.) Diagrams 2020. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 12169, pp. 26–33. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54249-8_3
Termont, W., Demey, L., Smessaert, H.: First steps toward a Digital Access to Textual Cultural Heritage. In: Poster presentation at the third international conference on digital access to textual cultural heritage (DATeCH 2019) (2019)
Vignero, L.: Combining and relating Aristotelian diagrams. In: Basu, A., Stapleton, G., Linker, S., Legg, C., Manalo, E., Viana, P. (eds.) Diagrams 2021. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 12909, pp. 221–228. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86062-2_20
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Demey, L., Smessaert, H. (2022). A Database of Aristotelian Diagrams: Empirical Foundations for Logical Geometry. In: Giardino, V., Linker, S., Burns, R., Bellucci, F., Boucheix, JM., Viana, P. (eds) Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Diagrams 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13462. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15146-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15146-0_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-15145-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-15146-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)