Library Automation and Knowledge Sharing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Springer Handbook of Automation

Part of the book series: Springer Handbooks ((SHB))

  • 4760 Accesses

Abstract

Library automation has a rich history of more than 130 years of development, from the standardization of card catalogs to the creation of the machine-readable cataloging (MARC) communications format and bibliographic utilities. Beginning in the early 1980s university libraries and library automation vendors pioneered the first integrated library systems (ILS). The digital era, characterized by the proliferation of content in electronic format, brought with it the development of services for casual users as well as scholarly researchers – services such as OpenURL linking and metasearching and library staff tools such as electronic resource management systems. Libraries have now developed approaches to search that integrate data from the many disparate content sources they have historically managed, as well as the new systems being developed for digital object management. Additionally, the proliferation of services that emerged in the first decade of this century is being consolidated into emergent library service platforms that provide flexible frameworks for managing the full range of library collections. These developments have allowed libraries to evolve their mission of knowledge sharing from aggregating knowledge created globally to a local community to one in which they also aggregate and disseminate locally created knowledge to the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 298.53
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
EUR 379.79
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Porter, V.: Continuous library catalog card, Patent 4005810. This represents a computer-area patent on the original library catalog card. https://pdfpiw.uspto.gov/.piw?Docid=04005810&idkey=NONE (1976). Last accessed 2021

  2. Wong, T.-A.: Card catalogs and card catalog drawers, Patent 5257859. This represents a tweak on the original design of the card catalog drawer. Patent Images (uspto.gov) (1993). Last accessed 2021

    Google Scholar 

  3. University of Pennsylvania: Cards from rapidly-disappearing card catalog. (Philadelphia 2008). http://www.library.upenn.edu/exhibits/pennhistory/library/cards/cards.samples.html. Last accessed 2009

  4. Online Computer Library Center (OCLC): OCLC catalog cards, Dublin. http://www.oclc.org/support/documentation/worldcat/cataloging/cards/default.htm (2008). Last accessed 2009

  5. Coyle, K.: Catalogs, card – and other anachronisms. J. Acad. Librariansh. 31(1), 60–62 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Early years of Web of Science, which became Web of Knowledge. http://wokinfo.com/about/whoweare/. Last accessed 2021

  7. National Bureau of Standards: Miscellaneous Publication 269, Issued December (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Salton, G.: Developments in automated text retrieval. Science. 253(5023), 974–980 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Ojala, M.: Everything old is new again. Medford. 25(4), 5 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Avram, H.: Obituary, with reference to the MARC project. https://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/30/classified/paid-notice-deaths-avram-henriette.html(2006). Last accessed 2021

  11. Kilgour, F.: Obituary, with reference to the founding of OCLC. https://scanblog.blogspot.com/2006/07/frederick-g-kilgour-1914-2006.html (2006). Last accessed 2021

  12. Online Computer Library Center (OCLC): Official homepage. http://www.oclc.org. Last accessed 2021

  13. Goldstein, C.M.: Integrated library systems. Bull. Med. Libr. Assoc. 71(3), 308–311 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fayen, E.G.: Integrated library systems. Enc. Libr. Inf. Sci. 1(1), 1–12 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lynch, C.: From automation to transformation: forty years of libraries and information technology in higher education. Educ. Rev. 35(1), 60–68 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Primich, T., Richardson, C.: The integrated library system: from innovation to relegation to innovation again. Acquis. Libr. 18(35–36), 119–133 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kochtanek, T.R., Matthews, J.R.: Library Information Systems: From Library Automation to Distributed Information Access Solutions. Libraries Unlimited, Westport (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  18. De Gennaro, R.: A computer produced shelf list. Coll. Res. Libr. 31(5), 318–331 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Robinson, T.: Personal Communication. Harvard University Office for Information Systems, Harvard (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Elsevier: Endeavor merges with Elsevier Science, American Libraries (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fast, K.V., Campell, D.G.: I still like Google: university student perceptions of searching OPACS and the web. Proc. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 138-146 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.1450410116

  22. Connaway, L.S., Dickey, T.J., Radford, M.L.: If it is too inconvenient I’m not going after it: convenience as a critical factor in information-seeking behaviors. Libr. Inf. Sci. Res. 33(3), 79–190 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Antelman, K., Lynema, E., Pace, A.K.: Toward a twenty-first century catalog. Inf. Technol. Libr. 25(3), 128–139 (2006). https://doi.org/10.6017/ital.v25i3.3342. Last accessed 2021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Simser, C.N., Vukas, R.R., Stephens, J.M.: The impact of EDI on serials management. Ser. Libr. 40(3–4), 331–336 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v40n03_19. Last accessed 2021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kelsey, P.: Implementing EDI X12 book acquisitions at a medium-sized university library. New Libr. World. 116(7–8), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-11-2014-0130. Last accessed 2021

  26. Somers, M.A.: Causes and effects: shelf-ready processing, promptcat, and Lousiana State University. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0364640897000185. Last accessed 2021

  27. Schroeder, R., Howald, J.L.: Shelf-ready: a cost-benefit analysis. Libr. Collect. Acquis. Tech. Serv. 35(4), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcats.2011.04.002. Last accessed 2021

  28. Price, J., Savova, M.: DDA in context: defining a comprehensive eBook acquisition strategy in an access-driven world. Against Grain. 27(5) (2011). https://doi.org/10.7771/2380-176X.7177

  29. Townley, C.T.: Knowledge management and academic libraries. Coll. Res. Libr. 62(1) (2001). https://crl.acrl.org/index.php/crl/article/view/15420/16866. Last accessed 2021

  30. Dempsey, L.: Library collections in the life of the user: two directions. LIBER Q. 26(4), 338–359. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10170. Last accessed 2021

  31. Caplan, P.: Information on the appropriate copy problem. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september01/caplan/09caplan.html (2001). Last accessed 2009

  32. Breeding, M.: Trends in library automation: meeting the challenges of a new generation of library users. http://www.oclc.org/programsandresearch/dss/ppt/breeding.ppt (2006). Last accessed 2009

  33. NISO: Information on NISO's OpenURL standard. http://www.niso.org/standards/index.html (updated 2008). Last accessed 2009

  34. Campbell, J.: The case for creating a scholars portal to the web: a white paper. Portal Libr. Acad. 1(1), 15–21 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. NISO: NISO metasearch initiative. http://www.niso.org/workrooms/mi (2006). Last accessed 2009

  36. Digital Library Federation: Electronic resource management. http://www.diglib.org/pubs/dlf102/ (2004). Last accessed 2009

  37. Crow, R.: The case for institutional repositories: a SPARC position paper. https://ils.unc.edu/courses/2014_fall/inls690_109/Readings/Crow2002-CaseforInstitutionalRepositoriesSPARCPaper.pdf (2002). Last accessed 2021

  38. DSpace: Official homepage. http://www.dspace.org. Last accessed 2009

  39. Fedora: Official homepage. http://www.fedora.info. Last accessed 2009

  40. Fedora DSpace merger. https://duraspace.org/lyrasis-and-duraspace-complete-merger-members-and-community-benefit/. Last accessed 2021

  41. Samvera: https://samvera.org/samvera-open-source-repository-framework/technology-stack/. Last accessed 2021

  42. Dublin Core: Official homepage. https://dublincore.org/. Last accessed 2021

  43. OAI-PMH: https://www.openarchives.org/pmh/. Last accessed 2021

  44. Kindling, M.: The landscape of research data repositories in 2015: a re3data analysis. D-Lib Mag. 23(4). http://mirror.dlib.org/dlib/march17/kindling/03kindling.html (2017)

  45. Krafft, D., Cappadona, N., Caruso, B., Corson-Rikert, J., Devare, M., Lowe, B., V. Collaboration: VIVO: enabling national networking of scientists. In: Proceedings of the Web Science Conference, Web Science Trust. https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2ece777913fc3e2f2bda4a37afbd0bdc8/jaeschke (2010). Last accessed 2021

  46. Givens, M., Macklin, L., Mangiofico, P.: Faculty profile systems: new services and roles for libraries. Portal Libr. Acad. 17(2), 235–255. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/653202/summary. Last accessed 2021

  47. Brandt, D.S.: Librarians as partners in e-research: Purdue University Libraries promote collaboration. Coll. Res. Libr. News. 68(6), 365–367, 396 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Online Computer Library Center (OCLC): Perceptions of libraries and information resources. http://www.oclc.org/reports/2005perceptions.htm (2005). Last accessed 2009

  49. Flecker, D.: OPACS and our changing environment: observations, hopes, and fears. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/pcc/archive/opacfuture-flecker.ppt (2005). Last accessed 2009

  50. Endeca: Official hompepage. http://www.endeca.com. Last accessed 2009

  51. Antelman, K., Lynema, E., Pace, A.K.: Toward a twenty-first century library catalog. Libr. Inf. Technol. Assoc. 25(3), 128–139 (2006). http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.2/84. Last accessed 2009

    Google Scholar 

  52. Grant, C.: The future of library systems: library service platforms. Inf. Stand. Q. 24(4), 4–15 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Breeding, M.: The future of library systems. J. Elect. Res. Libr. 24(4), 338–339 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Ex Libris: BIBFRAME. https://developers.exlibrisgroup.com/alma/integrations/linked_data/bibframe/. Last accessed 2021

  55. Library Technology Guides. Alma. https://librarytechnology.org/product/alma/. Last accessed 2021

  56. Library Technology Guides. WorldShare. https://librarytechnology.org/product/wms/. Last accessed 2021

  57. Folio. About. https://www.folio.org/about/. Last accessed 2021

  58. OLE Press Release. https://librarytechnology.org/document/13445. Last accessed 2021

  59. Folio. Supporting partners and contributors. https://www.folio.org/community/support/. Last accessed 2021

  60. Library of Congress. Standards. https://www.loc.gov/librarians/standards. Last accessed 2021

  61. Joint Steering Committee for the Development of RDA: RDA: Research description and access. http://www.rda-jsc.org/archivedsite/rda.html. Last accessed 2021

  62. Carlyle, A.: Understanding FRBR as a conceptual model: FRBR and the Bibliographic Universe. Libr. Resour. Tech. Serv. 50(4), 264–273 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Overview of differences between IFLA LRM and the FRBR-FRAD-FRSAD models. https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbr-lrm/transitionmap**_overview_20161207.pdf

  64. IFLA Library Reference Model: A Conceptual Model for Bibliographic Information. Pat Riva, Patrick Le Bœuf, and Maja Žumer. https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frbr-lrm/ifla-lrm-august-2017.pdf

  65. Program for Cooperative Cataloging. https://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/. Last accessed 2021

  66. Hallo, M., Lujan-Mora, S., Mate, A., Trujillo, J.: Current state of linked data in digital libraries. J. Inf. Sci. 42(2), 117–127 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Share-VDE: https://share-vde.org/sharevde/clusters?l=en. Last accessed 2021

  68. Sinopia. https://sinopia.io/. Last accessed 2021

  69. Nelson, J.: Develo** Sinopia’s linked-data editor with react and redux. Code4Lib J. (45). https://journal.code4lib.org/articles/14598 (2019). Last accessed 2021

  70. Linked Data for Productio: LD4P. https://wiki.lyrasis.org/display/LD4P. Last accessed 2021

  71. Linked Data for Production: Pathway to Implementation. https://wiki.lyrasis.org/display/LD4P2 (last accessed 2021)

  72. Linked Data for Production: Closing the Loop. (LD4CP). https://wiki.lyrasis.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=187176106. Last accessed 2021

  73. Suominen, A.O.: DIY automated subjectindexing using multiple algorithms. LIBER Q. 29(1), 1–25 (2019). Last accessed 2021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Esploro Web site: https://exlibrisgroup.com/products/esploro-research-services-platform/. Last accessed 2021

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul J. Bracke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bracke, P.J., McNeil, B., Kaplan, M. (2023). Library Automation and Knowledge Sharing. In: Nof, S.Y. (eds) Springer Handbook of Automation. Springer Handbooks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96729-1_54

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation