Abstract
Although the literature has generally well defined the actors and their roles within international entrepreneurial ecosystems, more insight is needed on how SMEs fit into these networks and use them to broaden their knowledge exploitation frontiers and leverage their international innovation. This study draws upon knowledge-based theory and an international perspective on entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystems to examine how collaboration between actors within an international entrepreneurial ecosystem (IEE) stimulates knowledge exploitation and, consequently, the success of international SME innovation and commercialization. To this end, we examined an international pharma-biotech SME and collected primary data from in-depth interviews with its top management team and triangulated the interview data with secondary data. The study was initiated before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and continued 11 months after. Our research findings contribute to the theory that the diversity of an IEE’s actors and the intensity of collaboration between them are fundamental to the dynamics of scientific, technological, market, and institutional knowledge exploitation and to international innovation success. Further, the dynamics of this knowledge exploitation can support the development of business agility, that is, adapting quickly and efficiently—and even gaining an advantage in pursuing new opportunities—in turbulent context such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-Omoush, K. S., Simón-Moya, V., & Sendra-García, J. (2020). The impact of social capital and collaborative knowledge creation on e-business proactiveness and organizational agility in responding to the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(4), 279–288.
Awate, S., Larsen, M. M., & Mudambi, R. (2015). Accessing vs sourcing knowledge: a comparative study of R&D internationalization between emerging and advanced economy firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(1), 63–86.
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559.
Belitski, M., Caiazza, R., & Lehmann, E. E. (2019). Knowledge frontiers and boundaries in entrepreneurship research. Small Business Economics, 56, 521–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187019001870
Bhawe, N., & Zahra, S. A. (2019). Inducing heterogeneity in local entrepreneurial ecosystems: the role of MNEs. Small Business Economics, 52(2), 437–454.
Cantwell, J. (2017). Innovation and international business. Industry and Innovation, 24(1), 41–60.
Caputo, A., & Pellegrini, M. M. (2019). An overview of the anatomy of entrepreneurial decisions. In The anatomy of entrepreneurial decisions (pp. 1–6). Springer.
Cetindamar, D., Lammers, T., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Exploring the knowledge spillovers of a technology in an entrepreneurial ecosystem—the case of artificial intelligence in Sydney. Thunderbird International Business Review, 62(5), 457–474.
Coradi, A., Heinzen, M., & Boutellier, R. (2015). Designing workspaces for cross-functional knowledge-sharing in R & D: the “co-location pilot” of Novartis. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(2), 236–256.
Dabić, M., Lažnjak, J., Smallbone, D., & Švarc, J. (2019). Intellectual capital, organisational climate, innovation culture, and SME performance: evidence from Croatia. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 26(4), 522–544.
Dabić, M., Maley, J., Dana, L. P., Novak, I., Pellegrini, M. M., & Caputo, A. (2020). Pathways of SME internationalization: a bibliometric and systematic review. Small Business Economics, 55(3), 705–725.
Dana, L. P. (2017). International entrepreneurship research: how it evolved and directions for the future. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 30(4), 477–489.
Dumez, H. (2016). Comprehensive research. A methodological and epistemological introduction to qualitative research. Copenhagen Business School Press.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.
Feld, B. (2020). Startup communities: building an entrepreneurial ecosystem in your city. John Wiley & Sons.
Ferraris, A., Giachino, C., Ciampi, F., & Couturier, J. (2019). R&D internationalization in medium-sized firms: the moderating role of knowledge management in enhancing innovation performances. Journal of Business Research, 128, 711–718.
Ferreira, J. J., Ratten, V., & Dana, L. P. (2017). Knowledge spillover-based strategic entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(1), 161–167.
Fuerst, S., & Zettinig, P. (2015). Knowledge creation dynamics within the international new venture. European Business Review, 27(2), 182–213.
Gassmann, O., & Keupp, M. M. (2007). The competitive advantage of early and rapidly internationalising SMEs in the biotechnology industry: a knowledge-based view. Journal of World Business, 42(3), 350–366.
Ghio, N., Guerini, M., Lehmann, E. E., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2015). The emergence of the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 44(1), 1–18.
Gurău, C., & Dana, L. P. (2020). Financing paths, firms’ governance and corporate entrepreneurship: accessing and applying operant and operand resources in biotechnology firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153, 119935.
Gurău, C., Dana, L. P., & Lasch, F. (2010). Human capital for successful entrepreneurial ventures: the profile of the top management team (TMT) in UK biopharmaceutical SMEs. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 11(4), 436–454.
Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255–2276.
Jafari-Sadeghi, V., Nkongolo-Bakenda, J. M., Dana, L. P., Anderson, R. B., & Biancone, P. P. (2019). Home country institutional context and entrepreneurial internationalization: the significance of human capital attributes. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 18, 165–195.
Lange & Wagner. (2019). The influence of exploratory versus exploitative acquisitions on innovation output in the biotechnology industry. Small Business Economics, 56, 1–22.
Link, A. N., & Sarala, R. M. (2019). Advancing conceptualisation of university entrepreneurial ecosystems: the role of knowledge-intensive entrepreneurial firms. International Small Business Journal, 37(3), 289–310.
Machado, D., Qu, Y., & Cervantes, M. (2019). Innovation policies for sustainable development: low-carbon energy and smart-city initiatives. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, n° 80, Éditions OCDE. https://doi.org/10.1787/6287ddb2-en
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2014). Designing qualitative research. Sage.
Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth-oriented entrepreneurship. Final Report to OECD, 30(1), 77–102.
Morrish, S. C., & Earl, A. (2020). Networks, institutional environment and firm internationalization. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-05-2019-0230
Naldi, L., & Davidsson, P. (2014). Entrepreneurial growth: the role of international knowledge acquisition as moderated by firm age. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(5), 687–703.
Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. (2005). Defining international entrepreneurship and modeling the speed of internationalization. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5), 537–553.
Patterson, W., & Ambrosini, V. (2015). Configuring absorptive capacity as a key process for research intensive firms. Technovation, 36, 77–89.
Ramadani, V., Abazi-Alili, H., Dana, L. P., Rexhepi, G., & Ibraimi, S. (2017). The impact of knowledge spillovers and innovation on firm-performance: findings from the Balkans countries. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(1), 299–325.
Saridakis, G., Idris, B., Hansen, J. M., & Dana, L. P. (2019). SMEs’ internationalisation: when does innovation matter? Journal of Business Research, 96, 250–263.
Scaringella, L. (2016). Knowledge, knowledge dynamics, and innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 19(3), 337–361.
Theodoraki, C., & Catanzaro, A. (2021). Widening the borders of entrepreneurial ecosystem through the international lens, The Journal of Technology Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09852-7
Tolstoy, D., & Agndal, H. (2010). Network resource combinations in the international venturing of small biotech firms. Technovation, 30(1), 24–36.
Vahlne, J. E., & Johanson, J. (2020). The Uppsala model: networks and micro-foundations. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(1), 4–10.
Yin, R. K. (2002). Case study research. Design and methods. Sage.
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cherchem, N., Keen, C. (2022). International Entrepreneurial Ecosystem, Knowledge Exploitation and Innovation: Case of International Pharma-Biotech SME. In: Caputo, A., Pellegrini, M.M., Dabić, M., Dana, LP. (eds) The International Dimension of Entrepreneurial Decision-Making. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85950-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85950-3_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85949-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85950-3
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)