Hypogean Architecture: Apparent Simplicity and Effective Complexity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digital Draw Connections

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 107))

  • 723 Accesses

Abstract

The theme of hypogean architecture refers in itself to instances relegated both to simplicity and to complexity, unraveling in that complex relationship between inside and outside that becomes the characterizing expression of the typical articulation of the composition in negative, a composition that expresses the close link between architecture and landscape, between man and ground. The contribution intends to investigate, through the tools of survey and representation, the dichotomy between an apparent simplicity and an effective complexity of the hypogean architectural forms. A formal and linguistic heterogeneity that often reveals itself in overlap** and contrasting languages and forms typical of the sub divo architecture imitated by the hypogean architecture. With reference to the themes offered by Venturi’s essay, through an analysis of the works, we want to investigate the dichotomy of the relationship between inside and outside, focusing on the contradictions juxtaposed and the different contradictory levels, relating to the two different ways of composing, that of subtracting and that of adding, highlighting affinities and divergences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free ship** worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Please refer to the text The Aesthetic Vision of Semper. The Four Elements of Architecture by Heinz Quitzsch and Gottfried Semper. Influenced by the methodological approach based on the system of classification that is organized on the functioning of organs and other vital processes of plants, which resulted in a taxonomy of a few and original elements that are reread in all species proposed by Georges-Leopold Cuvier (biologist and his teacher of genetic biology), Semper condenses his aesthetic vision by theorizing the four original elements of architecture: the hearth, the fence, the roof, the mound; these are the ultimate summary of his studies of social history and the history of architecture, thus identifying the original elements necessary for each architecture, whose development is the basis of architecture of all time. In formulating its principles, Semper proceeds in a similar way to the studies of biologist Cuvier and therefore his approach does not start from the analysis of forms but from the analysis of the functions that make certain forms necessary, identifying the social functions and fundamental activities common to the life of all peoples: for example, the production of heat and hot food—and therefore the element of the hearth—of defense from the outside—and therefore the element of the fence—from the weather—and therefore the roof; so from these elements responding to actions all other elements develop with scientific necessity. It is an evolutionary theory of architecture starting from its function, and sought after by the origins of man. (see also the theory of the “Bekleidung”—namely the principle of cladding in architecture—of Semper, a theory to be considered a fundamental part of his thought, with particular reference to the volume Der Stil).

  2. 2.

    The text contains what Carlo Aymonino claimed and is reported in the monographic number of “d’Architettura” n.27 (May—September 2005), in Laboratorio Italia 2005 di V. Longheu, E. Pitzalis.

  3. 3.

    To subtract, from the latin subtrahĕre, “to draw below”.

  4. 4.

    To dig, from the latin ex-cavare, etymologically “to make cable”.

  5. 5.

    The plasticity of the volumes obtained with the use of reinforced concrete hides an important subtractive action of referring to instances of subtraction architecture: in fact, one of the perimeter walls is, in its composition in brick and reinforced concrete, excavated by a series of tunnels of different sizes, thus altering the tectonic nature of that “wall”. It is then possible to interpret the Rochamp wall as a monolithic block within which subtractive excavations have been carried out, confirming in some way that certain degree of ambiguity inherent in the architectural organism itself.

  6. 6.

    It is important to note that what has been said about possible contradictions can be found in various examples of hypogean architecture, not only scattered throughout Italy; see for example the Troglodyte Barrio in Gaudix in Andalusia, the district of Derinkuyu in Cappadocia (Turkey), or even the sacred city of Lalibela in Ethiopia. The two figures (Figs. 1 and 2) make a comparison between the church of Santa Barbara in Göreme, Turkey (XI century) and the church of San Michele in Frengesto in Fasano, Italy (XII century approx.), and underline how the language of the architecture of subtraction is a theoretical attitude rather than a mere mode of construction.

  7. 7.

    The “virtual restoration” of the pictorial apparatus inside the rock church has recently been carried out: the intervention—Virtual “Restoration Experience”, the first Italian example of virtual restoration—promoted by the San Domenico Foundation, which has been managing the site for six years, ensuring its knowledge and enhancement, was curated by Giuseppe Donvito, creator of the project, art historian and head of the park, by the expert in virtual restoration Maria Potenza and by Massimo Limoncelli, digital archaeologist and professor at the University of Palermo. The “restoration” consists of a laborious operation of videomap** through which it is possible to admire the wall paintings in their ancient splendor, without the need to work on the paintings with anachronistic or even harmful interventions. (see http://www.lamadantico.it/it/attivita/virtual-restoration-experience-118.html).

  8. 8.

    The bema—an area reserved for the clergy, the place where the liturgy is celebrated—is located on a higher level than that of the two naves. Currently the bema is separated from the rest of the church by a trace of a wall that certainly replaced the iconostasis.

References

  1. Alberti LB (1804) Della pittura e della statua. Società Tipografica dei Classici Italiani, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  2. Avanza F (1991) Progettare il sottosuolo: elementi di cultura tecnica per l’architettura sotterranea. Franco Angeli, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bugatti A (2010) Progettare il sottosuolo nella città densa e nel paesaggio. Maggioli Editore, Santarcangelo di Romagna

    Google Scholar 

  4. Calvino I (2016) Le città invisibili, Mondadori

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chionna A (1973) Il villaggio rupestre di Lama d’Antico, Ed. Grafischena, Fasano

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dell’Aquila C, Carofiglio F (1985) Bari extra moenia, insediamenti rupestri ed ipogei, Quaderni monografici del Comune di Bari n. 2–3, Bari

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dell’Aquila F (1977) Ipogei e insediamenti rupestri. Nuove Edizioni Italiane, Bari

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dell’aquila F F, Messina A (1998) Le chiese rupestri di Puglia e Basilicata. Mario Adda Editore, Bari

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dostoevskij F (2005) Memorie del sottosuolo. Einaudi, Torino

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fonseca CD (1975) La civiltà rupestre medievale nel mezzogiorno d’Italia: ricerche e problemi, Atti del I Convegno Internazionale di studi. Istituto grafico S, Basile, Genova

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fonseca CD (cur.) (1978) Habitat Strutture Territorio, Atti del terzo Convegno Internazionale di studi sulla Civiltà Rupestre Medioevale d’Italia, Congedo Editore, Galatina

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fonseca CD (1970) Civiltà rupestre in terra jonica. Carlo Bestetti Edizioni D’arte, Milano-Roma

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fonseca CD (1980) La Puglia fra Bisanzio e l’Occidente. Electa, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gregotti V (maggio 1982) Elogio della tecnica, Casabella n. 480

    Google Scholar 

  15. La Creta R, Truppi C (1994) L’ architetto tra tecnologia e progetto. Franco Angeli, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  16. Laureano P (1993) Giardini di Pietra, i Sassi di Matera e la civiltà mediterranea. Bollati Boringhieri, Torino

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lavermicocca N (2001) I sentieri delle grotte dipinte. Laterza, Bari

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mongiello L (1996) Chiese di Puglia. Il fenomeno delle chiese a cupola. Adda, Bari

    Google Scholar 

  19. Polano S (settembre 1998) L’architettura della sottrazione, Casabella n. 659

    Google Scholar 

  20. Quitzsch H, Semper G (1991) La Visione Estetica di Semper. I Quattro Elementi dell’Architettura. Jaca Book, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  21. Senofonte (2016) Anabasi. Rusconi Libri, Santarcangelo di Romagna

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tommaselli M (1988) Guida alla chiese rupestri del materano. BMG Editrice, Matera

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tozzi M (2008) Italia segreta. Viaggio nel sottosuolo da Torino a Palermo. Rizzoli, Roma

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonia Valeria Dilauro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dilauro, A.V., Pavone, R. (2021). Hypogean Architecture: Apparent Simplicity and Effective Complexity. In: Bianconi, F., Filippucci, M. (eds) Digital Draw Connections. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 107. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59743-6_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59743-6_45

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-59742-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-59743-6

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Navigation