Abstract
Pedagogical agents (PAs) could be used to mimic a one-on-one human tutoring experience in adaptive training systems. Social agency theory (SAT) is one perspective that describes how humans learn from PAs. However, there are no measures to test the components of SAT and their effects on learning. Therefore, we discuss the development of a subjective measure, the Social Agency Theory Questionnaire (SATQ), to assess components of the social agency theory framework: social cues, the cooperation principle, and deep cognitive processing. Next, we present a study that investigates the effectiveness of a PA instructor who provides error-sensitive human-voiced feedback to learners in an adaptive training system (PA-Present group), compared against an instructionally equivalent text-based instructor system (PA-Absent group). We hypothesize that the PA-Present group will exhibit higher learning outcomes than the PA-Absent group. Additionally, we hypothesize that participants in the PA-Present group will rate the “instructor” higher on all three subscales of the SATQ than participants in the PA-Absent group. Data collection for this project is currently underway. Future analyses will examine between-group differences on performance and learning outcomes, and their association with subjective ratings on SATQ subscales. In addition, we will present psychometric analyses of the SATQ and proposed revisions to the scale.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Landsberg, C.R., Astwood Jr., R.S., Van Buskirk, W.L., Townsend, L.N., Steinhauser, N.B., Mercado, A.D.: Review of adaptive training system techniques. Mil. Psychol. 24(2), 96–113 (2012)
Landsberg, C.R., Mercado, A., Van Buskirk, W.L., Lineberry, M., Steinhauser, N.: Evaluation of an adaptive training system for submarine periscope operations. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 56th Annual Meeting, pp. 2422–2426. SAGE Publications, Los Angeles (2012)
Marraffino, M.D., Johnson, C.I., Whitmer, D.E., Steinhauser, N.B., Clement, A.: Advise when ready for game plan: adaptive training for JTACs. In: Proceedings of the Interservice/Industry, Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (I/ITSEC), Orlando (2019)
Wickens, C.D., Hutchins, S., Carolan, T., Cumming, J.: Effectiveness of part-task training and increasing-difficulty training strategies: a meta-analysis approach. Hum. Factors 55(2), 461–470 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720812451994
Bloom, B.S.: The 2 sigma problem: the search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educ. Res. 13, 4–16 (1984)
VanLehn, K.: The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educ. Psychol. 46(4), 197–221 (2011)
Buff, W.L., Campbell, G.E.: What to do or what not to do?: identifying the content of effective feedback. In: Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, pp. 2074–2078. HFES, Santa Monica (2002)
Landsberg, C.R., Bailey, S., Van Buskirk, W.L., Gonzalez-Holland, E., Johnson, C.I.: Designing effective feedback in adaptive training systems. In: Interservice/Industry, Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (I/ITSEC), Orlando (2016)
Veletsianos, G., Russell, G.S.: Pedagogical agents. In: Spector, J., Merrill, M., Elen, J., Bishop, M. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, pp. 759–769. Springer, New York (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4616-3185-5_61
Martha, A.S.D., Santoso, H.B.: The design and impact of the pedagogical agent: a systematic literature review. J. Educat. Online 16(1) (2019)
Backlund, P., Engstrom, H., Hammar, C., Johannesson, M., Lebram, M.: SIDH–a game based firefighter training simulation. In: 2007 11th International Conference Information Visualization (IV 2007), pp. 899–907. IEEE (2007)
Halverson, R., Blakesley, C., Figueiredo-Brown, R.: Video game design as a model for professional learning. In: Learning to Play: Exploring the Future of Education with Video Games, pp. 9–28 (2011)
Muntean, C.H., Andrews, J., Muntean, G.M.: Final frontier: an educational game on solar system concepts acquisition for primary schools. In: 2017 IEEE 17th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), pp. 335–337. IEEE (2017)
Lankoski, P., Björk, S.: Gameplay design patterns for believable non-player characters. In: Akira, B. (ed.) Situated Play: Proceedings of the 2007 Digital Games Research Association Conference, pp. 416–423. The University of Tokyo, Tokyo (2007)
Riedl, M., Lane, H.C., Hill, R., Swartout, W.: Automated story direction and intelligent tutoring: towards a unifying architecture. U.S. Army Research, Development, and Engineering Command (2006). https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a459187.pdf
Warpefelt, H., Johansson, M., Verhagen, H.: Analyzing the believability of game character behavior using the game agent matrix. In: DiGRA Conference, pp. 1–11 (2013)
Mitrovic, A., Suraweera, P.: Evaluating an animated pedagogical agent. In: Gauthier, G., Frasson, C., VanLehn, K. (eds.) ITS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1839, pp. 72–82. Springer, Berlin (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45108-0_11
Moreno, R., Mayer, R.E., Spires, H.A., Lester, J.C.: The case for social agency in computer based teaching: do students learn more deeply when they interact with animated pedagogical agents? Cogn. Instr. 19(2), 177–213 (2001)
Zakharov, K., Mitrovic, A., Johnston, L.: Towards emotionally-intelligent pedagogical agents. In: Woolf, B.P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., Lajoie, S. (eds.) ITS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5091, pp. 19–28. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69132-7_7
Adams, E.: Fundamentals of Game Design, 3rd edn. Pearson Education, Peachpit (2014)
Schroeder, N.L., Adesope, O.O., Gilbert, R.B.: How effective are pedagogical agents for learning? A meta-analytic review. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 49(1), 1–39 (2013)
Atkinson, R.K.: Optimizing learning from examples using animated pedagogical agents. J. Educ. Psychol. 94(2), 416–427 (2002)
Domagk, S.: Do pedagogical agents facilitate learner motivation and learning outcomes? J. Media Psychol. 22(2), 82–95 (2010)
Wang, N., Johnson, W.L., Mayer, R.E., Rizzo, P., Shaw, E., Collins, H.: The politeness effect: pedagogical agents and learning outcomes. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 66(2), 98–112 (2008)
Kim, Y., Baylor, A.L.: Research-based design of pedagogical agent roles: a review, progress, and recommendations. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 26(1), 160–169 (2016)
Baylor, A.L., Kim, Y.: Simulating instructional roles through pedagogical agents. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 15(1), 95 (2005)
Veletsianos, G.: Contextually relevant pedagogical agents: visual appearance, stereotypes, and first impressions and their impact on learning. Comput. Educ. 55(2), 576–585 (2010)
Mayer, R.E., Sobko, K., Mautone, P.D.: Social cues in multimedia learning: role of speaker’s voice. J. Educ. Psychol. 95(2), 419–425 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.419
Mayer, R.E., DaPra, C.S.: An embodiment effect in computer-based learning with animated pedagogical agents. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 18(3), 239–252 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028616
Grice, H.P.: Logic and conversation. In: Cole, P., Morgan, J. (eds.) Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3, pp. 41–58. Academic Press (1975). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003
Lin, L., Atkinson, R.K., Christopherson, R.M., Joseph, S.S., Harrison, C.J.: Animated agents and learning: does the type of verbal feedback they provide matter? Comput. Educ. 67, 239–249 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.017
Lester, J.C., Converse, S.A., Kahler, S.E., Barlow, S.T., Stone, B.A., Bhogal, R.S.: The persona effect: affective impact of animated pedagogical agents. In: Pemberton, S. (ed.) Proceedings of CHI 1997: Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 259–266. ACM Press (1997). https://doi.org/10.1145/258549.258797
Arner, T., McCarthy, K.S., McNamara, D.S.: iSTART stairstepper – using comprehension strategy to game the test. Computers 10(4), 48 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/computers10040048
Lester, J.C., Stone, B.A.: Increasing believability in animated pedagogical agents. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Autonomous Agents, pp. 16–21. ACM Press (1997)
van Mulken, S., Andre, E., Müller, J.: The persona effect: how substantial is it? In: Johnson, H., Nigay, L., Roast, C. (eds.) People and Computers XIII, pp. 53–66. Springer, London (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3605-7_4
Walker, J.H., Sproull, L., Subramani, R.: Using a human face in an interface. In: Adelson, B., Dumais, S., Olson, J. (eds.) Proceedings of CHI 1994: Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 85–91. ACM Press (1994). https://doi.org/10.1145/191666.191708
Schroeder, N.L., Gotch, C.M.: Persisting issues in pedagogical agent research. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 53(2), 183–204 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115597625
Louwerse, M.M., Graesser, A.C., Lu, S., Mitchell, H.H.: Social cues in animated conversational agents. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 19(6), 693–704 (2005)
Atkinson, R.K., Mayer, R.E., Merrill, M.M.: Fostering social agency in multimedia learning: examining the impact of an animated agent’s voice. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 30(1), 117–139 (2005)
Moon, J., Ryu, J.: The effects of social and cognitive cues on learning comprehension, eye-gaze pattern, and cognitive load in video instruction. J. Comput. High. Educ. 33(1), 39–63 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-020-09255-x
Baylor, A., Ryu, J.: The API (agent persona instrument) for assessing pedagogical agent persona. In: EdMedia+ Innovate Learning, pp. 448–451. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE) (2003)
Schroeder, N.L., Romine, W.L., Craig, S.D.: Measuring pedagogical agent persona and the influence of agent persona on learning. Comput. Educ. 109, 176–186 (2017)
Johnson, W.L., Rickel, J.W., Lester, J.C.: Animated pedagogical agents: face-to-face interaction in interactive learning environments. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 11(1), 47–78 (2000)
Martin, A.J., Jackson, S.A.: Brief approaches to assessing task absorption and enhanced subjective experience: examining ‘short’ and ‘core’ flow in diverse performance domains. Motiv. Emot. 32(3), 141–157 (2008)
Brockmeyer, J.H., Fox, C.M., Curtiss, K.A., McBroom, E., Burkhart, K.M., Pidruzny, J.N.: The development of the game engagement questionnaire: a measure of engagement in video game playing. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 45(4), 624–634 (2009)
Schroeder, N.L., Yang, F., Banerjee, T., Romine, W.L., Craig, S.D.: The influence of learners’ perceptions of virtual humans on learning transfer. Comput. Educ. 126, 170–182 (2018)
Nass, C., Steuer, J., Tauber, E.R.: Computers are social actors. In: Adelson, B., Dumais, S., Olson, J. (eds.) CHI 1994: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, vol. 12, pp. 72–78. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (1994)
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge Dr. Jason Hochreiter, Mr. Rob Veira, and Ms. Rebecca Pharmer for their assistance with testbed development. This work was funded under the Naval Innovative Science and Engineering program established by the National Defense Authorization Act, Section 219. Due to difficulties with data collection brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic, data collection for this study is ongoing at time of writing. Data relevant to this project are to be presented virtually at the 2022 HCII conference. Interested readers are encouraged to contact the authors for recent developments and analyses with the SATQ. Presentation of this material does not constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the U.S. Navy or the Department of Defense (DoD). The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official position of the Department of Defense or its components. NAWCTSD Public Release 22-ORL016 Distribution Statement A – Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Schroeder, B.L., Fraulini, N.W., Van Buskirk, W.L., Miller, R.M. (2022). Assessing the Social Agency of Pedagogical Agents in Adaptive Training Systems. In: Sottilare, R.A., Schwarz, J. (eds) Adaptive Instructional Systems. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13332. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05887-5_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05887-5_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05886-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05887-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)