Abstract
Conducting research on the politics of cybercrime requires an understanding of the role of the actors involved in its definition, application, and enforcement. In particular, what drives policymakers to decide that an issue in cyberspace is a “crime” issue, and what type of response is most suited to that issue? Using the case study of the EU’s actions in the field of cybercrime as part of a broader “policy universe” within the context of the Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice, this chapter demonstrates that the framing of cybercrime as a specific form of insecurity is deeply political, and the result of a range of ideas, interests, and institutions that serve as drivers for an approach that is often unrelated to cybercrime itself. With the blurring of state and non-state actors involved in both perpetrating and combating cybercrime, and new phenomena such as online disinformation and data manipulation becoming pervasive, current EU approaches seem ill-equipped to tackling new forms of cyber-insecurity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bachmann, S. D., & Gunneriusson, H. (2015). Russia’s hybrid warfare in the East: The integral nature of the information sphere military matters. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs,16, 198–211.
Ballou, T., Allen, J., & Francis, K. (2016). Hands-off approach or effective partnership? Journal of Information Warfare,15, 44–59.
Barrinha, A. (2020). European security in cyberspace. In A. Calcara, R. Csernatoni, & C. Lavallée (Eds.), Emerging security technologies and EU governance: Actors, practices and processes. Routledge.
Bechtold, E. (2020). Terrorism, the internet, and the threat to freedom of expression: The regulation of digital intermediaries in Europe and the United States. Journal of Media Law,12, 13–46.
Bossetta, M. (2018). The weaponization of social media: Spear phishing and cyberattack on democracy. Journal of International Affairs,71, 97–106.
Buchanan, T., & Benson, V. (2019). Spreading disinformation on Facebook: Do trust in message source, risk propensity, or personality affect the organic reach of “fake news”? Social Media + Society, 5, 1–9.
Cantero Gamito, M. (2018). Europeanization through standardization: ICT and telecommunications. Yearbook of European Law,37, 395–423.
Carrapico, H., & Barrinha, A. (2018). European Union cyber security as an emerging research and policy field. European Politics and Society,19, 299–303.
Carrapico, H., & Farrand, B. (2018). Cyber crime as a fragmented policy field in the context of the area of freedom, security and justice. In A. Ripoll Servent & F. Trauner (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of justice and home affairs research, Routledge Handbook Series. Routledge.
Carrapico, H., & Farrand, B. (2017). Dialogue, partnership and empowerment for network and information security: The changing role of the private sector from objects of regulation to regulation shapers. Crime, Law and Social Change,67, 245–263.
Carrapico, H., & Farrand, B. (2016). The European Union’s fight against cybercrime: Policy, legal and practical challenges. In M. Fletcher, E. Herlin-Karnell & C. Matera (Eds.), The European Union as an area of freedom, security and justice. Routledge.
Christensen, K. K., & Petersen, K. L. (2017). Public–private partnerships on cyber security: A practice of loyalty. International Affairs,93, 1435–1452.
Christou, G. (2015). Cybersecurity in the European Union: Resilience and adaptability in governance policy. AIAA. Houndmills.
Clough, J. (2015). Principles of cybercrime. Cambridge University Press.
Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section Criminal Division. (2007). Prosecuting computer crimes. Office of Legal Education Executive Office for United States Attorneys.
Council of the European Union. (2000). eEurope 2002—An information society for all. Brussels.
Council of the European Union. (1997). Action plan to combat organised crime (No. C251/1–15.8.97). Official Journal of the European Communities.
de Arimatéia da Cruz, J. (2020). The legislative framework of the European Union (EU) convention on cybercrime. In T. J. Holt & A. M. Bossler (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of international cybercrime and cyberdeviance. Springer.
Deflem, M., & Shutt, E. (2006). Law enforcement and computer security threats and measures. In H. Bidgodi (Ed.), Handbook of information security, information warfare, social, legal, and international issues, and security foundations. Wiley.
Dunn Cavelty, M. (2013). A resilient Europe for an open, safe and secure cyberspace (No. 23). Swedish Institute of International Affairs.
European Commission. (1985). White paper: Completing the internal market (No. COM(85) 310 final). European Commission, Brussels.
European Commission. (1993). Growth, competitiveness, employment: The challenges and ways forward into the 21st century—White paper (No. COM(93)700 final).
European Commission. (2000). Creating a safer information society by improving the security of information infrastructures and combating computer-related crime (No. COM(2000) 890).
European Commission. (2007). Towards a general policy on the fight against cyber crime (No. COM(2007) 267).
European Commission. (2010). The EU internal security strategy in action: Five steps towards a more secure Europe (No. COM(2010) 673 final).
European Commission. (2012). Tackling crime in our digital age: Establishing a European cybercrime centre (No. COM(2012) 140).
European Commission. (2015). The European agenda on security (No. COM(2015) 185).
European Commission. (2018a). Tackling online disinformation: A European approach (No. COM(2018) 236).
European Commission. (2018b). EU code of practice on online disinformation.
European Commission. (2018c). Proposal for a regulation on preventing the dissemination of terrorist content online (No. COM(2018) 640).
European Commission. (2019a). Twentieth progress report towards an effective and genuine Security Union (No. COM(2019) 552).
European Commission. (2019b). Code of practice on disinformation: First annual reports.
European Commission. (2020a). Communication on the EU security union strategy (No. COM(2020) 605.
European Commission. (2020b). Cybercrime: New survey shows Europeans feel better informed but remain concerned. Accessible at: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2019-2024/schinas/announcements/cybercrime-new-survey-shows-europeans-feel-better-informed-remain-concerned_en.
European Commission. (2020c). Special Eurobarometer 499—European’s attitudes towards cyber security.
European Commission. (2020d). Europe’s moment: Repair and prepare for the next generation (No. COM(2020) 456 final).
European Commission, Bangemann Group. (1994). Europe and the global information society: Recommendations of the high-level group on the information society to the Corfu European Council (No. S.2/94). Brussels.
European Commission and High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. (2013). Cybersecurity strategy of the European Union: An open, safe and secure cyberspace (No. JOIN(2013) 1). Brussels.
European Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. (2016). Joint framework on countering hybrid threats (No. JOIN(2016) 18).
European Council. (1999). Tampere European Council conclusions. Tampere.
European Parliament and Council of the European Union. (1999). Decision No. 276/1999/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 January 1999 adopting a multiannual Community action plan on promoting safer use of the Internet by combating illegal and harmful content on global networks.
Europol. (2020). Catching the virus: Cybercrime, disinformation and the COVID-19 pandemic. Accessible at: https://www.europol.europa.eu/publications-documents/catching-virus-cybercrime-disinformation-and-covid-19-pandemic.
Fahey, E. (2014). The EU’s cybercrime and cyber-security rulemaking: Map** the internal and external dimensions of EU security. European Journal of Risk Regulation,5, 46.
Gercke, M. (2009). Europe’s legal approaches to cybercrime. ERA Forum,10, 409–420.
Kierkegaard, S. M. (2007). EU tackles cyber crime. In L. J. Janczewski & A. M. Colarik (Eds.), Cyber warfare and cyber terrorism. IGI Global.
Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Harper Collins.
Klompmaker, N. (2019). Censor them at any cost: A social and legal assessment of enhanced action against terrorist content online scientific. Amsterdam L.F. 11, 3–29.
Levi-Faur, D. (2012). Regulatory networks and regulatory agencification: Towards a single European regulatory space. In B. Rittberger & A. Wonka (Eds.), Agency governance in the EU. Routledge.
Marsden, C., Meyer, T., & Brown, I. (2020). Platform values and democratic elections: How can the law regulate digital disinformation? Computer Law & Security Review,36, 105373.
Pielemeier, J. (2020). Disentangling disinformation: What makes regulating disinformation so difficult? Symposium: News, disinformation, and social media responsibility. Utah Law Review,2020, 917–940.
Schjolberg, S. (2008). The history of global harmonization on cybercrime legislation—The road to Geneva. Cyber Crime Law. Accessible at: https://cybercrimelaw.net/documents/cybercrime_history.pdf.
Sabbagh, D. (2020). Covid-related cybercrime drives attacks on UK to record number. The Guardian. Accessible at: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/nov/03/covid-related-cybercrime-drives-attacks-on-uk-to-record-number.
Sieber, U. (1998). Legal aspects of computer-related crime in the information society: Prepared for the European Commission. University of Würzburg. Accessible at: https://www.law.tuwien.ac.at/sieber.pdf.
Treverton, G. F., Thvedt, A., Chen, A. R., Lee, K., & McCue, M. (2018). Addressing hybrid threats. Center for Asymmetric Threat Studies; The European Centre of Excellence for Countering Hybrid Threats, Swedish Defence University.
Wall, D.S. (2007). Cybercrime: The transformation of crime in the information age. Polity Press.
Wall, D. S., & Williams, M. L. (2013). Policing cybercrime: Networked and social media technologies and the challenges for policing. Policing and Society,23, 409–412.
Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Farrand, B., Carrapico, H. (2021). The How and Why of Cybercrime: The EU as a Case Study of the Role of Ideas, Interests, and Institutions as Drivers of a Security-Governance Approach. In: Lavorgna, A., Holt, T.J. (eds) Researching Cybercrimes. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74837-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74837-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74836-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74837-1
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)