Abstract
Library automation has a rich history of more than 130 years of development, from the standardization of card catalogs to the creation of the machine-readable cataloging (MARC) communications format and bibliographic utilities. Beginning in the early 1980s university libraries and library automation vendors pioneered the first integrated library systems (ILS). The digital era, characterized by the proliferation of content in electronic format, brought with it the development of services for casual users as well as scholarly researchers – services such as OpenURL linking and metasearching and library staff tools such as electronic resource management systems. Libraries have now developed approaches to search that integrate data from the many disparate content sources they have historically managed, as well as the new systems being developed for digital object management. Additionally, the proliferation of services that emerged in the first decade of this century is being consolidated into emergent library service platforms that provide flexible frameworks for managing the full range of library collections. These developments have allowed libraries to evolve their mission of knowledge sharing from aggregating knowledge created globally to a local community to one in which they also aggregate and disseminate locally created knowledge to the world.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Porter, V.: Continuous library catalog card, Patent 4005810. This represents a computer-area patent on the original library catalog card. https://pdfpiw.uspto.gov/.piw?Docid=04005810&idkey=NONE (1976). Last accessed 2021
Wong, T.-A.: Card catalogs and card catalog drawers, Patent 5257859. This represents a tweak on the original design of the card catalog drawer. Patent Images (uspto.gov) (1993). Last accessed 2021
University of Pennsylvania: Cards from rapidly-disappearing card catalog. (Philadelphia 2008). http://www.library.upenn.edu/exhibits/pennhistory/library/cards/cards.samples.html. Last accessed 2009
Online Computer Library Center (OCLC): OCLC catalog cards, Dublin. http://www.oclc.org/support/documentation/worldcat/cataloging/cards/default.htm (2008). Last accessed 2009
Coyle, K.: Catalogs, card – and other anachronisms. J. Acad. Librariansh. 31(1), 60–62 (2005)
Early years of Web of Science, which became Web of Knowledge. http://wokinfo.com/about/whoweare/. Last accessed 2021
National Bureau of Standards: Miscellaneous Publication 269, Issued December (1965)
Salton, G.: Developments in automated text retrieval. Science. 253(5023), 974–980 (1981)
Ojala, M.: Everything old is new again. Medford. 25(4), 5 (2001)
Avram, H.: Obituary, with reference to the MARC project. https://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/30/classified/paid-notice-deaths-avram-henriette.html(2006). Last accessed 2021
Kilgour, F.: Obituary, with reference to the founding of OCLC. https://scanblog.blogspot.com/2006/07/frederick-g-kilgour-1914-2006.html (2006). Last accessed 2021
Online Computer Library Center (OCLC): Official homepage. http://www.oclc.org. Last accessed 2021
Goldstein, C.M.: Integrated library systems. Bull. Med. Libr. Assoc. 71(3), 308–311 (1983)
Fayen, E.G.: Integrated library systems. Enc. Libr. Inf. Sci. 1(1), 1–12 (2004)
Lynch, C.: From automation to transformation: forty years of libraries and information technology in higher education. Educ. Rev. 35(1), 60–68 (2000)
Primich, T., Richardson, C.: The integrated library system: from innovation to relegation to innovation again. Acquis. Libr. 18(35–36), 119–133 (2006)
Kochtanek, T.R., Matthews, J.R.: Library Information Systems: From Library Automation to Distributed Information Access Solutions. Libraries Unlimited, Westport (2002)
De Gennaro, R.: A computer produced shelf list. Coll. Res. Libr. 31(5), 318–331 (1970)
Robinson, T.: Personal Communication. Harvard University Office for Information Systems, Harvard (2007)
Elsevier: Endeavor merges with Elsevier Science, American Libraries (2000)
Fast, K.V., Campell, D.G.: I still like Google: university student perceptions of searching OPACS and the web. Proc. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 138-146 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.1450410116
Connaway, L.S., Dickey, T.J., Radford, M.L.: If it is too inconvenient I’m not going after it: convenience as a critical factor in information-seeking behaviors. Libr. Inf. Sci. Res. 33(3), 79–190 (2011)
Antelman, K., Lynema, E., Pace, A.K.: Toward a twenty-first century catalog. Inf. Technol. Libr. 25(3), 128–139 (2006). https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v25i3.3342. Last accessed 2021
Simser, C.N., Vukas, R.R., Stephens, J.M.: The impact of EDI on serials management. Ser. Libr. 40(3–4), 331–336 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v40n03_19. Last accessed 2021
Kelsey, P.: Implementing EDI X12 book acquisitions at a medium-sized university library. New Libr. World. 116(7–8), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-11-2014-0130. Last accessed 2021
Somers, M.A.: Causes and effects: shelf-ready processing, promptcat, and Lousiana State University. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0364640897000185. Last accessed 2021
Schroeder, R., Howald, J.L.: Shelf-ready: a cost-benefit analysis. Libr. Collect. Acquis. Tech. Serv. 35(4), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcats.2011.04.002. Last accessed 2021
Price, J., Savova, M.: DDA in context: defining a comprehensive eBook acquisition strategy in an access-driven world. Against Grain. 27(5) (2011). https://doi.org/10.7771/2380-176X.7177
Townley, C.T.: Knowledge management and academic libraries. Coll. Res. Libr. 62(1) (2001). https://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/view/15420/16866. Last accessed 2021
Dempsey, L.: Library collections in the life of the user: two directions. LIBER Q. 26(4), 338–359. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10170. Last accessed 2021
Caplan, P.: Information on the appropriate copy problem. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september01/caplan/09caplan.html (2001). Last accessed 2009
Breeding, M.: Trends in library automation: meeting the challenges of a new generation of library users. http://www.oclc.org/programsandresearch/dss/ppt/breeding.ppt (2006). Last accessed 2009
NISO: Information on NISO's OpenURL standard. http://www.niso.org/standards/index.html (updated 2008). Last accessed 2009
Campbell, J.: The case for creating a scholars portal to the web: a white paper. Portal Libr. Acad. 1(1), 15–21 (2001)
NISO: NISO metasearch initiative. http://www.niso.org/workrooms/mi (2006). Last accessed 2009
Digital Library Federation: Electronic resource management. http://www.diglib.org/pubs/dlf102/ (2004). Last accessed 2009
Crow, R.: The case for institutional repositories: a SPARC position paper. https://ils.unc.edu/courses/2014_fall/inls690_109/Readings/Crow2002-CaseforInstitutionalRepositoriesSPARCPaper.pdf (2002). Last accessed 2021
DSpace: Official homepage. http://www.dspace.org. Last accessed 2009
Fedora: Official homepage. http://www.fedora.info. Last accessed 2009
Fedora DSpace merger. https://duraspace.org/lyrasis-and-duraspace-complete-merger-members-and-community-benefit/. Last accessed 2021
Samvera: https://samvera.org/samvera-open-source-repository-framework/technology-stack/. Last accessed 2021
Dublin Core: Official homepage. https://dublincore.org/. Last accessed 2021
OAI-PMH: https://www.openarchives.org/pmh/. Last accessed 2021
Kindling, M.: The landscape of research data repositories in 2015: a re3data analysis. D-Lib Mag. 23(4). http://mirror.dlib.org/dlib/march17/kindling/03kindling.html (2017)
Krafft, D., Cappadona, N., Caruso, B., Corson-Rikert, J., Devare, M., Lowe, B., V. Collaboration: VIVO: enabling national networking of scientists. In: Proceedings of the Web Science Conference, Web Science Trust. https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2ece777913fc3e2f2bda4a37afbd0bdc8/jaeschke (2010). Last accessed 2021
Givens, M., Macklin, L., Mangiofico, P.: Faculty profile systems: new services and roles for libraries. Portal Libr. Acad. 17(2), 235–255. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/653202/summary. Last accessed 2021
Brandt, D.S.: Librarians as partners in e-research: Purdue University Libraries promote collaboration. Coll. Res. Libr. News. 68(6), 365–367, 396 (2007)
Online Computer Library Center (OCLC): Perceptions of libraries and information resources. http://www.oclc.org/reports/2005perceptions.htm (2005). Last accessed 2009
Flecker, D.: OPACS and our changing environment: observations, hopes, and fears. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/pcc/archive/opacfuture-flecker.ppt (2005). Last accessed 2009
Endeca: Official hompepage. http://www.endeca.com. Last accessed 2009
Antelman, K., Lynema, E., Pace, A.K.: Toward a twenty-first century library catalog. Libr. Inf. Technol. Assoc. 25(3), 128–139 (2006). http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.2/84. Last accessed 2009
Grant, C.: The future of library systems: library service platforms. Inf. Stand. Q. 24(4), 4–15 (2012)
Breeding, M.: The future of library systems. J. Elect. Res. Libr. 24(4), 338–339 (2012)
Ex Libris: BIBFRAME. https://developers.exlibrisgroup.com/alma/integrations/linked_data/bibframe/. Last accessed 2021
Library Technology Guides. Alma. https://librarytechnology.org/product/alma/. Last accessed 2021
Library Technology Guides. WorldShare. https://librarytechnology.org/product/wms/. Last accessed 2021
Folio. About. https://www.folio.org/about/. Last accessed 2021
OLE Press Release. https://librarytechnology.org/document/13445. Last accessed 2021
Folio. Supporting partners and contributors. https://www.folio.org/community/support/. Last accessed 2021
Library of Congress. Standards. https://www.loc.gov/librarians/standards. Last accessed 2021
Joint Steering Committee for the Development of RDA: RDA: Research description and access. http://www.rda-jsc.org/archivedsite/rda.html. Last accessed 2021
Carlyle, A.: Understanding FRBR as a conceptual model: FRBR and the Bibliographic Universe. Libr. Resour. Tech. Serv. 50(4), 264–273 (2006)
Overview of differences between IFLA LRM and the FRBR-FRAD-FRSAD models. https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbr-lrm/transitionmap**_overview_20161207.pdf
IFLA Library Reference Model: A Conceptual Model for Bibliographic Information. Pat Riva, Patrick Le Bœuf, and Maja Žumer. https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbr-lrm/ifla-lrm-august-2017.pdf
Program for Cooperative Cataloging. https://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/. Last accessed 2021
Hallo, M., Lujan-Mora, S., Mate, A., Trujillo, J.: Current state of linked data in digital libraries. J. Inf. Sci. 42(2), 117–127 (2015)
Share-VDE: https://share-vde.org/sharevde/clusters?l=en. Last accessed 2021
Sinopia. https://sinopia.io/. Last accessed 2021
Nelson, J.: Develo** Sinopia’s linked-data editor with react and redux. Code4Lib J. (45). https://journal.code4lib.org/articles/14598 (2019). Last accessed 2021
Linked Data for Productio: LD4P. https://wiki.lyrasis.org/display/LD4P. Last accessed 2021
Linked Data for Production: Pathway to Implementation. https://wiki.lyrasis.org/display/LD4P2 (last accessed 2021)
Linked Data for Production: Closing the Loop. (LD4CP). https://wiki.lyrasis.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=187176106. Last accessed 2021
Suominen, A.O.: DIY automated subjectindexing using multiple algorithms. LIBER Q. 29(1), 1–25 (2019). Last accessed 2021
Esploro Web site: https://exlibrisgroup.com/products/esploro-research-services-platform/. Last accessed 2021
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bracke, P.J., McNeil, B., Kaplan, M. (2023). Library Automation and Knowledge Sharing. In: Nof, S.Y. (eds) Springer Handbook of Automation. Springer Handbooks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96729-1_54
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96729-1_54
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-96728-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-96729-1
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)