SpringerLink
Log in

Digital Bariatric Surgery

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Obesity, Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery

  • 85 Accesses

Abstract

Artificial intelligence and digital technologies are at the forefront of a future patient-centered and precision-based digital bariatric surgery practice. Technology has the potential to enhance every aspect of a modern-day practice to become smarter, safer, and more efficient. This chapter discusses the exciting vision of the future intelligent operating room and implications for continued quality training and mentorship for healthcare professionals. Furthermore, the current and future impact of digital technologies that assist in breaking down traditional patient-clinician barriers while encouraging and empowering patients are also examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
EUR 29.95
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
EUR 588.49
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
EUR 1,002.24
Price includes VAT (France)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zakka K, Chidambaram S, Mansour S, Salminen P, Almino R, Schauer P, Kinross J, Purkayastha S. SARS-CoV-2 and obesity: “CoVesity” – a pandemic within a pandemic. To be published in OBES SURG. Preprint. 2020; https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-39118/v1.

  2. Gough IR. The impact of reduced working hours on surgical training in Australia and New Zealand. Surgeon. 2011;9(Suppl 1):S8–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fitzgerald JE, Giddings CE, Khera G, Marron CD. Improving the future of surgical training and education: consensus recommendations from the Association of Surgeons in Training. Int J Surg (London, England). 2012;10(8):389–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fitzgibbons SC, Chen J, Jagsi R, Weinstein D. Long-term follow-up on the educational impact of ACGME duty hour limits: a pre-post survey study. Ann Surg. 2012;256(6):1108–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chidambaram S, Erridge S, Leff D, Purkayastha S. A randomized controlled trial of skills transfer: from touch surgery to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Surg Res. 2019;234:217–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.042. Epub 2018 Oct 11. PMID: 30527477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sugand K, Mawkin M, Gupte C. Validating Touch Surgery™: a cognitive task simulation and rehearsal app for intramedullary femoral nailing. Injury. 2015;46(11):2212–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.05.013. Epub 2015 Jun 3. PMID: 26094504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Whitaker M, Esther K. Google glass: the future for surgical training? Bulletin R Coll Surg Engl. 2014;96(7):223–3. https://doi.org/10.1308/147363514X13990346756445.

  8. Quezada J, Achurra P, Jarry C, Asbun D, Tejos R, Inzunza M, et al. Minimally invasive tele-mentoring opportunity-the Mito project. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(6):2585–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Okrainec A, Henao O, Azzie G. Telesimulation: an effective method for teaching the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery in resource-restricted countries. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(2):417–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Datta N, MacQueen IT, Schroeder AD, Wilson JJ, Espinoza JC, Wagner JP, Filipi CJ, Chen DC. Wearable technology for global surgical teleproctoring. J Surg Educ. 2015;72(6):1290–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.07.004. Epub 2015 Aug 11. PMID: 26276303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Erridge S, Yeung D, Patel H, Purkayastha S. Telementoring of surgeons: a systematic review. Surg Innov. 2019;26(1):95–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350618813250. Epub 2018 Nov 22. PMID: 30465477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Goonewardene SS, Brown M, Challacombe B. Single- versus dual-console robotic surgery: dual improves the educational experience for trainees. World J Urol. 2016;34(9):1337–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-016-1762-1. Epub 2016 Jan 14. PMID: 26767531.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R, MacRae H, Murnaghan J, Hutchison C, Brown M. Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg. 1997;84(2):273–8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.1997.02502.x. PMID: 9052454.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tang B, Cuschieri A. Objective assessment of surgical operative performance by observational clinical human reliability analysis (OCHRA): a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(4):1492–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07365-x. Epub 2020 Jan 17. PMID: 31953728; PMCID: PMC7093355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Birkmeyer JD, Finks JF, O’Reilly A, Oerline M, Carlin AM, Nunn AR, Dimick J, Banerjee M, Birkmeyer NJ. Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative. Surgical skill and complication rates after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(15):1434–42. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1300625. PMID: 24106936.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Varban OA, Thumma JR, Finks JF, Carlin AM, Kemmeter PR, Ghaferi AA, Dimick JB. Assessing variation in technique for sleeve gastrectomy based on outcomes of surgeons ranked by safety and efficacy: a video-based study. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(3):895–903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6382-y. Epub 2018 Aug 15. PMID: 30112611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. ** A, Yeung S, Jopling J, Krause J, Azagury D, Milstein A, Fei-Fei L. Tool detection and operative skill assessment in surgical videos using region-based convolutional neural networks. 2018 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), Lake Tahoe, NV. 2018:691–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/WACV.2018.00081.

  18. Chang JY, Tsui LY, Yeung KS, Yip SW, Leung GK. Surgical vision: Google glass and surgery. Surg Innov. 2016;23(4):422–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350616646477. Epub 2016 May 3. PMID: 27146972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pratt P, Ives M, Lawton G, Simmons J, Radev N, Spyropoulou L, Amiras D. Through the HoloLens™ looking glass: augmented reality for extremity reconstruction surgery using 3D vascular models with perforating vessels. Eur Radiol Exp. 2018;2(1):2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-017-0033-2. Epub 2018 Jan 31. PMID: 29708204; PMCID: PMC5909360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Scherl C, Stratemeier J, Karle C, Rotter N, Hesser J, Huber L, Dias A, Hoffmann O, Riffel P, Schoenberg SO, Schell A, Lammert A, Affolter A, Männle D. Augmented reality with HoloLens in parotid surgery: how to assess and to improve accuracy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06351-7. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 32910225.

  21. Schiavina R, Bianchi L, Chessa F, Barbaresi U, Cercenelli L, Lodi S, Gaudiano C, Bortolani B, Angiolini A, Bianchi FM, Ercolino A, Casablanca C, Molinaroli E, Porreca A, Golfieri R, Diciotti S, Marcelli E, Brunocilla E. Augmented reality to guide selective clam** and tumor dissection during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a preliminary experience. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2020;S1558–7673(20):30221–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2020.09.005. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33060033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Madani A, Namazi B, Altieri MS, Hashimoto DA, Rivera AM, Pucher PH, Navarrete-Welton A, Sankaranarayanan G, Brunt LM, Okrainec A, Alseidi A. Artificial intelligence for intraoperative guidance: using semantic segmentation to identify surgical anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004594. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33196488.

  23. Nakamura T, Ogiwara T, Goto T, Fujii Y, Miyaoka Y, Hanaoka Y, Horiuchi T, Hongo K. Clinical experience of endoscopic endonasal approach in the innovative, newly developed operating room “smart cyber operating theater (SCOT)”. World Neurosurg. 2020;134:293–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.11.021. Epub 2019 Nov 9. PMID: 31715411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rockstroh M, Franke S, Hofer M, Will A, Kasparick M, Andersen B, Neumuth T. OR.NET: multi-perspective qualitative evaluation of an integrated operating room based in IEEE 11073 SDC. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2017;12:1461–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-017-1589-2. Epub 2017 May 8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Irion KM, Novak P. Systems workplace for endoscopic surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2000;9(3–4):193–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645700009169647. PMID: 20156014.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Jung JJ, Jüni P, Lebovic G, Grantcharov T. First-year analysis of the operating room black box study. Ann Surg. 2020;271(1):122–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002863. PMID: 29916872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hashimoto DA, Rosman G, Witkowski ER, Stafford C, Navarette-Welton AJ, Rattner DW, Lillemoe KD, Rus DL, Meireles OR. Computer vision analysis of intraoperative video: automated recognition of operative steps in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Ann Surg. 2019;270(3):414–21. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003460. PMID: 31274652; PMCID: PMC7216040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Winter Beatty J, Kerr K, Luengo I, Giatagas P, Stoyanov D, Kinross J, Purkayastha S. Intelligent Operating Room. Peer-reviewed presentation, program number ET012; 2019 Emerging Technology Session of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), Baltimore, Maryland, USA, 3–6 April 2019. Available at: https://youtu.be/Ke4SpQSZLvY

  29. NICE. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence- Obesity : identification, assessment and management (NICE Guideline 189). 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Campanella P, Lovato E, Marone C, Fallacara L, Mancuso A, Ricciardi W, et al. The impact of electronic health records on healthcare quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pub Health. 2015;26(1):60–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ben-Assuli O. Electronic health records, adoption, quality of care, legal and privacy issues and their implementation in emergency departments. Health Policy. 2015;119(3):287–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bowden T, Coiera E. The role and benefits of accessing primary care patient records during unscheduled care: a systematic review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017;17(1):138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Statista. Number of smartphone users worldwide from 2016 to 2021 2020. Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/330695/number-of-smartphone-users-worldwide/. Accessed 15 Dec 2020.

  34. Scherer J, Keller F, Pape HC, Osterhoff G. Would patients undergo postoperative follow-up by using a smartphone application? BMC Surg. 2020;20(1):229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Connell A, Montgomery H, Martin P, Nightingale C, Sadeghi-Alavijeh O, King D, et al. Evaluation of a digitally-enabled care pathway for acute kidney injury management in hospital emergency admissions. npj. Dig Med. 2019;2(1):67.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Joshi M, Ashrafian H, Arora S, Khan S, Cooke G, Darzi A. Digital alerting and outcomes in patients with sepsis: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(12):e15166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. St John ER, Scott AJ, Irvine TE, Pakzad F, Leff DR, Layer GT. Completion of hand-written surgical consent forms is frequently suboptimal and could be improved by using electronically generated, procedure-specific forms. Surgeon. 2017;15(4):190–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Muysoms F, Campanelli G, Champault GG, DeBeaux AC, Dietz UA, Jeekel J, et al. EuraHS: the development of an international online platform for registration and outcome measurement of ventral abdominal wall hernia repair. Hernia. 2012;16(3):239–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Stechemesser B, Jacob DA, Schug-Paß C, Köckerling F. Herniamed: an internet-based registry for outcome research in hernia surgery. Hernia. 2012;16(3):269–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Kyle-Leinhase I, Köckerling F, Jørgensen LN, Montgomery A, Gillion JF, Rodriguez JAP, et al. Comparison of hernia registries: the CORE project. Hernia. 2018;22(4):561–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Martin G, Koizia L, Kooner A, Cafferkey J, Ross C, Purkayastha S, et al. Use of the HoloLens2 mixed reality headset for protecting health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: prospective, observational evaluation. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(8):e21486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. England H. How do people feel about their data being shared by the NHS? 2018. Available from: https://www.healthwatch.co.uk/news/how-do-people-feel-about-their-data-being-shared-nhs. Accessed 13 Dec 2020.

  43. European Parliament and The Council of The European Union. General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR) 2018. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32016R0679&from=EN. Accessed 10 Dec 2020.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK

    Kai Tai Derek Yeung, Jasmine Winter Beatty & Sanjay Purkayastha

Authors
  1. Kai Tai Derek Yeung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jasmine Winter Beatty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sanjay Purkayastha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjay Purkayastha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Homerton University Hospital, London, UK

    Sanjay Agrawal

Section Editor information

  1. St Richard’s Hospital, University Hospitals Sussex Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust,, Chichester, United Kingdom

    William J. Hawkins

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Yeung, K.T.D., Winter Beatty, J., Purkayastha, S. (2023). Digital Bariatric Surgery. In: Agrawal, S. (eds) Obesity, Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60596-4_115

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60596-4_115

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60595-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60596-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation