Structural Health Monitoring and IoT: Opportunities and Challenges

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligence of Things: Technologies and Applications (ICIT 2022)

Abstract

As structures like sky scrappers get taller and bridges are getting longer, there is a need to closely monitor the health of the structures, particularly under varying environmental effects. The traditional wire-based structural health monitoring systems that require laying down cables are costly and time-consuming. New and miniaturised sensors coupled with Internet of Things (IoT) and powerful cloud computing platforms lead to a new cost-effective approach to SHM. This paper introduces Structural Health Monitoring (SHM), its conventional approaches of Visual, Destructive and Non-Destructive evaluations. After discussing the limitations of conventional SHM approaches, Internet of Things and its components are introduced. SHM with IoT, its strengths and challenges are reviewed in light of published literature. This is evident that SHM will benefit enormously from IoT, provided technical challenges like energy consumption, scalability, data security and reliability are handled.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 117.69
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
EUR 160.49
Price includes VAT (Germany)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burj khalifa - facts & figures (2021). www.burjkhalifa.ae/en/the-tower/facts-figures/

  2. Britannica: Bridge (2021). www.britannica.com/technology/bridge-engineering/U-S-designs#ref1261381

  3. Italy bridge collapse: Two drivers survive (2020). www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-52213898

  4. Miami building collapse (2021). https://edition.cnn.com/2021/07/15/us/miami-dade-building-collapse-thursday/index.html

  5. Humar, J., Bagchi, A., Xu, H.: Performance of vibration-based techniques for the identification of structural damage. Struct. Health Monit. 5(3), 215–241 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Attar: What is destructive and non-destructive testing? (2020). www.attar.com.au/what-is-destructive-and-non-destructive-testing/

  7. Mahmud, M.A., Bates, K., Wood, T., Abdelgawad, A., Yelamarthi, K.: A complete Internet of Things (IoT) platform for structural health monitoring (SHM). In: 2018 IEEE 4th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT), pp. 275–279 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Edwards, G.R., Tuncbilek, K., Walker, B.: Development of a multi-purpose wireless network for the structural health monitoring of a suspension bridge. In: IET Conference on Wireless Sensor Systems (WSS 2012), pp. 4B1–4B1 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cao, J., Liu, X.: Structural health monitoring using wireless sensor networks. In: Mobile and Pervasive Computing in Construction, pp. 210–236 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Clark, J.: What is the internet of things, and how does it work? (2021). www.ibm.com/blogs/internet-of-things/what-is-the-iot/

  11. What is the internet of things (IoT)? (2021). www.oracle.com/au/internet-of-things/what-is-iot/

  12. 802.15.4 wireless for internet of things developers (2021). https://blog.helium.com/802-15-4-wireless-for-internet-of-things-developers-1948fc313b2e

  13. Sonee, S.: Top IoT communication protocols updated 2021 (2020). https://hashstudioz.com/blog/top-iot-communication-protocols-2020/

