Abstract
Evolutionary multi-objective optimization (EMO) found applications in all fields of science and engineering. Chemical engineering discipline is no exception. Literature abounds on EMO with a variety of algorithms proposed by a few dedicated researchers. The Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-III) is the latest addition to the family of EMO. NSGA-III claims to have solved multi and many-objective optimization problems up to 15 objective functions. On the other hand, during the last 2 decades, chemical engineering has witnessed many applications of multi-objective optimization algorithms such as NSGA-II. In a first-of-its-kind study, this paper exploits the power and versatility of the NSGA-III to solve a four-objective optimization problem occurring in refinery profit planning. NSGA-III is eminently suitable for this class of problems. We applied NSGA-III to this problem and obtained the full set of pareto solutions for the four-objective problem. We also observed that they are dominated solutions when compared to the FNLGP and others. The ratio of HV/IGD was proposed to measure the quality of the solutions obtained in a run. It can be applied to solve other many-objective optimization problems in Chemical Engineering.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, D.H.: Linear programming models for plant operations planning. British. Chem. Eng. 16, 685–691 (1971)
Ravi, V., Reddy, P.J.: Fuzzy linear fractional goal programming applied to refinery operations planning. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 96, 173–182 (1998)
Ravi, V., Reddy, P.J., Dutta, D.: Application of Fuzzy nonlinear goal programming to a refinery model. Comput. Chem. Eng. 22, 709–712 (1998)
Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6, 182–197 (2002)
Deb, K., Jain, H.: An Evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm using reference-point-based nondominated sorting approach, Part I: solving problems with box constraints. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 18, 577–601 (2014)
Reddy, P.S., Rani, K.Y., Patwardhan, S.C.: Multi-objective optimization of a reactive batch distillation process using reduced order model. Comput. Chem. Eng. 106, 40–56 (2017)
Hemalatha, K., Nagveni, P., Kumar, P.N., Rani, K.Y.: Multiobjective optimization and experimental validation for batch cooling crystallization of citric acid anhydrate. Comput. Chem. Eng. 112, 292–303 (2018)
Rangaiah, G.P., Sharma, S., Sreepathi, B.K.: Multi-objective optimization for the design and operation of energy efficient chemical process and power generation. Curr. Opin. Chemcial Eng. 10, 49–62 (2015)
Seinfeld, J.H., McBride, W.L.: Optimization with multiple criteria: application to minimization of parameter sensitivities in a refinery model. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 9(1), 53–57 (1970)
Suman, B.: Study of self-stop** PDMOSA and performance measure in multiobjective optimization. Comput. Chem. Eng. 29, 1131–1147 (2005)
Van Veldhuizen, D.A., Lamont, G.B.: Multiobjective evolutionary algorithm research: a history and analysis. Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright- Patterson AFB, Ohio, TR-98-03 (1998)
Zitzler, E., Thiele, L.: Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: A comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach. IEEE Trans. Evol, Comput (1999)
Ishibuchi, H., Masuda, H., Tanigaki, Y., Nojima, Y.: Difficulties in specifying reference points to calculate the inverted generational distance for many-objective optimization problems. In: 2014 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) (2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Madhav, V., Huq, S.TU., Ravi, V. (2021). Refinery Profit Planning via Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization. In: Gunjan, V.K., Zurada, J.M. (eds) Modern Approaches in Machine Learning and Cognitive Science: A Walkthrough. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 956. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68291-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68291-0_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-68290-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-68291-0
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)