Abstract
Ethics codes and ethical guidelines are an established way of installing standards in professions, science, technology, and business. They help institutions and organizations address emerging issues, regulate practice-specific contexts, provide support, and are seen as helpful resources for professional-specific teaching. When it comes to the broader role of ethics codes in society and to the question of how ethics codes are seen and perceived outside professional contexts, the picture is much less clear, however. In order to find out about the broader societal role of ethics codes-related topics, we analyzed mentions of ethics codes on the social media site Twitter between June 2016 and May 2017. This chapter will detail the results of the study, which examined the frequency, content, and role of tweets that contain the search phrases “ethics code,” “code of ethics,” “professional code,” and their plural versions. We used the Twitter streaming application programming interface (API) and STACK to retrieve the tweets. It turned out that by far, the most often used term is “code of ethics,” with an overall frequency of around 83,000. Topics discussed in the tweets centered around ethical issues in political journalism, politics, media, and sports. While we had assumed we would find an ongoing illuminating conversation between professionals from all kinds of fields that would give us some hints on the current role of ethics codes in an evolving technology-relying society; instead, we found a much more diverse conglomerate of stakeholders partly using ethics codes-related tweets to promulgate their views strategically.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
“‘Trending,’ ‘going viral’ or ‘exploding’” on social media may increase urgency, but these phenomena only heighten the need for strict standards of accuracy.” (RTNDA 2015)
References
Association of Internet Researchers, Ethics Working Committee. 2012. “Ethical Decision-Making and Internet Research (Version 2.0). https://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf
British Broadcasting Cooperation. 2016. “Gianni Infantino: Fifa president cleared in ethics probe. BBC Sport. August 5, 2016. https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/36834094 Accessed 6 January 2020.
Byers, Dylan. 2017. “BuzzFeed’s publication of Trump memos draws controversy.” CNN Money. January 11, 2017. https://money.cnn.com/2017/01/10/media/buzzfeed-trump-report/ Accessed 23 January 2020.
Collins, Kimberley, David Shiftman, and Jenny Rock. 2016. How are scientists using social media in the workplace? PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162680.
Cross, Katherine. 2016. “Augmented reality games like Pokèmon Go need a code of ethics.” Wired. August 8. https://www.wired.com/2016/08/ethics-ar-pokemon-go/ Accessed 18 January 2020.
Culver, Kathleen Bartzen. 2017. Disengaged ethics. Journalism Practice 11 (4): 477–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2015.1121788.
Davis, Michael. 1991. Thinking like an engineer: The place of a code of ethics in the practice of a profession. Philosophy and Public Affairs 20 (2): 150–167.
———. 2015. “Codes of Ethics.” In Holbrook J. Britt and Carl Mitcham (eds.) Ethics, Science, Technology and Engineering, 2nd Edition. Farmington Hills, MI: Gale, Cengage Learning. pp. 380–383.
Evon, Dan. 2017. “Did the New York times contradict their 20 January 2017 report about wiretap**?” 8 March 2017. Snopes.com https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/nytimes-wiretap-articles/ Accessed 22 February 2020.
Frankel, Mark S. 1989. Professional codes: Why, how, and what impact? Journal of Business Ethics 8: 109–115.
Homewood, Brian. 2016. “Former FIFA President Blatter loses appeal against ban.” Reuters. December 6, 2016. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-soccer-fifa-blatter/former-fifa-president-blatter-loses-appeal-against-ban-idUSKBN13U1O9 Accessed 3 March 2020.
Information Commissioner’s Office. 2019. “Lawful basis for processing.” Guide to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-data-protection/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/lawful-basis-for-processing/ Accessed 30 March 2021.
Mele, V., and D.H. Schepers. 2013. E Pluribus Unum? Legitimacy issues and multi-stakeholder codes of conduct. Journal of Business Ethics 118: 561–576.
Michael, Davis. 1997. The moral Authority of Professional Code. NOMOS 29: 302–337.
Mohammadi, Ehsan, Mike Thelwall, Mary Kwasny, and Kristi L. Holmes. 2018. Academic information on twitter: A user survey. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197265. Accessed 30 March 2021.
Moreno, Megan A., Natalie Goniu, Peter S. Moreno, and Douglas Diekema. 2013. Ethics of social media research: Common concerns and practical considerations. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking 00: 1–6.
Nolte, John. 2017. “Hours before Trump’s Press Conference CNN and BuzzFeed hit ‘Fake News’ Bottom.” Daily Wire.com. https://www.dailywire.com/news/hours-trumps-press-conference-cnn-and-buzzfeed-hit-john-nolte. Accessed 7 January 2020.
Perrin, Andrew, and Monica Anderson. (2019). “Share of U.S. adults using social media, including Facebook, is mostly unchanged since 2019.” Pew Research Center. (April 10) https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/04/10/share-of-u-s-adults-using-social-media-including-facebook-is-mostly-unchanged-since-2018/. Accessed 14 January 2020.
Radio, Television Digital News Association. (2000). “RTNDA code of ethics.” Ethics Codes Collection. http://ethicscodescollection.org/detail/5c239d3c-b95e-4c81-ac2a-49873f388a8a Accessed 5 December 2019.
———. (2015). RTNDA code of ethics. https://www.rtdna.org/content/rtdna_code_of_ethics. Access 5 December 2019.
Rein, Lisa, and Elise Viebeck. 2016. “Trump gets to decide if his transition team will have a code of ethics.” Washington Post. November 16, 2016. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/wp/2016/11/16/trump-gets-to-decide-the-ethics-rules-for-his-own-transition/ Accessed 3 February 2020.
Rosen, Aliza. 2017. “Tweeting Made Easier.” November 7. https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/product/2017/tweetingmadeeasier.html Accessed 2 December 2019.
Samuel G. W. Amed, H. Kara, C. Jessop, S. Quinton, and S. Sanger. 2018. Is it time to re-evaluate the ethics governance of social media research? Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 13(4): 452–454.
Schmidt, Michael S, Matthew Rosenberg, Adam Goldman, and Matt Apuzzo. 2017. “Intercepted Russian communications part of an inquiry into Trump associates.” January 19, 2017. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/19/us/politics/trump-russia-associates-investigation.html. Accessed 5 January 2020.
Slattery, Karen L. 2016. The moral meaning of recent revisions to the SPJ code of ethics. Journal of Media Ethics 31 (1): 2–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2015.1116393.
Society of Professional Journalists. (2014). “SPJ code of ethics.” https://www.spj.org/ethicscode.asp Accessed 6 January 2020.
Syal, Rajeev. 2016. “Momentum drops pledge to nonviolence from code of ethics.” Guardian. August 19. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/aug/19/momentum-drops-pledge-to-non-violence-from-code-of-ethics Accessed 12 January 2020.
Taylor, Joanna, and Claudia Pagliari. 2018. Mining social media data: How are research sponsors and researcher addressing the ethical challenges? Research Ethics. 14 (2): 1–39.
Twitter Inc. 2018. “Developer Agreement and Policy” https://developer.twitter.com/en/developer-terms/agreement-and-policy.html. Accessed 2 January 2020.
Vyas, Bhanu Priya. 2017. “Padmavati does not distort history, clarified Deepika Padukone after attack on Bhansali. 28 January 2017. NDTV India News. https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/padmawati-does-not-distort-history-clarifies-deepika-padukone-after-attack-on-bhansali-1653620. Accessed 12 January 2020.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Otto Brown for his valuable support in analyzing the data in the summer of 2018 during his tenure as an intern at the Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions at the Illinois Institute of Technology.
This study was financially supported by the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, Grant No. 15-109237-000-DIS.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Laas, K., Hildt, E., Wu, Y. (2022). Mentions of Ethics Codes in Social Media: A Twitter Analysis. In: Laas, K., Davis, M., Hildt, E. (eds) Codes of Ethics and Ethical Guidelines. The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86201-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86201-5_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86200-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86201-5
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)