  14. Mobile base stations (2021). https://mobilenetworkguide.com.au/mobile_base_stations.html

  15. Tudosa, I., Picariello, F., Balestrieri, E., Carnì, D.L., Lamonaca, F.: A flexible DAQ hardware architecture using SoCs for IoT based structural health monitoring systems. In: 2019 II Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 and IoT (MetroInd4.0 &IoT), pp. 291–295 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lynch, J.P.: A summary review of wireless sensors and sensor networks for structural health monitoring. Shock Vibr. Digest 38(2), 91–128 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Malekloo, A., Ozer, E., AlHamaydeh, M., Girolami, M.: Machine learning and structural health monitoring overview with emerging technology and high-dimensional data source highlights. Struct. Health Monit. 21, 1906–1955 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, Z., Yang, G., Hu, K.: Prediction of fatigue crack growth in gas turbine engine blades using acoustic emission. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 18(5), 1321 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pierleoni, P., et al.: IoT solution based on MQTT protocol for real-time building monitoring. In: 2019 IEEE 23rd International Symposium on Consumer Technologies (ISCT), pp. 57–62 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cusati, V., Corcione, S., Memmolo, V.: Impact of structural health monitoring on aircraft operating costs by multidisciplinary analysis. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 21(20), 6938 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim, S., et al.: Health monitoring of civil infrastructures using wireless sensor networks. In: 2007 6th International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, pp. 254–263 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Diamanti, K., Soutis, C.: Structural health monitoring techniques for aircraft composite structures. Progr. Aeros. Sci. 46(8), 342–352 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hodge, V.J., O’Keefe, S., Weeks, M., Moulds, A.: Wireless sensor networks for condition monitoring in the railway industry: a survey. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 16(3), 1088–1106 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schubel, P., Crossley, R., Boateng, E., Hutchinson, J.: Review of structural health and cure monitoring techniques for large wind turbine blades. Renew. Energy 51(C), 113–123 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Vestroni, F., De Sortis, A., Pau, A.: Measurements of the colosseum response to environmental actions. In: XI International Conference on Structural Dynamics (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pierdicca, A., Clementi, F., Isidori, D., Concettoni, E., Cristalli, C., Lenci, S.: Numerical model upgrading of a historical masonry palace monitored with a wireless sensor network. Int. J. Masonry Res. Innov. 1(1), 74 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Aygün, B., Gungor, V.C.: Wireless sensor networks for structure health monitoring: recent advances and future research directions. Sensor Rev. 31(3), 261–276 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Celebi, M., et al.: Seismic instrumentation of the bill emerson memorial mississippi river bridge at cape girardeau (mo): a cooperative effort. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Seismic Highway Conference (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Noel, A.B., Abdaoui, A., Elfouly, T., Ahmed, M.H., Badawy, A., Shehata, M.S.: Structural health monitoring using wireless sensor networks: a comprehensive survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 19(3), 1403–1423 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Muttillo, M., et al.: Structural health monitoring: an IoT sensor system for structural damage indicator evaluation. Sensors 20(17), 4908 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Accelerometer sensors (2021). www.rohm.com/electronics-basics/sensor/accelerometer-sensor

  32. Hanly, S.: Accelerometers: Taking the guesswork out of accelerometer selection (2021). https://blog.endaq.com/accelerometer-selection

  33. Komarizadehasl, S., Mobaraki, B., Ma, H., Lozano-Galant, J.A., Turmo, J.: Development of a low-cost system for the accurate measurement of structural vibrations. Sensors 21(18), 6191 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Villacorta, J.J., et al.: Design and validation of a scalable, reconfigurable and low-cost structural health monitoring system. Sensors 21(2), 648 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Why mems accelerometers are becoming the designer’s best choice for cbm applications (2021). www.analog.com/en/technical-articles/why-memes-acceler-are-best-choice-for-cbm-apps.html

  36. Sabato, A., Niezrecki, C., Fortino, G.: Wireless MEMS-based accelerometer sensor boards for structural vibration monitoring: a review. IEEE Sens. J. 17(2), 226–235 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bassoli, E., Vincenzi, L., Bovo, M., Mazzotti, C.: Dynamic identification of an ancient masonry bell tower using a MEMS-based acquisition system. In: 2015 IEEE Workshop on Environmental, Energy, and Structural Monitoring Systems (EESMS) Proceedings, pp. 226–231 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Patil, P.K., Patil, S.R.: Structural health monitoring system using WSN for bridges. In: 2017 International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems (ICICCS), pp. 371–375 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rice, J.A., Spencer, J.B.F.: Structural health monitoring sensor development for the Imote2 platform. In: Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems 2008, pp. 693234–693234-12 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bedon, C., Bergamo, E., Izzi, M., Noè, S.: Prototy** and validation of MEMS accelerometers for structural health monitoring-the case study of the pietratagliata cable-stayed bridge. J. Sens. Actuator Netw. 7(3), 30 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hu, X., Wang, B., Ji, H.: A wireless sensor network-based structural health monitoring system for highway bridges. Comput.-Aided Civil Infrastruct. Eng. 28(3), 193–209 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Chanv, B., Bakhru, S., Mehta, V.: Structural health monitoring system using IoT and wireless technologies. In: 2017 International Conference on Intelligent Communication and Computational Techniques (ICCT), pp. 151–157 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Naraharisetty, V., Talari, V.S., Neridu, S., Kalapatapu, P., Pasupuleti, V.D.K.: Cloud architecture for IoT based bridge monitoring applications. In: 2021 International Conference on Emerging Techniques in Computational Intelligence (ICETCI), pp. 39–42 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  44. White paper: Optical fiber sensors vs. conventional electrical strain gauges for infrastructure monitoring applications (2021). www.hbm.com/en/6482/white-paper-optical-fiber-sensors-vs-conventional-electrical-strain-gauges/

  45. Tennyson, R.C., Mufti, A.A., Rizkalla, S., Tadros, G., Benmokrane, B.: Structural health monitoring of innovative bridges in Canada with fiber optic sensors. Smart Mater. Struct. 10(3), 560 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Dai, D., He, Q.: Structure damage localization with ultrasonic guided waves based on a time-frequency method. Signal Process. 96, 21–28 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Paul, P., et al.: An internet of things (IoT) based system to analyze real-time collapsing probability of structures. In: 2018 IEEE 9th Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON), pp. 1070–1075 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Niranjan, D., Rakesh, N.: Early detection of building collapse using IoT. In: 2020 Second International Conference on Inventive Research in Computing Applications (ICIRCA), pp. 842–847 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Di Nuzzo, F., Brunelli, D., Polonelli, T., Benini, L.: Structural health monitoring system with narrowband IoT and mems sensors. IEEE Sens. J. 21(14), 16371–16380 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Balestrieri, E., Vito, L.D., Picariello, F., Tudosa, I.: IoT system for remote monitoring of bridges: measurements for structural health and vehicular traffic load. In: 2019 II Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 and IoT (MetroInd4.0 &IoT), pp. 279–284 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Abdelgawad, A., Yelamarthi, K.: Internet of Things (IoT) platform for structure health monitoring. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. 2017, 1–10 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Why zigbee? (2021). https://zigbeealliance.org/why-zigbee

  53. Cho, S., et al.: Structural health monitoring of a cable-stayed bridge using wireless smart sensor technology: data analyses. Smart Struct. Syst. 6(5–6), 461–480 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Lamonaca, F., Sciammarella, P., Scuro, C., Carnì, D., Olivito, R.: Internet of Things for structural health monitoring. In: 2018 Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 and IoT, pp. 95–100 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Wang, P., Yan, Y., Tian, G.Y., Bouzid, O., Ding, Z.: Investigation of wireless sensor networks for structural health monitoring. J. Sens. 2012, 1–7 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Ghosh, S.K., Suman, M., Datta, R., Biswas, P.K.: Power efficient event detection scheme in wireless sensor networks for railway bridge health monitoring system. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Networks and Telecommuncations Systems (ANTS), pp. 1–6 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Alonso, L., Barbarán, J., Chen, J., Díaz, M., Llopis, L., Rubio, B.: Middleware and communication technologies for structural health monitoring of critical infrastructures: a survey. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 56, 83–100 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Mahmoud, R., Yousuf, T., Aloul, F., Zualkernan, I.: Internet of things (IoT) security: current status, challenges and prospective measures. In: 2015 10th International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions (ICITST), pp. 336–341 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This research is funded by the Planning and Transport Research Centre (PATREC) and the iMOVE CRC and supported by the Cooperative Research Centres program, an Australian Government initiative.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marzuki Kamal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kamal, M., Mansoor, A. (2022). Structural Health Monitoring and IoT: Opportunities and Challenges. In: Nguyen, NT., Dao, NN., Pham, QD., Le, H.A. (eds) Intelligence of Things: Technologies and Applications . ICIT 2022. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 148. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15063-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation