Abstract
In the human interaction with CAs, research has shown that elements of persuasive system design, such as praise, are perceived differently when compared to traditional graphical interfaces.
In this experimental study, we will extend our knowledge regarding the relation of persuasiveness (namely dialog support), anthropomorphically designed CAs, and task performance. Within a three-conditions-between-subjects design, two instances of the CA are applied within an online experiment with 120 participants. Our results show that anthropomorphically designed CAs increase perceived dialog support and performance but adding persuasive design elements can be counterproductive. Thus, the results are embedded in the discourse of CA design for task support.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Benbasat, I.: HCI research: future challenges and directions. AIS Trans. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2(2), 16–21 (2010)
Fogg, B.J.: Computers as persuasive social actors. In: Persuasive Technology. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, USA, pp. 89–120 (2003)
Loock, C.-M., Staake, T., Thiesse, F.: Motivating energy-efficient behavior with green is: an investigation of goal setting and the role of defaults. Manag. Inf. Syst. Q. 37(4), 1313–1332 (2013)
Haque, M.S., Isomursu, M., Kangas, M., Jämsä, T.: Measuring the influence of a persuasive application to promote physical activity. CEUR Workshop Proc. 2089, 43–57 (2018)
Slattery, P., Vidgen, R., Finnegan, P.: Persuasion: an analysis and common frame of reference for is research. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 46, 30–69 (2020)
Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Harjumaa, M.: A systematic framework for designing and evaluating persuasive systems. In: Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Hasle, P., Harjumaa, M., Segerståhl, K., Øhrstrøm, P. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5033, pp. 164–176. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68504-3_15
McTear, M., Callejas, Z., Griol, D.: The Conversational Interface: Talking to Smart Devices. Springer Publishing Company, Basel, Switzerland (2016)
Wang, N., Johnson, W.L., Mayer, R.E., Rizzo, P., Shaw, E., Collins, H.: The politeness effect: Pedagogical agents and learning outcomes. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 66(2), 98–112 (2008)
Reeves, B., Nass, C.: The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers. The Center for the Study of Language and Information Publications, Television and New Media Like Real People and Places (1996)
Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Harjumaa, M.: Persuasive systems design: key issues, process model, and system features. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 24(1), 96 (2009)
Diederich, S., Lichtenberg, S., Brendel, A.B., Trang, S.: Promoting sustainable mobility beliefs with persuasive and anthropomorphic design: Insights from an experiment with a conversational agent November 2019
Gnewuch, U., Morana, S., Heckmann, C., Maedche, A.: Designing conversational agents for energy feedback. In: Chatterjee, S., Dutta, K., Sundarraj, R.P. (eds.) DESRIST 2018. LNCS, vol. 10844, pp. 18–33. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91800-6_2
Koeder, M.J., Tanaka, E., Mitomo, H.: Lootboxes in digital games - a gamble with consumers in need of regulation? An evaluation based on learnings from Japan. In: 22nd Bienn. Conference International Telecommunation Social Beyond boundaries Challenges business, policy Social (2018)
Toscos, T., Faber, A., An, S., Gandhi, M.P.: Chick clique: persuasive technology to motivate teenage girls to exercise. In: CHI 2006 Extended Abstracts on Human factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1873–1878 (2006)
Seeger, A.M., Pfeiffer, J., Heinzl, A.: Designing anthropomorphic conversational agents: development and empirical evaluation of a design framework. In: ICIS, pp. 1–17 (2018)
Nass, C., Steuer, J., Tauber, E.R.: Computers are social actors. In: ACM CHI, p. 204 (1994)
Nass, C., Moon, Y.: Machines and mindlessness: social responses to computers. J. Soc. Issues 56(1), 81–103 (2000)
Langrial, S., Lehto, T., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Harjumaa, M., Karppinen, P.: Native mobile applications for personal wellbeing: a persuasive systems design evaluation. In: PACIS, pp. 1–16 (2012)
Consolvo, S., Everitt, K., Smith, I., Landay, J.A.: Design requirements for technologies that encourage physical activity. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, vol. 1, pp. 457–466 (2006)
Filippou, J., Cheong, C., Cheong, F.: Modelling the impact of study behaviours on academic performance to inform the design of a persuasive system. Inf. Manag. 53(7), 892–903 (2016)
Lichtenberg, S., Brendel, A.B.: Arrr you a pirate ? towards the gamification element ‘ Lootbox , AMCIS (Forthcoming) (2020)
Lichtenberg, S., Lembcke, T., Brenig, M., Brendel, A.B., Trang, S.: Can Gamification lead to Increase Paid Crowdworkers Output ?. In: 15. Internationale Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik December 2019 (2020)
Lehto, T., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Drozd, F.: Factors affecting perceived persuasiveness of a behavior change support system. ICIS 3, 1926–1939 (2012)
Diederich, S., Brendel, A.B., Kolbe, L.M.: On conversational agents in information systems research: analyzing the past to guide future work. In: Proceedings Internationa Conference Wirtschaftsinformatik, pp. 1550–1564 (2019)
Oracle, “Can Virtual Experiences Replace Reality? The future role for humans in delivering customer experience, p. 19 (2016)
Wünderlich, N.V., Paluch, S.: A nice and friendly chat with a bot: user perceptions of AI-based service agents. In: ICIS, no. 1, pp. 1–11 (2017)
Stock, R.M., Merkle, M.: Can humanoid service robots perform better than service employees? a comparison of innovative behavior cues (2018)
Feine, J., Gnewuch, U., Morana, S., Maedche, A.: A taxonomy of social cues for conversational agents. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 132, 161 (2019)
Verhagen, T., van Nes, J., Feldberg, F., van Dolen, W.: Virtual customer service agents: using social presence and personalization to shape online service encounters. J. Comput. Commun. 19(3), 529–545 (2014)
Fogg, B.J., Nass, C.: How users reciprocate to computers. In: ACM CHI, p. 331 (1997)
Gong, L.: How social is social responses to computers? The function of the degree of anthropomorphism in computer representations. Comput. Hum. Behav. 24(4), 1494–1509 (2008)
Gnewuch, U., Morana, S., Adam, M.T.P., Maedche, A.: Faster is not always better: understanding the effect of dynamic response delays in human-chatbot interaction. In: ECIS, pp. 1–17 (2018)
Araujo, T.: Living up to the chatbot hype: The influence of anthropomorphic design cues and communicative agency framing on conversational agent and company perceptions. Comput. Hum. Behav. 85, 183–189 (2018)
Hanus, M.D., Fox, J.: Persuasive avatars: The effects of customizing a virtual salespersons appearance on brand liking and purchase intentions. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 84, 33–40 (2015)
Sebastian, J., Richards, D.: Changing stigmatizing attitudes to mental health via education and contact with embodied conversational agents. Comput. Hum. Behav. 73, 479–488 (2017)
Sah, Y.J., Peng, W.: Effects of visual and linguistic anthropomorphic cues on social perception, self-awareness, and information disclosure in a health website. Comput. Hum. Behav. 45, 392–401 (2015)
Schuetzler, R.M., Giboney, J.S., Grimes, G.M., Nunamaker, J.F.: The influence of conversational agents on socially desirable responding. HICSS 9, 283–292 (2018)
Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V.: The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica 1(1), 49–98 (1969)
Mayer, R.E., Johnson, W.L., Shaw, E., Sandhu, S.: Constructing computer-based tutors that are socially sensitive: politeness in educational software. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 64(1), 36–42 (2006)
Shevchuk, N., Oinas-Kukkonen, H.: Exploring green information systems and technologies as persuasive systems: a systematic review of applications in published research. In: ICIS, pp. 1–11 (2016)
El Kamali, M., Angelini, L., Caon, M., Andreoni, G., Khaled, O.A., Mugellini, E.: Towards the Nestore e-Coach: A tangible and embodied conversational agent for older adults, in UbiComp/ISWC 2018, pp. 1656–1663 (2018)
Hamari, J.: Transforming homo economicus into homo ludens: a field experiment on gamification in a utilitarian peer-to-peer trading service. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 12(4), 236–245 (2013)
Xu, K., Lombard, M.: Persuasive computing: feeling peer pressure from multiple computer agents. Comput. Hum. Behav. 74, 152–162 (2017)
Harjunen, V.J., Spapé, M., Ahmed, I., Jacucci, G., Ravaja, N.: Persuaded by the machine: the effect of virtual nonverbal cues and individual differences on compliance in economic bargaining. Comput. Hum. Behav. 87, 384–394 (Oct. 2018)
Adler, R.F., Iacobelli, F., Gutstein, Y.: Are you convinced? a wizard of oz study to test emotional vs. rational persuasion strategies in dialogues. Comput. Hum. Behav. 57, 75–81 (2016)
Boudreau, M.C., Gefen, D., Straub, D.W.: Validation in information systems research: a state-of-the-art assessment. MIS Q. Manage. Inf. Syst. 25(1), 1–16 (2001)
Erdfelder, E., FAul, F., Buchner, A., Lang, A.G.: Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav. Res. Meth. 41(4), 1149–1160 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
Lezzi, E., Fleming, P., Zizzo, D.J.: Does it matter which effort task you use? a comparison of four effort tasks when agents compete for a prize. SSRN Electron. J. (2015)
Dennis, A.R., Valacich, J.S.: Conducting experimental research in information systems. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 7(5), 1–41 (2001)
Bagozzi, R.P., Yi, Y.: On the use of structural equation models in experimental designs. J. Mark. Res. 26(3), 271 (1989)
Fombelle, P.W., Bone, S.A., Lemon, K.N.: Responding to the 98%: face-enhancing strategies for dealing with rejected customer ideas. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 44(6), 685–706 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0469-y
Trenz, M., Veit, D., Tan, C.-W.: Disentangling the impact of omnichannel integration on consumer behavior in integrated sales channels. Manag. Inf. Syst. Q. 44(3) (2020)
Clark, L., et al.: What makes a good conversation? Challenges in designing truly conversational agents. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, vol. 12 (2019)
Puca, R.M., Schmalt, H.D.: Task enjoyment: a mediator between achievement motives and performance. Motiv. Emot. 23(1), 15–29 (1999)
Wrzesniewski, A., Dutton, J.E., Debebe, G.: Interpersonal sensemaking.pdf. Res. Organ. Behav. 25, 93–135 (2003)
Bussell, H., Forbes, D.: Understanding the volunteer market: the what, where, who and why of volunteering. Int. J. Nonprofit Volunt. Sect. Mark. 7(3), 244–257 (2002)
Agarwal, R., Sinha, A.P., Tanniru, M.: Cognitive fit in requirements modeling: a study of object and process methodologies. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 13(2), 137–162 (1996)
Durward, D., Blohm, I., Leimeister, J.M.: The nature of crowd work and its effects on individuals’ work perception. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 37(1), 66–95 (2020)
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Jonas Gehrke and Jessica Lühnen for their support during this research project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lichtenberg, S., Bührke, J., Brendel, A.B., Trang, S., Diederich, S., Morana, S. (2021). ‘Let Us Work Together’– Insights from an Experiment with Conversational Agents on the Relation of Anthropomorphic Design, Dialog Support, and Performance. In: Ahlemann, F., Schütte, R., Stieglitz, S. (eds) Innovation Through Information Systems. WI 2021. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 47. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86797-3_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86797-3_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86796-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86797-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)