Mentions of Ethics Codes in Social Media: A Twitter Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Codes of Ethics and Ethical Guidelines

Part of the book series: The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology ((ELTE,volume 23))

  • 559 Accesses

Abstract

Ethics codes and ethical guidelines are an established way of installing standards in professions, science, technology, and business. They help institutions and organizations address emerging issues, regulate practice-specific contexts, provide support, and are seen as helpful resources for professional-specific teaching. When it comes to the broader role of ethics codes in society and to the question of how ethics codes are seen and perceived outside professional contexts, the picture is much less clear, however. In order to find out about the broader societal role of ethics codes-related topics, we analyzed mentions of ethics codes on the social media site Twitter between June 2016 and May 2017. This chapter will detail the results of the study, which examined the frequency, content, and role of tweets that contain the search phrases “ethics code,” “code of ethics,” “professional code,” and their plural versions. We used the Twitter streaming application programming interface (API) and STACK to retrieve the tweets. It turned out that by far, the most often used term is “code of ethics,” with an overall frequency of around 83,000. Topics discussed in the tweets centered around ethical issues in political journalism, politics, media, and sports. While we had assumed we would find an ongoing illuminating conversation between professionals from all kinds of fields that would give us some hints on the current role of ethics codes in an evolving technology-relying society; instead, we found a much more diverse conglomerate of stakeholders partly using ethics codes-related tweets to promulgate their views strategically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 87.50
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 109.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
GBP 109.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    For more information on privacy issues in social media research, see Association of Internet Researchers 2012; Taylor & Pagliari 2018; Samuel et al. 2018; Moreno 2013.

  2. 2.

    “‘Trending,’ ‘going viral’ or ‘exploding’” on social media may increase urgency, but these phenomena only heighten the need for strict standards of accuracy.” (RTNDA 2015)

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Otto Brown for his valuable support in analyzing the data in the summer of 2018 during his tenure as an intern at the Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions at the Illinois Institute of Technology.

This study was financially supported by the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, Grant No. 15-109237-000-DIS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelly Laas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Laas, K., Hildt, E., Wu, Y. (2022). Mentions of Ethics Codes in Social Media: A Twitter Analysis. In: Laas, K., Davis, M., Hildt, E. (eds) Codes of Ethics and Ethical Guidelines. The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86201-5_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation